1) Why do subforum guidelines not exist for other subforums (except the pseudoscience subforum)?
2) "But what is “support”? Ideally, support is an article published in a scholarly peer-reviewed journal. Yes, this system is not perfect, but it is the only system of publication held to the high standards of science. Sources other than peer-reviewed articles may still be challenged." This standard seems to imply that peer-reviewed sources are not allowed to be challenged. On the other hand, if both peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed sources are allowed to be challenged, then what is the point of including this statement within the set of standards?
3) When addressing ID and Creationism, the standards claim that these ideas involve a supernatural guiding intelligence. I was wondering how the moderators know that any potential guiding intelligence would be supernatural as opposed to natural. I posted a thread in the Pseudoscience subforum asking how scientists know if something is natural and this was never adequately explained.