Notices

View Poll Results: level of qualification/religious stance

Voters
12. You may not vote on this poll
  • no qualifications/relgious

    0 0%
  • no qualif/no religion

    1 8.33%
  • reasonable highschool qualif/religious

    0 0%
  • reasonable highschool qualif/non religious

    2 16.67%
  • resonable college(a-levels etc)/religious

    1 8.33%
  • resonable college(a-levels etc)/non religious

    0 0%
  • resonable university(degree etc)/religious

    0 0%
  • resonable university(degree etc)/non religious

    4 33.33%
  • post grad(masters, phD)/religious

    2 16.67%
  • post grad(masters, phD)/non religious

    2 16.67%
Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Religion and education.

  1. #1 Religion and education. 
    Forum Ph.D. GhostofMaxwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Thames estuary
    Posts
    851
    #I just thought it would be cool to test how religion correlates to education. in a small way, on here.


    Just pick the option that best fits you(this is not an argument for agnosticism). Dont lie now. :wink:


    Es ist Zeit für sauberen



    You guys
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Guest
    I believe you failed by introducing a flawed premise. I've seen many religious people hold adequate degree's in varying areas of life. Yet I've found it obvious in my years that a piece of paper and a title does not bestow one with ultimate wisdom. You can train a monkey, but they'll still be monkey's.

    That said, a highschool student could be more intelligent than a post-grad. Depending on how you define intelligence. Some go through college just memorizing book information and never really growing in any other area.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Forum Ph.D. GhostofMaxwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Thames estuary
    Posts
    851
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremyhfht
    I believe you failed by introducing a flawed premise. I've seen many religious people hold adequate degree's in varying areas of life. Yet I've found it obvious in my years that a piece of paper and a title does not bestow one with ultimate wisdom. You can train a monkey, but they'll still be monkey's.

    That said, a highschool student could be more intelligent than a post-grad. Depending on how you define intelligence. Some go through college just memorizing book information and never really growing in any other area.
    Failures sales talk man! Failures sales talk.
    Es ist Zeit für sauberen



    You guys
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    Quote Originally Posted by GhostofMaxwell
    Failures sales talk man! Failures sales talk.
    My 'reasonable degree' was insufficient to allow me to interpret this response.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    Forum Ph.D. GhostofMaxwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Thames estuary
    Posts
    851
    Which word are you having problems with in particular?
    Es ist Zeit für sauberen



    You guys
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Forum Ph.D. GhostofMaxwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Thames estuary
    Posts
    851
    No seriously, my grammar is lazy.

    That is sales talk of a failure, man.
    Es ist Zeit für sauberen



    You guys
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    Quote Originally Posted by GhostofMaxwell
    No seriously, my grammar is lazy.
    That is sales talk of a failure, man.
    Meaning 1: that kind of talk will lead you into failure. You'll sell yourself the idea of failing.
    Meaning 2: that is just putting a positive gloss on what is in essence a failure. You are just papering over the cracks.
    Meaning 3: That is is promoting the idea that failure is a good thing. You seem to be trying to sell failure.
    Meaning 4: ????

    Do you see the problem?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Forum Ph.D. GhostofMaxwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Thames estuary
    Posts
    851
    Quote Originally Posted by Ophiolite
    Quote Originally Posted by GhostofMaxwell
    No seriously, my grammar is lazy.
    That is sales talk of a failure, man.
    Meaning 1: that kind of talk will lead you into failure. You'll sell yourself the idea of failing.
    Meaning 2: that is just putting a positive gloss on what is in essence a failure. You are just papering over the cracks.
    Meaning 3: That is is promoting the idea that failure is a good thing. You seem to be trying to sell failure.
    Meaning 4: ????

    Do you see the problem?
    Ah not if I mean to imply all of the above to a degree.


    Was you ever told to sell youself at an interview? This would be a classic advert for that, if it could convince an employer of course.
    Es ist Zeit für sauberen



    You guys
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Forum Ph.D. GhostofMaxwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Thames estuary
    Posts
    851
    The point was to test if their was a correlation, there is no assertion that correlation is causality. I dont want to go that deep.
    Es ist Zeit für sauberen



    You guys
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10  
    Forum Professor
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,893
    I believe it has been established by many studies that religiosity and education are inversely correlated. The inverse correlation is especially strong in science.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11  
    Forum Ph.D. GhostofMaxwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Thames estuary
    Posts
    851
    I believe it has been established by many studies that religiosity and education are inversely correlated. The inverse correlation is especially strong in science.

    Yes, but you can never get too much data. Even though this is hardly controlled conditions.


    Also there are many scientist(even on this board) , that still insist in assuming there is no correlation in either of those situations.
    Es ist Zeit für sauberen



    You guys
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #12  
    New Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    4
    Personally I don’t think you should try to find a link between ‘intelligence’ and religion. Religion is more an emotional business than a something to be considered intelligent or stupid. It is in ones personality to believe or not. The only reason why I could think that education could be involved in religiousness is because school is as well a social/emotional process as a learning process.
    I'm not crazy, just diferent.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #13  
    Forum Ph.D. GhostofMaxwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Thames estuary
    Posts
    851
    So you cant see at all why tellu7ng people to believe the world was created in 6 days and evolution is laughable(to name but a few ), is diametrically opposed to gaining an orthodox education?
    Es ist Zeit für sauberen



    You guys
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #14  
    New Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    4
    I think most people have come to their senses when it comes to the creation part of the bible. Besides there is more to religion than just the bible. There is even more to Christianity then just the bible. You’ll have to look further than that. If you look to WHY people are religious or believe in God you’ll see social and emotional reasons. And stupid or smart people are everywhere in both religion as outside it.
    I'm not crazy, just diferent.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #15  
    Forum Ph.D. GhostofMaxwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Thames estuary
    Posts
    851
    Quote Originally Posted by Exclusive
    And stupid or smart people are everywhere in both religion as outside it.
    But to what ratio? Is there an exact equality? Science is about asking these kind of questions , rather than assuming everything is equal and independent from one or two anecdotal recollections.
    Es ist Zeit für sauberen



    You guys
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #16  
    New Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by GhostofMaxwell
    Science is about asking these kind of questions , rather than assuming everything is equal and independent from one or two anecdotal recollections.
    You're right about that of course. What I wanted to say is the I BELIEVE that being religious has nothing to do with you’re intelligence but MORE PROBABLY with the state of your emotional mind. And I base those believes to what I have experienced myself. I’m not saying I am absolutely right, maybe I’m absolutely wrong.

    Just thinking: It is somewhat human to want an explanation for most of the things we see. That’s how both science and religion began: trying to explain why something happens. Some people will be absolutely scared if they should believe that everything, death, illness or whatever is just a random happening. They want to believe there is a bigger something that has control of those things. Some believe it is God who does this. Others seek for more natural causes. Would you consider one more intelligent than the other? It all depends on what you are WILLING to believe. It depends on you’re experiences. Have you ever been to a church? Even as a not believer you can have this feeling of being whole. It is nice just to listen to the choir and feel good, you there are no musts.
    I'm not crazy, just diferent.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #17  
    Forum Professor
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,893
    Quote Originally Posted by Exclusive
    You're right about that of course. What I wanted to say is the I BELIEVE that being religious has nothing to do with you’re intelligence but MORE PROBABLY with the state of your emotional mind.
    Again, I believe there are many studies showing an inverse correlation between religion and intelligence and between religion and education. I can dig around in the university database to find some examples if people are really interested.
    Just thinking: It is somewhat human to want an explanation for most of the things we see. That’s how both science and religion began: trying to explain why something happens. Some people will be absolutely scared if they should believe that everything, death, illness or whatever is just a random happening. They want to believe there is a bigger something that has control of those things. Some believe it is God who does this. Others seek for more natural causes. Would you consider one more intelligent than the other?
    Yes. It seems to me that an intelligent, educated person should be able to realize that something isn't any more or less likely to be true simply because they find it emotionally appealing or unappealing. Rejecting or accepting an idea simply because you like/don't like it, rather than because of what reason or evidence indicates, has got to be one of the stupidest things a person can do. So, yeah, I would consider someone who does that to be less intelligent.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #18  
    Forum Freshman Swordsmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    The infinite reaches of the net.
    Posts
    50
    I've not yet graduated highschool and I've been an atheist since the 6th grade.

    Education has something to do with a reduction of faith, obviously, do to the fact that education thrives on logic and questioning your surroundings. Religion relies on ignorance and labels it "God."
    "Sire, I have no need of that hypothesis." - As Laplace said when Napoleon wondered how the famous mathematician could write his book without mentioning God.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •