Thread: Nature as God

Why I believe NATURE is GOD

Nature is the ONLY creator of all life. The female being the most important
of the pairs. The male acts as the protector, servant and decoy.
Nature has created food for us all and it is free.
Nature has given all creatures its clothing. Almost all pairs (female and
male) have the same clothing.
Nature is a liberal GOD because it made NO laws, but gave us enetic
and biological characteristics to govern our lives.
Nature requires no licenses to reproduce or any other licenses for that
matter.
Hence, no costly marriages.
It has created the food chain as our burial sites, hence no funerals.
It has given us our own doctors with the 'immune systems' within us.
It requires no rituals, tithes or taxes, forced attendances and etc.
It grants no property ownerships, patents or any other grants to create
millionaires or billionaires.
It has given us complete freedom with no restrictions although people do need laws to govern themselves.
It is a merciful GOD because it does not suffer us by prolonging death and even tempers this brief interim with the endorphin pain killers.
It allows post abortion (carnivore consumption of newborns) and the food chain in the sea and ocean life to limit population imbalances.
Therefore, it has created all creatures as 'equals' with minor exceptions

That exception is that the Apes are the Natural Gods 'chosen specie' because it gave them the 'greatest natural tool in creation', OUR HANDS.
So you can thank Mrs. Chimpanzee for this great gift and because of it, we have all these material goodies that the dollar factions crave.

Nature promotes a 'multiple god system with the following:
The Females are the Creator Gods
The Lion is the Weapons God
The Gorilla is the Muscle GOD
The Dog Pack are the Dollar gods as portrayed by the La Cosa Nostra that are the Hollywood godfathers, the Star of David portrayed as a 'hot dog', the Vatican Dogma (maybe Dracula?) and the chauvinist capitalists.

And finally, the spiritual world that has the evil spirit and the good spirit. Believe me, they do exist and are real. However, you will notice this only with your mind.

Socialism is about the closest political system to NATURE because it
gives us the essential needs and freedoms and yet takes care of our lives with the necessities.


The bible, on the other hand, is at complete opposition to Nature.

It promotes 'creation out of nothing that the Laws of Physics refute.
It promotes a deity that demands absolute obedience with the first three commandments. This promotes a 'one god concept'.
The last six can be considered generic and are OK.
It’s deity is a genocidal deity.
It portrays sex as punishment for sin. This is nonsense. Perverse sex can be considered to be sinful. But I would hardly call that punishment. Sex is more like a drug that creates the perversions and especially crimes.
It portrays the males as chauvinists. In our current culture, the males dominate and use the females as slaves while they consider themselves to be the masters.
It portrays the females as the sinners and a fruit from a tree as a sin if eaten. This is a blatant falsehood. Fruit and vegetables are our proper food source because they can be eaten RAW. Only foods that can be eaten raw are sanctified by GOD.
It promotes racism by forbidding marriages outside the Jewish cult.

This book does not represent truth.

NS

First of all, wtf is nature?
Secondly, 'nature is God' is a complete paradox.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

Why I believe NATURE is GOD

Nature is the ONLY creator of all life.

And the ambiguity begins.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

The female being the most important
of the pairs.

I wonder why.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

The male acts as the protector, servant and decoy.

How stereotypical. Do you know much about Biology?

Originally Posted by Mike NS

Nature has created food for us all and it is free.

'Nature' has created nothing. 'Nature' just is.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

Nature has given all creatures its clothing.

Again, 'nature' has 'given' nothing.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

Almost all pairs (female and
male) have the same clothing.

What about naked mole rats? Apparently this 'nature God' has forgotten about them...how cruel!

Originally Posted by Mike NS

Nature is a liberal GOD because it made NO laws, but gave us enetic
and biological characteristics to govern our lives.

I can name several laws.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

Nature requires no licenses to reproduce or any other licenses for that
matter.

Quite true, but I ask again, "who is nature"?

Originally Posted by Mike NS

Hence, no costly marriages.

Apparently you aren't aware that marriages aren't made for us to reproduce; hence, gays seek to get married also.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

It has created the food chain as our burial sites, hence no funerals.

So you and your God oppose funerals...I must say, that's kind of disgusting.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

It has given us our own doctors with the 'immune systems' within us.

Apparently these doctors fail, and we have to go to doctors who actually have a degree.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

It requires no rituals, tithes or taxes, forced attendances and etc.

This is great...

Originally Posted by Mike NS

It grants no property ownerships, patents or any other grants to create
millionaires or billionaires.

Are you and your God in opposition to society, as well?

Originally Posted by Mike NS

It has given us complete freedom with no restrictions although people do need laws to govern themselves.

Complete freedom...sounds like chaos to me. So your God is one of chaos?

Originally Posted by Mike NS

It is a merciful GOD because it does not suffer us by prolonging death and even tempers this brief interim with the endorphin pain killers.

O really? How about you stepping into a house filled with aggressive African bees and see how 'merciful' this 'nature God' is.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

It allows post abortion (carnivore consumption of newborns)

That's disgusting...so you promote eating babies, do you? Perhaps you should start your own 'nature tribe' on some desolate island?

Originally Posted by Mike NS

and the food chain in the sea and ocean life to limit population imbalances.
Therefore, it has created all creatures as 'equals' with minor exceptions

non-sequitur.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

That exception is that the Apes are the Natural Gods 'chosen specie' because it gave them the 'greatest natural tool in creation', OUR HANDS.

No, my friend, we are the 'chosen specie'. Thus, we have way more advanced brains than apes. I know more about your religion than you do...how pathetic.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

So you can thank Mrs. Chimpanzee for this great gift and because of it, we have all these material goodies that the dollar factions crave.

No...I can thank either random chance or a metaphysical God.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

Nature promotes a 'multiple god system with the following:
The Females are the Creator Gods

Are they now? Stereotyping again, are we?

Originally Posted by Mike NS

The Lion is the Weapons God

I wonder why.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

The Gorilla is the Muscle GOD

Again, I wonder why.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

The Dog Pack are the Dollar gods as portrayed by the La Cosa Nostra that are the Hollywood godfathers, the Star of David portrayed as a 'hot dog', the Vatican Dogma (maybe Dracula?) and the chauvinist capitalists.

Interesting.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

And finally, the spiritual world that has the evil spirit and the good spirit. Believe me, they do exist and are real. However, you will notice this only with your mind.

Wait...what? Explain, please.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

Socialism is about the closest political system to NATURE because it
gives us the essential needs and freedoms and yet takes care of our lives with the necessities.

And so the key question has been answered!

Originally Posted by Mike NS

The bible, on the other hand, is at complete opposition to Nature.

Democracy as opposed to socialism?

Originally Posted by Mike NS

It promotes 'creation out of nothing that the Laws of Physics refute.

O, rly?

Originally Posted by Mike NS

It promotes a deity that demands absolute obedience with the first three commandments.

Just as most parents demand absolute obedience...I don't see what's so bad with demanding absolute obedience. Even nature demands absolute obedience. First commandment to living beings in nature: you must eat, or you die. Obey nature, or die.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

This promotes a 'one god concept'.

Oh, so you're polytheistic.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

The last six can be considered generic and are OK.

What?

Originally Posted by Mike NS

It’s deity is a genocidal deity.

Nature has put so many species into extinction, it isn't funny.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

It portrays sex as punishment for sin.

I continue to marvel at your ignorance of the Bible.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

This is nonsense.

Exactly...which is why it isn't in the Bible.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

Perverse sex can be considered to be sinful. But I would hardly call that punishment.

I agree.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

Sex is more like a drug that creates the perversions and especially crimes.

I disagree. Sex is no different than a gun. A gun doesn't cause crimes, the person wielding the gun does.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

It portrays the males as chauvinists.

O rly? I suggest you discuss this with some church officials so they can point you to the right verse...I don't really remember the verses myself, but I remember the ideas presented in them.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

In our current culture, the males dominate and use the females as slaves while they consider themselves to be the masters.

Welcome to the future. Please leave past ideas behind you, and wipe your foot of misconceptions before you step inside.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

It portrays the females as the sinners and a fruit from a tree as a sin if eaten.

Again, women are not the only ones portrayed as sinners: everyone is.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

This is a blatant falsehood. Fruit and vegetables are our proper food source because they can be eaten RAW. Only foods that can be eaten raw are sanctified by GOD.

Don't start this 'we're herbivores' crap again. We're omnivores we were made to eat meat and plants. You don't think those canines are there for nothing, do you?

Originally Posted by Mike NS

It promotes racism by forbidding marriages outside the Jewish cult.

So we're jumping to Jews now, are we?

Originally Posted by Mike NS

This book does not represent truth.

Nothing represents the truth.

In summary,
You're a socialist who advocates eating babies, and who believes that in our current culture men dominate women, and who believes that women are creators and men are protectors, and who believes that the lion is the God of weapons, and who believes that nature is a being. You are against funerals, and believe that the sole purpose of marriage is reproduction. You believe "grant[ing] property ownerships, patents or any other grants" is a bad thing. Further, you believe that a metaphysical God grants these patents, etc. You believe that the Christian Bible states that sex is a form of punishment, and you believe that Jews are racist.

Now tell me, why would I want to follow your religion?

if you take the concept of god as having created the universe, he must exist outside the universe - hence couldn't equate to nature, which is part of the universe

Originally Posted by Mike NS

It has given us complete freedom with no restrictions although people do need laws to govern themselves.
It is a merciful GOD because it does not suffer us by prolonging death and even tempers this brief interim with the endorphin pain killers.
It allows post abortion (carnivore consumption of newborns) and the food chain in the sea and ocean life to limit population imbalances.
Therefore, it has created all creatures as 'equals' with minor exceptions

Oh it has laws all right, with rather unforgiving and harsh punishments consisting of death and excrutiating pain. It tortures the innocent without a shred of mercy with disease. And on top of that, it arbitrarily goes and kills large numbers of people for no reason at all with tidal waves, earthquakes, hurricanes and tornadoes.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

That exception is that the Apes are the Natural Gods 'chosen specie' because it gave them the 'greatest natural tool in creation', OUR HANDS.
So you can thank Mrs. Chimpanzee for this great gift and because of it, we have all these material goodies that the dollar factions crave.

Are you sure that the primates are not one of capricious plagues by which you god of Nature exterminates whole species and devastates entire ecosystems for no reason at all? Or by chosen do you mean the instrument of God's whimsical wrath?

Originally Posted by Mike NS

And finally, the spiritual world that has the evil spirit and the good spirit. Believe me, they do exist and are real. However, you will notice this only with your mind.

Interesting and what is its purpose? Is this to enable your God to continue his delight in the torment of the innocent for an eternity or what?

Originally Posted by Mike NS

Socialism is about the closest political system to NATURE because it
gives us the essential needs and freedoms and yet takes care of our lives with the necessities.

Where in the world have you come up with that nonsense? It is capitalism that is closest to nature in its operation according to the principles of competition and the survival of the fittest. Socialism smells of the unatural operation of compassion which breeds weakness and the tolerance of mediocrity. LOL

Originally Posted by Mike NS

The bible, on the other hand, is at complete opposition to Nature.

It promotes 'creation out of nothing that the Laws of Physics refute.

Really? I wonder where you got that idea. Creation ex-nihilo is not in the bible but is a doctrine added on to the Bible by men. And the theory of beginning of the universe in physics is the big bang from which all of matter, energy, space and time orgininated in a singular event - that sounds like creation ex-nihilo to me.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

It promotes a deity that demands absolute obedience with the first three commandments. This promotes a 'one god concept'.
The last six can be considered generic and are OK.
It’s deity is a genocidal deity.

Yes whereas Nature is a compasion and loving one... preposterous. Nature does not stop at wiping out mere races, instead it exterminates whole groups of species, and not for any punitive reason, but for no reason at all. Oh yes, that sound much better!

Originally Posted by Mike NS

It portrays sex as punishment for sin. This is nonsense. Perverse sex can be considered to be sinful. But I would hardly call that punishment. Sex is more like a drug that creates the perversions and especially crimes.

Well that is one of the most bizzare interpretations of scripture that I have heard of in a long time. I would guess that there are wackos of every religious and philosophical persuation with such bizzarre ideas.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

It portrays the males as chauvinists. In our current culture, the males dominate and use the females as slaves while they consider themselves to be the masters.

Since this has been just as true (if not more so) in cultures which never heard of the Bible, you argument falls to pieces. It is just an accident of course, that the women's liberation movement first arose in a Christian culture.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

It portrays the females as the sinners and a fruit from a tree as a sin if eaten. This is a blatant falsehood. Fruit and vegetables are our proper food source because they can be eaten RAW. Only foods that can be eaten raw are sanctified by GOD.

Weirder and weirder..... The evils of cooking? hmm.... I guess I am just an unrepentant sinner. Although I do prefer raw sunflower seeds...

I never heard of any "tree of life" or "tree of knowledge of good and evil" in any garden. These name have always been highly suggestive to me of something quite symbolic.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

It promotes racism by forbidding marriages outside the Jewish cult.

And nature does not? Hmmm... I guess we need some biological studies of animal groups... but I suspect that animal groups generally do not allow "intermarriage" between groups, so I think this may be a vestigal influence of the law of Nature that we have only now begun to reject. In nature, isn't it usually the dominant male who gets all the females, for his own private harem?

Originally Posted by Mike NS

This book does not represent truth.

I cannot say that I think very much of YOUR alternative.

Originally Posted by marnixR

if you take the concept of god as having created the universe, he must exist outside the universe - hence couldn't equate to nature, which is part of the universe

therefore it is commonly seen that nature is described as being contingent on god

To All

Since there is so much comment about this article, I will post an added clarification of my concept of GOD tomorrow. Thank you.

I will also post the 'Origin of Religion' soon.

NS

.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

Since there is so much comment about this article, I will post an added clarification of my concept of GOD tomorrow. Thank you.

I don't think we need clarification. Your views are very clear. It's just that, so far, no one agrees with you. Restating those views will not persuade anyone.

Your initial statement Nature is God is one that would resonate with many people. Such a pantheistic view matches what Einstein likely meant when he said God does not play dice. I am not saying the view is a correct one, merely that is one that sits comfortably with many people. (And probably a high proportion of scientists.)

However, your statements offered as proof/evidence for your contention are repeatedly and seriously flawed. I could find none of those statements that could be said to even approach the truth.

reminds me of the following "proof" of god's existence i picked up from the godless geeks website

73. ARGUMENT FROM EXHAUSTION (abridged)
(1) Do you agree with the utterly trivial proposition X?
(2) Atheist: of course.
(3) How about the slightly modified proposition X'?
(4) Atheist: Um, no, not really.
(5) Good. Since we agree, how about Y? Is that true?
(6) Atheist: No! And I didn't agree with X'!
(7) With the truths of these clearly established, surely you agree that Z is true as well?
(8 ) Atheist: No. So far I have only agreed with X! Where is this going, anyway?
(9) I'm glad we all agree.....
....
(37) So now we have used propositions X, X', Y, Y', Z, Z', P, P', Q and Q' to arrive at the obviously valid point R. Agreed?
(38 ) Atheist: Like I said, so far I've only agreed with X. Where is this going?
....
(81) So we now conclude from this that propositions L'', L''' and J'' are true. Agreed?
(82) I HAVEN'T AGREED WITH ANYTHING YOU'VE SAID SINCE X! WHERE IS THIS GOING?
....
(177) ...and it follows that proposition HRV, SHQ'' and BTU' are all obviously valid. Agreed?
(178 ) [Atheist either faints from overwork or leaves in disgust.]
(179) Therefore, God exists.

Originally Posted by theist

non-sequitur.

Whay does that mean?
My dictionary does have it in 'foreign words and phrases'.

NS

non sequitur - latin for "does not follow"

a commonly used term in logic when a conclusion is drawn which does not logically follow from the premises

Originally Posted by mitchellmckain

Oh it has laws all right, with rather unforgiving and harsh punishments consisting of death and excrutiating pain. It tortures the innocent without a shred of mercy with disease. And on top of that, it arbitrarily goes and kills large numbers of people for no reason at all with tidal waves, earthquakes, hurricanes and tornadoes.

Natural diseases are humane. Just a fever developes to destroy the disease. You either survive the fever or die. This is humane.
The physical disasters are the work of the 'evil spirit'.

Are you sure that the primates are not one of capricious plagues by which you god of Nature exterminates whole species and devastates entire ecosystems for no reason at all? Or by chosen do you mean the instrument of God's whimsical wrath?

you mean like Joe Stalin derived from the bible? Or the population explosions promoted by the popes and the bible?

Interesting and what is its purpose? Is this to enable your God to continue his delight in the torment of the innocent for an eternity or what?

The popes and Islam have provided you with the pupose.

Where in the world have you come up with that nonsense? It is capitalism that is closest to nature in its operation according to the principles of competition and the survival of the fittest. Socialism smells of the unatural operation of compassion which breeds weakness and the tolerance of mediocrity. LOL

Nature did not create the billionaires or multi-millionares. Government that has created the monopolies as crutches and the corporate corruptions has done that.

Really? I wonder where you got that idea. Creation ex-nihilo is not in the bible but is a doctrine added on to the Bible by men. And the theory of beginning of the universe in physics is the big bang from which all of matter, energy, space and time orgininated in a singular event - that sounds like creation ex-nihilo to me.

Yes, the BBU is creation ex-nihilo and the bible is the originator in the Book of Genesis.

Yes whereas Nature is a compasion and loving one... preposterous. Nature does not stop at wiping out mere races, instead it exterminates whole groups of species, and not for any punitive reason, but for no reason at all. Oh yes, that sound much better!

Nature created the food chain to eliminate the worst most sickening odor there is with the 'rotting flesh' that is worst than cat crap or dog dung.

Well that is one of the most bizzare interpretations of scripture that I have heard of in a long time. I would guess that there are wackos of every religious and philosophical persuation with such bizzarre ideas.

Did not yahweh say 'for eating the forbidden fruit, you shall toil in the fields' and the women, of course, have to suffer the pains of birthing?
Do you see the capitalists suffering?

Since this has been just as true (if not more so) in cultures which never heard of the Bible, you argument falls to pieces. It is just an accident of course, that the women's liberation movement first arose in a Christian culture.

Our Constitution has more to do with promoting equality with its added Amandments.

Weirder and weirder..... The evils of cooking? hmm.... I guess I am just an unrepentant sinner. Although I do prefer raw sunflower seeds...
I never heard of any "tree of life" or "tree of knowledge of good and evil" in any garden. These name have always been highly suggestive to me of something quite symbolic.

I will admit that some foods HAVE to be cooked. Raw meat, I suppose, is unsafe and not that tasty?
On the other hand, raw salads can have their taste enhanced with the dressings.

And nature does not? Hmmm... I guess we need some biological studies of animal groups... but I suspect that animal groups generally do not allow "intermarriage" between groups, so I think this may be a vestigal influence of the law of Nature that we have only now begun to reject. In nature, isn't it usually the dominant male who gets all the females, for his own private harem?

Amongst humans, there is only one race that was separated by continental divides. So there is no discrimination here that creates a 'cult'.

I cannot say that I think very much of YOUR alternative.

Well yes, the biblical followers are commited to believe in the fantasy that the bible teaches in the early years.

NS

A Clarification of my article above.

This applies to the 'living' or biological Nature only.
It does NOT apply to the physical Universe.
The living universe can 'replicate'. The physical universe CANNot replicate.
The Laws of Conservation of Matter and Energy (physics, LoP) imply that.
So the LoP do not apply to the living lifeforms.

As far as our human lives are conserned, we EVOLVED from the Chimpanzees.
So quoting the behavior of other animals in reference to us is not validated.

So, we can say that Nature is our greatest teacher, inventor and artist.

So, as humans with GODs greatest given gift (our hands), we copy the other living
creature inventions like river dams (beavers), bird flight (airplanes), fish (subnarines), turtles (tanks), sonar (dolphins and bats) plus some others.
And art? The colorful birds, fish and Natural scenery is certainly the greatest IMO.
This makes Nature our greatest teacher.

So we do NOT need the bible, the Torah, the Koran or the popes Dogma to tell us what to do because the animals do not need them.

But because we are the most savage and sadistic chauvinist creatures on the planet, we do need laws to protect ourselves from ourselves and the chauvinists.

On the other hand, the biblical one god concept, teaches genocide (J. Stalin, Mao Tse Tung?)), Hitlers karmic reaction to the Stalin atrocities, the popes genocides of indoctrination and the current Islamic terrorist genocides.
Chauvinism that implies slavery and the others mentioned in the article above.

NS

Originally Posted by Mike NS

Well yes, the biblical followers are commited to believe in the fantasy that the bible teaches in the early years.

Ah... so you are a participant in this delusion that all Christians were brainwashed as children. LOL My parents are not and never have been Christian. A religion's real strength comes from its converts. Religion means nothing unless it comes as a result of your own quest for truth.

Originally Posted by marnixR

non sequitur - latin for "does not follow"

a commonly used term in logic when a conclusion is drawn which does not logically follow from the premises

Thanks.

NS

Originally Posted by Mike NS

A Clarification of my article above.

This applies to the 'living' or biological Nature only.
It does NOT apply to the physical Universe.
The living universe can 'replicate'. The physical universe CANNot replicate.
The Laws of Conservation of Matter and Energy (physics, LoP) imply that.
So the LoP do not apply to the living lifeforms.

This makes no sense, and only has me more confused.

What confuses me even more is your apparent contradiction:

Originally Posted by Mike NS

...quoting the behavior of other animals in reference to us is not validated.

Originally Posted by Mike NS

So we do NOT need the bible, the Torah, the Koran or the popes Dogma to tell us what to do because the animals do not need them.

Originally Posted by mitchellmckain

Originally Posted by Mike NS

Well yes, the biblical followers are commited to believe in the fantasy that the bible teaches in the early years.

Ah... so you are a participant in this delusion that all Christians were brainwashed as children. LOL My parents are not and never have been Christian. A religion's real strength comes from its converts. Religion means nothing unless it comes as a result of your own quest for truth.

Religions today are powerfyl because they practice 'genocide. This is true of Islam and the popes Christianity. Joseph Stalin practiced it too.

The Christian faction is divided into two. The popes christianity that promotes the crucifixion and Christ as a sacrificial lamb for the sins of humanity.
That is why they all preach 'moral' reform.

Then their is the other faction that sees Christ as a preacher/reformer.
However, Christ was not preaching moral reform but preaching against chauvinism that the Jewish power faction was practicing.
They felt threatened, so they urged POntius PilatE (condemsed to pope) to kill christ.
So the real reason Christ was killed was because of 'free speech'.

Our US Constitution endorses the latter view that I support because it outlaws 'cruel and unusual punishment' and allows 'free speech'.

So the popes version of Christianity is outlawed.

However, the popes still have a lot of 'spiritual' power and resulting followers to remain dominant. The 'gun and the cannon' that was invented by the Romans also gave them a lot of power.
As a matter of fact, it helped them spread their Christianity all over the world. No Gospel here.

NS

Originally Posted by Mike NS

Religions today are powerfyl because they practice 'genocide. This is true of Islam and the popes Christianity. Joseph Stalin practiced it too.

The Christian faction is divided into two. The popes christianity that promotes the crucifixion and Christ as a sacrificial lamb for the sins of humanity.
That is why they all preach 'moral' reform.

Then their is the other faction that sees Christ as a preacher/reformer.
However, Christ was not preaching moral reform but preaching against chauvinism that the Jewish power faction was practicing.
They felt threatened, so they urged POntius PilatE (condemsed to pope) to kill christ.
So the real reason Christ was killed was because of 'free speech'.

Our US Constitution endorses the latter view that I support because it outlaws 'cruel and unusual punishment' and allows 'free speech'.

So the popes version of Christianity is outlawed.

However, the popes still have a lot of 'spiritual' power and resulting followers to remain dominant. The 'gun and the cannon' that was invented by the Romans also gave them a lot of power.
As a matter of fact, it helped them spread their Christianity all over the world. No Gospel here.

I see, so you feel left out. You want some of this power for yourself. Well if your theory is correct, then you are well on the way to creating your own persoal religion of power based on the hatred of people who are different from you. I would say good luck with that, based on my guess that your success is extremely unlikey except for 2 things. The first is that Marx also started what was essentially a religion based on hatred and it was quite effective at gathering a substantial amount of power for a while. The second is that wishing you good luck in your endeavor would be rather disingenuous, for to be honest I really hope that you would fail in converting people to such a religion of hatred, and that you yourself will learn to appreciate people different than yourself and understand them better.

Originally Posted by Mitchell

I see, so you feel left out. You want some of this power for yourself. Well if your theory is correct, then you are well on the way to creating your own persoal religion of power based on the hatred of people who are different from you. I would say good luck with that, based on my guess that your success is extremely unlikey except for 2 things. The first is that Marx also started what was essentially a religion based on hatred and it was quite effective at gathering a substantial amount of power for a while. The second is that wishing you good luck in your endeavor would be rather disingenuous, for to be honest I really hope that you would fail in converting people to such a religion of hatred, and that you yourself will learn to appreciate people different than yourself and understand them better.

Well. if you consider endorsing Christ as a man that was crucified for 'free speech' as hatred, then you are right because it was the chauvinist Jews that caused it.

Our US Constitution's endorsement of Christ is to show respect for him as a representative of the poor, sick and the lower elements of our society.
Our revolutionaries have taken that advice and established a representative government.
So you call that hatred?

If you interpret that as hatred for the chauvinists like kings, dictators and similar individuals like the capitalists and I could include the criminals as well because they are 'self serving' like those mentioned previously, then yes, that is hatred for the proper individuals in society.

NS

Originally Posted by Mike NS

Well. if you consider endorsing Christ as a man that was crucified for 'free speech' as hatred, then you are right because it was the chauvinist Jews that caused it.

Our US Constitution's endorsement of Christ is to show respect for him as a representative of the poor, sick and the lower elements of our society.
Our revolutionaries have taken that advice and established a representative government.
So you call that hatred?

Ah I see so you are not creating a new religion of hatred but are merely a die hard of an old one, trying to give it an new image by candy coating it with the word "nature" and hiding (rather unsuccessfully) behind other issues. How droll and regressive!

Originally Posted by Mike NS

If you interpret that as hatred for the chauvinists like kings, dictators and similar individuals like the capitalists and I could include the criminals as well because they are 'self serving' like those mentioned previously, then yes, that is hatred for the proper individuals in society.

It is typical of religions and ideologies of hatred that they call the people different from themselves all sorts of devaluating names like vermin and criminals in order to justify their hatred and justify their own inhumane and criminal behavior against them. How boringly predictable.