Hello deric, welcome to the forum.
I am not sure how much time you have spent looking around threads on the forum, but if you have you may have noticed that the majority of the regular members are people who are either scientists or engineers, people with science educations, or people interested in science. Most of these have a common belief in the demonstrated value of evidence and of the scientific method. Therefore your ideas, attractive as they may be to some, will not get a warm reception.
Let's take a look at some of your points from a scientific perspective:
1.Scientists are suspicious of the notion of truth. They recognise that as time passes our knowledge grows and ideas change. Scientists do not speak of something as being true, but as offering the best explanation currently available based on existing evidence.
2. Using the internet as your primary source, without any training in critical thinking, is not a good idea. I could phrase that more strongly, but I do not want to offend you. The internet does contain links to some outstandingly good material, but it also contains an enormous amount of nonsense. Distinguishing the two can be very difficult.
3. You may not be aware of it, but there is a lot of research on near death experiences, and they are readily explained as an effect of a brain that is in the process of shutting down. There is no serious indication that they represent some genuine contact with 'the beyond'.
4. There are much more plausible explanations for Out of Body experiences than those offered by Monroe. You may wish to
read this as an example, or consult the wikipedia page on the subject. I'm sure there is one.
5. The
common theme of reincarnation, with progressive improvement, is an attractive one to many, but it lacks any meaningful evidence. Evidence is not a story someone tells, no matter how convincingly about their own experiences. Eye witness testimony is not reliable. People are easily mistaken, misled, confused, or may lie, or hallucinate, or otherwise be inaccurate or wrong.
6. Basing your life on a possibility of
what is really going on, without any meaningful evidence to support it, is an excellent way to waste a life.
7. It is highly questionable whether Jesus ever existed as an individual, but if he did there is no evidence whatsoever that he was the Son of God.
8. There is no meaningful evidence that the God of the Bible exists and absolutely no meaningful explanation of why he went through such a personality change moving from Old to New Testament times.
9. You could be wrong, you say, and based upon a critical examination of the evidence, you are wrong.
I do not expect you to accept any of what I have written. I do hope you will start to think about it and begin to use your critical thinking faculties.
Good luck.