
Originally Posted by
always asking
Hi there geezer I am not asking to be ridiculed on my personal opinions and to accuse me of lying is something I do not appreciate
Your statement in your OP, ie "and hence
refuse to believe in god" is something a religious person would say, not a non religious person. this is why I doubt the sincerity, with your claim of non religious.

Originally Posted by
always asking
On another note u seem to be more focused on criticizing my questions than actually posting answers to the question
Well unless I'm blind I think I answered your question twice in posts 12 and 14, but you did not seem to like those answers and were pushing for some alternate ones. Hence why I said
"I think you misunderstand, doubts. They will still be there regardless of whether an all powerful god, sent angels, changed the colour of the sky, made the moon vanish or turned off the sun, it could still be a very powerful alien, it doesn't prove it was a god by any of this, and a being that intelligent would know that." in my last post.
That was my third time trying to get you to understand my answers, it's not rocket science now is it.

Originally Posted by
always asking
the OP was to see if people weather religious or not would under certain circumstances just change their views,
and I told you what would happen in my case, in posts 12, 14, and 18, and several other members have posted up similar replies throughout this thread but you seem to want your own set of answers, answers that fit your beliefs.

Originally Posted by
always asking
I made the post to test the human ability to look at new perspectives with new data, I was trying to show that us as scientists(me included) are not as blind as the religious fanatics of our past in looking at new information.
By using hypotheticals you failed, new perspectives must be factual, not fiction, hence the fail.

Originally Posted by
mitchellmckain
looks like you didn't anticipate running into anti-theists who are just as incapable of considering alternatives and possibilities as fundamentalists in religion, demonstrating quite well just how applicable this term "fundamentalist" can be to some atheists as it to many theists. Some people find thought provoking questions so threatening that they lash out quite blindly in response to them.
Where is any of this anti-theist
"I think you misunderstand, doubts. They will still be there regardless of whether an all powerful god, sent angels, changed the colour of the sky, made the moon vanish or turned off the sun, it could still be a very powerful alien, it doesn't prove it was a god by any of this, and a being that intelligent would know that."
"Do you really think a benevolent being would need or want to prove itself. I dont need my son to know that I'm there for him, I just am."
"Sorry I very much doubt that, because of your OP, and this post."
"Yes anybody would take a second look at religion and yes you would consider the bible to be truth, in that hypothetical scenario. but in reality we know differently."
"If a being did it would still be doubted.
the bible has change so much since it was first compiled, and there are so many different versions of it today, how can you know if it right or not. Given the absurdities written within."
And in regard to being called a fundamentalist, The very idea of a fundamentalist atheist makes no sense. Seriously consider what fundamentalism is supposed to mean. Fundamentalism is about relying on fundamental beliefs. it is problematical because there are no fundamental beliefs for an atheist to be fundamental about. so how can that possibly apply to the atheist?
This is your prejudice and misunderstandings of atheism showing