Thread: Mother Earth the creator of life and religion

Does one need proof of anything?
here is your experience,
no need for mathematics,
language or cleverness,
its for all whom it brings into creation,
one and many are all from the same source,
as we speak of it,
live within it,
feed from it,
breath its contents
as we are part of it,
Earth
Space
Reality
All we know as truth

Who else does one seek?
an idea?
a theory?
an experience long gone?
a feeling once felt?
a love once written about?

Observing clearly that,
each event is to that prior of it,
that once a seed falls,
water will drop upon it,
it has the will to open,
a stem shall form a bud,
a bud shall open into a blooming flower,
Is to witness the flower in bloom?
Or to witness the seed in memory?
Just so we know the flower again
to search for a creator when the created is all around

only true 'time',
is not 'then' or 'now',
if you find it,
do not try to catch it,
twill not be stopped,
never be slowed,
is neither fast,
nor is it slow,
in order to understand it,
one must become it,
yet firstly it must become you...

The timeless perception of nature.

Nature is the only 'truth' we have.
What god does one need?
Our senses are amazing tools yet limited to our survival as are that of a Bat or Eagle...
Before your senses is a reality beyond the comprehesion of the senses.
It is within the events yet to come that the truth lies towards our explanation as woman and man, as mankind.
But it is also true that truth is running through every vessel within the bodies of nature...

Let reality unfold, one's 'ideas' or 'beliefs' of creation do not account for what you are and cannot change - a living being of this planet..

In due time beings great and small shall witness the force of Mother Earth and what has to be done to make balance with itself and the universe which upholds her.

Dlrow, I'd like to introduce you to Cosmo. Cosmo, this is Dlrow.

Who wants to know my sockpuppet? Go on, guess 8).

Hello cosmos, but i am yet to experiece your true form.

I am yet to experience self realization..

Both of the above posts i dont understand to be honest, were they ment to make any sense?

Yes. Look for a thread by Cosmo in this religion forum. He has some similar views to yours.

Another closet atheist?

I think it is impossible to put people in catagories labeled with names for example 'athiest'.

However, put me into which ever you please so you apparently know where i stand in my thoughts towards reality.

One being may have this perception of God and another that perception of God. They both believe in God but hold different perceptions of God.
No man can define God to another man.
How then can we put them two men into the same catagory?

Defination of the word 'God' (by google); the supernatural being conceived as the perfect and omnipotent and omniscient originator and ruler of the universe.
I hope you now understand 'God'?
Sorry to be sarcastic..
But this is just another bunch of words waiting to be defined.

There is no true and common defintation of God.
How can two men say that they believe in the same God when they both do not know if they have the same perception of God?

We all hold a common perception of nature.
It is true that all human beings reading this now are reading with eyes.
Eyes being a natural part of the body.
Eyes a means to understand reality.
Eyes a common perception to the natural world.

'God' a word with no definate defination or observational qualities, no evidence of it as thing in itself - other than nature (the human being for example).
'Nature' a word and a truth for all to observe as it is observationally clear that nature is everywhere and within all space.