The Science Forum - Scientific Discussion and Debate  
 
 Live Chat    FAQ    Search    Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
Science Forum Forum Index » Pseudoscience » psychohistory

   Goto page 1, 2  Next
 psychohistory « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
ishmaelblues
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:23 pm    Post subject: psychohistory Reply with quote

Forum Freshman
Forum Freshman

Joined: 27 Mar 2008
Posts: 61

i would really like to know what everyone thinks about psychohistory, it a subject i get heated about.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
marnixR
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forum Cosmic Wizard
Forum Cosmic Wizard

Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Posts: 2386
Location: Cardiff, Wales

surely psychohistory is Asimov's science fiction invention in the Foundation Trilogy, not anything real ? or am i missing something ?
_________________
if you find this place too crowded or too confrontational, how about trying Philosophorum,
the amicable forum where small is beautiful and even the trolls are intelligent

biology without evolution is but stamp collecting
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
425 Chaotic Requisition
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Doctor

Joined: 18 Jun 2007
Posts: 3147
Location: Now

I didn't know that psychohistory existed. What is it?
_________________
An apple a day... Oh never mind.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Orleander
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forum Freshman
Forum Freshman

Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 90

425 Chaotic Requisition wrote:
I didn't know that psychohistory existed. What is it?


I'm gonna guess creationism??
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Selene
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Banned
Banned

Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 1060
Location: I live in Bertrand Russells teapot!

425 Chaotic Requisition wrote:
I didn't know that psychohistory existed. What is it?


'Psychohistory is the study of the psychological motivations of historical events. It combines the insights of psychotherapy with the research methodology of the social sciences to understand the emotional origin of the social and political behavior of groups and nations, past and present. Its subject matter is childhood and the family (especially child abuse), and psychological studies of anthropology and ethnology.'

From.....Wiki - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychohistory

Or for fictional.............


'Psychohistory, a fictional science in Isaac Asimov's Foundation universe, combines history, sociology, and mathematical statistics to make (nearly) exact predictions of the collective actions of very large groups of people, such as the Galactic Empire.'

Courtesy of Wiki Wiki Wiki..................

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychohistory_(fictional)


The W.W.W.B.W.W. Fanclub!
_________________
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I love a bit of SLAP & TICKLE

You Tickle

I'll Slap


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ishmaelblues
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forum Freshman
Forum Freshman

Joined: 27 Mar 2008
Posts: 61

it applies psychology to analyzing historic event and the motivations behind it, Jung and Freud innovated the idea then it fissled out, now a very smal community of zealots protect its online representation
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BumFluff
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forum Senior
Forum Senior

Joined: 06 Mar 2008
Posts: 371
Location: Canada

I think in order to live the lives or to go through what people in history went through we have to analyze what they went through psychologically. Why this has been put on the back burner is beyond me. I do know that archeologists attempt to do this but I had no idea it had it's own title.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Selene
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 4:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Banned
Banned

Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 1060
Location: I live in Bertrand Russells teapot!

A very good recent example of this idea is the phenomena of the Nazi regime.

Nowadays when we analyse such things we are often aghast at the fact that such a large collective supported the horrors of genocide.

We like to think and hope that such a thing could never happen because there will surely be people who have the reason and compassion to prevent such a thing.

Yet when you analyse the background of Germans and especially the way they were raised as children prior to this era, which was very harsh in a lot of ways and sought to moderate or eliminate emotions, coupled with political activity and the suffering Germans experienced with the Geneva convention and the behaviour of the Jews towards the Germans during this time........well all these ingredients certainly make a recipe for the potential cruelty and genocide.

Alice Miller, a German psychologist did lots of research on this and studies of the effects of child abuse and especially the sorts of abuse which are concealed because they are accepted by the majority as the correct way to bring up children, even postulated and confirmed and encouraged in sayings, for example:

'Children should be seen and not heard'

'Spare the rod and spoil the child'

Alice Millers books For Your Own Good and The Drama Of Being A Child are excellent books to read for anyone that's suffered these subtle forms of psychological abuse in childhood, especially if you want to get more insight and understanding on the route to healing those scars.
_________________
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I love a bit of SLAP & TICKLE

You Tickle

I'll Slap


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Harold14370
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 9:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forum Professor
Forum Professor

Joined: 13 Apr 2007
Posts: 1528
Location: Pennsylvania

I smell pseudoscience.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
marnixR
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 9:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forum Cosmic Wizard
Forum Cosmic Wizard

Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Posts: 2386
Location: Cardiff, Wales

pseudoscience smells ?
_________________
if you find this place too crowded or too confrontational, how about trying Philosophorum,
the amicable forum where small is beautiful and even the trolls are intelligent

biology without evolution is but stamp collecting
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Wolf
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 10:35 am    Post subject: Re: psychohistory Reply with quote

Forum Lycanthrope

Joined: 15 May 2007
Posts: 1014
Location: Here

ishmaelblues wrote:
i would really like to know what everyone thinks about psychohistory,

It's vital. You'd be a very bad historian not to take into account the psychological state of the people in the past, or the psychological impact of events on people and societies.

ishmaelblues wrote:
it a subject i get heated about.

Why?
_________________
Wolf
---------------------------------------------------------
"Be fair with others, but then keep after them until they're fair with you." Alan Alda
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ishmaelblues
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 1:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forum Freshman
Forum Freshman

Joined: 27 Mar 2008
Posts: 61

well, because historians aim to understand how people thought in different times in order to make sense of their actions, but, psychohistorians as we know of them today (DeMause's followers) are somewhat jaded, and if you look at DeMause you can kind of see that, he has no degree in history or psychology he has a masters in polisci and then he dropped out of his doctoral studies. DeMause and his followers (the bulk of psychohistorians today) defy much of the the historical and anthropological society. I would say the problem with their research is primarliy three-fold, 1. they focus on childhood, which is good but they often ignore or discredit everything else. 2. they use psychology where sociology should be applied (often assuming entire civilizations all think the same) 3. There is a definate lack of research, it is difficult enough to use psychoanalitical methods on a person in your time and place on your couch but in another setting without being able to ask them questions! please not reliable

finally the field as a whole is now just a shadow really a sheet being held up by a small vanguard
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
425 Chaotic Requisition
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 2:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Doctor

Joined: 18 Jun 2007
Posts: 3147
Location: Now

marnixR wrote:
pseudoscience smells ?


Like going off milk, your not sure if its going sour or if the cream has settled. Laughing

And the only way to know which is right is by tasting it Laughing.
_________________
An apple a day... Oh never mind.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
marnixR
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 3:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forum Cosmic Wizard
Forum Cosmic Wizard

Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Posts: 2386
Location: Cardiff, Wales

425 Chaotic Requisition wrote:
And the only way to know which is right is by tasting it Laughing.


careful now, or you'll end up like the milky-bar kid
_________________
if you find this place too crowded or too confrontational, how about trying Philosophorum,
the amicable forum where small is beautiful and even the trolls are intelligent

biology without evolution is but stamp collecting
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Selene
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 5:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Banned
Banned

Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 1060
Location: I live in Bertrand Russells teapot!

Harold14370 wrote:
I smell pseudoscience.


No that's sulphuric acid Harold

Does anyone know a substance guaranteed to dissolve bones?

Ah i guess i could always make glue

Back to the thread:

I agree with Wolf (which makes a change that we are not arguing!)

A good Historian will always try to put him/herself into the mind frame of the people of the time being studied, taking as many factors into account as it possible, especially the psychology of a person or a collective.

Lots of mistakes are made by regarding historical periods from the viewpoint of the era you are currently in.

For example

When i studied the Romans i had to suspend my attitude towards their 'sport' in the amphitheaters, in order to understand as best as i could why there was such an appeal for this type of 'entertainment', in effect i had to become a Roman and research further attitudes and belief systems based on primary evidence.

One of the issues that fascinates me at present which i am studying is the current political apathy of the polity in the west, when we are supposed to have the advantage and luxury of democracy.
To understand this i need to look at the current psychology and beliefs of westerners and the conditions in which they were raised as children, as well as political events leading up to the present which might have deterred people and encourage them to switch off from political interest.

A couple of the factors which appear to be prominent is.
1. A mistrust of politics and politicians and a sense of alienation and separation from political decisions from a sense of a 'them and us' which leads to a feeling of helplessness
2. The increase in information of politics and current affairs on a global scale through the media, which overwhelms the brain and causes people to literally 'switch off'
3. The economics which cause people to have little time available to study and take part in political decisions

Two of these factors are based explicitly on a psychological basis.
Number 3, although is economic, is implicitly based on the psychological belief that happiness comes from materialistic gains, perpetuated by psychologically manipulative advertising, and therefore leads people to work harder and longer to achieve this 'happiness' or fulfillment.

Just an example of taking psychological factors into account.

So Harold, pseudo, i think not, unavoidable, yes!
_________________
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I love a bit of SLAP & TICKLE

You Tickle

I'll Slap


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
   Goto page 1, 2  Next Page 1 of 2

Science Forum Forum Index » Pseudoscience » psychohistory
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
 
 


Google
 

© 2004-2008 Thescienceforum.com

Sponsored by EnluxLED

Partner Forums
Politics Forum  Radar Detector