Notices
Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: H.A.A.R.P at work

  1. #1 H.A.A.R.P at work 
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    80
    http://www.thewebfairy.com/fonebone/dispart.shtml?ID=65

    It seems there's gathering evidence to suggest H.A.A.R.P isnt just doing Auroral Reasearch, high frequencey ELF sweep's appear to be manipulating the weather. There are Eastern originating sweep's aswell affecting the US weather patterns, thought to be originating from Russia. is this a Scalar EM weather war?

    http://www.thewebfairy.com/fonebone/dispart.shtml?ID=65. HAARP clears western moisture.

    http://www.thewebfairy.com/fonebone/dispart.shtml?ID=49. Another sweep

    http://thewebfairy.com/fonebone/

    Information on the chemtrail marker program, and evidence of Scalar EM weather engineering technology.

    http://www.greatdreams.com/weather/w...wars-radio.htm

    http://www.indiadaily.com/editorial/2258.asp

    http://www.weatherwars.info/

    http://www.weatherwars.info/pilotsview.htm


    "The present is theirs ; the future, for which I really work , is mine." Nikola Tesla
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    Posts
    945
    i didnt read any of the links yet.. becasue i got to work soon. but... are they/you suggesting that someone is controlling the weather?

    therefore you are suggesting that somone controlled a certain catrina to flood the city of new orleans?

    or did i jump to conclusions?


    Stumble on through life.
    Feel free to correct any false information, which unknown to me, may be included in my posts. (also - let this be a disclaimer)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Forum Professor wallaby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,521
    unless it's an experiment gone wrong i don't know why anyone, other than terrorist assholes would even bother attacking the US.

    but what are the odds that terrorists would posses weather control technology.
    what are the odds weather control is even a possibility.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Forum Isotope (In)Sanity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Mesa AZ
    Posts
    2,699
    The Russians did it

    Rumor had it long ago that the Russians were also bombarding the US coast lines with EM radiation (mostly microwaves) to make the Americans less intelligent. While this appears to be the case, I don't think it was limited to just the US or that the Russians had anything to do with it. There appears to be a fair number of no so bright people in every country of the world.

    As to changing the weather, hmm. I guess it's possible. One can simply add contaminates to the clouds to change the rain patterns. I think the real question would be, why would they bother? I also think it would be very hard to gain very accurate control over such patterns.

    Every conspiracy theory with the Russians always appears to involve EM Waves...go figure.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    Forum Professor wallaby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,521
    Conspiracy theories

    if the russians tried altering rain patternes then it explains why us Aussies are in one of the longest Droughts we ever had. damm russians.

    but seriously the Russians?
    they gott bigger fish to fry.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    80
    Scalar Electromagnetic weapons dont class as 'conspiracey' theories.. im talking about the technology that uses the very 'wheel works of nature'. Extended Electrodynamic's, It just so happens the Russian's where the ones to create this extension back in the 1960's which has given them a working unified field theory, Western science still dogmatically addears to classical theories, which work but dont address the source charge problem, or give rigorous explaination's of force, or accept non symmetry in electrical systems, because of this they continue to ignore scalar waves and are still scratching their heads over gravity and its relationship with other EM effect's.

    A few examples of the stubborn nature are as follows: The scientific community:

    Fiercely resisted ultrawideband radar, slandering and libeling its pioneers

    Resisted Mayers original statement of energy conservation; hounded him so much that he attempted suicide and was institutionalized

    Laughed and slandered Ovshinsky on his insane amorphous semi-conductor. Everybody knew a semiconductor had to have a crystalline structure. The Japanese who funded Ovshinsky are still laughing all the way to the bank.

    Made Wegeners name a synonym for utter fool because of his continental drift theory. Why, imagine continents floating and moving! Insane!

    Refused to accept the Aharonov-Bohm effect for 25 years (as pointed out by Feynman). Prior to the MEG, the AB effect appears never to have been applied for COP > 1.0 from two-energy reservoir electrical power systems.

    Uses an EE model that assumes every EM field, EM potential, and joule of EM energy in the universe has been freely created from nothing, by their associated source charges without any energy input. Even very few EE professors are aware of that terrible faux pas of their model. It is not pointed out in any EE textbook, to our knowledge.

    Uses an EE model that assumes the material ether, a flat spacetime, an inert vacuum, and creation from nothing of all EM fields and potentials, all long falsified in physics. These flaws are not pointed out in any EE text or department to our knowledge, and indeed they are hidden from the students.

    Ubiquitously uses the closed current loop circuit in power systems, dooming them to COP < 1.0 and directly causing the present mess of the inadequate, monstrous, fragile, splintered, relatively unstable, and highly vulnerable power grids. This also is directly responsible for the continuing and ever-increasing hydrocarbon combustion, global warming gases, pollution of the planet, and strangling of species.

    Still largely pontificates in official publications that perpetual (uniform) motion is impossible in machines, which is ridiculous since that is merely Newton's first law. A continuous freely working machine is also possible, so long as it freely receives the necessary energy input from its environment (so long as it operates as a NESS system). Examples are the windmill, waterwheel, and solar cell and indeed a hydroelectric power system, if one speaks of the entire system including the river's flow.

    Ridicules anyone who seriously speaks of the active vacuum or active ST curvature as energy reservoirs and environments to be utilized practically even though all EM power systems and circuits are powered by EM energy extracted directly from the local vacuum by the source charges.

    Continues to ruthlessly ignore the impact of the long-discarded Heaviside giant nondiverged energy flow component, for both power systems and antigravity systems.

    Places an iron muzzle on 'out of the box' innovation by professors, grad students, and young post doctoral scientists, particularly in anything smacking of COP > 1.0 EM power systems. They must compete for available funding attached to research packages that come down from on high, with the research already specified. Any professor who really rocks the boat will be either parked or destroyed, as will any grad student or post doc. Science is controlled by controlling its funding. Since its funding is already controlled, our science is already muzzled and constrained with respect to energy research and development.

    T.E.Bearden
    nuclear weapons where obsolete a long time ago, along with particle beam weapons , laser's , and EMP weapons, Scalar inferometers can cut through them like a syth through a haystack. But like with anything we can control its a two edged sword, it can be used for immence good, or the unconceivable opposite.

    "For some time, Russia and several other nations have possessed highly advanced 'extended-electromagnetics' (energetics) weapons of a very novel kind, using a dramatically extended electrodynamics theory ... Most of these energetics weapons are more advanced than what has previously been known to the U.S. military, intelligence and scientific communities ... A major contributing factor holding back U.S. catch-up is that the flawed foundations of Maxwell's 1865 theory have not been changed by the Western scientific community." T.E.Bearden






    examples of local scalar Ionising burst's which force hole's disrupting cloud formation.





    http://www.weatherwars.info/holes01.htm
    "The present is theirs ; the future, for which I really work , is mine." Nikola Tesla
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Forum Isotope (In)Sanity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Mesa AZ
    Posts
    2,699
    Well I have to thank the Russians for all the rain Arizona got last year. More then it has in the last 100 years. Still we are a desert and will always be in a drought.

    One would think this would be very noticeable from space or even radar for that matter. Not to mention being picked up by primitive EM detection devices.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    80
    Chemtrail marker program in action, still not an official word about it.











    A photograph released by NSAS where by the wanted the public to 'count contrails!'






    Chemtrails laid down with the intent of creating high clouds are often delivered at the edge of a sheer zone where the lateral movement of the scalar wave will hold onto the metal component of the chemical mixture then pull out and away perpendicularly a thin shield of cirrus. This cirrus, and the remaining chemtrail cloud, will then take on the shape of the underlying scalar vibrations present in the sky that would be invisible without the presence of this manmade cloud.
    http://www.weatherwars.info/Animatio...rVortex_30.wmv
    "The present is theirs ; the future, for which I really work , is mine." Nikola Tesla
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    Posts
    945
    so it is possible, but a little far fetched. only people who would want to .. are terriosts * stated above!*
    and they neither have the funds or resorces to effect the weather in such a drastic rate....

    (to add humor)

    unless they plan it to rain on the white house. all those gards on the outside will get a bad cold. the terriosts will infiltrate at the exact moment of a sneez! then...

    8) shouldn't of done that... bad humor
    Stumble on through life.
    Feel free to correct any false information, which unknown to me, may be included in my posts. (also - let this be a disclaimer)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    Clarky, either your name is T.E.Bearden, or you appear to be breaching etiquette, in forums such as this, by failing to credit your large cut and paste job in this thread. Those wishing to read the full, and rather whimsical article, may go here: http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/Fact_Sheets/ Fact%20Sheet%20-%20MEG%20-%20How%20it%20works1.doc

    Edit made after the next post: thanks to Clarky for correcting this somewhat confusing oversight.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    80
    Im not breaching ettiquette anymore , the image is credited on scott stevens site. As for the text, im sorry if I havnt made it clear, and its been corrected.
    "The present is theirs ; the future, for which I really work , is mine." Nikola Tesla
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #12  
    Forum Sophomore Phlogistician's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    156
    Tinfoil Hat alert!

    HAARP cannot control the weather. It can excite the ionosphere, and bounce low frequency radio waves into the ground to detect missile silos, but it can't be used as a weather weapon.

    It can only heat the ionosphere, so could at best, cause convection currents, but as weather is a chaotic system, the results would be obviously unpredictable, and that does not make it a good weapon!

    BTW, HAARP isn't unique, ... why not blame the similar array in Norway?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #13  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    74
    Cuba did it with their whether weapon TESLA that was deliver to them from soviet 1976.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #14  
    Forum Cosmic Wizard SkinWalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Grand Prairie, TX
    Posts
    2,377
    Cuba did what, exactly and how do you know it? I'm thinking the source of your information might imply some validity to it. But then again, I'm not even sure what you're referring to with regard to a "weather weapon."
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #15  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    74
    Ok.. sorry I was a bit wrong.. it became operational in 1976..

    http://www.weatherwars.info/katrina.htm
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #16  
    Forum Cosmic Wizard SkinWalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Grand Prairie, TX
    Posts
    2,377
    Right.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #17  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    80
    Quote Originally Posted by Phlogistician
    Tinfoil Hat alert!

    HAARP cannot control the weather. It can excite the ionosphere, and bounce low frequency radio waves into the ground to detect missile silos, but it can't be used as a weather weapon.

    It can only heat the ionosphere, so could at best, cause convection currents, but as weather is a chaotic system, the results would be obviously unpredictable, and that does not make it a good weapon!

    BTW, HAARP isn't unique, ... why not blame the similar array in Norway?
    In regards to the idea of geometrically calculated ionic strikes within the upper atmosphere, you can pattern a signal geometrically.

    So in theory you could create systematic heating that has a knock on effect.. not choatic atall if applied on a large enough scale, not 100% accurate, but you may very well beable to do it accurately enough to induce or encourage a desired effect.

    The upper atmosphere effects the lower atmosphere, with the heating into the upper atmosphere you start to influence behaviour in the lower layers.
    "The present is theirs ; the future, for which I really work , is mine." Nikola Tesla
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #18  
    Forum Sophomore
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    179
    As someone who has been interested in weather for most of my life, I find these claims that people (you know, those people!) are trying to control weather rather laughable.

    First of all is the "evidence" features nothing but ground clutter and range rings on Doppler Radar.

    I've seen ground clutter and what's called verga (I think) in which rain is falling but not reaching the ground.

    Find something a little bit more plausable to believe in please. :P
    http://anomalous.wordpress.com/ - Vist Blog To See Video and Photographic Strange Sh...Stuff.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #19  
    Forum Sophomore
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    179
    haha look at this one.

    http://www.thewebfairy.com/fonebone/...s/52_image.gif

    "The south getting zapped". Whatever that means..
    http://anomalous.wordpress.com/ - Vist Blog To See Video and Photographic Strange Sh...Stuff.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •