This is from "appendix 0" of my download (p278):

APPENDIX 0

Time.

Who proposed time was only a line of events we live in?

Who proposed time was the fourth dimension to the three dimensions of space?

OK, forget “who”.

Let’s define what time IS not what we have assumed it to be.

We know time is like an arrow, going from a start reference to an end reference, and that line represents whatever happened to the 3 dimensions of space. Take the following diagram of 3 dimensional space construct A becoming 3 dimensional space construct B, as indicated by a passage of time, C.

(imagine what it might look like, maybe just look at the download)

Nothing may have happened as a gross observation from A to B other than the passage of time in an otherwise stagnant situation. But, clearly, on the more atomic level, things were happening to suggest time was passing.

Time here is a line.

I am now going to introduce the idea that time is not just a line, but actually a feature of the three dimensions of space. I am going to do this by introducing two new dimensions of time, to give time more depth and breadth, namely the FUTURE dimension of time AND THE PAST. It is a little tricky to draw as a diagram though. Let’s be simple to begin with, and then get more complicated as it may be required for explanation purposes.

Take the following:

(imagine what it might look like, maybe just look at the download)

The system goes from BEFORE to AFTER. “A” was the BEFORE state, and “B” is the AFTER state, compared to BEFORE, and NOW represents the theoretical state of that process of A going to B……….indeed, a very weak description of “time”……..because we know that to label time as one dimensional as either BEFORE in relation to A, a three dimensional space-construct, and AFTER in relation to B, a three dimensional space construct, isn’t improving the theory of time as a one dimensional construct. So, let’s be a little more thoughtful.

Let us say TIME is a line…….a straight line.

(imagine what it might look like, maybe just look at the download)

Now let us say that line is INFLUENCED to travel into the FUTURE “away from” the PAST:

(imagine what it might look like, maybe just look at the download)

Basically, the arrow would tend to move towards AFTER away from BEFORE. And so, in completing the LINE as though influenced by BEFORE and AFTER in such a manner:

(imagine what it might look like, maybe just look at the download)

Time would move as a circle, AWAY from the outer BEFORE zone (time dimension) and towards the inner AFTER zone (time dimension).

THAT’S OUR THEORY OF TIME.

THAT’S ALL IT IS.

NOW what we have to do is work into that theory the 3 dimensions of SPACE.

IF WE CAN DO THAT, and then PROVE we can theorise with this theory of time the PROPER equations for a circle and sphere, we would have PROVED this new theory of time.

This theory has been PROVED.

Now, who is going to challenge the theory, the new theory, of time?

Be warned though, it took me at least 200 or so pages to wire the 3 dimensions of space into this new theory for time.........BUT, all the equations for a circle and sphere for time were achieved.

I have the theory, people.......this is no hoax.