Notices
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Particles

  1. #1 Particles 
    Forum Sophomore
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    143
    Particles should have encoded in them: Isospin, color charge, electric charge, and mass. Strings and points do not do this.

    My particles encodes these. My particles are made from copies of space that transformed into Riemann spheres.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Forum Sophomore
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    157
    Quote Originally Posted by talanum46 View Post
    My particles are made from copies of space that transformed into Riemann spheres.
    Are these particles that you personally own? Where do you keep them?


    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Genius Duck Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,957
    Moved.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Forum Sophomore
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    143
    Quote Originally Posted by Bufofrog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by talanum46 View Post
    My particles are made from copies of space that transformed into Riemann spheres.
    Are these particles that you personally own? Where do you keep them?
    I own them in an intellectual way.


    See:
    https://www.rajpub.com/index.php/jap/article/view/8382
    Last edited by talanum46; March 5th, 2020 at 12:40 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,557
    Just more bullshit from this clown...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    exchemist
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,667
    Quote Originally Posted by PhDemon View Post
    Just more bullshit from this clown...
    One of his posts on another forum, made under the name Willem, elicited the following reply from one reader (not me):

    "That statement is so profoundly absurd and just plain stupid that I think Willem should get an immediate ban, followed by deletion of all his threads and anyone who was unfortunate enough to read this should have electro-shock therapy to erase the memory of what he wrote. This does not even rise to the level of pseudoscience, it is more like stuposcience.

    I am going to stick my tongue into a light socket to try and forget, it might kill me but it is worth the risk.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    17,036
    Quote Originally Posted by talanum46 View Post
    Particles should have encoded in them: Isospin, color charge, electric charge, and mass. Strings and points do not do this.
    If that were the case, string theory would not correctly describe the particles and their interactions. Which it does.

    So just yet another example of you having no clue. Negative clue, even.
    ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Forum Sophomore
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    143
    One may be able to correctly describe, yet not get the underlying details right.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,557
    Dumb as dogshit
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    17,036
    Quote Originally Posted by talanum46 View Post
    One may be able to correctly describe, yet not get the underlying details right.
    That seems a reasonable description of your posts. Especially if you remove the word "correctly".

    Just face it: you don't understand anything about the subjects you post about. So all of your posts are just meaningless nonsense.

    Just stop posting endless drivel.
    ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11  
    Forum Sophomore
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    143
    I can prove it: before last century they computed about steam engines using temperature (thus describing the steam engine correctly) without knowing the underlying cause of temperature.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #12  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,557
    Yes, but the people who designed steam engines were rational, intelligent and relied on observation to come to their conclusions. You are not... You are an idiot simply making stuff up
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 13
    Last Post: June 25th, 2014, 10:08 PM
  2. Seeing particles
    By Darkmatter in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: July 17th, 2012, 04:06 PM
  3. Virtual Particles?
    By GiantEvil in forum Physics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: February 13th, 2011, 04:45 PM
  4. Particles Help
    By xnarutox in forum Chemistry
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: September 13th, 2010, 10:43 PM
  5. Particles
    By verzen in forum Physics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: March 24th, 2010, 03:04 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •