Notices
Results 1 to 36 of 36

Thread: Telepathy

  1. #1 Telepathy 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    172
    A group of international neuroscientists and robotics engineers have discovered for the first time that human brains can indeed ‘talk’ directly to one another, even from thousands of miles away. A brain-to-brain communication study conducted in coordination with Harvard Medical School has proven that extrasensory mind-to mind interaction can happen over great distances by leveraging different pathways in the mind.

    ...the neuroscientific equivalent of instant messaging.

    Perhaps we can ditch our cell phones soon, once we learn how to ‘talk’ straight to our intended recipients using just our minds.Study Proves Extrasensory Mind-to-Mind Interaction at a Distance | The Mind Unleashed


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,763
    Quote Originally Posted by emilito View Post
    A group of international neuroscientists and robotics engineers have discovered for the first time that human brains can indeed ‘talk’ directly to one another
    This is incorrect.
    The communication was not "direct", it used various intermediary equipments.
    And such "communication" as there was was merely one brain ("the "receiver") getting some sort of signal (which meant nothing in real terms) from the "sender".
    The conclusion in that article - "This corroborates findings..." is highly flawed and not at all supported by the results of the actual experiment.


    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    ESP involves the communication of two or more minds without intervening instrumentalities. In this experiment there was direct connection between the two brains, via a variety of equipment. Whatever this was:
    1. It was not ESP.
    2. It totally failed to provide any corroboration of any aspect of ESP.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Moderator Moderator Cogito Ergo Sum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    2,519
    For people who are interested what the fuzz is all about (since the first lines of the O.P. are copy-pasted on various websites), here is the original study (Grau, C. et al., 2014). It is an interesting study, and the realization of B2B communication could lead to more efficient communication, but it is a bit overhyped by all the media outlets (at least, so it seems).
    Last edited by Cogito Ergo Sum; October 5th, 2014 at 12:41 PM.
    "The only safe rule is to dispute only with those of your acquaintance of whom you know that they possess sufficient intelligence and self-respect not to advance absurdities; to appeal to reason and not to authority, and to listen to reason and yield to it; and, finally, to be willing to accept reason even from an opponent, and to be just enough to bear being proved to be in the wrong."

    ~ Arthur Schopenhauer, The Art of Being Right: 38 Ways to Win an Argument (1831), Stratagem XXXVIII.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    172
    Yeah they used a scanner, and a program to translate the consciousness into binary code, then sent the message via email into the other brain. This test fails to explore the direct connection without a computer interface. The ability to send and receive with the mind, or the attention directly, using attention as a connection or gateway directly. The ability to project conscious awareness into other areas. Other tests have been done in this area in other ways thus far that prove awareness can be projected into distant locations to see things unknown, or even never before seen by eyes. But the level of awareness to see and perceive into another's mind has rarely been proven scientifically, and even when proof was given it has been heavily slammed by many people in the sciences. Some experiments done on even average people without training produced positive results in some testings, but I prefer to seek out the trained people, or the gifted ones who have spent much time harnessing and cultivating these abilities, and then examine these findings. Like the CIA projects that are declassified and the Stargate projects.

    On the other hand technology that reads your mind, networks, and commands techs is an amazing step. Think of virtual reality projections. Mindscapes. I think of them both as with a computer interface and without them. Without them for the trained, and with them for the not trained and tech-dependent. Some will someday see that the machine is within your own eyes too, like everything else is, built upon a foundation of the knowledge applied to it's construction, nothing more then a construction of human awareness. Power given to a machine, through your mind, and not to yourself, to witness the machine's marvel and not your own. Meanwhile the machine is doing what your eyes are programmed to see it do. With your intent and with your will, with your knowledge and with your awareness. Good to watch it do things for you yes, but not good to lose sight of this fact that it your application of knowledge and the life you give it that creates this form, this reaction, and not really the 'machine' at all. This is my opinion and experience in life and if you look closely at the double slip experiment you can begin to see this mystery... in... this "light"!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,763
    Quote Originally Posted by emilito View Post
    This test fails to explore the direct connection without a computer interface.
    That would be because all tests for this have shown that there is no "direct connection" from brain to brain.

    The ability to send and receive with the mind, or the attention directly
    And that there is no "ability to send and receive".

    Other tests have been done in this area in other ways thus far that prove awareness can be projected into distant locations to see things unknown, or even never before seen by eyes.
    This is a false claim.
    No tests have proven this.
    Nor even demonstrated it with any reliability whatsoever beyond chance.

    But the level of awareness to see and perceive into another's mind has rarely been proven scientifically, and even when proof was given it has been heavily slammed by many people in the sciences.
    Um, you think it was slammed BECAUSE it wasn't proof possibly?

    Some experiments done on even average people without training produced positive results in some testings
    Only if the facts are ignored.

    but I prefer to seek out the trained people, or the gifted ones who have spent much time harnessing and cultivating these abilities
    There are no people with these abilities, not anyone trained to have them.

    Like the CIA projects that are declassified and the Stargate projects.
    Oh, you mean the project that was shut down because it failed to produce any results? That one?

    On the other hand technology that reads your mind
    There is no such technology.

    I think of them both as with a computer interface and without them. Without them for the trained, and with them for the not trained and tech-dependent. Some will someday see that the machine is within your own eyes too, like everything else is, built upon a foundation of the knowledge applied to it's construction, nothing more then a construction of human awareness. Power given to a machine, through your mind, and not to yourself, to witness the machine's marvel and not your own. Meanwhile the machine is doing what your eyes are programmed to see it do. With your intent and with your will, with your knowledge and with your awareness. Good to watch it do things for you yes, but not good to lose sight of this fact that it your application of knowledge and the life you give it that creates this form, this reaction, and not really the 'machine' at all. This is my opinion and experience in life and if you look closely at the double slip experiment you can begin to see this mystery... in... this "light"!
    What nonsense.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    172
    [QUOTE=Dywyddyr;598993]
    Quote Originally Posted by emilito View Post

    Like the CIA projects that are declassified and the Stargate projects.
    Oh, you mean the project that was shut down because it failed to produce any results? That one?

    On the other hand technology that reads your mind
    There is no such technology.
    then how do explain how the signals were/are communicated into the other brain? Is not the brain sending to the machine, or the machine scanning the brain, sending and translating the data into code, then sending it into the other brain which is then received and processed? Yes it is. Can not the programmed computer know what "Hola" means or translate the consciousness into words as well as learn to convert even visual consciousness and stimulate and form visual imagery? Surely.

    I know many such trained people actually, in my own life, and science has also had phenomenal testing done with some of them. Indeed. From teleportation studies, remote viewing (which is E.S.P.), and other phenomena as well. I'll get to the findings a little later if you can have patience.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    exchemist
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,331
    Quote Originally Posted by emilito View Post
    Yeah they used a scanner, and a program to translate the consciousness into binary code, then sent the message via email into the other brain. This test fails to explore the direct connection without a computer interface. The ability to send and receive with the mind, or the attention directly, using attention as a connection or gateway directly. The ability to project conscious awareness into other areas. Other tests have been done in this area in other ways thus far that prove awareness can be projected into distant locations to see things unknown, or even never before seen by eyes. But the level of awareness to see and perceive into another's mind has rarely been proven scientifically, and even when proof was given it has been heavily slammed by many people in the sciences. Some experiments done on even average people without training produced positive results in some testings, but I prefer to seek out the trained people, or the gifted ones who have spent much time harnessing and cultivating these abilities, and then examine these findings. Like the CIA projects that are declassified and the Stargate projects.

    On the other hand technology that reads your mind, networks, and commands techs is an amazing step. Think of virtual reality projections. Mindscapes. I think of them both as with a computer interface and without them. Without them for the trained, and with them for the not trained and tech-dependent. Some will someday see that the machine is within your own eyes too, like everything else is, built upon a foundation of the knowledge applied to it's construction, nothing more then a construction of human awareness. Power given to a machine, through your mind, and not to yourself, to witness the machine's marvel and not your own. Meanwhile the machine is doing what your eyes are programmed to see it do. With your intent and with your will, with your knowledge and with your awareness. Good to watch it do things for you yes, but not good to lose sight of this fact that it your application of knowledge and the life you give it that creates this form, this reaction, and not really the 'machine' at all. This is my opinion and experience in life and if you look closely at the double slip experiment you can begin to see this mystery... in... this "light"!
    My woo detector has just gone off.

    I think this is going to get moved to Pseudoscience before long.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Life-Size Nanoputian Flick Montana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Flatland
    Posts
    5,437
    Quote Originally Posted by emilito View Post
    I'll get to the findings a little later if you can have patience.
    The longer you wait the more credibility you lose.
    "Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us." -Calvin
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    172
    The double slit... amazing thing. I knew it before it was discovered, saw it being discovered and where it leads. What it proves. An amazing reaction. Kind of like learning how to set up a paradigm, or dimension, and then observing the reaction within the conformity of that space, that set-up, that preordained reaction. Behind the veil is every possibility but the life we give it, oh the values we align do indeed align. It answers many things. Such as how an experience may be one way for someone but another way for someone else. How someone using a specific knowledge of their brain can have better memory function and a higher developed brain region or form then someone who does not possess the same knowledge. Knowledge is power. What we see is what we get you know? But before that happens, before it's observed, touched with our energies, it is potentially anything, and is actually all of those things. We collapse that potential into one predictable outcome. It is a if someone ate some food, while in a garden of knowledge and aligned that knowledge into form. Tada! The world as you now KNOW it to be. Aligned to this order. Particle/wave duality gives us the answers we need to control a super-reaction, to align and predict a full potential possibility, by controlling the position of the observer. When the observer looks to see it as matter then matter he sees, but when he looks to see it as a wave so it is a wave instead, but before that moment it is potentially both. Gives us an open circle, full, complete and collapsed, a cross hair. There was an old commercial I tried to find but couldn't form stride gum I think about different people looking at the same thing and seeing differently. They had this black liquid forming into different formations depending on the connections of the people observing. They said then something like "What do you see it as?" or "How do you see it?", Pretty clever. Wish I could find it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    Even more amazing than the invention of MRI scanners and the internet was the invention of the paragraph. You should try it out sometime.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #12  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    172
    Quote Originally Posted by Flick Montana View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by emilito View Post
    I'll get to the findings a little later if you can have patience.
    The longer you wait the more credibility you lose.
    What a silly thing to say. Obviously if a man presents to the world a truth he said he would bring to it and does so, then credibility is met perfectly. Your own expectations and impatience can only reflect upon your own nature. I did not state a timeline upon which to discredit, nor do I answer to your deadlines.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #13  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,763
    Quote Originally Posted by emilito View Post
    The double slit... amazing thing. I knew it before it was discovered, saw it being discovered
    Unless you're well over 200 years old this is highly unlikely.
    Thomas Young first performed the experiment in 1803.

    An amazing reaction. Kind of like learning how to set up a paradigm, or dimension
    No, it's nothing like "setting up a dimension".

    Particle/wave duality gives us the answers we need to control a super-reaction, to align and predict a full potential possibility, by controlling the position of the observer.
    This is incorrect.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #14  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    172
    Quote Originally Posted by exchemist View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by emilito View Post
    Yeah they used a scanner, and a program to translate the consciousness into binary code, then sent the message via email into the other brain. This test fails to explore the direct connection without a computer interface. The ability to send and receive with the mind, or the attention directly, using attention as a connection or gateway directly. The ability to project conscious awareness into other areas. Other tests have been done in this area in other ways thus far that prove awareness can be projected into distant locations to see things unknown, or even never before seen by eyes. But the level of awareness to see and perceive into another's mind has rarely been proven scientifically, and even when proof was given it has been heavily slammed by many people in the sciences. Some experiments done on even average people without training produced positive results in some testings, but I prefer to seek out the trained people, or the gifted ones who have spent much time harnessing and cultivating these abilities, and then examine these findings. Like the CIA projects that are declassified and the Stargate projects.

    On the other hand technology that reads your mind, networks, and commands techs is an amazing step. Think of virtual reality projections. Mindscapes. I think of them both as with a computer interface and without them. Without them for the trained, and with them for the not trained and tech-dependent. Some will someday see that the machine is within your own eyes too, like everything else is, built upon a foundation of the knowledge applied to it's construction, nothing more then a construction of human awareness. Power given to a machine, through your mind, and not to yourself, to witness the machine's marvel and not your own. Meanwhile the machine is doing what your eyes are programmed to see it do. With your intent and with your will, with your knowledge and with your awareness. Good to watch it do things for you yes, but not good to lose sight of this fact that it your application of knowledge and the life you give it that creates this form, this reaction, and not really the 'machine' at all. This is my opinion and experience in life and if you look closely at the double slip experiment you can begin to see this mystery... in... this "light"!
    My woo detector has just gone off.

    I think this is going to get moved to Pseudoscience before long.
    Naturally you would think this. Even if everything here is actual proven data and experimentation. Yes you are one of the ones to stay in the past, and not advance into the frontiers. One of the nay-sayers who later eat their words, later down the road when the world is proven to be round. Now that its proven to be a multi-potential wave particle instead and is many things, and not just the one singular thing you thought it was you resist and fight the way. Even though it has begun to be proven now just in our age, at the very edges of this day. Free. Water from a stone it is.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #15  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    172
    Quote Originally Posted by John Galt View Post
    Even more amazing than the invention of MRI scanners and the internet was the invention of the paragraph. You should try it out sometime.
    With that kind of focus it is no wonder you are saddened.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #16  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    172
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by emilito View Post
    The double slit... amazing thing. I knew it before it was discovered, saw it being discovered
    Unless you're well over 200 years old this is highly unlikely.
    Thomas Young first performed the experiment in 1803.

    An amazing reaction. Kind of like learning how to set up a paradigm, or dimension
    No, it's nothing like "setting up a dimension".

    Particle/wave duality gives us the answers we need to control a super-reaction, to align and predict a full potential possibility, by controlling the position of the observer.
    This is incorrect.
    For me it is as setting up dimensions. Indeed it is. To clear a space, to free a space, then to form a space to your knowledge, your values, your paradigm. To collapse the wave, then set the position of observation, then observe the particle wave into alignment of my observer body. It an ancient practice used in different cultures. What is it before you look at it, and when you look at it why does it form to what you see and know of? Why does looking at something from a different angle provide a different alignment of energy to a solution or new state of consciousness? Why does one point in existence become two then three, and also add together as one? It's all there in the experiment if you look close. All the possibilities are in alignment until we focus into our own possibility, our own alignment. Then SNAP it appears. We give real to reality. The particle wave reaches every point, and has, is, and yet we only see our own. Think omni. Think of time itself and how it can be perceived in different ways, and thus in each way so is time itself presented, and experienced as such. Think the matrix wisdom you cannot bend the spoon because that is impossible, instead try to see that there is no spoon". Do you see the woo wisdom here? The wave collapses and boom its a spoon again, but when it is not a spoon it is no longer a spoon in the same form. You bend the position of observation to bend the experience, altering the result or reaction. Change the knowledge then you change the form, the experience, and you control the outcome, or the formation of the fluid potential.
    Last edited by emilito; October 5th, 2014 at 02:43 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #17  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,763
    Mods, could we move this out of Biology and to somewhere more appropriate?
    Like Pseudo or Trash.
    Thanks.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #18  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,763
    Quote Originally Posted by emilito View Post
    For me it is as setting up dimensions.
    Right.
    So what you're saying here is that you don't know what a dimension is.

    It an ancient practice used in different cultures.
    Nope.

    Why does looking at something from a different angle provide a different alignment of energy
    It doesn't.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #19  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    172
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by emilito View Post
    For me it is as setting up dimensions.
    Right.
    So what you're saying here is that you don't know what a dimension is.

    It an ancient practice used in different cultures.
    Nope.

    Why does looking at something from a different angle provide a different alignment of energy
    It doesn't.
    I said I set my own value, my own measurements in other words. I can see the dimensions of everything, anything, as well as alter them, erase them, reform them, leave them to go somewhere else, merge, etc.

    Many cultures do yes. You seem often to deny everything, all truth, as if you seem to know otherwise, as always, and yet are wrong in your demands. One culture of ancient Indians practice setting the positions of their energy bodies, and their dreaming bodies, in order to enter into the dreaming alignments of their bodily faced positions. Indeed a form of prophecy. Or knowing the world you are within. Kind of like setting the probabilities and rearranging them, eliminating some, or all others even but one. Very controlled mastery they sought. They referred to some of these positions as different 'gaits'. I liked that term when i heard it for the reason of gate and gait combined. It is to say the famous quote "the communication you intend is the communication you receive". More culture studying the same phenomena, even western this time I think even. It is to say blatantly "What you seek you shall also find". Or the famous one "beauty is in the eye of the beholder":. Can you see the essence of these statements? The knowledge within them and how they apply to what I am saying? Can you see the culture in it? What happens when you sow seeds of evil in your fertile field the Bible asks? When you give power and trust and faith to evil knowledge and design? It asks right? It says you reap what you sow right, and not to follow or trust that alignment doesn't it? More culture, ancient culture saying the same things exactly. Studying the same potential of the observer. The famous "You make your own heaven or hell" right? The infamous mind over matter philosophy. the law of attraction clearly applies as well so long as you understand it that is. More. I could go on forever. But that will suffice to make my point I think. Yet I think you will somehow resist.

    So you are saying Einstein was wrong when he said "No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it."

    If it doesnt change when you look at it, then why does the wavelength collapse upon being observed? Why does it form to your own alignment when you look at it? It sees you some suspect too.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  21. #20  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    172
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Mods, could we move this out of Biology and to somewhere more appropriate?
    Like Pseudo or Trash.
    Thanks.
    what a discussion about actual science is too much for your brain to handle? It is all about actual proven scientific findings afterall is it not? so what is the problem here?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  22. #21  
    exchemist
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,331
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Mods, could we move this out of Biology and to somewhere more appropriate?
    Like Pseudo or Trash.
    Thanks.
    Snap: just reported, with identical suggestions, before I saw your post.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  23. #22  
    Moderator Moderator Cogito Ergo Sum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    2,519
    I am currently sending telepathic messages to the moderators with the question if they can relocate this thread to another, more fitting, subforum.
    "The only safe rule is to dispute only with those of your acquaintance of whom you know that they possess sufficient intelligence and self-respect not to advance absurdities; to appeal to reason and not to authority, and to listen to reason and yield to it; and, finally, to be willing to accept reason even from an opponent, and to be just enough to bear being proved to be in the wrong."

    ~ Arthur Schopenhauer, The Art of Being Right: 38 Ways to Win an Argument (1831), Stratagem XXXVIII.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  24. #23  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,763
    Quote Originally Posted by emilito View Post
    what a discussion about actual science is too much for your brain to handle? It is all about actual proven scientific findings afterall is it not? so what is the problem here?
    No, it's not about "actual proven scientific findings".
    It started with a false claim, linked to an article that came to false and unfounded conclusions and went downhill from there.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  25. #24  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    172
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by emilito View Post
    what a discussion about actual science is too much for your brain to handle? It is all about actual proven scientific findings afterall is it not? so what is the problem here?
    No, it's not about "actual proven scientific findings".
    It started with a false claim, linked to an article that came to false and unfounded conclusions and went downhill from there.
    Oh yes I know all downhill. Unbounded horizons, freedom, transformation of physical matter into waves, and unbridled potential, is surely downhill for you. The freedom to deny a form of knowledge to see it as something different is quite appalling i know. You must only see it in one way am I right? And the way you see the free path i lay out is ''downhill''. Your freedom is thus measured to you as being 'downhill'. Your own judgement of a free path.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  26. #25  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,326
    nuttier than squirrel shit...Trash please...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  27. #26  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    172
    If you look closely you can see telepathy in everything, in everywhere, staring at you from all around you. A relationship you have within you and with everything in the universe. An aware connection. It is as they say in the double slit experiments and the light experiments they now have. It is as if reality sees you, and knows what to do when you look at it, looking at you, looking at it. They say that in some of the latest light data that the interaction, interference that takes place is as if they are totally aware of each other. Makes sense to me because reality aligns to the form intended, the bonds created, everything has within it information or wavelengths, light retains all information it contacts, because it illuminates and retains data. Just like awareness retains memory, it knows what it retains, what it sees. You are always sending signals out into the environment all around you all the time, depending an what and how you think of something. It is an active relationship that happens right now. Just the fact that a machine can be made to read your thoughts and translate them and send them to other people shows that our thoughts connect and enter into the environment and are sent to different places. It shows that thoughts can enter into the physical world, and be seen by the physical world too. The woo, the trick, is that you think the machine is doing it for you. You should see what my machines can do, or not do, for me. Tell me this before the machine was made to do this was the potential there? What else is there, as man and as machine? Some try to block man while only supporting machine. Baad. Man imagine machine, man intend machine, man make machine. Human have memory, man make machine with memory. man have knowledge, man make machine with knowledge. man have eyes, man make machine with eyes. it goes on. we invest. One day man will see, and some have now, that the machine is sustained right now, by your relationship you have built with it. It is synchronicity. The power you give something, the knowledge you apply is the attraction you manifest. The ability to 'enchant' something (woo i know) is no different then the ability to program something using binary code. You apply your own active values only, and apply 0 to the rest. Or collapse your wave function. Now direct it to the form you want, the values you begin to explore, to expand upon, and into, and allow reality to flow into the new alignment. Veeeeery magical. And very real. And thank heavens for heaven. Imagine only earthly knowledge growing forever. yuk. i love earth but it must spin on. let grow different fruit and new fruit too, thus life give and create life. Some call it the power of now, and letting go the past too. Very ingrained in our culture.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  28. #27  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,326
    yep, squirrel poop has nothing on this guy, when he walks into a room people with nut allergies go into shock...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  29. #28  
    Life-Size Nanoputian Flick Montana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Flatland
    Posts
    5,437
    Speaking on behalf of culture, I apologize for being unaccepting of unsupported gibberish and unfounded conclusions that fall outside the realm of reality. We're very sorry. Now go away.
    Last edited by Flick Montana; October 5th, 2014 at 05:32 PM.
    "Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us." -Calvin
    Reply With Quote  
     

  30. #29  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,034
    Quote Originally Posted by emilito View Post
    If you look closely you can see telepathy in everything, in everywhere, staring at you from all around you. A relationship you have within you and with everything in the universe. An aware connection. It is as they say in the double slit experiments and the light experiments they now have. It is as if reality sees you, and knows what to do when you look at it, looking at you, looking at it. They say that in some of the latest light data that the interaction, interference that takes place is as if they are totally aware of each other. Makes sense to me because reality aligns to the form intended, the bonds created, everything has within it information or wavelengths, light retains all information it contacts, because it illuminates and retains data. Just like awareness retains memory, it knows what it retains, what it sees. You are always sending signals out into the environment all around you all the time, depending an what and how you think of something. It is an active relationship that happens right now. Just the fact that a machine can be made to read your thoughts and translate them and send them to other people shows that our thoughts connect and enter into the environment and are sent to different places. It shows that thoughts can enter into the physical world, and be seen by the physical world too. The woo, the trick, is that you think the machine is doing it for you. You should see what my machines can do, or not do, for me. Tell me this before the machine was made to do this was the potential there? What else is there, as man and as machine? Some try to block man while only supporting machine. Baad. Man imagine machine, man intend machine, man make machine. Human have memory, man make machine with memory. man have knowledge, man make machine with knowledge. man have eyes, man make machine with eyes. it goes on. we invest. One day man will see, and some have now, that the machine is sustained right now, by your relationship you have built with it. It is synchronicity. The power you give something, the knowledge you apply is the attraction you manifest. The ability to 'enchant' something (woo i know) is no different then the ability to program something using binary code. You apply your own active values only, and apply 0 to the rest. Or collapse your wave function. Now direct it to the form you want, the values you begin to explore, to expand upon, and into, and allow reality to flow into the new alignment. Veeeeery magical. And very real. And thank heavens for heaven. Imagine only earthly knowledge growing forever. yuk. i love earth but it must spin on. let grow different fruit and new fruit too, thus life give and create life. Some call it the power of now, and letting go the past too. Very ingrained in our culture.
    My brain melted after reading that.

    For your sake, I hope it was a love letter in disguise and you are severely stoned!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  31. #30  
    Forum Professor astromark's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    1,015
    This is really sad. I see a idea tabled that has not a single thread of facts found in it. The imaginings of a unproven notion.
    `~ No proofs of message sent from brain to brain across and without contact known.. No actual proofs offered.
    No communication was shown..
    Have I missed something ? No. Try this HOMMMmmm... calling moderators ( use the force [ report ] OH !) This is rubbish.
    Wait, there's more;
    ~ From half way around the world I call into action the forces of darkness to ascend upon this idea and deal to it a fatal blow.. In to the trash bin it must go.. because without a actual experiment showing proofs of purpose we have nothing.
    ~ I have not reported this post or thread.. lets see if the mods get the message by magic ? Pfft
    Reply With Quote  
     

  32. #31  
    WYSIWYG Moderator marnixR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Cardiff, Wales
    Posts
    5,810
    very little biology content, if any
    move to pseudo
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." (Philip K. Dick)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  33. #32  
    Theatre Whore babe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Resident of Big Island of Hawai'i since 2003, and in Bayside, Ca. since 1981, Humboldt since 1977
    Posts
    13,149
    SIR DUCKY!!! LET'S MIND RELATE!!

    OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMM

    NO I do not eat worms!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  34. #33  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,763
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    SIR DUCKY!!! LET'S MIND RELATE!!
    Whut?
    Aaargh!
    /Runs away.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  35. #34  
    Theatre Whore babe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Resident of Big Island of Hawai'i since 2003, and in Bayside, Ca. since 1981, Humboldt since 1977
    Posts
    13,149
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    SIR DUCKY!!! LET'S MIND RELATE!!
    Whut?
    Aaargh!
    /Runs away.
    don't be such a twit!

    OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMM

    I get lots more feathers....and your right duck breast is being auctioned for the betterment of man kind..... try to get rehatched there buddy.... VERY EVIL GRIN your feathers are getting old and your duck breast is equal to JERKY!

    *ducking* *snicker*
    Reply With Quote  
     

  36. #35  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Reading
    Posts
    66
    Pure plop, science has proved that telepathy is a dud to put it politely.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  37. #36  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    Quote Originally Posted by EMR15 View Post
    Pure plop, science has proved that telepathy is a dud to put it politely.
    You can't generally prove a negative. Science has shown that the evidence thus far presented and examined scientifically has been inadequate to demonstrate the existence of telepathy. That is different from proving that it does not exist.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. Artificial Telepathy
    By Sci-fi guy in forum Pseudoscience
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: September 16th, 2012, 11:24 AM
  2. Telepathy - how it works?
    By VictorHedman in forum Pseudoscience
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: November 17th, 2011, 03:57 AM
  3. Telepathy - how it works?
    By VictorHedman in forum Behavior and Psychology
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: October 21st, 2011, 10:49 AM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •