Notices
Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: THE SOLUTION ! HOW WE CAN PROVE THAT EINSTEIN WAS WRONG !!!

  1. #1 THE SOLUTION ! HOW WE CAN PROVE THAT EINSTEIN WAS WRONG !!! 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    31
    HOW WE CAN PROVE THAT EINSTEIN WAS WRONG USING A SPIMPLE INTERFEROMETER!

    Sirs (referring to Universities, researchers etc),


    Why are you spending huge amounts of money in various complex experiments for the verification of the Relativity Theory, such as the Gravity Probe b experiment, etc, etc, etc)?

    The solution is simple!


    THE SOLUTION:

    In your laboratory, by using a simple interfometer that costs little money (see my experiment 3 at www.tsolkas.gr) it will immediately and with a 100% certainty be proven whether the Ether exists in nature or not and, consequently, if the whole Relativity Theory (Special and General) is correct or not!!!



    Sincerely, my question is as follows:

    Haw can’t you, the great Universities, Professors etc, see this simple “solution”?


    I am sorry to say that this fact will be quoted in the history of Physics and that the future Physicists will be laughing while drinking their coffee or tea…!!!

    Regards,


    CHRISTOS A. TSOLKAS


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2 Re: THE SOLUTION ! HOW WE CAN PROVE THAT EINSTEIN WAS WRONG 
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    Quote Originally Posted by tsolkas-1
    HOW WE CAN PROVE THAT EINSTEIN WAS WRONG USING A SPIMPLE INTERFEROMETER!
    If you take as much care over the construction of your experiments as you do over the construction of your sentences, then Einstein remains quite safe.

    Where may we obtain this spimple intereferometer? Is is a simple one, with a pimple on one end?


    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    oh my self not the crackpot again.
    Einstein has been right this far and most likly will be right with gravity probe B.
    And if it were as simple as you claim to disprove einstein you can be sure scientists has already thought of it a dozen times before

    say after me "I am NOT smarter than SCIENTISTS and defenitly NOT EINSTEIN"
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Forum Senior miomaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    302
    I beleve there to be something like the string theory. (while it was just proven with math)
    If this thoery is wright than einstein was wrong.(I think)

    A question, there is this famous example, with a peace of cloth a ball and marbles. It is sayed that (in this example) space(cloth) is bent though the ball, while the marbles are pulled to the ball because of the bending.
    How is this possible without gravety(cince gravety is the bending and not the pull)?
    I haven't come to fight my word, but to find the truth.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    If this thoery is wright than einstein was wrong.(I think)
    nope, it unites einstein and QM. doesnt go against any of them
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6 Re: THE SOLUTION ! HOW WE CAN PROVE THAT EINSTEIN WAS WRONG 
    New Member pariah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by Ophiolite
    If you take as much care over the construction of your experiments as you do over the construction of your sentences, then Einstein remains quite safe.
    I agree with Ophiolite; you cannot even explain your ideas in a coherent manner. Is your first language english?

    On a sidenote, you're completely wrong. Look up a little thing called Bell's Theorem.
    "He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would suffice. This disgrace to civilisation should be done away with at once. Heroism at command, senseless brutality, deplorable love-of-country stance, how violently I hate all this, how despicable and ignoble war is; I would rather be torn to shreds than be a part of so base an action! It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder." - Albert Einstein
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Guest
    Those were the words of Ophiolite I believe, I think you chopped out the wrong part of the quote...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Forum Senior miomaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    302
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    If this thoery is wright than einstein was wrong.(I think)
    nope, it unites einstein and QM. doesnt go against any of them
    very good, so my theory about timegravety is pausable(PAUSABLE not directly possible, Im working on evidence and proof)
    thanks a bundle Zelos.
    I haven't come to fight my word, but to find the truth.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    New Member pariah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by miomaz
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    If this thoery is wright than einstein was wrong.(I think)
    nope, it unites einstein and QM. doesnt go against any of them
    very good, so my theory about timegravety is pausable(PAUSABLE not directly possible, Im working on evidence and proof)
    thanks a bundle Zelos.
    You mean plausible?
    "He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would suffice. This disgrace to civilisation should be done away with at once. Heroism at command, senseless brutality, deplorable love-of-country stance, how violently I hate all this, how despicable and ignoble war is; I would rather be torn to shreds than be a part of so base an action! It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder." - Albert Einstein
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10 Re: THE SOLUTION ! HOW WE CAN PROVE THAT EINSTEIN WAS WRONG 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by pariah
    Quote Originally Posted by Ophiolite
    If you take as much care over the construction of your experiments as you do over the construction of your sentences, then Einstein remains quite safe.
    I agree with Ophiolite; you cannot even explain your ideas in a coherent manner. Is your first language english?

    On a sidenote, you're completely wrong. Look up a little thing called Bell's Theorem.
    Is that you, toast?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11 Re: THE SOLUTION ! HOW WE CAN PROVE THAT EINSTEIN WAS WRONG 
    New Member pariah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by LeavingQuietly
    Quote Originally Posted by pariah
    Quote Originally Posted by Ophiolite
    If you take as much care over the construction of your experiments as you do over the construction of your sentences, then Einstein remains quite safe.
    I agree with Ophiolite; you cannot even explain your ideas in a coherent manner. Is your first language english?

    On a sidenote, you're completely wrong. Look up a little thing called Bell's Theorem.
    Is that you, toast?
    No, I do not know of this toast. I'm just an overly-inquisitive geologist/internet addict.
    "He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would suffice. This disgrace to civilisation should be done away with at once. Heroism at command, senseless brutality, deplorable love-of-country stance, how violently I hate all this, how despicable and ignoble war is; I would rather be torn to shreds than be a part of so base an action! It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder." - Albert Einstein
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #12  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    967
    Alright, cause you had the same avatar. Then I know, thank you.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #13 Re: THE SOLUTION ! HOW WE CAN PROVE THAT EINSTEIN WAS WRONG 
    Forum Masters Degree
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Detroit Metropolitan area
    Posts
    565
    Quote Originally Posted by tsolkas-1
    HOW WE CAN PROVE THAT EINSTEIN WAS WRONG USING A SPIMPLE INTERFEROMETER!

    Sirs (referring to Universities, researchers etc),


    Why are you spending huge amounts of money in various complex experiments for the verification of the Relativity Theory, such as the Gravity Probe b experiment, etc, etc, etc)?

    The solution is simple!


    THE SOLUTION:

    In your laboratory, by using a simple interfometer that costs little money (see my experiment 3 at www.tsolkas.gr) it will immediately and with a 100% certainty be proven whether the Ether exists in nature or not and, consequently, if the whole Relativity Theory (Special and General) is correct or not!!!



    Sincerely, my question is as follows:

    Haw can’t you, the great Universities, Professors etc, see this simple “solution”?


    I am sorry to say that this fact will be quoted in the history of Physics and that the future Physicists will be laughing while drinking their coffee or tea…!!!

    Regards,


    CHRISTOS A. TSOLKAS
    Einstein is wrong about a few things like his mass/energy formula, his collapse of a static (Steady State) universe, his curvature of space that causes light to bend (gravity bends the light) and possibly others.

    NS
    Real science is objective, not subjective
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #14  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    mike youre wrong not him
    einsteins E=MC² is true and proven beyond any doubt, atleast among sane people

    Steady state universe was a flawn idea and he admited it as "my lifes biggest misstage"

    curvature of space that causes light to bend (gravity bends the light) and possibly others
    that is also where youre wrong he was right here aswell and its also proven beyond doubt. mike if youre gonna play among the big guys try atleast by one and not a stupid kid
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #15  
    Forum Bachelors Degree
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    405
    I've "understood" Einstein for 25 years, or so I thought. It wasn't actually until late 2004, however, that I saw a documentary about the laws of physics that I finally realised I had not understood Einstein at all. I had not understood the rubber sheet universe, I had not understood light being "bent by gravity". Both the path of light around a large gravitational object and the force of gravity itself are actually explained by the curvature of a four-dimensional space time continuum, and that it is this continuum that is distorted by large masses giving us the effects of gravity - curved paths - on objects of mass and radiation of no mass alike.

    The weird thing is, without Einstein we would have spent most of the 20th century finding all sorts of weird phenomena which were hard to explain, from apparently duplicated galaxies, right up to the time on satellites being wrong. But Einstein figured it all out when we actually didn't have anomaly one, except for the Mitchelson-Morley experiment on the speed of light.


    Mr Tsolkas, you might do better if you began by not using every single crackpot cliché in your submission.

    There needs to be some kind of reference for us to determine whether the Theory of Relativity really does state that there will be no shift of the diffraction fringes. For myself, I'm not certain what specifically is claimed by Relativity when the light is travelling through media, and what this means for the time dilation effect - or is light travelling through media simply bounced back and forth while still travelling at full c in the interstices?
    "It is comparatively easy to make clever guesses; indeed there are theorems, like 'Goldbach's Theorem' which have never been proved and which any fool could have guessed." G.H. Hardy, Fourier Series, 1943
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #16 Re: THE SOLUTION ! HOW WE CAN PROVE THAT EINSTEIN WAS WRONG 
    Forum Ph.D. Wolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    969
    Quote Originally Posted by tsolkas-1
    HOW WE CAN PROVE THAT EINSTEIN WAS WRONG USING A SPIMPLE INTERFEROMETER!

    blah blah blah

    Regards,

    CHRISTOS A. TSOLKAS
    Wait, wut? I thought the scientific community moved past Einstein's "ether" years ago?

    Either way, if such a proof is so simple, doesn't it seem kinda strange that the thousands of scientists out there in the world haven't done this already? (Assuming it makes any sense, of course.)

    I mean...I.......ugh....*shakes head, walks away*
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •