Gravity's diffuseness makes it hard to theoretically analyze compared to electromagnetism (EM). Standard theory of course views gravity as not being a force but rather being due to Einsteinian curvature of "space-time." EM is viewed as being due to electron flow. However, physicists admit they do not really understand these two phenomena.
As an ether-theorist with a more unifying model of these forces, I believe that gravity is the same phenomenon as EM, with gravity's electro- component being under-fired due to its more diffuse origin.
What about this as a new way to think about the two phenomena. -If one considers structural features of certain biological bodies, especially of some of the softer plant species, one can appreciate that some of them have disproportionately wide transverse structure (which aids in functionality), with their associated vertical structure being much less bulky by comparison. Therefore, the distribution of internal energic forces is disproportionate from the standpoint of horizontal-to-vertical. -If (basically EM) energy were the only force acting, the horizontal force vectors of the wide part of the plant would overwhelm the plant's structural integrity; atomic and molecular connections would come unspliced. The plants must have evolved in a way that balanced the force vectors. This would appear to be a point in favor of gravity being the same kind of force as EM, and that gravity is what is balancing the horizontal and vertical force vectors.
The best example of the type of plant structure would be a flower bud with a wide transverse diameter (of course advantageous for pollination). The energic activity in flower buds is very high, and the structure soft.