Notices
Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: This is not a sensation

  1. #1 This is not a sensation 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    45
    Speed-of-light experiments give baffling result at Cern.
    BBC News - Speed-of-light experiments give baffling result at Cern

    This is not a sensation. Einstein was right. This result is explained in terms of learned knowledge. The speed of light is limited to particles with mass, and photons. This is typical of the particle-wave. The speed of the wave is limited. Neutrino has no mass. The neutrino is not a typical particle. Its wave-like properties are not associated with a mass. Therefore the speed of neutrinos in a quantized space-time may be greater than the speed of light.

    The principle of relativity is a fundamental property of the quantized space-time.
    This confirms that Einstein was right. This phenomenon and others have been predicted the theory of Superunification:

    http://theoryofsuperunification-leonov.blogspot.com/2011/07/video-tests-2009-of-quantum-pulsed.html
    http://theoryofsuperunification-leonov.blogspot.com/
    http://leonov-leonovstheories.blogspot.com/

    LHC resultscast doubt on supersymmetry theory.
    http://www.thescienceforum.com/new-h...ry-theory.html

    I'm surprised at the conservatism of theoretical physicists, my colleagues. I advise them not to panic and let them begin learning the theory of Superunification. The theory of Superunification gives the answers to all questions.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    10
    I don't want to hijack multiple threads but I really want a few questions answered that I have about this.

    Firstly what exactly is a neutrino? Is it like an atom?
    Second...if these neutrinos are capable of travelling faster than the speed of light what does that really mean? How does it actually affect us? I know for learning purposes and knowledge we're constantly researching and evaluating but how do we actually use this information?

    These are probably really stupid questions for someone to ask so you'll have to excuse my ignorance but I'm very interested in learning further information regarding this so any reply would be appreciated.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Comet Dust Collector Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    2,848
    post deleted
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Forum Masters Degree
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    738
    Quote Originally Posted by no1raniuk View Post
    I don't want to hijack multiple threads but I really want a few questions answered that I have about this.
    You shouldn't post your questions in multiple threads -- that's just sort of rude/impatient. And the answers to your question (What is a neutrino?) can be found easily online.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    45
    You shouldn't post your questions in multiple threads -- that's just sort of rude/impatient. And the answers to your question (What is a neutrino?) can be found easily online.
    The answer to question (What is a neutrino?) is not as simple as you imagine. On the Internet you can find only the properties of neutrinos. The structure of the neutrino can be seen only in the theory of Superunification. I have to give a link to my book, because this material is not online:
    “Chapter 4. The quantised structure of the electron and positron. The neutrino”.
    From the book:
    1. Leonov V. S. Quantum Energetics.Volume 1. Theory of Superunification.
    Cambridge International Science Publishing, 2010, 745 pages.
    2. V.S. Leonov. Quantum Energetics :Theory of Superunification.
    Viva Books, India, 2011, 732 p.
    This is not advertising the book. This is a reference to Chapter 4.
    Last edited by Leonov; September 23rd, 2011 at 10:42 AM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Forum Masters Degree
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    738
    Quote Originally Posted by Leonov View Post
    The answer to question (What is a neutrino?) is not as simple as you imagine. On the Internet you can find only the properties of neutrinos. The structure of the neutrino can be seen only in theory Superunification. I have to give a link to my book, because this material is not online:
    With all due respect, he should start with the basics and go from there. Wiki is always a good place to start. To jump to your books without the slightest knowledge of physics (his admission) would be difficult at best.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Forum Radioactive Isotope Paleoichneum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Washington State, USA
    Posts
    4,561
    To be honest I am tempted to report Leonov's post as personal advertizing that does not actually add to the thread.
    If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world. -Thorin Oakenshield

    The needs of the many outweigh the need of the few - Spock of Vulcan & Sentinel Prime of Cybertron ---proof that "the needs" are in the eye of the beholder.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Comet Dust Collector Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    2,848
    That's the same as all of his other posts, so what's the point?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Moderator Moderator TheBiologista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,569
    Quote Originally Posted by Leonov View Post
    Speed-of-light experiments give baffling result at Cern.
    BBC News - Speed-of-light experiments give baffling result at Cern

    This is not a sensation. Einstein was right. This result is explained in terms of learned knowledge. The speed of light is limited to particles with mass, and photons. This is typical of the particle-wave. The speed of the wave is limited. Neutrino has no mass. The neutrino is not a typical particle. Its wave-like properties are not associated with a mass. Therefore the speed of neutrinos in a quantized space-time may be greater than the speed of light.

    The principle of relativity is a fundamental property of the quantized space-time.
    This confirms that Einstein was right. This phenomenon and others have been predicted the theory of Superunification:

    http://theoryofsuperunification-leonov.blogspot.com/2011/07/video-tests-2009-of-quantum-pulsed.html
    http://theoryofsuperunification-leonov.blogspot.com/
    http://leonov-leonovstheories.blogspot.com/

    LHC resultscast doubt on supersymmetry theory.
    http://www.thescienceforum.com/new-h...ry-theory.html

    I'm surprised at the conservatism of theoretical physicists, my colleagues. I advise them not to panic and let them begin learning the theory of Superunification. The theory of Superunification gives the answers to all questions.
    Really Vladimir, must you use absolutely every opportunity to advertise your own website and theory? Have you ever made a post on these forums in which you just have a discussion with our users without preaching to them about your ideas? This is supposed to be a discussion forum and I for one am getting very, very sick of this crap.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    45
    Why do not you spend a discussion? Where questions to me?

    Originally Posted by MeteorWayne
    That's the same as all of his other posts, so what's the point?
    The whole point is that I observe the degradation of the fundamental science. The fundamental science has stopped in the 20th century. Now we observe progress of applied science and technology. In field of fundamental research there are attempts to create a series of hypotheses that are not confirmed experimentally. This is the theory of supersymmetry, string theory and the Higgs boson. Higgs boson is not observed experimentally. Quantum chromodynamicsis an unfinished theory. Supersymmetry theory has failed. String theory has no experimental verification methods. I've fixed a critical situation in fundamental research.

    It took me only four quarks in order to understand how to construct the diversity of the material world. Only four quarks. It is four integer quarks: two electric quarks (+1 e and -1e) and two magnetic quarks (+1 g and -1g). In 1996 I opened the quantum of space-time (quanton). Quanton includes in the structure four integer quarks: two electric quarks (+1 e and-1e) and two magnetic quarks (+1 g and-1g). In fact, in order to isolate the space-time quantum, it is necessary to isolate its minimum volume which cannot be divided any further.

    Only four coordinates points 1, 2, 3, 4, are required for this purpose. One point is simply a point, two points can be used to draw a line, three points to produce a surface, and four point to isolate the volume. The four coordinates points are geometry. In transition from geometry to physics, the points must be replaced by physical objects, i.e., quarks.

    The calculated diameter of the quanton is very small, of the order of 10(-25 degrees)m. The calculations show that the quantised space-time, as the carrier of the superstrong electromagnetic interaction, has a colossal energy capacity, approximately 10(73 degrees) J/m3. If only one m3 of the energy of cosmic vacuum is activated, this would be sufficient for generation of another universe as a result of a big bang.

    The quantised space-time is also a weightless primary matter thus far free from mass (elementary particles). As shown in the theory of Superunification , the quantised space-time is the carrier of the superstrong electromagnetic interaction, the fifth force which was the subject of research in the 20th century. To combine the known four forces (electromagnetism, gravitation, nuclear and weak forces), the superforce was necessary. Only the superforce can combine other, weaker forces in itself. This is the golden rule of physics which will not be discussed here.

    However, whether a big bang would occur, is the problem which requires constant study. It is not possible to release the energy of the quantons by splitting the quanton into individual charges because in nature there are no forces capable of this. The absence of free magnetic charges (Dirac monopoles) confirms this.However, how can we explain the presence of free electrical charges in nature?

    In particular, the presence of the free electrical charges determines the entire variety of ponderable matter. This is possible only in the case of the electrical asymmetry of quantised space-time. However, the structure of the quantum is characterised by electromagnetic symmetry, i.e., by two pairs of electrical and magnetic charges, balancing each other. Evidently, the problem of the generation of electrical asymmetry of the universe can also be answered by the inflationary theory. Apparently, in the period of expansion of the universe, the emission of quantons was accompanied by the emission of the electron neutrinos containing a pair of electrical quarks (charges).

    I am unable to explain the theory of Superunification in my comments on the forum. But I'll deal with the popularization of the theory of Superunification.
    I am disappointed a conservatism of theoretical physicists. Quantum of space-time (quanton) was opened 15 years ago. But this discovery does not interest anyone. I hear it's just pseudoscience. But I did my job for the benefit of human civilization. I have built a good laboratory as once Edison, Nikola Tesla. I have good employees. The government refused to help me. But I have created a quantum engine and spent a lot of different experiments in the management gravitation and electromagnetism.

    Quanton have an alternative to the Higgs boson. If the Higgs boson still cannot find, but the theory of Superunification and quanton has experimental confirmation. Results of a number of experiments published in my books.

    I ask the moderator to return my thread on the old place for further discussion.





    Last edited by Leonov; September 24th, 2011 at 02:25 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11 Degradation of the fundamental science 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    45
    I observe the degradation of the fundamental science. The fundamental science has stopped in the 20th century. Now we observe progress of applied science and technology.In field of fundamental research there are attempts to create a series of hypotheses that are not confirmed experimentally. This is the theory of supersymmetry, string theory and the Higgs boson. Higgs boson is not observed experimentally. Quantum chromodynamics is an unfinished theory. Supersymmetry theory has failed. String theory has no experimental verification methods. I've fixed a critical situation in fundamental research.

    It took me only four quarks in order to understand how to construct the diversity of the material world. Only four quarks. It is four integer quarks: two electric quarks (+1 e and -1e) and two magnetic quarks (+1 g and -1g). In 1996 I opened the quantum of space-time (quanton). Quanton includes in the structure four integer quarks: two electric quarks (+1 e and -1e) and two magnetic quarks (+1 g and -1g). In fact, in order to isolate the space-time quantum, it is necessary to isolate its minimum volume which cannot be divided any further.

    Only four coordinates points 1, 2, 3, 4, are required for this purpose. One point is simply a point, two points can be used to draw a line, three points to produce a surface, and four point to isolate the volume. The four coordinates points are geometry. In transition from geometry to physics, the points must be replaced by physical objects, i.e., quarks.

    The calculated diameter of the quanton is very small, of the order of 10 (-25 degrees) m. The calculations show that the quantised space-time, as the carrier of the superstrong electromagnetic interaction, has a colossal energy capacity, approximately 10 (73 degrees) J/m3. If only one m3 of the energy of cosmic vacuum is activated, this would be sufficient for generation of another universe as a result of a big bang.

    The quantised space-time is also a weightless primary matter thus far free from mass (elementary particles). As shown in the theory of Superunification, the quantised space-timeis the carrier of the superstrong electromagnetic interaction, the fifth force which was the subject of research in the 20th century. To combine the known four forces (electromagnetism, gravitation, nuclear and weak forces), the superforce was necessary. Only the superforce can combine other, weaker forces in itself. This is the golden rule of physics which will not be discussed here.

    However, whether a big bang would occur, is the problem which requires constant study. It is not possible to release the energy of the quantons by splitting the quanton into individual charges because in nature there are no forces capable of this. The absence of free magnetic charges (Dirac monopoles) confirms this.However, how can we explain the presence of free electrical charges in nature?

    In particular, the presence of the free electrical charges determines the entire variety of ponderable matter. This is possible only in the case of the electrical asymmetry of quantised space-time. However, the structure of the quantum is characterised by electromagnetic symmetry, i.e., by two pairs of electrical and magnetic charges, balancing each other. Evidently, the problem of the generation of electrical asymmetry of the universe can also be answered by the inflationary theory. Apparently, in the period of expansion of the universe, the emission of quantons was accompanied by the emission of the electron neutrinos containing a pair of electrical quarks (charges).

    I am unable to explain the theory of Superunification in my comments on the forum. But I'll deal with the popularization of the theory of Superunification. I am disappointed a conservatism of theoretical physicists. Quantum of space-time (quanton) was opened 15 years ago. But this discovery does not interest anyone. I hear it'sjust pseudoscience.

    But I did my job for the benefit of human civilization. I have built a good laboratory as once Edison,Nikola Tesla. I have good employees. The government refused to help me. But I have created a quantum engine and spent a lot of different experiments in the management gravitation and electromagnetism.

    Quanton have an alternative to the Higgs boson. If the Higgs boson still cannot find, but the theory of Superunification and quanton has experimental confirmation. Results of a number of experiments published in my books:

    (Spam removed)


    I do not see discussion of the theory of Superunification. I beg to ask me any questions.

    Last edited by Lynx_Fox; September 24th, 2011 at 07:33 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #12  
    Moderator Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    8,306
    Leonov,
    Stop spamming your books, blogs and other publications. This is not the place to do free advertising for your stuff.

    This is a warning.

    Lynx (mod)

    Meteorologist/Naturalist & Retired Soldier
    The Holy Land is everywhere Black Elk
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #13  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by Lynx_Fox View Post
    Leonov,
    Stop spamming your books, blogs and other publications. This is not the place to do free advertising for your stuff.

    This is a warning.

    Lynx (mod)

    My books, my experiments were very dangerous for little minds who cannot understand the latest scientific discoveries. Degradation of the fundamental science is an obstacle to the development of civilization. If it were not of these obstacles, then people would have flown at the Moon and Mars. Moon should be colonized.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #14 Crisis of fundamental science 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    45
    I observe the degradation of the fundamental science. The fundamental science has stopped in the 20th century. Now we observe progress of applied science and technology. In field of fundamental research there are attempts to create a series of hypotheses that are not confirmed experimentally. This is the theory of supersymmetry, string theory and the Higgs boson. Higgs boson is not observed experimentally. Quantum chromodynamics is an unfinished theory. Supersymmetry theory has failed. String theory has no experimental verification methods. I've fixed a critical situation in fundamental research. Degradation of the fundamental science is an obstacle to the development of civilization.

    I developed a theory of Superunification to stop the crisis of fundamental science. Unfortunately,the moderator of forbidding giving links to my books, websites and experiments. He believes that the recent fundamental discoveries are spam. It is a violation of democracy in the free forum. I advise you to type the key phrase"theory Superunification" to understand what is at stake.

    I am willing to discuss on this topic.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #15  
    Moderator Moderator TheBiologista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,569
    Quote Originally Posted by Leonov View Post
    I observe the degradation of the fundamental science. The fundamental science has stopped in the 20th century. Now we observe progress of applied science and technology. In field of fundamental research there are attempts to create a series of hypotheses that are not confirmed experimentally. This is the theory of supersymmetry, string theory and the Higgs boson. Higgs boson is not observed experimentally. Quantum chromodynamics is an unfinished theory. Supersymmetry theory has failed. String theory has no experimental verification methods. I've fixed a critical situation in fundamental research. Degradation of the fundamental science is an obstacle to the development of civilization.

    I developed a theory of Superunification to stop the crisis of fundamental science. Unfortunately,the moderator of forbidding giving links to my books, websites and experiments. He believes that the recent fundamental discoveries are spam. It is a violation of democracy in the free forum. I advise you to type the key phrase"theory Superunification" to understand what is at stake.

    I am willing to discuss on this topic.
    It's not the links that are the problem. It's your refusal to talk about anything other than your own work. This forum is not a platform for your self-promotion and our users are not here to satisfy your vanity.

    Also- this is a privately owned forum. You are permitted to use it under conditions, just as you would be permitted to use a lecture hall or theater under conditions. Freedom of speech doesn't come into it. If you don't like the conditions that you have implicitly agreed to here, feel free to go post somewhere else.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #16  
    Moderator Moderator TheBiologista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,569
    I've merged three threads on this topic. Leonov- please post any further arguments here rather than creating new threads in New Hypotheses.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. Ahh the sweet burning sensation
    By (In)Sanity in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: November 17th, 2004, 07:02 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •