Notices
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: The use of invention ideas, the GE

  1. #1 The use of invention ideas, the GE 
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    72
    I posted many inventions that are worth a lot of money. Since they come from God then nobody is allowed exclusive rights, nobody is allowed to monopolize in the use of the ideas.
    I know many think I am crazy. I just cannot explain all my ideas here, and in any case they would perhaps make me look crazier. Also knowledge is not a commodity. if you look at my social and science progress comment yuou will see the most important thing is a person do their own research and advance alone: critisize their own proposed ideas.
    We divide our attention between the power and precision of any act. Until and if you notice that in your life, then you wont come to the conclusion there is another system of measuring the universe. The usual system is quantitative but the alternative system is qualitative measurment of the universe.
    mass is a quality and one of the divisions of our attention and power is the other division of our attention and both terms should be in the general equation: so it is power = mv-squared, where v is v(one) plus v(two) since no speed exists as a pure single velocity, everying is going fast-slow fast-slow even if the actually difference is impossible to measure its still there. Power is(v1 -v2) time (v1 + v2)
    -- these terms simplify the GE. Roughly, the velocity addition we call 'acceleration' and the velocity subtraction we call momentum or force.
    But the GE is useless without the nest, since in nature all three terms are variables, the nest tells us how the three variables vary. So in fact, the GE is useless alone and describes only one element (the ring) of a whole system: nest. We fixed the constant of one variable so we could use calculus on the other two, but nature varies all three. So even though we found the nest as the MPT curve of electric engineerring, we fudged it.
    When we look for a nest in phenomenon, like maybe the variation of the stregth of an acid according to concentration in water, then really the nest helps us learn more about the phenomenon under study: this case acids. So its not really a case of intelligent sampling to derive the nest so much as finding the range of the nest in the acid concentration and hence discovering how many rings are in the acids range.


    I am seeking supporters for a qualitative basis of science, not quantative. Quality: precision,shape, color, pitch. Quantity: power,size,brightness,volume. A quality can be found as a ratio of quantities. Mass is a quality.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    72
    PS I suppose there is both quantity and quality assessment of the universe but a problem develops when we over-emphasize quantity because then we may say all measured things are quantities when such is not the case. Mass can be measured and it is a quality.


    I am seeking supporters for a qualitative basis of science, not quantative. Quality: precision,shape, color, pitch. Quantity: power,size,brightness,volume. A quality can be found as a ratio of quantities. Mass is a quality.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •