Thread: Genesis Geology

Greetings,


If we take a close look at the Theory of Pangaea, an ignore the biblical scriptures, we have one substantial flaw. This fundamental flaw of the theory currently supported by science is that to Bring all the continents together in accordance with the tectonic histories recorded by the ocean floor,

we must connect Antarctica to Africa prior to South America.

The theory of Pangaea is over 80 years old, and it has not once been revised but simply compiled upon by scientists.

The fact is the biblical scriptures accurately record the true geological history of the planet. Earth having been defined as dry land, a title stolen by scientists for the name of the planet. Justly the term the Earth has four corners remains accurate: Africa, Europe, Oceania and America - Antarctica is not dry.


If you make a fist - pretending your thumb and pinky also connect on the outsides - you have a remote interpretation of true geological history.
Label your thumb Oceania, your index Indonesia, your middle India, your ring Africa, and your pinky Americas, Antarctica imaginably projected from your palm.

By opening your hand, you increase the volume of your fist, but subsequently for within itself. The spaces between your fingers are now the ocean floors. The Earth upon the palm of the Lord God.


On the third day the Lord said, "Let the waters be gathered into one place, and let the dry land appear." : "When the Lord drew a circle upon the face of the deep" provers 8.27: "by his knowledge the depths were broken up." proverbs 3.20
Praise Is to the Lord, who has never hidden his works.



By reducing the scale of the planet tot he surface area of dry land, connecting all coasts you may submerge the Earth, and accurately create a model as described in the first paragraph of the Holy Bible, The most accepted doctrine on earth; Muslims, Jews, Christians, and others.

It states in the First paragraph that the soils and water predate the first days of recorded creation, at the beginning of the 6000sum years. This accounts for soil, due to erosion, and geological dating.

Praise be to the Lord God, Jesus Christ whom is glorified in all his works.


God Bless each of you
as he does everyone,
especially those who love him.[/b]

SO out of curiosity do you have any physical evidence you would like ot add to this thread to make it actually viable?

By not wrapping south America around Africa both north and south but instead pushing South and North America together first, and pressing the Cape Horn into the Ross Sea of Antarctica you accurately follow the maps of the ocean floors.

The entire Pacific sea is lined with marks indicating quite factually that America was just as soon connected to Asia in the west as to Africa in the East.

Malaysia connects to the east coast of India in Perfect unison. Rangoon to Calcutta | Surat to Nellore | Singapore "to" Sri Lanka


In addition. It works.

Originally Posted by A.Proof

The theory of Pangaea is over 80 years old, and it has not once been revised but simply compiled upon by scientists.

by making this statement you admit that you have not bothered to find out about the change from continental drift to plate tectonics and any advances since then

why should we listen to you if from the first few paragraphs you prove yourself to be devoid of any real knowledge on the topic ?

How do these people find this site?

Marnix,

the theory of Pangaea is still widely accepted and unchanged.

if I am wrong could you explain how?

I've moved this nonsense to Pseudoscience so someone less familiar with our forum doesn't get the idea that we would seriously entertain nonsensical notions like this one.

Please. Continue with the pseudoscience.

Originally Posted by A.Proof

the theory of Pangaea is still widely accepted and unchanged.

What do you understand the theory of Pangea to be. Our percpetion of Pangea has most certainly undergone substantial changes over the last eighty years,

Originally Posted by A.Proof

if I am wrong could you explain how?

Probably an inadequate intellect.

Originally Posted by A.Proof

Marnix,

the theory of Pangaea is still widely accepted and unchanged.

if I am wrong could you explain how?

It is still in place as it is supported by vast quantities of Geological, paleontological, paleobotanical, geochemical, and paleomagnetic evidence.

What disproves it, taking into account the current knowledge of plat tectonics.