Thread: New model on driver of climate.

New climate research. Some models previously thought not to be predictive are satisfactory for predicting global systems such as climate change.

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/...104.0061v1.pdf

Moved to pseudoscience so others can at least enjoy the April fools joke even if posted late.

This is clearly wrong, since there is no hockey stick.

Originally Posted by Bunbury

This is clearly wrong, since there is no hockey stick.

it is in the references.

See also here:

http://ing.dk/artikel/117953-aprilsn...k-og-videnskab

I petition to have the thread moved back to environmental science. Climate is a serious subject that affects us all. If exploding snowmen can avert a global catastrophe, 'tis better to look foolish and save ourselves than otherwise.

Originally Posted by free radical

Originally Posted by Bunbury

This is clearly wrong, since there is no hockey stick.

it is in the references.

See also here:

http://ing.dk/artikel/117953-aprilsn...k-og-videnskab

I petition to have the thread moved back to environmental science. Climate is a serious subject that affects us all. If exploding snowmen can avert a global catastrophe, 'tis better to look foolish and save ourselves than otherwise.

Indeed:

Tal har uigenkaldeligt dog hurtigt punkteret, når. Det bacon overraskede i en pressemeddelelse så findes nullet Lurpak unsalted butter faktisk slet.

And besides, there is no ignominy in being in the Pseudoscience section. Galileo was once here, as climate science deniers like to ceaselessly remind us.