Notices
Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: A rope between Sun and the Galactic Core

  1. #1 A rope between Sun and the Galactic Core 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    225
    with a rope, we can make a small ball revolve around us.

    in the theory of active resonance, there is a rope between sun and the galactic core, which is the reason why sun revolves around the GC. it is a energy line (Graviton line), it's very huge.

    Our Earth is going to cross it in recent years. This is the reason of global warming and extreme weather.

    We should also pay attention to the ropes between sun and jupiter, sun and saturn.

    Jin Guangnian


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    Give a man enough rope and he may hang himself.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    225
    Give a man enough rope and he may hang himself.
    I'm not making joke, It's about lives. there is a energy line between sun and the GC. I found a lot of proofs which show how this line affects us.

    If you realise how many peoples have died for this line, you won't think it's funny.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    tomjin there is no evidence for the existence of the line. Your speculation is based upon your poor understanding of physics and astronomy, combined with a superior ability to deceive yourself. Your proposals are ludicrous, your ideas unsubstantiated, your claims are laughable. Based upon your contributions here your ideas are totally without merit.

    Worse than this your nonsense could mislead the unsuspecting lurker. There is danger here, but it is all of your making. Your silly pronouncements are corrupt. Please grow up, or get an education, or resume taking your medication, or all three.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    gravity does not act in a "line"
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Forum Radioactive Isotope MagiMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,440
    How wide is this rope supposed to be and why aren't we crossing it every single year? The Earth's orbit is fairly consistently in the same plane, and the angular velocity of the sun around the galactic core is very slow, so unless you imagine it's literally a one-dimensional line, we'd have been passing over it every year for the last several thousand years (or more) if at all.

    Other than that, yeah, this is a complete misunderstanding of how gravity works.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Your Mama! GiantEvil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Vancouver, Wa
    Posts
    2,290
    This rope, the end tied to the Sun. Doe's it smoke?
    I was some of the mud that got to sit up and look around.
    Lucky me. Lucky mud.
    -Kurt Vonnegut Jr.-
    Cat's Cradle.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    225
    tomjin there is no evidence for the existence of the line.
    I have found more than 20 proofs that the line really exist. If I like, I can find 1 thousand more.

    tip: May 22, 1960, the most powerful Earthquake recorded. (Chile Earthquake). Earth hit "Sun-Jupiter line", "Sun-Saturn line" and "Sun-GC line" almost at the same time.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    225
    gravity does not act in a "line"
    I bet you don't know how gravity works. Curved space (the theory of relativity) or Graviton (Quantum Physics).

    without a rope (Graviton line) between Sun and Earth, why Earth revolves around Sun.

    Please don't tell me the reason is Earth loves Sun.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    225
    How wide is this rope supposed to be and why aren't we crossing it every single year? The Earth's orbit is fairly consistently in the same plane, and the angular velocity of the sun around the galactic core is very slow, so unless you imagine it's literally a one-dimensional line, we'd have been passing over it every year for the last several thousand years (or more) if at all.
    good question. in fact, Earth doesn't cross the "GC-Sun line" every year. Earth cross it once in every 5125 years.

    the smallest angle between "Sun-Earth line" and "GC-Sun line" changes every year. It's from 0 degree to 2 degree (or 3 degree). When the angle is 0 degree, Earth will cross "GC-Sun line" . It's very hard to observe, because the angle is too small. But I believe ancient Mayan found it out. (they have very advanced astromony and they know what alignment means to them).

    My theory (the theory of active resonance) is very similar to Christiaan Huygens'. If you understant his, you will understand mine.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    225
    This rope, the end tied to the Sun. Doe's it smoke?
    I don't know.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #12  
    Moderator Moderator TheBiologista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,564
    Tomjin, what unique predictions does the "graviton line" model of gravity make? What does it explain that is not explained by other theories of gravity?

    Also, by what exact mechanisms does gravity- specifically during alignments- influence climate and tectonics?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #13  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    225
    Tomjin, what unique predictions does the "graviton line" model of gravity make?
    I still wish to spend more time to study the theory of active resonance, so I don't want to make prediction at this moment.


    What does it explain that is not explained by other theories of gravity?
    the law of universal gravitation isn't a theory of gravity. Because it doesn't tell us where gravity comes from. It just tried to give an equation to calculate gravity.

    I don't believe gravity come from curved space. the theory of relativity mislead us. I'm going to tell why.

    The gravity comes from exchanging Graviton between 2 objects (Quantum Physics), it's reasonable. but Quantum Physics doesn't tell us how to exchange Graviton.

    Rene Descartes、Christiaan Huygens、Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Their theory about gravity is very good, which is widely accepted 300 years ago. the theory of active resonance is very similar to theirs.


    Also, by what exact mechanisms does gravity- specifically during alignments- influence climate and tectonics?
    Graviton line can affect us in different ways. For example, it's a energy line, when Earth cross it, Earth will become warmer. When Earth crosses "Sun-Jupiter line", it a kind of alignment.

    Actually, It's not the moment to understand my theory. You should review the law of Universal Gravitation first. Mr Newton doesn't know where gravity comes from, is that possible for him to get a correct equation to calculate Gravity.

    f=GMm/R^2. there are 2 masses in this equation. this equation is useless if we don't know the masses. 200 years ago, in a very simple exp, Mr Henry Cavendish weighted the mass of Earth through 4 lead balls. (he actually weighted the masses of Sun and other planets as well).

    In 17 century, no one would believe human being can calculate the mass of Earth through 4 lead balls. But now, almost no one is sceptical about it. You have to look into this exp first.


    Rene Descartes、Christiaan Huygens、Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz's theory of gravity was defeated by the law of universal gravitation.


    That's why we still don't know the meaning of alignment, we still don't know the reason of Earthquake.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #14  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    Quote Originally Posted by tomjin2000
    That's why we still don't know the meaning of alignment, we still don't know the reason of Earthquake.
    we are very comfortable in knowing the reason for earthquakes and are getting ever closer to being able to predict them with precision.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #15  
    Moderator Moderator TheBiologista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,564
    Quote Originally Posted by tomjin2000
    Tomjin, what unique predictions does the "graviton line" model of gravity make?
    I still wish to spend more time to study the theory of active resonance, so I don't want to make prediction at this moment.
    A scientific theory makes predictions. How can you expect anyone here to be convinced of the value of your hypothesis if you have no such predictions?

    Quote Originally Posted by tomjin2000
    What does it explain that is not explained by other theories of gravity?
    the law of universal gravitation isn't a theory of gravity. Because it doesn't tell us where gravity comes from. It just tried to give an equation to calculate gravity.

    I don't believe gravity come from curved space. the theory of relativity mislead us. I'm going to tell why.

    The gravity comes from exchanging Graviton between 2 objects (Quantum Physics), it's reasonable. but Quantum Physics doesn't tell us how to exchange Graviton.

    Rene Descartes、Christiaan Huygens、Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Their theory about gravity is very good, which is widely accepted 300 years ago. the theory of active resonance is very similar to theirs.
    I asked you what your model explains that others do not. You responded by telling me that your model is a model to calculate gravity, what you think the underlying mechanism is and then named-checked a bunch of people. This doesn't even vaguely answer my question. You might has well have listed your favorite ice cream flavors for all the relevance your reply had to my question.


    Quote Originally Posted by tomjin2000
    Also, by what exact mechanisms does gravity- specifically during alignments- influence climate and tectonics?
    Graviton line can affect us in different ways. For example, it's a energy line, when Earth cross it, Earth will become warmer.
    By what mechanism? The sun heats the Earth by firing photons at it in huge numbers. That's a mechanism, though dumbed down. What is an energy line and by what mechanism does it increase the temperature of matter?

    Quote Originally Posted by tomjin2000
    When Earth crosses "Sun-Jupiter line", it a kind of alignment.
    I know what an alignment is, thank you.

    Quote Originally Posted by tomjin2000
    Actually, It's not the moment to understand my theory. You should review the law of Universal Gravitation first. Mr Newton doesn't know where gravity comes from, is that possible for him to get a correct equation to calculate Gravity.

    f=GMm/R^2. there are 2 masses in this equation. this equation is useless if we don't know the masses. 200 years ago, in a very simple exp, Mr Henry Cavendish weighted the mass of Earth through 4 lead balls. (he actually weighted the masses of Sun and other planets as well).

    In 17 century, no one would believe human being can calculate the mass of Earth through 4 lead balls. But now, almost no one is sceptical about it. You have to look into this exp first.


    Rene Descartes、Christiaan Huygens、Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz's theory of gravity was defeated by the law of universal gravitation.
    None of this addresses the question of mechanism. I get that Newton's model was also short in that respect, but his was a useful model that made predictions that held true when tested (albeit with inaccuracies). A model that succeeds Newton and Einstein must at the very least be useful in that sense, but you seem oddly reluctant to pin your colors to the mast and be held to a prediction.

    Quote Originally Posted by tomjin2000
    That's why we still don't know the meaning of alignment, we still don't know the reason of Earthquake.
    We understand the cause of earthquakes quite well. We have models which make specific predictions (and I'm not talking about forecasting). Where specifically do they fall short? Where are they inaccurate? Please don't make an argument regarding forecasting, that's not what I'm on about at all.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #16  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    225
    A scientific theory makes predictions. How can you expect anyone here to be convinced of the value of your hypothesis if you have no such predictions?
    In the theory of active resonance, the gravitational storm underground is the reason of earthquake, flood, sandstorm, typhoon and so on. I wish to build a system which can predict all natural disasters. We study satellite cloud images to predict typhoon and flood. I want to do the same thing.



    What does it explain that is not explained by other theories of gravity?
    in my theory, the reason of gravity is active resonance. which is not explained by any other theory. (Ether is a very important concept in my theory)


    By what mechanism? The sun heats the Earth by firing photons at it in huge numbers. That's a mechanism, though dumbed down. What is an energy line and by what mechanism does it increase the temperature of matter?
    Energy line (Graviton line) works in a very different way from Sun energy. It can cause gravitational storm underground, which will cause flood、Earthquake、snowstorm and so on.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #17  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    225
    if you want to understand the theory of active resonance, you have to go back to the very beginning.

    we all know there are 2 masses in the law of universal gravitation. Without knowing the masses of Earth、Sun、Jupiter and so on, this law is useless.

    You have to understand that Henry Cavendish could't weight the mass of Earth through 4 lead balls. if you don't understand this, I can't tell the mechanism of my theory. It's meaningless.

    a very simple exp, 4 lead balls, then he magicly got the mass of Earth. I know almost every scientist on our planet believe his exp. But I don't.

    After understanding the mistakes in this exp, you are going to understand the real atom model, real Earth structure, Galactic long bar, Alien on Europa (a satellite of Jupiter) and so on.

    4 lead balls and the mass of Earth, You have to look into it.

    Jin Guangnian
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •