Notices
Results 1 to 26 of 26

Thread: Unified Field Theory (revised/polished 2010)

  1. #1 Unified Field Theory (revised/polished 2010) 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    Unified field theory? (Revised/Polished 2010)


    Atom is just a shell, 99.999999999999% vacant, and inside that shell dwells electrons and nucleus, re- protons and neutrons. Still, protons and neutrons are just inner shell and dwelling inside such inner shell are the incredible quarks, of different colors, actually indestructible, inseparable positive and negative, an inherent force which creates strong nuclear force and weak force, called asymptotic freedom, inside the nucleus. How the positive and negative creates strong nuclear force and weak asymptotic freedom is this original explanation: It is like a bar magnet with inseparable positive and negative on whose farthest distant ends of the bar magnet is the strongest force while distance closer toward the dead middle of the bar magnet, the force becomes weaker, weakest.. It is like earth on whose surface, farthest distance from the interior center, has the strongest gravity while distance closing toward the dead interior center of earth is the weakest gravity, even “floating”, free of gravity.. In like manner with quarks, re- connected quarks , at its outermost distance from the interior center of quarks is the strongest force, call that “strong nuclear force” while the distance, closer, toward the center of quarks is the weakest force, free willing, call that “asymptotic freedom”. It is added with all due respect to the three Physicists who won the Novel Prize for physics, 2004 for the discovery of weak “asymptotic freedom”, but consider the meritorious explanation as stated above, complete explanation for both strong force and asymptotic freedom, as continuation of that discovery. It is known that exchanges are happening inside the atom, inside the nucleus: neutrons exchange/release its negative to proton to complete positive and negative in proton, and the difference of neutron is released as negative electron, and positive neutrinos. Another exchanges is proton, either negative-starved or not, steals/sucks nearby electron. All of these exchanges/transfer/stealing/ decaying, etc., considered due to “nuclear weak force”, obey the unwritten law of opposite law of opposite: unlike-attract, like-repulse to CREATE EQUAL POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE in quarks, protons, neutrons, and electrons, but such acts is simply the action of positive and negative to equalize itself, to balance positive to negative in atom, in electron, in proton-neutron, in quarks! Before it was thought that protons consist of all positive, thus binding is extremely difficult, and that it is gluon that binds them together. But the development in science shows that protons and neurons of nucleus consist of quarks of different colors, actually positive and negative! Even electron is complete in itself, with positive and negative, hard to accept at the moment But note, as in macrocosm, so in microcosm: Atom is patterned after the solar system, the sun as the nucleus, the planets as the rotating electrons: both have positive and negative, even in human beings, in each, male and female. Why is neutron slightly larger than proton? It means more positive and negative of the nucleus completely intersect one another to become one, call it neutron thus it is slightly larger than the proton which is not completely intersected but as a whole, the positive and negative of protons which intersects with neutron seek stated equality, as the quarks of both show.

    Does monopole exist? Is electron a monopole? Is proton a monopole? Is neutron a monopole? Is black hole a monopole? This may be controversial but here is continuing progress of science: The unwritten law of opposite is unerring, just like the law on conservation: There must be positive and negative, equal, balance to one another. The long time concept that in the atom, positive proton equalizes/balances negative electron is not applicable anymore. The mass of proton (not to mention the mass of the neutron) is awesome, not the same, does not balance the mass of electron. The discovery of quarks that there are equal positive and negative inside the nucleus proves that nucleus is complete in itself, equal positive and negative. Such as the case, electron is complete in itself too, with balanced positive and negative. It is the spin, the direction that makes positive and negative, just like electric motor that can be made to rotate clockwise or counter clockwise. Earth, itself, flips its polarity. There is no such thing as monopole because positive and negative intersects one another indivisibly, even intersects completely as to become one, complete as neutron star, black hole, but in that, positive and negative is never lost nor destroyed. That is why neutron stars that spin unbelievably close to 1/3 the speed of light ejects gargantuan electrical magnetic emission, actually electrical magnetic positive and negative emission.

    It is found at LHC that collisions of nuclei at extreme temperature, re- 4 trillion degree, some 250,000 hotter than the sun, quarks and gluons attained plasma state, and found out to be frictionless plasma liquid state, called QGP. At such temperature - collision, quarks and gluons release tremendous energy, and as stripped of their energy, the inseparable quarks and gluons, like collapsing star, constrict inward into smaller sized super-heat liquid state, at its outermost layer is the “strong nuclear force” , at the center, free willing, call it, “asymptotic freedom”. As the LHC showed, further, quarks and gluons, the smallest elementary particles, of which the universe was constructed, cannot be separated from one another, against prediction that quarks and gluon should separate at that supra-hot temperature! Here is a proof that quarks and gluons are one and the same:. Both have charges, both have inherent inseparable positive and negative. Gluon appears actually hypothetical, the action of positive of one quarks to “glue”, to bind the negative of other quarks because quarks, itself, is complete, have inherent positive and negative that align and bind, call that binding “gluon”.

    Atom, as stated, is like the solar system, 99.9999999999999% vacant, with the sun as nucleus and rotating planets as electrons, and just like the solar system, in such incredible wide vacuum of the atom world, separating and connecting the nucleus to the fast-rotating electrons, called gravitational field is created electro-magnetism, just like rotation of planets around the revolving sun creates electro-magnetism in the gravitational field. Gravity on earth is incredibly weak, trillion times weaker than a magnet lifting a nail, we call it simply as gravity that it appears differently from magnet (and strong nuclear force) but basically all are the making of the one and the same positive and negative. Such is the all-encompassing scope of positive and negative in the atom world, in quantum microcosm scale. On the macrocosm scale, earth, for instance, is a solidified matter, composed of stated fundamental atoms, nucleus and electrons. It is stated that matter and energy are convertible from one to the another, neither one is lost nor destroyed. Further the law should state:: positive and negative property is neither lost nor destroyed in matter nor in energy. THIS IS THE UNIFICATION OF FORCES: all four fundamental forces, namely, strong nuclear force, weak nuclear force, gravity, electro-magnetism and gravity are unified into such indestructible, inseparable, indivisible, intersecting, equal inherent positive and negative property from microcosm scale to macrocosm scale, this unifying positive and negative property or force that attracts and repulses, re-unlike attracts, like repulse. On surface on earth, re-gravity, such positive and negative manifests supra- weak, in magnetism, it manifests very strong, inside the nucleus of atom, it becomes nuclear, in its active states, due to rotation, inside and outside the nucleus of atom, it creates electro-magnetism.. But all are the different manifestations of one and the same positive and negative.

    jsaldea12
    Philippine Copyright 2010
    By jose s. aldea


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    Observation incorporated above.

    jsaldea12


    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    Observation consolidated above.

    jsaldea12
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    Observation consolidated above.

    jsaldea1 12
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    Because it can neither be lost nor destroyed…

    Even if the LHC could attain temperature of 10TeV at speed of light (99.99999%), and produced in the proton to proton collision, not quarks-gluon plasma “liquid state” but separated quarks-gluon plasma “ gaseous state”, still in each of that separated most fundamental particles, there is positive and negative that can neither be lost nor destroyed.

    And each stated separated particle is actually quark, none gluon. Perhaps, this is the reason why only one quark in that collision is accounted, thus spin of 30%.. Because the collision of proton to proton resulted in collision of quark to quark, not mass quark to massless gluon. Thus the combined spin of the two quarks could be accelerating to 90% up.

    What is tickling is where is now the Big Bang? Because It appeared that Big Bang was conceived originated from a point the size of proton. But LHC is now breaking proton to proton…and nothing like that is happening.

    I could be wrong… correct me.…

    Jsaldea12
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    Because it can neither be lost nor destroyed....


    The Large Hadrons Collider (LHC) has reached temperature of4TeV and almost speed of light in attaining proton to proton collision which is actually quark to quark collision, not quark to non-existing gluon. Perhaps, this is the reason why the accounted spin is 30% because only one colliding quark is considered, none of the other colliding quark. Thus the combined spin of the two collided quarks could be accelerating to 90% up.

    In normal temperature on earth, quarks are linked group by positive-negative at center of nucleus. In temperature of 4TeV and 10TeV, quarks are in liquid state and gaseous state, respectively, flexible, stretchable but still connected to one another by positive to negative in the confinement of the nucleus, that the more stretching, the more strength is created at the farthest stretch, but as compressed toward the center, the weaker the force, just like the middle of bar magnet, just like gravity at center of earth.

    Even if the LHC could attain temperature of 10TeV at speed of light (99.99999%), and produced in the proton to proton collision, not quarks-gluon plasma “liquid state” but separating quarks-gluon plasma “ gaseous state”, still in each of that separating (appeared separating but actually stretching) gaseous state QGP, has positive and negative that connect one another because positive and negative is neither lost nor destroyed..

    What is tickling is where is now the Big Bang? Because It appears that Big Bang was conceived originated from a point the size of proton. But LHC is now breaking proton to proton at temperature and at speed of light comparable to that at earliest dawn…and nothing like that is happening.

    Somewhere between the lines of above paragraphs, I could be wrong… correct me.

    Jsaldea12
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7 Re: Unified Field Theory (revised/polished 2010) 
    . DrRocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,486
    Quote Originally Posted by jsaldea12
    Unified field theory? (Revised/Polished 2010)

    Now I understand the expression "polshing a turd".
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    Stick to issue. If there is anything you like to question or doubt or want to be clarified, let us have it. In the meantime, Merry X’mas and Happy New Year.

    Jsaldea12
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Valencia - Venezuela
    Posts
    45
    There is a new theory that unifies the fundamental forces:

    it is in the page web: www.teoria-espinoza.es.tl calls herself Theory of the Short Microscopic Circuit

    This theory says that Á = É. Ú where the Á is the force of attraction, É it is the energy and Ú it is the force of the Veegtrón. The force of the Veegtrón is calculated in the following way: separating the original formula would be this way: Ú = Á / É has the value of Á and the value of É.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    Response to peer victorespinoza:

    Very interesting. We share in our search. Actually, everything in the universe is vibration, vibration that has inherent positive and negative, matter energy, gravity, gravitational field, spacetime, have different vibrations, grosser, finer vibrations, but all emanating from one and same vibration that is why there is change/conversion from matter, to energy, and to a finer element, which to you is called fifth force, to me it is the Source Force, call it “Creative Energy”. The law of conservation is stated like this: conversion is matter to energy to matter and vice versa , but the complete law is as follows: matter to energy and a conversion to that source force, and back. (This is noted in nuclear explosion in which matter is converted into energy but a small portion of such energy never return to matter. This is what gives mass, scientists at LHC are feverishly, earnestly searching, it is called higgs boson, or “Gods particle.” This Creative Force that gives, too, life force in us..fortunately or unfortunately with operating inherent positive and negative, good or bad, etc. .. expanding..religions throughout the world call it Spirit.

    Jsaldea12
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    I may not have a Ph.D. in physics…but the terminology used to describe what is inside the atom, particularly, the nucleus, the quarks, are quite mind mixing….up, down, gluon, W & Z, etc. when in reality, all of these can be simplified into fundamental positive and negative, because at the bottom, it is positive and negative that is operating inside the atom. Each quark is complete in itself, with positive and negative, There is no thing as up quark alone, a monopole. Quarks create a field, like gravitational field, particularly when stretched, if that is what is called gluon, then it is correct, but that field is created by the positive and negative binding of quarks. W & Z, too, is a field, a non-contact force, like gravitational field, with positive and negative, such field, as wide proportionately like the gap that exist between earth and the sun, is created by the positive to negative binding of the nucleus and the rotating electrons. This is just a suggestion…simplification.

    Jsaldea12
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #12  
    . DrRocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,486
    Quote Originally Posted by jsaldea12
    I may not have a Ph.D. in physics…but the terminology used to describe what is inside the atom, particularly, the nucleus, the quarks, are quite mind mixing….up, down, gluon, W & Z, etc. when in reality, all of these can be simplified into fundamental positive and negative, because at the bottom, it is positive and negative that is operating inside the atom. Each quark is complete in itself, with positive and negative, There is no thing as up quark alone, a monopole. Quarks create a field, like gravitational field, particularly when stretched, if that is what is called gluon, then it is correct, but that field is created by the positive and negative binding of quarks. W & Z, too, is a field, a non-contact force, like gravitational field, with positive and negative, such field, as wide proportionately like the gap that exist between earth and the sun, is created by the positive to negative binding of the nucleus and the rotating electrons. This is just a suggestion…simplification.

    Jsaldea12
    Still polishing ?
    http://superchargedcamira.files.word...g-turd-big.jpg
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #13  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    I got a feeling you agree with me. It is not polishing, just consolidating exhaustive research for just some 10 years. Happy New Year in advance.

    Jsaldea12
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #14  
    . DrRocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,486
    Quote Originally Posted by jsaldea12
    I got a feeling you agree with me. It is not polishing, just consolidating exhaustive research for just some 10 years. Happy New Year in advance.

    Jsaldea12
    You have apparently forgotten your medication.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #15  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    I have brought these highly defensible observations to CERN, referred to this forum, hoping for response, none so far.

    jsaldea12.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #16  
    Your Mama! GiantEvil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Vancouver, Wa
    Posts
    2,279
    DrRocket said;
    Is polishing a turd like putting lipstick on a pig?
    http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/myth...ng-a-turd.html
    I was some of the mud that got to sit up and look around.
    Lucky me. Lucky mud.
    -Kurt Vonnegut Jr.-
    Cat's Cradle.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #17  
    . DrRocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,486
    Quote Originally Posted by GiantEvil
    DrRocket said;
    Is polishing a turd like putting lipstick on a pig?
    http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/myth...ng-a-turd.html
    That video relieves you of all guilt for stealing my Cicero quote.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #18  
    Your Mama! GiantEvil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Vancouver, Wa
    Posts
    2,279
    That video relieves you of all guilt for stealing my Cicero quote.
    Welcome and thank's. Couldn't help stealing the Cicero quote, had to.
    I was some of the mud that got to sit up and look around.
    Lucky me. Lucky mud.
    -Kurt Vonnegut Jr.-
    Cat's Cradle.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #19  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    Time was when everybody thought the earth was flat, until a daring idiot tried to cross the ocean. Time was when everybody thought the sun revolved around earth, until somebody got hanged stating otherwise. And etc.
    These are all developments progress in science. If Einstein were alive today, he would have advised us not to stop thinking just because what he said was considered sacred now.

    Science is not rigid that all we have to know is all known now. Time was when it was thought atom is indivisible, then it was found there is inner shell, the nucleus, until a bomb hit Hiroshima, all entirely new concept is open. That was some 70 years ago. Before it was just radio, and IBM electrical computer. Now Microsoft computer is proving with unlimited capacity ….even religions are rapidly changing now…what with the world is getting smaller due to high tech. . KNOWLEDGE is increased now never before. we are unendingly growing. Changing, not stagnant..trying to get closer to the truth, the elusive truth that has no end.

    If there is/are points on this posting that is hard to accept, now yes, it is hard to accept, but think again, it took me more than 10 years exhaustive research with interest that never subside…This posting is the culmination of that research.
    Stick to issues.

    Jsaldea12
    Reply With Quote  
     

  21. #20  
    . DrRocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,486
    Quote Originally Posted by jsaldea12
    .

    If there is/are points on this posting that is hard to accept, now yes, it is hard to accept, but think again, it took me more than 10 years exhaustive research with interest that never subside…This posting is the culmination of that research.
    Stick to issues.

    Jsaldea12
    You wasted 10 years.

    There are no issues here. Your theory is ridiculous.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  22. #21  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    Atom was thought in olden time as indestructible, then it was found it has inner shell, the nucleus, thus, the concept that positive nucleus equal the negative electrons. Now it is found that the nucleus has inner quarks…,quarks of protons and neutrons, intersecting one another to make complete and equal positive and negative. .call it colors up-down, charm-strange, top-bottom, but actually positive and negative. Worst, weak nuclear force/decays can make exchanges positive to negative, negative to positive from neutron to proton, from neutrons to protons o electrons, positron, etc.

    All of these are decisive that positive and negative are intersecting ONE BUT NOT MONOPOLE.. It is the spin, the direction that makes it positive or negative.If the nucleus, composed of protons and neutrons, is complete and balanced positive and negative, itself, what makes the old concept that in the atom, the balance is the positive of nucleus equal the negative of electrons? Atom is patterned after the solar system. The sun is the nucleus and the planets the electrons. The sun has complete positive and negative, in like manner, the planets have, each, complete positive and negative. In like manner, the nucleus of atom is complete and balanced positive and negative, and the electrons has complete positive and negative.

    This is just one issue in that posted article. Very new and hard to accept concept…but I find relief there are some few “crazy scientists” who share the same observations and prefer to remain quiet for the meantime.. Not acceptable now, but t ell me 10 years after.

    The other issues: Is there gravity inside the atom. Yes. What is gluon? Is it not just the action of positive and negative inside the nucleus. The strong force and the asymptotic freedom. etc.

    Jsaldea12
    Reply With Quote  
     

  23. #22 Re: Unified Field Theory (revised/polished 2010) 
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    945
    Quote Originally Posted by jsaldea12
    Unified field theory? (Revised/Polished 2010)


    jsaldea12
    Philippine Copyright 2010
    By jose s. aldea
    You clearly believe you are a scientist as you describe yourself as being a physicist!
    Surely it must bother you that a very high proportion of your posts end up in New Hypotheses and, even more, in the Pseudoscience sub forum.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  24. #23  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    Dont ask me. Happy New Year to all!!

    jsaldea12
    Reply With Quote  
     

  25. #24  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    Electromagnetism and the weak nuclear force appear very different from one another, but it is found that the two are manifestation of the same electroweak force. Gravity appears very different from magnetism, electro-magnetism, strong force, electroweak force, but it is another manifestation making of the same positive and negative.

    Jsaldea12
    Reply With Quote  
     

  26. #25  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    About the detailed explanations of the behaviors of strong force (gluon) and asymptotic freedom, please refer, also, to latest posting dated July 30, 2010, originally posted January 4, 2010 under subject “physics” of this forum, re- "science forum -scientific discussions and debates".

    Jsaldea12
    Reply With Quote  
     

  27. #26  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    Does gluon exist?

    As quoted in Wikipedia: “Particle physics is a branch of physics that studies the elementary subatomic constituents of matter and radiation, and their interactions. The field is also called high energy physics, because many elementary particles do not occur under ambient conditions on Earth. They can only be created artificially during high energy collisions with other particles in particle accelerators”.
    Thus, gluon is the result of high energy collisions of proton to proton collision as in particle accelerators, like LHC. Gluon is actually the FIELD created by the positive and negative of one quark binding with the negative and positive of another quark, respectively. Such binding is gluon. That is why in the proton to proton collision in LHC, it is stated that quark and gluon collided, but only the half spin integer of one quark is observed, accounting for some 30% half spin, and the collided gluon has no spin, polarized. Thus, there is missing completing spin. The truth is gluon as a field has no spin. That inner quark to quark clash resulted in creating TEMPORARY MASS, called gluon, the effect of collision which in normal state is field of binding of positive to negative of one quark to another quark. (There is no such thing as monopole). That is why quarks inside the confinement of nucleus can be stretched, called strong nuclear force because what is being stretched is the created field, called gluon. As such, gluon exists, a field, just like gravitational field.

    If in the LHC proton to proton collision (re-quark to quark collision), the other colliding quark is considered, the total spin would have been accounted and not 30%.
    .
    Would appreciate comments, especially from respected CERN.

    Jsaldea12
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •