Notices
Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: Whyis gravity all attraction?(2010)

  1. #1 Whyis gravity all attraction?(2010) 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    Why is gravity all attraction? (2010)

    Why is gravity on surface of earth all attraction downward, while the projection, re-gravitational field, of said gravity of earth stretches outward in outer space and binds similar gravitational field of the sun? It appears that the general make up of matters of earth and most suspended bodies in outer space, re- planets, stars, galaxies, have positive and negative property that are incredibly so close to one another, intersecting one another ( like in the dead middle of magnet bar where magnetism is most weak), thus, makes gravity incredibly weak, trillion times weaker than a magnet lifting a nail. But, such positive and negative property is indestructible, inseparable, intersecting/overlapping one another property, and always exist in equal positive and negative. It is like bar magnet: cut and cut to smaller pieces, and in each cut-piece, there is positive and negative, and such property is never lost nor destroyed. Because matter on earth are make up of such positive and negative incredibly closest to one another, intersecting one another, gravity is flexibly ambivalent..meaning, positive flexibly seeks, easily reaches, and connects to extremely close negative that everything on surface on earth, plants, human, atmosphere, etc. all have the same make up, too, align flexibly and bind with the greater negative and positive, respectively, of earth. This is the reason why the dominant gravity on surface of earth is all attraction pointing downward. Floating atmosphere, for instance, with inherent positive and negative, flexibly and easily aligns with the negative and positive of earth, that is why it is not blown outward to outer space. That earth is formed is proof that such behavior, positive-negative, negative - positive impulse binding, though incredibly weak, prevailed, from emanating mist, dust, nebulae, otherwise earth would not have been ultimately formed. It is like bar magnet, cut and cut to small pieces, throw such pieces together and the positive seeks negative and negative seeks positive. As formed one whole earth, the over-all signature of positive and negative property is never lost nor destroyed, that is why it shows itself as one whole dipole, thus, earth, as a dipole, has north pole and south pole.

    Why does the outstretch of gravity of earth, called gravitational field, to outer space binds with the gravitational field of sun? Earth is now one independent body suspended in space, the sun is even much larger independent suspended body in space, that relationship of the two is of separate even or similar size/ footing. Here is an untenable proof why that invisible gravitational field of earth binds with the gravitational field of the sun: the positive and negative property of earth that manifests itself as gravity on surface and that extends to outer space as gravitational field is, as stated, never lost nor destroyed, thus its positive and negative property binds with negative and positive, respectively, of the extended gravitational field of the sun, THERE IS BINDING BECAUSE ONLY OPPOSITE POLES BIND, POSITIVE-NEGATIVE BINDING. As earth and the sun are in motion, such motion causes such positive and negative property of both locked gravitational fields to create , incredibly, undetectable electro-magnetism, just as motion/rotation of generator creates electro-magnetism, thus, making such gravitational fields electro-magnetic. Who can deny that all of outer space is vibration? Here is an equally significant implication: Because the linked gravitational fields of the universe possess electro-magnetic property, such electro-magnetic gravitational fields act as medium on which electro-magnetic light wave propagates. This is one reason why an electro-magnetic light when passing nearby an equally electro-magnetic gravitational field, like the sun, slightly bends and could very slightly slow it, call it time delay. Dr. Einstein proposed “a certain region in space (spacetime) in which gravitational field is so strong as to prevent light to escape” that paved way to the making of “ black hole”. Dr. Einstein was unifying the reality of strong gravitational field of Newton which is a “force” with his spacetime which is not a force. That strong gravitational force is the making of positive and negative, such indestructible force participates in the curling of spacetime, including in the anomalous precession of perihelion of Mercury. Mainly, the anomalous perihelion is due to the faster rotation of the strong gravitational force of the sun that make the satellite planets orbit in perihelion proportionately faster. Please refer to separate article, entitled, "Anomalous perihelion of mercury in Newtonian explanation". see Google.

    It is stressed that whatever is that in the whole universe that attracts and binds is 97% up the making of such indestructible unwritten law: opposite poles or unlike attracts and bind, positive-negative, inherent even in the atom, in the nucleus, the quarks, inherent in that extension gravitational field and skein of vibrating spacetime, such positive and negative is operating, without which operative, the formation of the universe, galaxies, stars, planets, earth, human would not have occurred. Such positive and negative which has many manifestations but one and the same : in matter in gravity, it manifests as incredibly weak, in magnet, it is incredibly stronger than gravity, in quarks, it becomes unbelievably nuclear, in black hole, it proves stronger than light , in gravitational field, it is undetectably weak, in all occupying “no-force” outer space, called spacetime, it is even much finer, in human beings, there is no question.

    Jsaldea12
    12.11.10

    Revised Philippine Copyright 2010
    By jose s. aldea

    With revised Philippine Copyrights
    2002-2009


     

  2.  
     

  3. #2 Re: Whyis gravity all attraction? 
    Moderator Moderator TheBiologista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,564
    Quote Originally Posted by jsaldea12
    Jsaldea12
    12.11.10

    Revised Philippine Copyright 2010
    By jose s. aldea

    With revised Philippine Copyrights
    2002-2009
    Seriously, you don't need bother with this. All materials published online are the intellectual property of the author. Besides which, if someone really wants to rip you off, sticking this stuff at the end of every post is not going to stop them.


     

  4. #3 Re: Whyis gravity all attraction? 
    Moderator Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    8,416
    Quote Originally Posted by jsaldea12
    Why is gravity all attraction?

    Why is gravity on surface of earth all attraction downward,
    Very strange and not really true. Even as I sit at my computer, my heavy head is attracting my feet upwards by gravity though I don't notice the minuscule amount.
    Meteorologist/Naturalist & Retired Soldier
    “The Holy Land is everywhere” Black Elk
     

  5. #4 Re: Whyis gravity all attraction? 
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    Quote Originally Posted by Lynx_Fox
    Quote Originally Posted by jsaldea12
    Why is gravity all attraction?

    Why is gravity on surface of earth all attraction downward,
    Very strange and not really true. Even as I sit at my computer, my heavy head is attracting my feet upwards by gravity though I don't notice the minuscule amount.
    Not to mention your massive (though not nearly as massive as the earth beneath you) roof above your head.
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

     

  6. #5  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    I post here to spur conversation.

    jsaldea12
     

  7. #6  
    Forum Junior TheDr.Spo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    208
    Quote Originally Posted by jsaldea12
    I post here to spur conversation.

    jsaldea12


    Hence, your probation.
     

  8. #7  
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    Quote Originally Posted by jsaldea12
    I post here to spur conversation.

    jsaldea12
    Did you pull that straight out of my signature?
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

     

  9. #8  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    Yes, I quoted you. It sounds so good and friendly. But expecting, inviting peer comments.

    jsaldea12
     

  10. #9 Re: Whyis gravity all attraction? 
    Reptile Dysfunction drowsy turtle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,255
    Quote Originally Posted by jsaldea12
    Why is gravity all attraction?
    Doesn't matter. That's the realm of philosophy, not science.
    "The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at or repair." ~ Douglas Adams
     

  11. #10  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    It matters enormously. Gravity is one of the greatest, IF NOT THE GREATEST, mystery in science. I am offering the most valid, undeniable answer why gravity is all attraction.

    jsaldea
     

  12. #11  
    Forum Junior TheDr.Spo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    208
    Quote Originally Posted by jsaldea12
    It matters enormously. Gravity is one of the greatest, IF NOT THE GREATEST, mystery in science. I am offering the most valid, undeniable answer why gravity is all attraction.

    jsaldea
    The "why" is a question for Philosophy. I agree with drowsy turtle.

    Your theory, even if it were correct and later produced scientific predictive power by indirect means, currently carries no predictive power whatsoever. So, for right now, at least, it's just philosophy.
     

  13. #12  
    Time Lord
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    8,035
    The problem with any dipole/electric theory of gravity is explaining why protons are attracted more strongly than electrons. Protons have greater mass and therefore "weigh" more, but their electric charge has the same magnitude as the electric charge of an electron.

    Why would that happen?
     

  14. #13  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    The answer is in the posted: "What is the unified field theory? (revised/polished)

    jsaldea12
     

  15. #14  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    Quoted: “The problem with any dipole/electric theory of gravity is explaining why protons are attracted more strongly than electrons. Protons have greater mass and therefore "weigh" more, but their electric charge has the same magnitude as the electric charge of an electron. Why would that happen?”

    There is created a field in that incredible wide space of atom that separates the nucleus and electrons that super-rotation of electrons and the orbiting nucleus create electrical magnetic charge in stated field, such created electrical magnetic charge implicates unerringly the presence of positive and negative which are INHERENT IN, EACH, NUCLEUS AND ELECTRONS (PLS. REFER TO POSTED: “What is the unified field theory? (revised/polished) Thus, as both the electrons and nucleus are the participants, both creates same CONNECTED electrical magnetic magnitude IN THE STATED WIDE FIELD, re-the binding of positive-negative of nucleus with the negative-positive, respectively, of electrons, call that, electro-magnetic gravitational field in the wide space inside the shell of atom. The mention of such incredible wide, wide, field, actually gravitational field, electro magnetic gravitational field inside the atom may not be easily acceptable now, but consider that the span of the space inside the atom is proportionately of same span or even wider than that of the solar system separating the sun and the planets.

    Jsaldea12
     

  16. #15  
    Time Lord
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    8,035
    What about free protons with no electrons near them? All you've got to do to get a free proton is strip the electron off of a Hydrogen atom. Why is that proton observed to fall toward Earth at the same speed as a free Electron despite having a greater moment of inertia?
     

  17. #16  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    Gravity on earth is incredibly weak that it has equal effect on speeding small objects from outer space, like asteroids, falling stars, protons and electrons. But, protons and electrons, upon entering the atmosphere of earth, interact with the atmosphere, (like speed of light interacts under water) could be affected, that the speed, particularly, of the much lighter mass electron is very, very slightly lessen, compared to greater mass proton. But gravity of earth affects inertia of objects, like rotating spacecraft orbiting earth. An astronaut, out on spacewalk, is tied to the spacecraft, otherwise such astronaut might wander because gravity of earth keeps pulling on two independent objects, re-the spacecraft and the astronaut, and the effect of such gravitational pull is not the same to both independent objects in outer space anymore. Gravity affects speed of falling objects from outer space. On Jupiter, asteroids, falling stars, even proton and electron which have mass, fall faster than on earth. Gravity, too, could affect speed of light, re- particle electro-magnetic photons which has mass, has inertia.

    Jsaldea12
     

  18. #17  
    Time Lord
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    8,035
    Quote Originally Posted by jsaldea12
    Gravity on earth is incredibly weak that it has equal effect on speeding small objects from outer space, like asteroids, falling stars, protons and electrons. But, protons and electrons, upon entering the atmosphere of earth, interact with the atmosphere, (like speed of light interacts under water) could be affected, that the speed, particularly, of the much lighter mass electron is very, very slightly lessen, compared to greater mass proton. But gravity of earth affects inertia of objects, like rotating spacecraft orbiting earth. An astronaut, out on spacewalk, is tied to the spacecraft, otherwise such astronaut might wander because gravity of earth keeps pulling on two independent objects, re-the spacecraft and the astronaut, and the effect of such gravitational pull is not the same to both independent objects in outer space anymore. Gravity affects speed of falling objects from outer space. On Jupiter, asteroids, falling stars, even proton and electron which have mass, fall faster than on earth. Gravity, too, could affect speed of light, re- particle electro-magnetic photons which has mass, has inertia.

    Jsaldea12
    Yes,... but all you have to do to test the falling rate of protons vs. electrons is fire one off into a vacuum tube, with detectors on the other end, and measure how much its trajectory has changed by the time it hits the other end of the tube.

    If you do this, you will find that both protons and electrons deviate from their initial direction of travel by the same amount. If the cause of the force were electrical in nature, then the protons would deviate less than the electrons because they have greater inertia.
     

  19. #18  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    .
    Maybe it is because the length of vacuum tube is limited, the tube, itself vacuum, and the force of electro-magnetic force situated outside? the vacuum tube is not that strong as to cause differences of inertia between proton and electron.

    But we know electro-magnetic light is bent passing a strong electro-magnetic gravitational field of big body like the sun. Such is not all due to spacetime but to reality of electro-magnetic gravity. This experiment done on wide, wide, outer space.

    If it is possible to perform the experiment in wide vacuum outer space passing nearby the sun, the lighter electrons would bend slightly more, than the heavier protons, toward the sun.

    Jsaldea12
     

  20. #19  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    Does graviton exist? The answer is no. What is considered graviton is simply the behavior of the inherent positive of one particle or field, such gravitational field, to attract and bind the inherent negative of another particle or field.

    Jsaldea12
     

  21. #20  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    For continuity of "Why is gravity all attraction", please refer to "Is spacetime of Dr. Einstein the real gravity?

    jsaldea12
     

  22. #21  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    260
    See more detailed explanation on the anomalous perihelion on the original article, entitled, "Anomalous perihelion of mercury in Newtonian explanation".

    jsaldea12
     

  23. #22  
    Moderator Moderator TheBiologista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,564
    Not a blog.
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •