Notices
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 100 of 112
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: Origin of The Universe

  1. #1 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    Hi I am a crackpot

    I have a new theory on the origin of the universe that I would like to discuss here (ducking things being thrown) I am not a scientist and live way outside the box. For years I have been trying to create something from nothing (empty space) knowing even if space is empty it still has characteristics, which includes the laws of physics. Infinity of empty space needs no explanation of its origin. The problem is nothing from nothing is ďnothing.Ē The key is infinity itself. Infinity needs no explanation of its origin infinity of anything, infinity of everything, infinity of nothing. The human experience is stuck in linear moments of time the maximum speed being the speed of light. Time is meaningless in infinity it is only its keeper. Anything and everything that exists in infinity is infinite. Time is an experience shared by the living. The speed of light is not the Holy Grail of time it is made out to be. In infinity all speeds exist at once and the laws of physics and existing entities will act accordingly to the speed it is experiencing. The speed of light may not be a constant in this universe it may vary from black hole to black hole. In my theory I would like to discuss the time we are experiencing and what I believe M = E/C squared means. If this is the wrong place or manner to discuss this please let me know.


    sokol-ballaci likes this.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    59
    I think your first sentence probably sums it up.....and it's E=mcsquared!


    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,169
    Quote Originally Posted by bradford28
    .....and it's E=mcsquared!
    Which is what he wrote. He just moved the c squared to the other side of the equation. His version says the same thing. Not bad for a crackpot.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    Thanks Ophiolite,

    I believe I tried to duck him. Planck constant states under certain conditions, energy could not take on any indiscriminate value ďquantum.Ē There is also a reduced Planck constant. I propose there is an expanded Planck constant. Unimpeded energy left to expand with the expansion of the universe will not expand into any indiscriminate value. I believe this is a starting and ending point for infinity of universes. As a universeís expansion speeds up matter will begin to unravel becoming energy. This energy will expand until it can expand no more becoming a macro-quantum connecting with all the other macro-quantum. Infinity of a three dimensional foam made up of potential energy. In a semi steady state with reoccurring vibrations strands can break turning potential energy into energy. In this expanded state a macro-quantum will collapse in on itself pulling on surrounding strands which will disconnect and begin to collapse as well. If infinity is connected strands of potential energy then energy is time. Collapsing spheres of time one after another each building in energy as each becomes larger pulling on more strands. The void can expand forever into the endless sea of connected strands of potential energy unless acted upon by another force. The collapsing spheres of time are finite and will eventually collapse into themselves recoil and expand out to collide with the next collapsing sphere of time. Collisions and interactions between these two forces (expanding and collapsing) create space, waveforms, particles, and heavy matter. These two opposing forces are the key to all forces in this universe positive expanding time and negative collapsing time.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    I do not believe there was a single big bang, collapsing and expulsion repeated itself over and over. If it happened once it will happen again and again... unless the forces change. Each recoil gains in strength, creating stronger forces of energy blasting out into positive time and dimension. Time collapsing in, collapses in as spheres. Energy with enough force blasting out into the opposite direction has the ability to curve around the inside of a collapsing sphere of negative time and dimension. This action creates waveforms. Collapsing encapsulations of negative time and dimension collapse in at regular intervals of 299,792,458 m/s. As energies increase waveforms have more energy to circumnavigate more times around the inside of a collapsing sphere of negative time and dimension. Waveforms progress until a balancing act is created in the form of a photon. Photons have the ability to spin a collapsing sphere of negative time around it creating curved time. The rotation of the collapsing sphere of negative time and dimension creates a fluctuation of time. This is because the equator is traveling greater distances through time than its axis. It takes longer for an encapsulating sphere of time to collapse around the equator. It pulls the axis first and they start going through the coil and recoil before the equator. This creates a separation between positive time and dimension and negative time and dimension at the axis. This creates magnetism. A photon carries electromagnetism because this all happens just as the next encapsulation occurs. This creates a small electric motor with no charge because both forces cancel each other out in the process. Photons become self contained entities which use each encapsulation to self perpetuate. This creates its own space and photons become a second stage of encapsulation. I will write about the creation of electrons tomorrow. I'm writing this in stages so it isn't so boring and leaving time for any questions.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,169
    You speak passionately of what you belive, but you offer zero evidence, or theoretical support for any of your claims. Until and unless you do then what you have is idle speculation and third rate science fiction.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    What I believe I have done is connect a sort of Steady State Theory, a sort of String Theory (my strands are all connected), a sort of Membrane Theory (no need for two), and the Big Bang Theory (not a single big bang). I am also trying to stay in the laws of physics which are slightly different pre big bang, pre black holes. Once in motion always in motion unless acted upon by another force. This means once you start something it will continue forever unless the forces that created it alters. That means chain of events must lead to the creation of all entities other than infinity. Pre existing energies and pre existing substances able to create new matter need an explanation of existence. If not, instead of pulling all matter out of a magic hat of existence I can pull anything out, letís say a chicken. My explanation is the chicken was always there before time and space therefore needs no explanation of its existence, when we all know it takes billions of years of chain of events to create a chicken. Here and now the scientific world wants me to believe a substance that has enough energy to create all matter in this universe needs no explanation of existence, now letís talk third rate science fiction. I believe I got some first rate science fiction going on ďbooyea.Ē What the scientific world needs to wake up to is the general public is becoming far more educated with the flow of information. This no need to explain where everything came from is as stale as religion. I believe in the truth and thank science for science. In the presenting of my Yang Yin Theory Iím not presenting it yet in scientific lingo because it is boring and a different language than what is needed to connect all the dots to existence. I speak in (because and why), while the scientific world is stuck in (how and what). Ophiolite is right for now.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    The negative encapsulations of time collapse in at regular intervals of 299,792,458 m/s what is known as the speed of light. The negative encapsulations of time creates the timeframes of our reality, it is the fastest rate that can be measured. As they collapse they only increase in energy not in speed. It is a universal moment. An entityís momentum into positive time dictates how much of the moment it will take up. The atomic micro world is viewed upon as being very small and the macro world we live in, huge with large amounts of space. This is a misconception the atomic micro world is traveling at speeds greater than 299,792,458 m/s and taking up most of its universal moment creating its own personal quanta. In a new universe as encapsulations increase in energy, recoiling increases in energy, the interactions between these two opposing forces create space. In the space energy heading into positive time and dimension is able to increase in speed. As energy increases in speed it is able to curve around the inside of its own personal universal moment. The universe begins to fill with radio waves, microwaves, infrared radiation, visible light, ultraviolet radiation, X-rays and gamma rays. Another balancing act is created in the form of an electron. The best way to describe a wavelength as it takes up its personal universal moment is a doughnut shaped slinky or semi doughnut shaped slinky. This creates its personal quanta, and it is its quanta, viewed traveling through our time and space. As wavelengths increase in speed their ability to circumnavigate around the inside of an encapsulating sphere increases. Eventually a doughnut shaped slinky is created in positive time and dimension and able to fold around and create another doughnut shaped slinky in negative time entering each space left by the slinky in positive time (a slinky inside a slinky). This creates energy divided by c squared. The space between the teeth of a slinky is divided time, the teeth of the slinky is energy. Folding into itself has reduced the electronís spin to one half. An electron is able to filter both positive and negative time through it. It is, in itself a miniature wormhole event. An electrons ability to filter time through it gives it many qualities. Its space between its teeth of energy is able to act as a fly wheel. An electron is able to absorb or expel time as it is exerted upon it. It feeds off both negative time and positive time to maintain itself. Matter equals energy divided by the constant speed of light squared because each collapsing moment of negative time collapses in at a constant speed of 299,792,458 m/s an electron is able to divide this moment up between negative and positive wavelengths (the teeth of the slinky). It is the moment of time that is keeping the teeth separated. It takes more than one moment of time to maintain the existence of an electron. This puts an electron in a time delay with the positive expansion force of the universe giving it gravity. An electron does not experience regular intervals of coil and expansion most of its energy is spent on its own existence. Recoils are influenced by many factors making them sporadic. An electron has created a balancing act in a collapsing mode giving it a negative charge and making it a third stage of encapsulation into negative time and dimension.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    Ok before I go any further and explain in the next step how up and down quark can be created from a positron I need to back up. I can see how I can start loosing a bunch of you over traveling faster than the speed of light. M= E/C squared means the speed of light squared is the fastest speed energy can travel before becoming matter which creates a time delay big enough to register in positive time and dimension.
    Silly earth creatures the human perception is flawed we can only see and live in the cracks of infinity. We are a glitch in infinity living entities are not a constant. All the energy created and all the time spent is so infinity can mend a tear created in it. In infinity all moments in time exist at once. To infinity this universe looks like a big ball of spaghetti connected to a web of endless foam of potential energy where countless other balls of spaghetti exist. No matter how tightly the ball of spaghetti is packed space still exists in places between the strands. We live and observe in these cracks of time. When a vibration occurs in the endless web of potential energy it is absorbed and passed through a ball of spaghetti giving the elusion to the viewers in the cracks it is a first time event. Strands in the ball are not always stable and fray, some break and the ends pull away in both directions. When particles are smashed what is observed is the ends of strands before they pull away. Fraying and breaking strands have the ability to create new stands in the voids of the space we share.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    IIRC, is related to the equation for energy of a moving object, and is especially obvious in Newtonian mechanics.
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    I totally agree when mass is achieved an entity with mass cannot travel at the speed of light without major cause and effects. I also believe Einsteinís special relativity goes beyond Newtonian mechanics. Energy cannot travel faster than the speed of light without creating negative results. This fits in with my theory because I believe in negative time. What I am suggesting is when energy travels at c squared it will be achieved in positive and negative time in a waveform. When this is achieved energy creates mass.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #12 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    I totally agree when mass is achieved an entity with mass cannot travel at the speed of light without major cause and effects. I also believe Einsteinís special relativity goes beyond Newtonian mechanics. Energy cannot travel faster than the speed of light without creating negative results. This fits in with my theory because I believe in negative time. What I am suggesting is when energy travels at c squared it will be achieved in positive and negative time in a waveform. When this is achieved energy creates mass.
    the only issue is, energy travels at a constant of c. Never more, never less
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #13 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    The reason the four fundamental forces cannot be explained is because the science world has created a box that we cannot get out of. This box is c squared which is funny to me because c squared is what gets me out of the box. What Iím trying to propose here is the speed of light (c) is the timeframe of our reality. It is how fast each moment passes by. It is the fastest that can be measured. Anything traveling at this speed or faster has the ability to stretch from one side of the frame to the other making it constant in each frame. Wavelengths are able to circumnavigate around the inside of an encapsulation of time making them faster than the speed of light. Wavelengths have the ability to divide time. Time is relative to the traveler and the observer. Although it is the wavelength that is dividing time it is time that is relevant to how fast the wavelength is traveling. Moments of time are going by faster to a wavelength because time is divided up between the frequencies. C squared is achieved when a wavelength's frequency is able to divide the space in positive expanding time and dimension and then fold back and divide that time in negative encapsulating time and dimension in one moment of time, M = E/c squared. This could be why the greatest cause and effect of a wavelength in not its intensity it is its frequency.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #14  
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    Alright, dude, again, is an arbitrary value, that has no bearing on any speed that any object has. Nothing moves at , and sadly, nothing ever will. That's just the way it is. Nothing moves faster than c. It is the speed at which energy moves, and, in accordance with observation and the math behind our theories, it is the "speed limit" on everything in the universe. Energy travels through the universe at c while matter travels at . Seriously, man, this isn't the point of general physics to get stuck on, it's pretty set in stone for physics theories.
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #15 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    The reason the four fundamental forces cannot be explained is because the science world has created a box that we cannot get out of. This box is c squared which is funny to me because c squared is what gets me out of the box. What Iím trying to propose here is the speed of light (c) is the timeframe of our reality. It is how fast each moment passes by. It is the fastest that can be measured. Anything traveling at this speed or faster has the ability to stretch from one side of the frame to the other making it constant in each frame. Wavelengths are able to circumnavigate around the inside of an encapsulation of time making them faster than the speed of light. Wavelengths have the ability to divide time. Time is relative to the traveler and the observer. Although it is the wavelength that is dividing time it is time that is relevant to how fast the wavelength is traveling. Moments of time are going by faster to a wavelength because time is divided up between the frequencies. C squared is achieved when a wavelength's frequency is able to divide the space in positive expanding time and dimension and then fold back and divide that time in negative encapsulating time and dimension in one moment of time, M = E/c squared. This could be why the greatest cause and effect of a wavelength in not its intensity it is its frequency.
    None of this makes sense in terms of physics understanding
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #16 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    Thank you thatís exactly the answer I would expect from the box. Itís the same ideology that kept the earth in the center of the universe ignoring the motion of the planets. Practically all the math has been done and practically all the pieces to the parts have been found or predicted. To figure out the puzzle of the four fundamental forces it is the concept of the pieces that need to be refigured. Einstein changed the very concept of time and sadly a box he could never get out of. The funny thing, it is Einsteinís theory of special relativity that changes the concept of the box. It is special relativity that says a wavelength can be traveling faster than observed. Special relativity creates a magnet. There is an invisible line between positive and negative time and most all observations point to this line. I have stopped now to break some of you out of the box, I know it is hard and it even hurts. I felt the same way when I first thought of this. It gets stranger as I go on and matter in slinky form become sprocket like entities and able to divide time even more as they connect. Or I could stop and crawl in the box there is plenty of room being it is void of any explanations. I ask please let me finish I know this is all very unscientific itís called brain storming. Anyone need a pry bar?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #17 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    Thank you thatís exactly the answer I would expect from the box. Itís the same ideology that kept the earth in the center of the universe ignoring the motion of the planets. Practically all the math has been done and practically all the pieces to the parts have been found or predicted. To figure out the puzzle of the four fundamental forces it is the concept of the pieces that need to be refigured. Einstein changed the very concept of time and sadly a box he could never get out of. The funny thing, it is Einsteinís theory of special relativity that changes the concept of the box. It is special relativity that says a wavelength can be traveling faster than observed. Special relativity creates a magnet. There is an invisible line between positive and negative time and most all observations point to this line. I have stopped now to break some of you out of the box, I know it is hard and it even hurts. I felt the same way when I first thought of this. It gets stranger as I go on and matter in slinky form become sprocket like entities and able to divide time even more as they connect. Or I could stop and crawl in the box there is plenty of room being it is void of any explanations. I ask please let me finish I know this is all very unscientific itís called brain storming. Anyone need a pry bar?
    Well we can't see things travelling faster then light because they don't have any room coordinates. That's why it is hard to accelerate it to this speed.

    so if ct = s, then s/c is t, and hence (s/c)≤(observed) - (s/c)≤(observer) = (vt/c)≤

    That is why: t≤(observed) - (vt/c)≤ = t≤(observer)

    sqrt(t≤(observed) - (vt/c)≤) = t(observer)

    evidently time goes faster for the observed (when the observed train goes away)

    The hypothenus is length (train)/ speed (train)

    the katetts are the other 2.

    but when it comes back, it's:

    sqrt(t≤(observed) + (vt/c)≤) = t(observer)

    That is why the bloody twins are equally old when they come back.

    That's why scientists invents the word paradox. They can't think like godium. Ofcourse, godium is supremely rare and I can't blame em.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #18 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    There are lots of explanations of what a moment in motion is. There seems to be no clear explanation of what a moment at rest is. A moment itself seems to be a paradox riddled with problems when being defined. What Iím trying to explain is what a moment is. What I am suggesting, a moment is a collapsing force that collapses in at the speed of light one after another which is negative time. A moment does not increase in speed as it collapses. A moment of time is the box and is why it appears nothing can travel as fast as the speed of light. There are two snapping back forces, recoil and when a moment detaches from an endless sea of potential energy. Both these actions create positive time. Energy traveling at fast enough speeds in positive time has the ability to curve and divide a moment of time altering time itself. It is why a wavelength is a wavelength and matter is matter. It takes the division of positive and negative time to create matter which creates moments of time that pass by within itself faster than its original speed, which is the speed of light.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #19  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,169
    You do realise you sound crazy? You display many of the hallmarks of crazy persons:
    1. You accuse other's of being trapped in conventional thinking.
    2. You take the mandatory swipe at Einstein.
    3. You strenuously avoid the use of mathematics in a subject that requires mathematics.
    4. You juxtapose misplaced terminology in apparently novel ways, yet fail to extract any meaning -old or new- from such concatenations.
    5. You have never heard of the concept of the paragraph.
    6. You have never heard of the concept of summaries and overviews.
    7. You conflate incoherent waffle with thought provoking originality.

    Would it be worth your while taking a step back, reflecting, then starting again in more measured manner?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  21. #20 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    I know this is a crazy idea thatís why itís here. Sorry for the way I write Iím not a smart man but I know what a universe is. Einstein is the king, and would probably say the same thing. What Iím trying to do here is reverse engineering. We humans seem to always get things ass backwards before we get it right, thatís why I thought of this.
    I fully realize there is going to be adamant nay Sayers there always is in the face of new and radical ideas. Iím not really interested in you. What Iím looking for here is a Johannes Kepler.
    Iím writing this so a child can understand what I am saying. My ten year old daughter understands, although she says Iím crazy too.
    Does anyone else out there want me to finish, is there a Kepler amongst you? When Iím done however unscientific it may seem all the pieces to the puzzle will simply fall into place.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  22. #21 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,169
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    I fully realize there is going to be adamant nay Sayers there always is in the face of new and radical ideas..
    There are two kinds of nay sayers.
    The first type is uncomfortable with change and prefer to embrace the status quo. They dismiss new ideas on the basis of dogmatically held views that they believe are authoritatively held by the consenus of specialists in the subject. Such persons should be ignored or held under water until they stop twitching.

    The second type dismiss ideas for five reasons:
    1. The ideas are not testable or falsifiable.
    2. the ideas are presented in an incoherent manner.
    3. The presenter of the idea offers no evidence.
    4. The presenter of the idea displays little of no understanding of current theory that they seek to replace.
    5. The presenter of the idea offers no instances of where there hypothesis produces superior results to current theory.
    In summary, the speculation is unscientific.

    One does not have to be Johannes Kepler to dismiss an idea for any or all of these reasons. One merely needs a reasonable base level science education.

    I say nay on that basis.

    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    Iím not really interested in you.
    (I take it that 'you' was addressed to the 'average' forum member.) You should be. I may be your only hope.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  23. #22 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,169
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    Iím writing this so a child can understand what I am saying.
    I suppose that's why it sounds like gibberish to me.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  24. #23 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Moderator Moderator TheBiologista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,569
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    I fully realize there is going to be adamant nay Sayers there always is in the face of new and radical ideas. Iím not really interested in you. What Iím looking for here is a Johannes Kepler.
    Kepler convinced the nay sayers. If he took your attitude, he'd likely have remained obscure. Mind you, he also had intelligibility on his side.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  25. #24 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    Sorry for the delay Iíve been out enjoying a new fad in water sports with Ophiolite called water boarding squared. What I am trying to clarify is c and c squared is not an arbitrary value. The frame of reference and the frame of reference squared is significant in too many equations for it to be arbitrary.
    There are too many observations if observed correctly that point to a separation between two opposing dimensions of time. There are too many observations that show time and matter form a sphere.
    In a rotating sphere the fastest that can be traveled is the equator. This is because the equator is traveling greater distances than the axis. The frame of reference in a rotating sphere is the equator.
    Waveforms traveling in positive time and dimension curving on the inside of an encapsulating sphere of negative time and dimension will start from the equator. Lower frequencies are towards the equator and higher frequencies are towards the axis at the top. Once a waveform achieves its maximum speed in one moment of time it creates its own frame of reference.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  26. #25 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    967
    Even though the universe may or may not have an origin it's more then probable that it has a reachable speed zero everywhere.

    Thus there should be something we move in that has this speed, Since it had been relative to our speed, else it wouldn't have been relative since it's a speed which nothing has.

    Is this scenario conceivable?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  27. #26 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    What we have to realize is we are in a time delay with the expansion force of the universe. Our planet Earth is in a 32 feet per second delay every second. The earth is in the sunís gravitational field and in its time delay. Our solar system along with all the other solar systems in our galaxy, are in the time delay of the black hole in the middle of our galaxy.
    Time wise everything in our galaxy is on the event horizon of the black hole in the middle of our galaxy. Physically being on the event horizon is different than time wise. Black holes are the gateways to negative time and dimension. Everything in the grasp of a black hole has just enough energy to move into the next moment with the expansion force of the universe. The moment left behind collapses into itself and back tracks the cork screw event it traveled in and is eventually pulled into the black hole. Light cannot travel fast enough to escape the force of a black hole. Black holes create a zero point for all entities at rest.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  28. #27 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    What we have to realize is we are in a time delay with the expansion force of the universe. Our planet Earth is in a 32 feet per second delay every second. The earth is in the sunís gravitational field and in its time delay. Our solar system along with all the other solar systems in our galaxy, are in the time delay of the black hole in the middle of our galaxy.
    Time wise everything in our galaxy is on the event horizon of the black hole in the middle of our galaxy. Physically being on the event horizon is different than time wise. Black holes are the gateways to negative time and dimension. Everything in the grasp of a black hole has just enough energy to move into the next moment with the expansion force of the universe. The moment left behind collapses into itself and back tracks the cork screw event we traveled in and is eventually pulled into the black hole. Light cannot travel fast enough to escape the force of a black hole. Black holes create a zero point for all entities at rest.
    That's your oppinion I don't harass you for it it is gripable to understand why you made that assumption. I have to post something rather remarkeable on another forum, I'll get back to how matter can be contradictory in the poles in due time.

    Cu l8er.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  29. #28 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    Carbon based life forms didnít explode into advanced structured life forms. Carbon based life forms evolved through a chain of events from simple structures to advanced structures. I believe like everything else matter evolved from a simple form to advanced forms. The progression of waveforms and the periodic table of elements almost make this point obvious.
    Thermal nuclear fusion the way it is explained is more like thermal nuclear fission then fusion. It takes high energy collisions of matter to break up matter then the broken up matter fuses into a larger structured atom. They key here is matter has to exist first.
    My idea is simple the evolution of matter itself revolves around two opposing forces of expanding positive time and dimension and collapsing time and dimension.
    If mechanical physics works in the macro world I believe the same physics is applicable in the micro world. A photon is a micro electric motor its perpetual motion is fueled by time alternating from positive time to negative time. A photon is a progression of wavelengths that created a balance and stable event between these two opposing forces. An electron is a micro magnet. A macro magnet proves these two dominate forces exist. An electron is also created from a progression of wavelengths.
    There was a point when the universe was filled with nothing but electrons. In this environment electrons in zones are able to line up and spin in the same direction. When enough electrons line up they can create a super accelerated magnetic force and a super accelerated wormhole event. Surrounding electrons are pulled into the south-pole of the magnetic event and accelerated out of the north-pole magnetic event as positrons. As positrons curve back around towards the equator they lose one third momentum in positive time and dimension. Surrounding electrons being pulled into the south-pole and expelled out as positrons from the north-pole puts the whole event into a spin of its own. This creates a super accelerated electromagnetic semiconductor inside of a super accelerated electromagnetic semiconductor, a larger massive version of an electron. A rotating slinky on its side creating sprockets of energy with its teeth, each tooth opposite signs from one another. The space between becomes second generation space. The rotation of the slinky is able to curve time in positive time and dimension. As curved positrons with 1/3 lost momentum and 2/3 positive momentum near the windows of space at the equator their forces are divided like a magnet. The positron is pulled in half each half pulled into a different window of space between the teeth of the sprocket. Each half form a new sprocket like entity as it is pulled into the inside of the slinky, one half with 2/3 positive momentum, the other half with a negative 1/3 momentum. The two electromagnetic forces create a meissner effect inside the slinky where magnetic attractions do not dominate. Bonds are created between the half sprocketís teeth as they collide. This happens because the space between the teeth is divided time. Divided time creates mass, mass creates gravity. As the halves connect their teeth enter each otherís space dividing time more. The attraction is gravity in the form of gluons, the 1/3 lost momentum half sprocket is down quark, the 2/3 positive momentum half sprocket is up quark.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  30. #29  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,169
    You really are demented.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  31. #30 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    Perhaps you should think about changing your quote Ophiolite, or at best read somewhere else. It is said a monkey randomly typing on a keyboard given infinity will eventually type out the entire works of Shakespeare in sequence. Add up all the humans ever born and equate in the human imagination and the ability to pass on knowledge and I believe it is possible to come close to begin to imagine our existence. Hoo, hoo, hoo, (monkey sound)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  32. #31  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,169
    NoToe,
    as I think I have previously pointed out to you why your ideas should be rejected. You quite failed to address any of the objections I raised. I offer them again for your further consideration. I reject your speculation on the following grounds:

    1. Your ideas are not testable or falsifiable.
    2. Your ideas are presented in an incoherent manner.
    3. You offer no evidence in support of your speculation.
    4. You displays little or no understanding of the current theory that you seek to replace.
    5. You offers no instances of where your hypothesis produces superior results to current theory.

    Your speculation is thus seen to be unscientific.

    This has nothing to do with having an open mind.
    This has nothing to do with the emergence of ideas from left field.
    This has nothing to do with the natural lethargy of scientists towards change.

    This has everything to do with the demonstrable observation that you are not following the scientific process, that your ideas are preseneted in an unscientific manner, and that the language of your presentation falls well short of meaningful communication.

    Since you chose to ignore those relevant criticisms, but instead sailed blithely on with woo-woo material that could well have emerged from the proverbail bank of monk typists, I was left with little option but to conclude that you are in fact demented. It will be simple for you to prove me wrong by addressing the five points I have raised and by doing so in a substantive fashion.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  33. #32  
    Moderator Moderator TheBiologista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,569
    Moved to pseudo. No idea why I left it here so long. Cue OP with claims of closed-mindedness.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  34. #33 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    Perhaps you should think about changing your quote Ophiolite, or at best read somewhere else. It is said a monkey randomly typing on a keyboard given infinity will eventually type out the entire works of Shakespeare in sequence. Add up all the humans ever born and equate in the human imagination and the ability to pass on knowledge and I believe it is possible to come close to begin to imagine our existence. Hoo, hoo, hoo, (monkey sound)
    A monkey randomly typing on a keyboard has a non-zero probability of typing out the works of Shakespeare, in sequence, but that does not, by any means, make it a necessity if we allow the time scale to approach infinity. It simply means that it could happen, not that it definitively will happen. Big difference.
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

    Reply With Quote  
     

  35. #34 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by Arcane_Mathematician
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    Perhaps you should think about changing your quote Ophiolite, or at best read somewhere else. It is said a monkey randomly typing on a keyboard given infinity will eventually type out the entire works of Shakespeare in sequence. Add up all the humans ever born and equate in the human imagination and the ability to pass on knowledge and I believe it is possible to come close to begin to imagine our existence. Hoo, hoo, hoo, (monkey sound)
    A monkey randomly typing on a keyboard has a non-zero probability of typing out the works of Shakespeare, in sequence, but that does not, by any means, make it a necessity if we allow the time scale to approach infinity. It simply means that it could happen, not that it definitively will happen. Big difference.
    Yeh, stupeed monkej

    Anyway and now more serious: Is the universe on a quest to write shakespears full works? Even the monkeys? That might take an infinity.. Or 2.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  36. #35 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    OK I forgot no freedom of speech or thought in science. The Gestapo here makes sure of that. I realize anyone can think or believe what they want and science will prove whether it is true or not, I am for that. I will explain after I finish with my so called demented idea I have not strayed far from the excepted theories known today. Don't touch my monkey, man!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  37. #36 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    The Gestapo here makes sure of that.
    We know it's just that not all countries has this freedom of speech, no matter how much they want it. Let's light a candle for them today .
    Reply With Quote  
     

  38. #37 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    Look my monkey tried to say something funny. I declare you as my monkey Shakespeare. Anyone interested I will write more tonight and then I will explain how it all ties together in other posts. 8)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  39. #38 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    Look my monkey tried to say something funny. I declare you as my monkey Shakespeare. Anyone interested I will write more tonight and then I will explain how it all ties together in other posts. 8)
    I see you on being the typing machine they lended me.

    In fact your humour is proportionate.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  40. #39 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Forum Ph.D. Dave Wilson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Cumbria UK
    Posts
    892
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    Look my monkey tried to say something funny. I declare you as my monkey Shakespeare. Anyone interested I will write more tonight and then I will explain how it all ties together in other posts. 8)
    Keep it coming dude.
    Latinos are Republican. They just don't know it yet.
    Ronald Reagan
    Reply With Quote  
     

  41. #40  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    967
    Yeah, FUDGE BOTH OF YOU!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  42. #41 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    The huge version of an electron creating a massive semiconductor inside a semiconductor starts to produce photons and neutrons on the inside of its slinky form. In this accelerated state the teeth of the slinky become W bosons. The slinky inside of a slinky formed from negative time folding into positive time has produced alternating W bosons in the teeth of the slinky W+ bosons and W- bosons. The space between the W bosons becomes Z bosons.
    Super massive electromagnetic slinky forms start to form in abundance in the sea of electrons. Some of the slinky forms collides breaking up scattering protons and neurons around at high enough speeds to create thermal nuclear fission then fusion as they collide with each other. Heavier matter is created and stronger forces are created when super massive electromagnetic slinky forms are created from heavier matter.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  43. #42 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    The huge version of an electron creating a massive semiconductor inside a semiconductor starts to produce photons and neutrons on the inside of its slinky form. In this accelerated state the teeth of the slinky become W bosons. The slinky inside of a slinky formed from negative time folding into positive time has produced alternating W bosons in the teeth of the slinky W+ bosons and W- bosons. The space between the W bosons becomes Z bosons.
    Super massive electromagnetic slinky forms start to form in abundance in the sea of electrons. Some of the slinky forms collides breaking up scattering protons and neurons around at high enough speeds to create thermal nuclear fission then fusion as they collide with each other. Heavier matter is created and stronger forces are created when super massive electromagnetic slinky forms are created from this heavier matter.
    I raise your bet. I postulate that the electron accumulates neutrinoes through quantumgravity & gravitomagnetic effects and make neutrons. That is why heavy planets also are more radioactive. Beyond that I postulate that the gravitomagnetical effect interfear with the charge turning the negative electron slightly positive.

    In either way, both ideas according to ophiolite are severe brain farts and should be eliminated from the forum, The other moderators throw their occasional insults and Harold looks around for a reason to throw the stuff in the trash can. The other members all think it is biased except someone who thinks states are in even worse condition then that leaving the rest of the society astounded, numbening every feeling in their body and someone, just someone hangs himself but fails, thus falls to the floor a little nostalgic laughing about it thinking "who the heck do I think I am?" Besides, someone locks the thread soon.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  44. #43 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    I believe neutrinos are created from the interaction of positive and negative forces between W+ and W- bosons through the space of the Z bosons. My slinky or sprocket is Higgs Mexican-hat when another dimension of time is added. The big riddle is not neutrinos or the riddle of steel itís the riddle of iron. Energy is emitted when atomic structures crunch down as their mass increases. They stop crunching down when iron is made. The big hiccup I like to call it, a big enough hiccup to cause suns to super nova. It is a big enough hiccup to interrupt a single big bang event and make the science world rethink its steps. It is why they now say we are all created from star dust which does not solve the riddle of iron and heavier atoms.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  45. #44 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    They stop crunching down when iron is made. The big hiccup I like to call it, a big enough hiccup to cause suns to super nova. It is a big enough hiccup to interrupt a single big bang event and make the science world rethink its steps. It is why they now say we are all created from star dust which does not solve the riddle of iron and heavier atoms.
    So basically you're saying that when there is a big bang from quick iron fusions.

    Let's say something highly explosive has material that fusion to iron in it. Would that bang much more then usual?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  46. #45 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    I believe neutrinos are created from the interaction of positive and negative forces between W+ and W- bosons through the space of the Z bosons. My slinky or sprocket is Higgs Mexican-hat when another dimension of time is added. The big riddle is not neutrinos or the riddle of steel itís the riddle of iron. Energy is emitted when atomic structures crunch down as their mass increases. They stop crunching down when iron is made. The big hiccup I like to call it, a big enough hiccup to cause suns to super nova. It is a big enough hiccup to interrupt a single big bang event and make the science world rethink its steps. It is why they now say we are all created from star dust which does not solve the riddle of iron and heavier atoms.
    Super Nova's tend to fuse heavier atoms than Iron. Wiki is your friend when it comes to learning about supernovae. Wiki also lets you know what happens to Massive Stars.

    Both 'wiki's are different Wikipedia articles on stars.
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

    Reply With Quote  
     

  47. #46 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by Arcane_Mathematician
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    I believe neutrinos are created from the interaction of positive and negative forces between W+ and W- bosons through the space of the Z bosons. My slinky or sprocket is Higgs Mexican-hat when another dimension of time is added. The big riddle is not neutrinos or the riddle of steel itís the riddle of iron. Energy is emitted when atomic structures crunch down as their mass increases. They stop crunching down when iron is made. The big hiccup I like to call it, a big enough hiccup to cause suns to super nova. It is a big enough hiccup to interrupt a single big bang event and make the science world rethink its steps. It is why they now say we are all created from star dust which does not solve the riddle of iron and heavier atoms.
    Super Nova's tend to fuse heavier atoms than Iron. Wiki is your friend when it comes to learning about supernovae. Wiki also lets you know what happens to Massive Stars.

    Both 'wiki's are different Wikipedia articles on stars.
    That's right. One learns of wiki. Lucky everything you read there sticks like glue.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  48. #47  
    Forum Senior Kukhri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    392
    A remedial wiki article is a good deal better than simple conjecture.
    Co-producer of Red Oasis
    Reply With Quote  
     

  49. #48  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by Kukhri
    A remedial wiki article is a good deal better than simple conjecture.
    Yes, a good deal better somewhat bad deal.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  50. #49  
    Forum Senior Kukhri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    392
    What?
    Co-producer of Red Oasis
    Reply With Quote  
     

  51. #50  
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    Read the cited links as well, They happen to be very informative and are often far more educational than wiki is on its own.
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

    Reply With Quote  
     

  52. #51 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    Supernova is kind of where my theory and the big bang theory collide. Compared to all the matter in the universe one can deduct it does not take that much matter to create a supernova or a black hole. My theory builds up matter to an electron stage and from there heavier matter, stronger gravitational fields, stronger electromagnetically fields, and higher temperatures are created. In abundance electrons have enough qualities to produce this universe. A universe filled with electrons has the ability to produce multiple isolated supernova events in multiple stages.
    A big bang event takes all the matter in the universe in generic form (whatever that means) and creates all matter in a super duper nova event. This means a singularity the generic form of matter has enough mass to exert enough gravitational forces to crunch it down into itself. For it to supernova into a big bang or big expansion some sort of Chandrasekhar limit and some sort of a Pauli exclusion principle must have existed in the generic form of matter of a singularity. Wow, wish I had some of this magical singularity shit. I can create just about anything, time, space, matter, and the four fundamental forces in an instant. Now I just want some coffee, real coffee not instant! :wink:
    Reply With Quote  
     

  53. #52 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    Supernova is kind of where my theory and the big bang theory collide. Compared to all the matter in the universe one can deduct it does not take that much matter to create a supernova or a black hole. My theory builds up matter to an electron stage and from there heavier matter, stronger gravitational fields, stronger electromagnetically fields, and higher temperatures are created. In abundance electrons have enough qualities to produce this universe. A universe filled with electrons has the ability to produce multiple isolated supernova events in multiple stages.
    A big bang event takes all the matter in the universe in generic form (whatever that means) and creates all matter in a super duper nova event. This means a singularity the generic form of matter has enough mass to exert enough gravitational forces to crunch it down into itself. For it to supernova into a big bang or big expansion some sort of Chandrasekhar limit and some sort of a Pauli exclusion principle must have existed in the generic form of matter of a singularity. Wow, wish I had some of this magical singularity shit. I can create just about anything, time, space, matter, and the four fundamental forces in an instant. Now I just want some coffee, real coffee not instant! :wink:
    You've failed to make a single cohesive, nor coherent, point. You took the crap off wiki that "sounded" smart, and plugged it into your theory. I doubt you have any idea at all whatsoever as to what you're talking about.
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

    Reply With Quote  
     

  54. #53 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    Hey, I think I hear monkey sounds again. A universe filled with electrons has great possibilities in the production of a universe. Electrons have mass, electromagnetic force, weak force, magnetic moment, one negative unit of charge, and Ĺ spin. Spinning and orbiting in the same direction they can create massive magnetic and electromagnetic fields. Compacted electrons can create Electron degeneracy pressure. Electrons encapsulating protons bound together by neutrons create shells around atomic structures due to the Pauli Exclusion Principle. These electronic shells act like gears in the sprocket system of a bike. Gears shift as energy is absorbed or emitted into the system. I believe a young universe filled with electrons is another pathway to the production of, subatomic, atomic structures, and eventually primordial black holes.
    I believe wavelengths have evolved to create sprocket systems of energy that rotate and divide time. These sprocket systems evolve into larger systems and are able to incorporate and absorb smaller systems. Energy dividing C squared creates matter. Sprocket systems large enough to divide curved positrons and create quark can collide and smash apart. Under the right circumstances and pressures these large sprocket systems connect. The teeth of their sprockets enter each otherís space dividing time more creating more mass and gravity. I believe these connection points to be Higgs Bosons. These large sprocket systems can connect and start creating a run away spiral stair case system. These systems are what form primordial black holes and black holes.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  55. #54  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,169
    Show us the math, or go away.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  56. #55 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    The expansion force of the big bang created time and space. Time and space have been continually expanding which creates expanding time, which equals positive time. Time slows down to zero on the event horizon of a black hole which is neutral time. Anything traveling beyond the event horizon of a black hole cannot escape not even light. Beyond zero time, into a black hole, time becomes negative time. Time is zero at the event horizon of a black hole. Time speeds up traveling away from a black hole until it reaches the maxim speed which is the speed of light. The bigger the mass the more time slows down as it collapses into it. This slows its personal clock down as it travels into the expansion force of the big bang. Is it the force of gravity that changes time or does time do to mass change the force of gravity? If time can travel at the speed of light and the speed of light is the frame of reference then I say the slowing of positive time is what creates gravity. General Relativity, Black Holes, the math has been done positive, negative, and neutral time does exist. The concept of time itself is the key to a Theory of Everything.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  57. #56 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    The expansion force of the big bang created time and space. Time and space have been continually expanding which creates expanding time, which equals positive time. Time slows down to zero on the event horizon of a black hole which is neutral time. Anything traveling beyond the event horizon of a black hole cannot escape not even light. Beyond zero time, into a black hole, time becomes negative time. Time is zero at the event horizon of a black hole. Time speeds up traveling away from a black hole until it reaches the maxim speed which is the speed of light. The bigger the mass the more time slows down as it collapses into it. This slows its personal clock down as it travels into the expansion force of the big bang. Is it the force of gravity that changes time or does time do to mass change the force of gravity? If time can travel at the speed of light and the speed of light is the frame of reference then I say the slowing of positive time is what creates gravity. General Relativity, Black Holes, the math has been done positive, negative, and neutral time does exist. The concept of time itself is the key to a Theory of Everything.
    Bullshit. You've still given nothing, so why accept your bullshit theory?
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

    Reply With Quote  
     

  58. #57 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,169
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    The expansion force of the big bang created time and space..
    Could you show me the maths of how you can get a force without a distance and a time for it to act over? Or are you defining force differently from the rest of the science community?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  59. #58 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    Yes, time itself is a force. Without a form of energy time would not exist. On the event horizon time slows down to zero. A black hole is the best state to observe the characteristics of time. It acts like a membrane, it is spherical in shape, and has a collapsing force. All things resisting a black holeís pull beyond its event horizon has positive momentum in positive time and dimension. The energy of the big bang created expanding positive time. Gravity is a force that reaches out infinitely and is instantaneous. The force of gravity dissipates over distance but still is instantaneous. If it were not for gravity energy would fill the universe.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  60. #59 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    Yes, time itself is a force. Without a form of energy time would not exist. On the event horizon time slows down to zero. A black hole is the best state to observe the characteristics of time. It acts like a membrane, it is spherical in shape, and has a collapsing force. All things resisting a black holeís pull beyond its event horizon has positive momentum in positive time and dimension. The energy of the big bang created expanding positive time. Gravity is a force that reaches out infinitely and is instantaneous. The force of gravity dissipates over distance but still is instantaneous. If it were not for gravity energy would fill the universe.
    And this is all, again, utter bullshit. You have a fanciful idea that would make great science fiction, but real science, it sure aint.
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

    Reply With Quote  
     

  61. #60 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    Time is dark energy! Black holes create a balancing act between positive time and negative time in positive time. The universe is expanding because negative encapsulating timeís force is becoming weaker as matter speeds up. The faster matter speeds up as the universe expands the more dark energy is consumed. Everything in the grip of a black hole stays relative to each other as more energy is consumed.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  62. #61 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Forum Senior Kukhri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    392
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    Time is dark energy! Black holes create a balancing act between positive time and negative time in positive time. The universe is expanding because negative encapsulating timeís force is becoming weaker as matter speeds up. The faster matter speeds up as the universe expands the more dark energy is consumed. Everything in the grip of a black hole stays relative to each other as more energy is consumed.
    Oh god, it's horrible.
    Co-producer of Red Oasis
    Reply With Quote  
     

  63. #62 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    Quote Originally Posted by Kukhri
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    Time is dark energy! Black holes create a balancing act between positive time and negative time in positive time. The universe is expanding because negative encapsulating timeís force is becoming weaker as matter speeds up. The faster matter speeds up as the universe expands the more dark energy is consumed. Everything in the grip of a black hole stays relative to each other as more energy is consumed.
    Oh god, it's horrible.
    He still has absolutely zero content to his posts. A troll is a troll, and this one would DESPERATELY need the boot if he posted anywhere else.
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

    Reply With Quote  
     

  64. #63 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    If galaxies were not self contained units as they speed up with the expansion force of positive time and dimension matter would start to change. I believe the first noticeable event would be neutron decay.
    Free neutrons decay just under 15 minutes. Neutrons are the weakest link in my system. They need the positive force of protons to maintain their existence in positive time and dimension.
    Black holes create a spaghettification effect a term used by Stephen Hawking. Only I believe the spaghetti effect is far more reaching than his version. Thatís what happens to each moment left behind as it is pulled into negative time and dimension.
    Time wise neutrons are closest to the event horizon of the black hole in the middle of our galaxy. In my sprocket system two down quark, maintain their existence in each moment with the positive force of one up quark. Sprocket systems are all connected in some manner. Sprocket systems can create larger versions of themselves using their selves and smaller sprocket systems can be created and exist in their cores.
    Since the last big bang and the creation of black holes with the force of positive expansion these sprocket systems have been unraveling. This unraveling can be seen in beta decay of a neutron. Eventually as the expansion rate of the universe increases I predict the rate of neutron decay will begin to change.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  65. #64 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    If galaxies were not self contained units as they speed up with the expansion force of positive time and dimension matter would start to change. I believe the first noticeable event would be neutron decay.
    Free neutrons decay just under 15 minutes. Neutrons are the weakest link in my system. They need the positive force of protons to maintain their existence in positive time and dimension.
    Black holes create a spaghettification effect a term used by Stephen Hawking. Only I believe the spaghetti effect is far more reaching than his version. Thatís what happens to each moment left behind as it is pulled into negative time and dimension.
    Time wise neutrons are closest to the event horizon of the black hole in the middle of our galaxy. In my sprocket system two down quark, maintain their existence in each moment with the positive force of one up quark. Sprocket systems are all connected in some manner. Sprocket systems can create larger versions of themselves using their selves and smaller sprocket systems can be created and exist in their cores.
    Since the last big bang and the creation of black holes with the force of positive expansion these sprocket systems have been unraveling. This unraveling can be seen in beta decay of a neutron. Eventually as the expansion rate of the universe increases I predict the rate of neutron decay will begin to change.
    you still have no math to back up any assertion. You believe unfounded ideals.
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

    Reply With Quote  
     

  66. #65 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    Matter if broken down can be measured photon by photon, wavelengths. My theory is all matter was created in a series of chain of events. These chains of events were the progression of wavelengths, radio waves to gamma rays. Wavelengths folded back into themselves to create matter, the first being an electron. If this were true then a prediction would be, if you smashed an electron and a positron into each other it should produce gamma ray photons. Positrons are anti electrons, when the two are smashed together they can and do produce gamma ray photons, two or more.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  67. #66 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Moderator Moderator TheBiologista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,569
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    Matter if broken down can be measured photon by photon, wavelengths. My theory is all matter was created in a series of chain of events. These chains of events were the progression of wavelengths, radio waves to gamma rays. Wavelengths folded back into themselves to create matter, the first being an electron. If this were true then a prediction would be, if you smashed an electron and a positron into each other it should produce gamma ray photons. Positrons are anti electrons, when the two are smashed together they can and do produce gamma ray photons, two or more.
    What predictions does your theory make that are unique? If you could only do one test, what one test would best support your theory whilst falsifying alternative models?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  68. #67 Origin of The Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    [TheBiologista wrote: What predictions does your theory make that are unique? If you could only do one test, what one test would best support your theory whilst falsifying alternative models?]

    Iím not trying to falsify alternative models. I am trying to tie them all together. Iím trying to tie everything together by changing the concept of time. The unique concept being positive and negative time, and the spacetime that we are experiencing is created by the interaction between these two opposing times both being forces. If you allow me I will show it is not just one test but all tests point to an invisible line between positive and negative time, even life itself. This is what a unified theory of everything should do. I know science is hung up in the mathematics of a theory and it should be. I have stated nothing that is physically impossible. I am grateful that you have allowed me to post my thoughts here. I ask please let me continue I believe others here are interested.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  69. #68 Re: Origin of The Universe 
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    [TheBiologista wrote: What predictions does your theory make that are unique? If you could only do one test, what one test would best support your theory whilst falsifying alternative models?]

    Iím not trying to falsify alternative models. I am trying to tie them all together. Iím trying to tie everything together by changing the concept of time. The unique concept being positive and negative time, and the spacetime that we are experiencing is created by the interaction between these two opposing times both being forces. If you allow me I will show it is not just one test but all tests point to an invisible line between positive and negative time, even life itself. This is what a unified theory of everything should do. I know science is hung up in the mathematics of a theory and it should be. I have stated nothing that is physically impossible. I am grateful that you have allowed me to post my thoughts here. I ask please let me continue I believe others here are interested.
    And, as such, we need an actual experiment that will validate the concept of negative time, along with a rigorous definition of the concept. Just noting that there are mathematically negative answers to equations of quantum mechanics and relativity that include time as a parameter is no where NEAR enough.
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

    Reply With Quote  
     

  70. #69 Origin of the Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    The two slit experiment in my theory shows that time itself comes in waves. The waves are coming in at the speed of light. Dark energy is time itself. There are two dimensions of time Positive expanding time and negative collapsing time. All forces in the universe are directly and indirectly related to the interactions of these two forces. The expansion force of the universe is known want proof of the collapsing force drop something. Want proof the collapsing force comes in waves at the speed of light try the two slit experiment using light.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  71. #70 Re: Origin of the Universe 
    Forum Senior questor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    385
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    The two slit experiment in my theory shows that time itself comes in waves. The waves are coming in at the speed of light. Dark energy is time itself. There are two dimensions of time Positive expanding time and negative collapsing time. All forces in the universe are directly and indirectly related to the interactions of these two forces. The expansion force of the universe is known want proof of the collapsing force drop something. Want proof the collapsing force comes in waves at the speed of light try the two slit experiment using light.

    The Two-Slit Experiment

    In the case of one electron
    Interfering with itself
    In the two-slit experiment,
    Modern physics has unhinged itself
    From causal reality by having it
    That electrons do not exist
    Until they are observed at the phosphor screen,
    The pattern being caused by
    The superposition of all possible paths
    The electron might take to the screen,
    Yet, it happens,
    And even electrons hundreds of kilometers apart
    Will form an interference pattern
    That accurately corresponds
    To the sourceís diameter.


    The Two-Slits Mystery Revealed

    In the two-slit experiment,
    In which one photon (or electron)
    Is sent through one at a time,
    Still forming an interference pattern,
    The solution to the mystery
    Is that any given photon
    Sets the apertureís state
    Based on its exit trajectory,
    For it has a particular momentum
    And energy based on the apertureís state
    And the incident photonís momentum;
    The next photon to follow
    Encounters this set state,
    Which is that casual relationship
    Between the two,
    Although widely separated in time.

    The material of which
    The aperture is composed
    Is a system with an existing quantum
    That that interacts with an incoming photon.

    The three states
    That the aperture must occupy are
    1) Photon is incident,
    2) Photon merges with aperture, and
    3) Photon is transmitted.

    Since energy and momentum
    Are always conserved
    And there is angular variance
    Caused by the width and spacing of the slits,
    The apertureís quantum state changes
    Depending on the direction
    Of the transmitted photon.
    The aperture, although macroscopic,
    Still exists in only one state at a time,
    And charts the path for the next incident photon.
    The results of the photon passages,
    Due to the conversation of momentum
    (To infinitely fine resolution),
    Must be preserved in
    The apertureís current state
    As a complimentary response.

    So, there is no observer-created reality
    With none before it.

    Heisenberg was wrong to say
    That ďatoms are not thingsĒ.

    Reality remains intact.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  72. #71 Origin of the Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    reply to questor

    http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/21st_ce...res/lec13.html


    The set state that you talk about in my theory is the invisible line that exists between all entities in each moment of time. The invisible line is the line from one moment to the next which is the interaction between positive and negative time. An entities state of rest or speed of its momentum into positive time determines how it effects one moment to the next. It is relative to the traveler and observerís speed that will determine how the invisible line from one moment to the next will be observed. The two slit experiment shows the pattern in between preexists. The in between pattern is the line from one moment to the next.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  73. #72  
    Forum Senior questor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    385
    I do like the positive and negative aspect of time, it somehow perhaps serving as the polarity of charge that divides/cancels All as opposites, as well as time being the difference of space(s), known as motion, a dual role, maybe, for this 1-D entity.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  74. #73 Origin of the universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    What we have to realize in our observations in our experiments are we creating or are we just shining a light on what already exists. I watched a topic here Faraday's Law Is False! And watched them fight over the equations of many scientists. All involved seemed to be very intelligent including the scientists. I think it is sad to see so much anger and name calling in these debates. The funny thing is many huge industries live and survive because these equations work. Itís like arguing about the equations behind the chemical reactions in concrete. The proof is in the sidewalk although the chemical reaction in concrete starts to break down as temperatures drop to freezing. Computers have glitches sometimes because equations do not work in all circumstances.

    It is known how to make a magnet and what kind of forces it will create but why a magnet is a magnet is unknown. A magnet in my theory is a magnet because of special relativity. It also reveals the two dominating forces in this universe. Rotations and orbits at fast enough speeds have the ability to curve time and space. Electrons not only have this ability but can in unison curve time and space enough to create noticeable forces. These forces are created because the equator of a rotating sphere is traveling through time and space faster and greater distances than its axis. This slows the equators personal clock as it stretches through time and space. The axis are pulled into negative time and space before the equator revealing the two dominating forces of this universe expanding positive time and collapsing negative time.

    Push a magnet through a copper coil and it creates a charge, (What a charge really is?) again not known. It seems pretty simple right? Electrons can only be packed together so close before they start to repel each other. A magnet pushed through a coil repels the free electrons in the copper wire creating a charge. Hmm donít know why a magnet is a magnet or what a charge really is. Why a coil? Why do alternating currents create an electromagnetic wave around a copper wire? What is observed depends on the rest state or speed of the observer.

    I believe as time collapses in at regular intervals at the speed of light (dark energy) in sphere form it rotates. Time and space is already curved to begin with and it rotates as it collapses. Heading into positive time and dimension with the expansion force of the last big bang all entities tend to rotate unless acted upon by other forces (collisions).

    We humans are in our own corkscrew event with the rotation and orbit of our planet and the rotation of our galaxy heading into positive time and dimension. A copper coil is like a corkscrew event frozen in time. A magnet reveals the forces of positive and negative time. Alternating currents pushing a charge along a copper wire reveal a corkscrew event that already exist around all entities in this universe in the form of an electromagnetic wave. Itís not the electromagnetic wave that preexists itís the collapsing corkscrew event.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  75. #74 Origin of the Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    It is not surprising in my theory to find out that DNA is a chain of two corkscrew events by passing each other in opposite directions connected to each other in increments of ninety degree angels.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  76. #75 Origin of the universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    It takes negative time more encapsulations to pull planet earth into negative time and dimension because of its mass and momentum into positive time and dimension. This puts earth in a thirty two feet per second delay every second with the expansion force of the universe. This delay gives life the time needed to divide cells. Cell division is a form of quanta. Alpha-amino acid is the key to life. Alpha-amino acids have a positive charge. A charge is the speed needed for life to negotiate the passing of one moment to the next. Protonated ammonia groups positive charges neutral out when they equal negative charged deprotonated carboxylate groups. Life is able to make use of the two energies of positive and negative time as they by pass each other. The 32 feet per second delay every second and the positive charge in amino acids gives life enough time to reconstruct itself before it is pulled into negative time and dimension.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  77. #76 Origin of the Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    As a child my father always asked me, what would happen if an unstoppable force ran into an immovable object? I was finally able to answer him at the dinner table by unscrewing a lid to a ketchup bottle and then tightening it back on. The answer is the unstoppable force would bypass the unmovable object in a corkscrew event.
    Positive and negative time bypass each other in a corkscrew event much like hot air and cold air do in hurricanes and tornados. Sub atomic and atomic matter spin as positive and negative time by pass each other.
    Gravity is created because it takes more encapsulations of negative time to pull larger masses into negative time and dimension. Gravity creates space. Space is curved because negative time curves as it collapses through it. Gravity speeds up the curvature of space as it draws near just as it speeds up the frequency in light as it draws near.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  78. #77 Origin of the Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    The expansion force of the universe is positive time and its initial force was produced during the last big bang. Matter was already forming together in huge electromagnetic fields. These fields full of matter crunched together both electromagnetically and gravitationally. Both these fields are fueled by the constant waves of encapsulating negative time. Both these fields of matter crunch in until electromagnet fields cancel each other out and the gravitational field starts to consume negative time faster than it is collapsing in. The big bang Iím talking about is different because there is a chain of events that lead up to it. Thermal nuclear fission and fusion is possible at lower temperatures because matter already exist. Matter expands out in clumps. Clumps of matter depart in all directions with the expansion force. They slow down as they are encapsulated by waves of negative time and dimension. The more mass each clump of matter has the more negative encapsulation it will consume as it is pulled into negative time and dimension. This creates gravity and space. As clumps of matter create their own gravity and space they start to depart from each other. As the rate of departure increases each clump of matter start to consume more encapsulations of negative time. The more encapsulations of negative time it takes to pull a clump of matter into negative time the more gravity it creates. The more gravity created the more space created departure rates increase. This explains why the expansion rate slowed down and is now speeding up and how blackholes were formed in each clump.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  79. #78 Re: Origin of the Universe 
    Forum Senior questor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    385
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    As a child my father always asked me, what would happen if an unstoppable force ran into an unmovable object?

    The Irresistible meets the Immovable

    She wanted to charge all those irresistible objects, even straight out of her husbandís pockets; but that grouchy and unlovable force said she could but window shop, of course. So she bought stain-glass windows, all very expensive ones, too, for all the bedrooms and the baths, a very large number, in her wrath.

    She went to the hospital for the emergency of the credit card cut of plastic surgery; Ďtwas nothing they could do for the charge, unable even to puzzle it together at large. She returned home very much negative, finding him accounting all his positives.

    ďStick Ďem up,Ē said she, assertively, a gun pointed at his fatherlies; ďGive me your money or your life if you want me as your loving wife!Ē

    Said he, ďDo I need all this rife and strife? Go take up music and blow a fife!Ē

    ďWhen I was making the lionís fare, all of that with you I did share. I need to glamorously amorous to keep our relationship harmonious.Ē

    He opened a drawer in his brain, that mister, that one of his mental cash register; he then closed this manly box, in fact, and into his brain he put it back.

    So, on and on this all ever went, but it was still that nothing could be spent. She robbed his wallet while he slept and left all the house very unkept. Paternity and maternity soon had it out this battle an evenly matched bout; the irresistible force met the immovable object, of which result no one could ever suspect.

    What would happen, nobody knew; and then everything really blew; a total annihilation had occurred, nothing left at all but for a blur a noisy bang, and a flash of light, such as with all creationís might. All had been shredded and torn, as when the universe was born.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  80. #79 Origin of the Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    Thanks questor thatís a clear example of un-random chaos. In my theory that would be a reason for collisions and impact or itís what happens when shake sphere smokes pot.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  81. #80  
    Forum Senior questor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    385
    If a lot of energy was circling (irresistibly), moving inwards, it would compress of pile up until there was no 'inward' left (the immovable), forming some spheres perhaps, which might spin, due to the necessary 'sidewards' motion that would be there as well, then, well, Bang!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  82. #81 Origin of the Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    The irresistible force and immovable object paradox is partly both would need infinity to exist. In my Yang Yin theory infinity does exist. This paradox does not define my theory. The question alone is what put me on my quest to the greatest puzzle of all time ďthe origin of the universe.Ē An object bending does not necessarily mean it has moved forward or backward in time. Gravity has the ability to bend light which is a constant and a reference frame of time. So a corkscrew event could be a close enough answer to the paradox of the irresistible force and immovable object.
    Infinity is the key to my theory. Science does not acknowledge infinity mostly because it is beyond demonstration. I say if you believe in the laws of conservation you believe in infinity just in a different way. The funny thing is most people keep infinity as a sacred shrine where good peopleís souls go to live forever in heavenly bless. I hope this does not invoke another poem.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  83. #82  
    Forum Senior questor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    385
    Totality must necessarily be infinite (and eternal) or it would be Total, making for no special place or time. Still, there is a mid-point between the infinitely large and the infinitely small (should say infinitesimal) and that's where we reside, in that finite region. The same might be said for the 'now', time-wise.

    Space or Nothing is all that could be infinite and eternalóthe Prime Mover.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  84. #83 Origin of the Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    A rocket ship blasts off from earth trying to enter space. Just before it gets there it runs out of fuel. Its momentum stops and it begins to fall to earth. Before it fell after its momentum stopped there was a moment when the rocket ship experienced zero effect of gravity. The black hole in the middle of our galaxy keeps everything in its gravitational field in this moment every moment. Everything in its grasp has just enough energy to go into the next moment as it heads into the expanding force of positive time. The past collapses into itself in a spaghettified corkscrew event. The pastís momentum in positive time has ended as it back tracks the path it took into positive time and dimension. This event fueled by each new moment is continually pulled into the black hole in the middle of our galaxy.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  85. #84 Origin of the Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    If I were to conduct an experiment to prove my case I would create matter rather than smash it. I would do so by collecting electrons at a Lagrange point either L1 or L2. I would collect an abundance of electrons and create a rotation as close to the speed of light as possible. (Maybe by bouncing the experiment in and out of the Lagrange point using the pull of gravity) I would hope this would create an electromagnetic field strong enough to pull in surrounding electrons into its core and expel them out as positrons. Positrons would curve around loosing 1/3 momentum in positive time and dimension as it is pulled in at the equator into the core. As itís pulled into the core its field of negative one third and its, two thirds positive field would be separated and reconnect with other fields in the core, like I explained earlier. I believe close observations of sun spots would also show matter can be created in this manner.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  86. #85 Origin of the Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    I believe it would be a good idea to start an experiment like this as soon as possible in the L1 zone. This would create an electromagnetic shield that would protect the earth as its polarity begins to shift. As the polarity of the earth begins to shift as it is doing now it will leave the earth vulnerable to our sunís solar wind.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  87. #86 Origin of the Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    Synchrotron radiation proves along with the laws of conservation it may be possible to create mass and then matter through a progression of wavelengths curving in a magnetic field.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  88. #87 Origin of the Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    The problem with the law of conservation of energy and mass is weight. Weight deals with gravity and the full understanding of gravity is not known in a single big bang event with only one dimension of time. In this theory gravity is known and the laws of conservation of energy and mass means no matter what form it takes or how fast it travels mass, energy, and matter will always be under the influence of negative time and dimesion (dark energy) as it moves into positive time and dimension. This influence will continue until all is converted to energy and energy expands into potential energy and reconnects to the infinity of expanded quantum foam.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  89. #88 Re: Origin of the Universe 
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,169
    Quote Originally Posted by NoToe
    A rocket ship blasts off from earth trying to enter space. Just before it gets there it runs out of fuel. Its momentum stops and it begins to fall to earth. Before it fell after its momentum stopped there was a moment when the rocket ship experienced zero gravity.
    Really? Are you sure? Define zero gravity.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  90. #89 Origin of the Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    Hi Ophilolite,
    How is your new year going?

    Sorry I should have put zero effect of gravity. Although there are many balancing acts that are not constant between opposing gravitational fields or momentum of an object in a gravitational field I believe negative time is the creator of gravity one encapsulation after another. So there really is no escape from it until expanded quantum foam returns to infinity. Speaking of balancing acts look how matter rotates in a galaxy around the black hole in its center. You would think like planets in our solar system orbits would speed up the closer they were to the black hole. This does not seem to be the case for most galaxies. Everything orbits at the same rate like a large sprocket around a black hole. It is like the whole system is stuck in some sort of larange point. A larange point is a balancing act created between two gravitational fields. Galaxies are too far apart to for this effect to take place. I believe gravity is created by the interaction between negative and positive time and dimension. I believe a possible explanation is a larange point can be created between positive and negative time and dimension.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  91. #90  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,169
    OK. I'll bite. Show me the math, no matter how preliminary.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  92. #91 Origin of the Universe 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    61
    The origin of the universe is not that kind of puzzle. One equation is not going to solve the problem. If this were the case I believe it would have been solved long ago. This is a problem of observation. Can finite beings ever observe infinity or another dimension of time? The answer maybe no in other circumstances but not in this case of the origin of this universe. Thatís because the other dimension of time I am speaking of bypasses the dimensions we observe in. The simplest answer is usually the correct answer the problem is a single big bang is too simple of an answer with too many unsolved questions. The answer is in all the unanswered questions a single big bang leaves not a single fix all equation. There are many known and excepted equations that have needed other equations on top of other equations trying to patch up a missing collapsing dimension of time. If you will allow me I will go down the List of ďUnsolved Problems in PhysicsĒ where another dimension of negative time could answer everything.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  93. #92  
    Forum Senior questor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    385
    WMAP, and its next, better successor, delayed by the Mars program, can see through the 380,000 year 'fog' into the very early moments of the 'Big Bang', via gravitational waves, if they exist, their form possibly supporting inflation, or otherwise, such as a big collision, as to do with B mode, etc.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  94. #93  
    . DrRocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,486
    Quote Originally Posted by questor
    WMAP, and its next, better successor, delayed by the Mars program, can see through the 380,000 year 'fog' into the very early moments of the 'Big Bang', via gravitational waves, if they exist, their form possibly supporting inflation, or otherwise, such as a big collision, as to do with B mode, etc.
    That is ridiculous.

    We have yet yet to directly detect the first gravitational wave, let alone have any technology for constructing images from primordial gravitational waves from the big bang. Empirical evidence for gravity waves comes from observations of the orbital decay of a binary pulsar in agreement with the gravity wave prediction of general relativity.

    I would expect that the verified direct detection of any gravitational wave will precipitate a Nobel Prize. Imaging is a long way off.

    WMAP is purely electromagnetic. Any successor for the foreseeable future will be also.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  95. #94  
    Forum Senior questor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    385
    See Paul J. Steinhardt's and Neil Turok's work, and live and learn. (Ignore the brane portions, for that part is only proposed).
    Reply With Quote  
     

  96. #95  
    . DrRocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,486
    Quote Originally Posted by questor
    See Paul J. Steinhardt's and Neil Turok's work, and live and learn. (Ignore the brane portions, for that part is only proposed).


    That comment simply compounds your naivete. Steinhardt and Turok are both theorists. Good ones. But their work has absolutely nothing to do with our capability, or lack thererof, to design and manufacture systems capable of detecting gravitational waves and forming images from them. That will be a problem for experimentalists and engineers.

    Do you ever actually read any of the stuff to which you make your vague references ? It is quite clear that if you do, that understand none of it.

    Still waiting for your first post with valid content.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  97. #96  
    Forum Senior questor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    385
    It is still their plan, and no one said that the technology is here now that would rule out inflation to 100%. Only some types of inflationary models have been ruled out so far, to a percentage not much more than 35%, via WMAP data. I could explain it to you, but you can also easily find it, plus they even have it in their book.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  98. #97  
    . DrRocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,486
    Quote Originally Posted by questor
    I could explain it to you, ....
    I doubt it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  99. #98  
    Forum Senior questor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    385
    Then you'll have to find a research assistant.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  100. #99  
    Forum Senior questor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    385
    Steinhardt and Turok still say that we may be able 'see' the origin of the universe. I have a summary of their theory and findings. Does anyone other than Rock-Star, such as NoToe, wish to know the 'pseudoscience' of it?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  101. #100  
    . DrRocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,486
    Quote Originally Posted by questor
    Steinhardt and Turok still say that we may be able 'see' the origin of the universe. I have a summary of their theory and findings. Does anyone other than Rock-Star, such as NoToe, wish to know the 'pseudoscience' of it?
    I already understand the real science of it. But there is a huge gap between recognizing the very long term potential to use gravitational wave detection to probe the very early universe and your statement that the next follow-on to WMAP will use this non-existent technology.

    The evidence for gravitational waves consists of predictions using general relativity and observations of the decay rate of the orbits of a binary pulsar that is consistent with the theory. That is not conclusive, but it is persuasive and most scientists, including me would grant that the gravitational waves probably do exist and behave as predicted by general relativity.

    However, direct detection of gravity waves has been the subject of several experiments since Weber's wor in the 1960's. Despite increasingly sophisticated techniques, no gravitational wave has yet been detected. So to make the statement that the follow-on to WMAP will use imaging via gravitational detection is just ridiculous.

    It is a potentially valuable approach, but quite a long way from producing an image in the near term. The LCGT was supposed to be operational in 2009. That fantasy seems to have abated. http://gw.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/lcgt/

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Weber

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravita..._wave_detector

    http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=103042

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LIGO
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •