Notices
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: gravity is a bit of bull

  1. #1 gravity is a bit of bull 
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    12
    Outher than the fact that i can not spell correctly I belive that sir isic newton has it all rong . we are not pulled down there are oposing forces one from the earth pushing up and one from the solar systome pushing down these forces push through each outher as in a magnet when tou try to push them together they opose each outher the field in between is simular to what i am talking abought the earths push up is slightly weaker than the outher push down there in fore all things remaine in one place until for every action there is an equay and oppisate reaction
    You see the moons push is greator push out than the systomes around its push down there in for the tides are not acting in accordance to the moons gravity pulling the water but it is reacting to the moos pushing down on the water that is all for now there is a lot more to say on this matter but i want to hear from youall first


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Moderator Moderator TheBiologista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,564
    Yes, Newton was inaccurate. Einstein showed that nearly 100 years ago.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3 thank you for your responce 
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    12
    actually einstine tried to prove a verry simular thery as i have stated mathmaticly he was frustrated with up until the day he died the differance between his thery and mine is that in my thery the force from the earth is pushing up not pulling us down

    we are being held in place by 2 forces 1 from the earth pushing up and 1 from the force of space pushing down each going through oneanouther with the force from the earth being just a little weaker than the force from space
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    8,795
    How will you test your hypothesis?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    Veracity Vigilante inow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    3,499
    Quote Originally Posted by TheBiologista
    Yes, Newton was inaccurate. Einstein showed that nearly 100 years ago.
    Small pedantic correction. Newton's ideas were only accurate in certain frames of reference. They are only inaccurate (more precisely, they only break down) in certain arenas. They are not inaccurate, just limited.

    The same applies to Einstein's ideas. They extend our abilities to model the universe, but even they breakdown at certain scales.

    You likely already know this, and were simply being curt with the OP which was deserving of a curt response, so I just add this for other readers.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Moderator Moderator TheBiologista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,564
    Quote Originally Posted by inow
    Quote Originally Posted by TheBiologista
    Yes, Newton was inaccurate. Einstein showed that nearly 100 years ago.
    Small pedantic correction. Newton's ideas were only accurate in certain frames of reference. They are only inaccurate (more precisely, they only break down) in certain arenas. They are not inaccurate, just limited.

    The same applies to Einstein's ideas. They extend our abilities to model the universe, but even they breakdown at certain scales.

    You likely already know this, and were simply being curt with the OP which was deserving of a curt response, so I just add this for other readers.
    I did and I was. Fair clarification though.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by inow
    Quote Originally Posted by TheBiologista
    Yes, Newton was inaccurate. Einstein showed that nearly 100 years ago.
    Small pedantic correction. Newton's ideas were only accurate in certain frames of reference. They are only inaccurate (more precisely, they only break down) in certain arenas. They are not inaccurate, just limited.

    The same applies to Einstein's ideas. They extend our abilities to model the universe, but even they breakdown at certain scales.

    You likely already know this, and were simply being curt with the OP which was deserving of a curt response, so I just add this for other readers.
    actually einstine tried to prove a verry simular thery as i have stated mathmaticly he was frustrated with up until the day he died the differance between his thery and mine is that in my thery the force from the earth is pushing up not pulling us down



    we are

    being held in place by 2 forces 1 from the earth pushing up and 1 from the force of space pushing down each going through oneanouther with the force from the earth being just a little weaker than the force from space

    Last edited by charles e sowers jr on Sun May 30, 2010 9:54 pm; edited 1 time in total
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Time Lord
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    8,035
    Sounds like this is not too different from the Aether theory. Space is most dense of all materials then, instead of the least dense. But then you would also have to explain why more massive objects exert less force pushing you away from them than less massive objects.

    Why does the Earth push you away from it more strongly than the Sun pushes you away from it? (Since gravity is lighter on the Earth than the Sun.)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    Quote Originally Posted by charles e sowers jr
    Quote Originally Posted by inow
    Quote Originally Posted by TheBiologista
    Yes, Newton was inaccurate. Einstein showed that nearly 100 years ago.
    Small pedantic correction. Newton's ideas were only accurate in certain frames of reference. They are only inaccurate (more precisely, they only break down) in certain arenas. They are not inaccurate, just limited.

    The same applies to Einstein's ideas. They extend our abilities to model the universe, but even they breakdown at certain scales.

    You likely already know this, and were simply being curt with the OP which was deserving of a curt response, so I just add this for other readers.
    actually einstine tried to prove a verry simular thery as i have stated mathmaticly he was frustrated with up until the day he died the differance between his thery and mine is that in my thery the force from the earth is pushing up not pulling us down



    we are

    being held in place by 2 forces 1 from the earth pushing up and 1 from the force of space pushing down each going through oneanouther with the force from the earth being just a little weaker than the force from space

    Last edited by charles e sowers jr on Sun May 30, 2010 9:54 pm; edited 1 time in total
    you effectively managed to double post nonsense. Good job.
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •