Thread: The Everyday UnifiedField for TalentedTruckDrivers

1. Theoretical Physics w'out Mathematics: For Talented Truck Drivers

The Reinstatement of Einstein's Presently Abandoned Unified Field (Steady State) Theory

1) Matter is in a constant state of accelerating expansion.

2) Einstein's Cosmological Constant is a repelling force responsible for the accelerating universe.

3) The Steady State Theory is reinstated.

4) Gravitational and inertial mass are identical because of the established accelerating expansion of physical matter; i.e. 'the universal rate of descent of objects in free fall in the absence of air resistance'.

5) Time dilation is due to the accelerating expansion of matter, i.e., the value of time varies with the - smaller or larger - coordinate system from which it originates and with which it is associated. C is constant, regardless of the velocity of its source, because it is an extension of that - given - source.

6) Lorentz Transformations are, basically, Doppler effect, as applied to expanding matter.

7) So called nuclear binding forces are electromagnetic gravity in the microcosms associated with the 'particle charge' - at earlier moments in the 4-D spacetime continuum.

8) This interpretation finds nuclear binding forces being what macrocosmic gravity is, in its earlier microcosmic moments in the continuum; hence, 'strong' and 'weak' forces of gravity are simply considerations of earlier and later moments in the accelerating expansion of the prevailing matter-field continuum.

9) This reduces - to two - the chore of unifying 'four forces' to the unification of electromagnetism and gravity, which are simply two different 'earlier' and 'later' considerations of the same phenomena. Mass is condensed energy, and energy is dispersed, transitory mass.

10) When the book is read, several pages of it explicate QM - why 'h' always has the same value - and the so called, enigmatic, 'quantum leap' - a sobriquet from chemistry's subjection of 'valence'. As an outsider, immune to the physics police, and as the world's #1 Einstein groupie I am recreationally ignored as passe; even while Einstein's 'abandoned' work is reinstated, camouflaged in the name of 'quintessence' and 'dark energy'.

11) It is well known that Einstein 'blundered' on the CC, it is not so well known that he was returned to working on it when he perished at Princeton in 1955.

12) The SOUND and SIGHT of ('unimaginable') 4-Dimensional acceleration.

13) The 'curvature' of light passing nearby a major gravitational mass, such as that determined in during a total eclipse of the sun, in the expedition of 1919 - which Einstein attributed to his example of an accelerating elevator and a light beam passing through it from side to side.

14) Black holes - if they exist - are 3-D singularities, becoming as small and dense as the accelerating expansion of the 4-d material universe becomes large and tenuous around it.

15) The comprehensive demystification of a subject which was previously accomodated only by authorities, on an esoteric and non mathematically incomprehensible subject. Simplifying what was previously and conceptually incomprehensible; especially to the majority without a specialized education.

16) It presents a panorama of thought provoking issues, questions and answers, which, of themselves - even if proven wrong - are a contribution to the contemplation of the physical universe, certainly including the unified field theory (Lambda - /\ ). Yes, even if disproven, it presents a reasonable riddle, any correctional solution to which only lets in even more light, and resolves what in the meanwhile has yet to be gainsayed.

17) All of these results (and more) are based on the same premise: matter is in a constant state of accelerating expansion; because that's what it's microcosmic constituents - fields and waves - are undergoing.

18) Regarding the hierarchical division of particles into ever smaller particles, the realm of the very small is as endless as the realm of the very large. In the words of Anorexus: "There's always something smaller than small, and always something larger than large'. "The universe is finite at any given moment in space, but infinite in time." - Einstein "There is no space empty of field." - Ibid
http://www.toequest.com/forum/toethe...-theories.html

2.

electromagnetism and gravity, which are simply two different 'earlier' and 'later' considerations of the same phenomena
Don't have a clue what that means, and I'm curious.

4. Thanks, Pong.
That URL was working when I first imparted it. Anyway, it should work again, now.

5. I think you need an editor. Readers want to know from the beginning (of a book, a chapter, a paragraph) what they're getting into. I for one, grew tired of half-heartedly skimming page after page rambling about your elusive thesis and your critic's somnambulance. What exactly are you talking about?!

There must be something in this book. Flip forward to the pictures then. Ah, a sketch of two elevators. Okay I think I get that idea. You are saying that if an elevator accelerates in space, the occupants will feel gravity. Next picture naturally is a planet with a stick figure standing on it. You are saying that if the planet surface accelerates outward, the person standing on it will feel gravity, just like in the elevator. Because everything in the universe expands, we find gravity throughout. So you've explained gravity, and I admit we sorely need an explanation for it.

I don't see this working. Suppose I leap off the planet's surface. Now, the planet is expanding. I'm expanding. The span between my free-falling feet is expanding. The ground should fly up and hit me? No, because the space between the planet and my flailing legs is also expanding with everything else. What's the difference?

6. Pong: There must be something in this book. Flip forward to the pictures then. Ah, a sketch of two elevators. Okay I think I get that idea. You are saying that if an elevator accelerates in space, the occupants will feel gravity. Next picture naturally is a planet with a stick figure standing on it. You are saying that if the planet surface accelerates outward, the person standing on it will feel gravity, just like in the elevator. Because everything in the universe expands, we find gravity throughout. So you've explained gravity, and I admit we sorely need an explanation for it.

I don't see this working. Suppose I leap off the planet's surface. Now, the planet is expanding. I'm expanding. The span between my free-falling feet is expanding. The ground should fly up and hit me? No, because the space between the planet and my flailing legs is also expanding with everything else. What's the difference?
---------------------------------------------------

Hi Pong:
The elevator, and the planet are not only expanding, they are accelerating - expanding ever-faster - and for the same reason the accelerating elevator overtakes you when you leap into the air, so too does the planet. The space between you and the ascending elevator floor doesn't prevent you from being overtaken by the acclerating elevator, nor does the space between you and the ascending earth's surface.

Although you are expanding along with the planet, you are not 25,000 miles in circumference (with your radius moving at 32 feet per second, squared); you move through a much lesser amount of space in a given unit of time. Electrons, protons and neutrons are charges of electricity, all, individually, expanding at the same rate. Whereas, a collective system of those constituents moves through more space in a given unit of time, than does a singular electron, neutron or proton.

The enigma is resolved in the recognition that the entire physical frame of reference is - 4-Dimensionally - ever enlarging, pinning the fans to their bleachers, all the cars to the asphalt in the parking lot, the city accommodating the ball park and the omnidirectionally expanding planet the city rests upon: rising up to create the illusion that the apparently curving baseball trajectory, which is actually a moving in a straight line ('geodesic'), appears to be moving in a parabolic arc. When a test object is projected straight up in the air, it does not 'slow down, turn around and return to the catcher. No indeed. The catcher - or the ground - rises up to overtake and impact the test object.

7. You didn't account for the also accelerating expanse of space between me and the planet.

For reality check: Move the letter "m". Suppose we float a letter "m" made of yarn, beside a brick, in space. Separate them as far as the span between "m" legs. Now, how do you get the near leg to bend and kick the brick?

8. You didn't account for the also accelerating expanse of space between me and the planet.

On or near a major gravitational coordinate system, the issue of the expansion of space is not the same issue as the expansion of deep, vacuous space as observed in the Silpher-Hubble expanding universe (which, since 1998, has been measured to be an accelerating expansion); or, the kind of expansion of space associated with the big bang.

The example of the elevator, as you may know, is used in Einstein's General Principle of Relativity, to explain, among other things, the equivalence of gravitational and inertial mass values. It is also used to explain the 'curvature' of light when passing near a major gravitational mass. The descent of free falling objects in the elevator is equivalent to the descent of free falling objects above the earth's surface.

I do not understand your metaphor of the 'm', constituted of yarn, and your question of how you kick the brick. Might you express this in a different metaphor?

9. I was asking how the space between the brick and "m"s nearest leg differs from the space between "m"s legs. Given equal spaces between brick, leg, and next leg; all these spaces should expand equally.

You kinda explained it with:
Originally Posted by That Rascal Puff
expansion of space is not the same issue as the expansion of deep, vacuous space
This seems like a kludgey fix. I think if you follow that route it grows increasingly complicated, and you'll be forever adding patches to conform with reality... just as other probably wrong theories do.

10. Pong: You kinda explained it with:

That Rascal Puff wrote:
expansion of space is not the same issue as the expansion of deep, vacuous space

Pong:
This seems like a kludgey fix. I think if you follow that route it grows increasingly complicated, and you'll be forever adding patches to conform with reality... just as other probably wrong theories do.

TRP:Since you haven't followed that route and are in doubtful understanding of the factors at issue in your question, you'll probably continue to consider it kind of a kludgey fix fulla patches like other probably wrong theories.

Meanwhile, test objects do descend in Einstein's accelerating elevator, while in your accordance, they don't come down at all when outside the elevator.

11. So are you going to explain the difference between an m leg space, and the brick-to-m space?

12. Pong:
So are you going to explain the difference between an m leg space, and the brick-to-m space?

TRP:
When you make it explicable, I'll explain it.

13. I'll try.

Here is a brick -> . <-
Here's an "m" -> m <-
And here they are side by side -> .m <-

The brick is relatively dense and massive compared to the m, which is only made of yarn. They're floating in space.

Note the space between "m" legs is about the same as the space between the near leg and the brick.

If we expand everything: brick, spaces, letter "m"; do you predict the near leg will bend and kick the brick? If so, why? Why don't all spaces expand equally?

14. Originally Posted by Pong
I'll try.

Here is a brick -> . <-
Here's an "m" -> m <-
And here they are side by side -> .m <-

The brick is relatively dense and massive compared to the m, which is only made of yarn. They're floating in space.

Note the space between "m" legs is about the same as the space between the near leg and the brick.

If we expand everything: brick, spaces, letter "m"; do you predict the near leg will bend and kick the brick? If so, why? Why don't all spaces expand equally?
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Your brick and yarn composites are sort of reminiscent of what weighs more, a pound of bricks, or a pound of yarn (something like that, anyway)?

Meanwhile, all neutrons, electrons and protons, et al, do expand equally, as does everything constituted of them. No, the brick leg will not bend and kick the brick. With the qualifications on near and distant space that we've already spoken of, all expansion maintains a relative density and is proportionate.

15. Originally Posted by That Rascal Puff
No, the brick leg will not bend and kick the brick.
I think you mean the "m" leg will not bend and kick the brick.

Okay, so let's replace the brick with a star, and replace the "m" with a nebula. Do you likewise predict the nearer part of the nebula will not bend into the star?

16. Originally Posted by Pong
Originally Posted by That Rascal Puff
No, the brick leg will not bend and kick the brick.
I think you mean the "m" leg will not bend and kick the brick.

Okay, so let's replace the brick with a star, and replace the "m" with a nebula. Do you likewise predict the nearer part of the nebula will not bend into the star?
----------------------------------------------------------
While the central theme of the work at issue is that the accelerating expansion of matter causes gravity on or near the surface of a major gravitational system, it is also a fact that a plumb bob suspended on a string near a montain range will move (however slightly) toward that mountain range. This proves a force of attraction acting in the 'Newtonian' sense, in tandem with the greater force of acceleration that is causing the bob to be suspended and have inertial mass at the end of the string.. For this reason there are apparently forces of attraction acting, as in the fact that like charges repel and unlike chages attract.

In order to determine whether the starlight would curve toward the nebula or conversely, more would need to be known about the arrangement of the two system's location in space. In any event, the curvature of light is accounted for by Einstein in his example of an accelerating coordinate system.

The overall status quo of the spatial universe is one of uniform placement of celestial systems, with exceptions to the rule, such as observations that some systems are actually in collision.

17. Originally Posted by That Rascal Puff
While the central theme of the work at issue is that the accelerating expansion of matter causes gravity on or near the surface of a major gravitational system, it is also a fact that a plumb bob suspended on a string near a montain range will move (however slightly) toward that mountain range.
"Also" admits the kludge, doesn't it? I don't mean that disparagingly - in fact I think if you got enough people invested in this potentially rich series of explanations upon explanations they'd support your theory because it is "vast, sophisticated, bolstered by growing mountains of work".

But weren't you wanting an elegant solution?

18. Originally Posted by Pong
Originally Posted by That Rascal Puff
While the central theme of the work at issue is that the accelerating expansion of matter causes gravity on or near the surface of a major gravitational system, it is also a fact that a plumb bob suspended on a string near a montain range will move (however slightly) toward that mountain range.
"Also" admits the kludge, doesn't it? I don't mean that disparagingly - in fact I think if you got enough people invested in this potentially rich series of explanations upon explanations they'd support your theory because it is "vast, sophisticated, bolstered by growing mountains of work".

But weren't you wanting an elegant solution?
Yes.
And the solution presented in my work is generally elegant, with exceptions that have beguiled every facet of theoretical physics, while the solution presented by Truly Yours has less kludges than most.

Speaking of 'kludges'...Although I have a more appropriate closure regarding this response from you, please allow this relevant digression regarding what 'elegance' can sometimes be said to mean. Namely, the book title: 'The Elegant Universe', about which I happen to have writtten something of a brief blog (with my sentiments, as it were, regarding a 'rich series of explanations', 'vast and sophisticated, bolstered by mountains of work'...)...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Brian Greene is a Keen Flying Machine
Spellbound, I will forever be under the baton of Nova's PBS broadcast Elegant Universe. Physicist Brian Greene is a Supreme and Empirical example of what it takes to become an American Idol. Anyone who can begin his fiat in real space-time with a one dimensional loop has my goat, I mean vote. There's no business like show business - like no business I know. The toughest business in the world. No I haven't stood in line to see the movie (stack it higher) yet, but I've read portions of the introduction to his book and all I can say is I've lost my ability to punctuate and misplaced any semblance of scientific inclination in the potent shadow of such a conspicuously talented and charismatic master of ceremonies.

In lieu of his Nobel Prize, room must be made for him in the house of Pulitzer, with Golden Globes suspended from the ceiling directly above the staging for the Academy Awards Oscar. Physicist Brian Greene is as every bit as elegant unto science & mathematics as Mike Tyson is unto pugilism in the international arena. The author is a model of what it takes to make it in the challenging world of political and social vertical ascension today. If Brian Greene and his 11 to 26 oscillating and undulating Super Strings don't vibrate all the way to the top of where it's at and stay there for another 30 years, displacing even the mighty big bang and black hole sensations, there is no Rex Reed or god... Meanwhile, the history of physics is kaput. My socks roll up and down in contemplation of the unfathomable depths that Lewis Carroll forsook, in his mathematical expeditions to and from Alice's Wonderland.

The destiny of science and humanity lies in the architectural ambition of designing a Castle in the Sky, where all that is needed is more bricks, mortar, multi- dimensional universal joints, wiring and an occasional - mathematically manifest - Sky Hook formula: when occasion behooves it. The Sky Hook's irreproachable mathematics rest on the backs of winged turtles. Forego talk of gravity. Any and all comprehensive understanding yields to highly classified. esoteric equations and formulae and elite societies of authorities ensconced in inscrutable coordinates.

Bewildered and beguiled public interrogatives may placate themselves with knowing with absolute certainty that the apparent complexities of reality are reducible to something that explains it with a burst of blinding lights that incapacitate all but the most refined, vitally youthful, specially educated and talented observers. A stronger, faster, more sentient class of scholars than there were before.

The Past, Present and Future is an anachronism.

As for me, I'm investing in #2 pencils and a tin cup. My goodness gracious in these editorial waves of future shock, what Joy of Cooking books will be Magically, Mystically & Mathematically Microwaved by String Theory's 'Mother', next? When Mother needs another string dimension, she summons Father to rustle one up. Hence 10 dimensions beget 11, and if need be, 11 beget 26, and more if you have need for them. Creating a begotten bustle of iconoclastically inbred bastards to rival Noah's Ark.

The Ministry of Plenty has merged with a Star Trek inspired Hollywood Guild, founded in the Top Guns of Geneva & Stockholm, where the answers proliferate in the parameters of a jungle of particular particles inventoried in collisions of ponderous protons. The reinstallment of Einstein's 'abandoned' Cosmological Constant - Lambda /\ - is a public secret wrapped in dark energy and quintessence, while it is forgotten that Einstein (Who?) was returned to working on what he had earlier called the 'biggest blunder' of his life, before he perished at Princeton in '55.

Without a quantitative prediction in over 30 years the New Age string 'theory' advocates are push-pinned to the academic bulletin board, with the young school following the Ministry of Justice, the mathematicians following the funds and the physicists following the grants.

The Lost Platoon's objective is to bag a metaphorical lion Einstein spoke of in a parable - of a Unified Field that would unite electromagnetism, gravity and/or quantum theory - and, according to the latest reports from the inscrutable inner circle, quite possibly eliminate any need for gravity altogether.

Pretenders may fall with confidence upon the old saw of talking about something that they understand no one comprehends in the first place. Only string 'theorists'. ouija board masters, and certified table levitators will penetrate the mathematical entanglements, equations and collapsations of the triple canopy wet woodlands and thick snarling masses of tropical vegetation where Einstein's (!) fabled, Mighty King of the Jungle Makes and Maintains his Mystical Magic.

The lion is too large to be seen in the thick foliage and wilderness right now but the leading scatologists are reporting that soon rare paw prints will be located and the equation and formula slingers will be in gifted sight of the Jungle King's legendary one half inch of tail and then his mighty, hirsute caboose is predicted to emit a roar that may disable all sensory equipment for any further detection of him. The universe (one verse) has been modified by the New Age World Order to mean as many and more universes than there are grains of sand on all the beaches in all the world. The sparkling possibilities are as endless as the New Age revised, revolutionary new approach to the 21st century TOE. The *Ministry of Truth has in the meanwhile cleared the path for the industriously unstoppable safari - by way of dismissing reality, for lack of evidence.
(*Co-authored "Battered & Bullied Women Make Better Pancakes & Burgers")

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Indeed, string 'theory' is now in the mainstream of physics, and the midstream is very deep and turbulent - rich with auxiliary explanations and boiling with vast and sophisticated tributaries and mountains of work...

On the other hand, I don't do math. So I'm out of the cabal's flourish of New Age 'elegance', whereas, I don't have to look over my shoulder for the establishment physics police either. Convoys of like minded truck drivers are immune to the politics of academia. Enough authorities of various stripe have complimented the 298 page missive that is centered in our discourse; the reading of which is a reward in itself - which also arms the critic with specific points of disagreement, questions, and/or concurrence.

Since it's based on the foundations of Modern Physics, disqualification isn't likely, but, even if and when it should be gainsayed, it's value as an educational primer for the lay reader in advanced physics will not be lost in whoever may liberate it from it's presently undisqualified status. The relatively elegant education will be imparted, and the work will be relegated to a valuable and solved riddle.

19. Dear Pong:
The following urls are but fragments of culminating world phenomenological trends; the messages therein may not portend the company that you and others keep, but, it is the company that keeps you and others.

The entire world, from eco-systems to academia, science, art and culture, is going south; the following blogs are some narrow beams of light still finding a way through the culminating darkness. One of these blogs is about the abuse of Dr. Brian Greene's sensational 'String Theory', and how it extends far beyond Dr. Greene or his theory, revealing 'a world that cannot scratch itself without becoming entangled in its own web'. http://milesmathis.com/string.html

Another is about control of information, which is directly related to how 'educational reform' is bearing down upon us like the 'New Math' (which was taught for decades before it summed up its own undoing).
http://milesmathis.com/wiki.html

Of course, anyone who may seriously consider these sources of information is at hazard of perishing beneath a hail of crank stigmatized darts. That - mud-slinging, back biting, rat packing, ostracizing dynamic of character assassination - also, is subjected in the proffered materials.

Then, there are those who would understandably ask, 'Why?' What is to be gained by methodologically mass producing misinformation and crazymaking? What is there to be gained, by whom, for such proposed, contrived dynamics?

The answer is simply, that a higher gross national product is to be gained, by the 'corporate state' (big business): Masses of people in a general state of harmony, consume much less - of everything that there is to be consumed - than do masses of people in a general state of chaos, confusion and fear.

Operant conditioning, neurolinguistic programming, psychomolecular restructuring, behavior modification - brainwashing by any other magnetically exotic, Orwellian NewSpeaking name. Reality is being dismissed for lack of evidence. It's 'not reality, it's (crazy-making) actuality.'

(*'What difference does it make? Nobody cares. It's always been this way. There's nothing you can do about it.' - Familiar calls to surrender. Give ye up all hoopex, who roll in *herex.)

'Those who are not willing to defend freedom and democracy, are not worthy of enjoying any of it'. - Ben Franklin (paraphrased)

Readers may draw their own conclusions.

 Bookmarks
Bookmarks
 Posting Permissions
 You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts   BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On [VIDEO] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are Off Pingbacks are Off Refbacks are On Terms of Use Agreement