Notices
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Universe Physics System Flaw

  1. #1 Universe Physics System Flaw 
    Forum Bachelors Degree martillo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Uruguay
    Posts
    463
    No enemy to kill.
    No "Devil" to destroy.
    Just a flaw to fix.

    This is a missing viewpoint/paradigm in all Religions, Sciences, Phylosophies and even Literature and Hollywood movies.

    http://www.geocities.com/anewlightin...cs_System_flaw

    I would like he opinion of people in this forum about this.
    Particularly if anyone know a reference or link with some kind of similar approach.


     

  2.  
     

  3. #2 Re: Universe Physics System Flaw 
    Forum Professor sunshinewarrior's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,525
    Quote Originally Posted by martillo
    No enemy to kill.
    No "Devil" to destroy.
    Just a flaw to fix.

    This is a missing viewpoint/paradigm in all Religions, Sciences, Phylosophies and even Literature and Hollywood movies.

    http://www.geocities.com/anewlightin...cs_System_flaw

    I would like he opinion of people in this forum about this.
    Particularly if anyone know a reference or link with some kind of similar approach.
    Dear Martillo

    Similar approaches can be found in the pseudo-science section.

    As there appears to be a semi-mystical flavour to your approach, I am allowing this one post on the grounds that it may be considered speculative/mystic philosophy, rather than the analytic tradition that we tend to follow on this sub-forum.

    Any further posts, in this sub-forum, of this nature, however (if this one does not raise a philosophically substantive response or set of responses), will be deleted summarily or moved, if it isn't a dupe, to pseudo-science.
    Best regards

    shanks (in moderator mode)


     

  4. #3  
    Forum Bachelors Degree martillo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Uruguay
    Posts
    463
    Aristoteles, may be the first scientist treated about Physics and about Metaphysics.
    In the scond he did present his viewpoint about those things that even without the lack of direct observation were important to be treated with the most reason and logic that those things could be treated in those times. He presented what made the most sense to him with such an analitic mind.
    I also expect an analitic approach here but in this area I think we only counts with a "fuzzy" knowledge spreaded around the world as different perceptions, beliefs, phylosophical tendencies, etc and may be all contains a piece of truth although wrong in many things particularly if taked literally.
    I'm offering a new point of view which is what makes sense to me after all I have seen, heared and thought in my life and I hope it could open another line of thought that as I said is missing and I think is important nowadays.
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •