Here is something of interest from:
http://brainblogger.com/2008/06/30/v...o-edged-sword/
""Sayer Ji
July 01, 2008 | Permalink
Vaccination is not safe, nor effective. Science demonstrates the veracity of this statement, over and over again. Statistics show that vaccination has not lead to a dramatic reduction in say, measles, or polio - but that preceding the advent of vaccines for these conditions, levels had dropped precipitously thanks to better hygiene and water purification. To the contrary, measles is now a growing threat because vaccination disables the innate mechanism by which measles is permanently eliminated from the body, transforming what would be an acute disease into a chronic one.
And to the critics of anecdotal evidence - the death or permanent disabling of a child (lets say, your child), when followed by an obvious, singular cause: vaccination, can not be dismissed because the tragedy did not occur within the context of a large, double-blind clinical trial. Claiming that drawing a connection between life-altering negative side effects and vaccination is “unscientific” obviates the lack of commonsense involved in believing that injecting disease entities into healthy bodies to defend that body from disease is a sound medical practice. Are there no naturopaths left in the world? Allopathic medicine (toximolecular) began with this selfsame presupposition: that treating the body with sublethal dosages of toxic substances is a sane practice. What nonsense! It is Big Pharma, and not “Good Science” that many of you unwittingly defend with your misplaced criticisms.
tia
July 01, 2008 | Permalink
Yes, take a big breath, indeed. First, the “bad science websites” include the archives of JAMA, NEJM, Lancet, CDC, FDA and Medscape. Still no sign of a double-blind, placebo study for vaccines…..EVER. (The academicians claim that would be “unethical”, despite thousands of parents who would willingly volunteer their children for the placebo group.)
Second, do your own homework on the amount of mercury in vaccines, still. Despite the tired journalistic phrase “it’s been removed”, it has not. Thimerisol is still used in the manufacturing process, and if you ask the CDC how much is still there, they defer to the FDA. The FDA (who should know, right?) defer to the manufacturer. The manufacturer(s) refuse to answer the question. Go ahead, ask. But you won’t get an answer. What IS noteworthy is that they have never been ‘required’ to remove the toxic matter, and although they have lowered the amounts, reluctantly, the old stocks with full mercury content stayed on the shelves for several years afterward. That might explain the continuing rise in neurological dysfunction afterward. “scientists”?
Third, call it a greed-based conspiracy if you like, and bear this in mind: An anonymous study conducted by Van Breda revealed that fewer than 30% of practicing pediatricians adhere to the CDC’s recommended vaccine schedule when it comes to their OWN children. Apparently, ordinary parents aren’t ’smart enough’ to decide if their children should be injected ad nauseum, but there’s some degree of genius required to inoculate OTHER people’s children. And whether vaccine manufacturers adhere to the schedule when it comes to their own children, I don’t know….and neither do you. Surely you don’t think they’d make that information public, considering the harassment that parents who don’t ‘comply’ face nowadays. ""
Ok now, I am not an expert in the "vaccination" area, yet I find it alarming of what many scientists are saying regarding the damage they cause.
biologista- there are many more scientists than you are aware of stating similar things to the above, many.
I think your mis-judging how small the group is that agree with the above opinion.
Even if 70%+ disagree- That doesnt automatically dismiss the whole matter as 'rubbish'. This is what I've been trying to point out about the mind-set scientists can get stuck into.