Notices
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Acredited Unified Field Theory

  1. #1 Acredited Unified Field Theory 
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    80
    Leslie R. Pastor
    (The following statement was issued by New Energy Congress member, Leslie R. Pastor, on Dec. 5, 2005)

    Two of The Brightest Lights Shine Forth in the Realm of Modern Physics Currently


    Searching for Isaac Newton, James Clerk Maxwell, or for that matter Albert Einstein is a sheer impossibility, since they have long since departed from our Earthly realm. They merely exist, as mere memories, or as an after-thought, when referring to their various equations, F=MA, E=MC^2, or the unification of electricity and magnetism giving us electromagnetic waves [light]. But they have remained steadfast pillars as a bulwark supporting our known 'sciences.' They are gratefully acknowledged for the sheer genius, they have bestowed upon us. Others, from a previous generation [Nikola Tesla] developed our industrial base from their discoveries.

    But today we have furthered their reach, we have extended their 'science,' indeed, we have formulated newer 'novelties of fact' from the 'minds' of their fresh discoveries. The ability to lower the ground state of the hydrogen atom is a significant accomplishment. Indeed the resultant release of vast quantities of plasma energy from those reactions is mind-boggling. The resultant creation of a new form of matter astounds one's credulity let alone belief. But, to further our incredulity, we also have newer 'unification' examples that seem to verify, indeed support, such 'novelty of fact.' This would tend to provoke us to toss such affirmations into the refuse bin. But...........

    Dr. Randell Lee Mills, [MD, Ph.D, Harvard, MIT, Summa Cum Laude,] http://www.blacklightpower.com/ the father of the 'hydrino' not only accomplished the lowering of the ground state of the hydrogen atom. He has earned the respect, admiration and acknowledgement of over sixty (60) university and research labs worldwide. He has received support from some of the most astute financial houses in the economic world. He is one of the greatest minds to grace this planet since, Newton, Maxwell and Einstein.

    Dr. Myron Wyn Evans http://www.aias.us/ recently received an 'historic' civil list pension from Her Majesty Elizabeth II, the Queen of England for his 'Unified Field Theory.' This is a magnificent and rare accomplishment that only five (5) previous historic men of science/letters have achieved: (1) Michael Faraday, (2) James Prescott Joule, (3) Lord Byron, (4) Lord Tennyson, (5) William Wordsworth.

    Both Mills and Evans sustain James Clerk Maxwell's original 'unified field theory' enabling us to discover 'energy' systems not hitherto acknowledged as acceptable to the 'scientific' community. Both of these superlative gentlemen have 'breathe' new life into our tired planet, giving us hope for the future of all mankind. Einstein would be proud of their achievements, since they, together, have furthered his reach.

    Incidentally, both of these 'gentlemen' have verified Thomas E. Bearden, and his Motionless Electromagnetic Generator. Their 'unified field theories together support and sustain 'overunity' and 'energy from the vacuum' systems. And by inference, these same two gentlemen sustain Nikola Tesla's initial discoveries as well.

    All the Best,
    Leslie R. Pastor

    PS: For those 'educated idiots' who rant and rave regarding the impossibility of 'perpetual motion,' let me silence them once and for all, by stating unequivocally, that Perpetual Motion is Sir Isaac Newton's FIRST LAW OF MOTION. Perpetual Motion is not only a possibility, IT IS REALITY throughout the known UNIVERSE enabling Nikola Tesla to make his now famous statement regarding the 'wheelworks of nature.'


    Randell Mills and Blacklight Power
    http://www.cheniere.org/misc/mills.htm

    Directory: Blacklight Power
    http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Blacklight_Power

    Blacklight Power Management
    http://www.blacklightpower.com/management.shtml

    A New Physics Paradigm
    http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin...mes;read=70088

    Eugene Mallove Answers Robert Park: Voodoo Science, INDEED!
    http://www.anomalist.com/commentaries/voodoo.html

    On Extracting Electromagnetic Energy From the Vacuum [EFTV]
    http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/o...M%20energy.htm

    Myron Wyn Evans: Alpha Institute of Advanced Study
    http://www.aias.us/
    http://www.atomicprecision.com/
    http://www.atomicprecision.com/blog/
    http://www.atomicprecision.com/blog/?page_id=465


    Fact OU is Suppressed: The Control Paradigm Enforces This Policy
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/endsecrecy/message/6098

    Extracting Energy From the Vacuum is Just A Drop In The Ocean
    http://pesn.com/2005/07/24/9600128_ZPE_Drop_in_Ocean/
    Myron Myn Evans unified field theory.

    http://www.aias.us/


    "The present is theirs ; the future, for which I really work , is mine." Nikola Tesla
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Forum Cosmic Wizard SkinWalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Grand Prairie, TX
    Posts
    2,377
    Clearly this is pseudoscience.

    Case in point:
    PS: For those 'educated idiots' who rant and rave regarding the impossibility of 'perpetual motion,' let me silence them once and for all, by stating unequivocally, that Perpetual Motion is Sir Isaac Newton's FIRST LAW OF MOTION.
    For anyone who's actually had high school level basic science, the statement above is immediately absurd, but for Clarky's sake, I'll remind him that Newton's First Law states, "Every object in a state of uniform motion tends to remain in that state of motion unless an external force is applied to it." Energy is still required to put an object in motion.

    I'm moving this to the pseudoscience forum and invite all science minded members to comment on this un-provenienced quote by Leslie Pastor and the links provided.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    80
    Using existing theories and non higher symmetry theories, yes this is interpreted as peseudo.. the point is in the case of that first law with higher symmetry systems such as myron evans's theory where you have to take vacuum space time into account, this being a source of energy in itself extend's newton's law in this circumstance, we are now talking about the supersystem here not what we traditionally understand which is a macrocosm of it, higher symmetry electrodynamic's, measuring space time curvature, scalar potential's as real working forces.

    that statment is only obsurb within classical 3 dimensional criteria, where vacuum is inert.

    ie. matter is energy and the energy source is perpetual as far as we are concerned within the time frame which we operate, the furthest the accepted theories have gone is the virtual particle which when concieved needs perpetual properties to allow the fundementals to happen, the physical hints are there, ie aharonov and bohm's experiment which proves virtual elements can be made to have a physically observable presence.

    As the theory states EM waves are not just simply what we see in a purely transverse form, that is just the 3 dimensional makeup. They have a substructure, a bi directional longitudinal component. It is what gives the photon its duality, it is what connects gravity to electromagnetisim, a wave is neither transverse or longitudinal it is both at the same time with the longitudinal component being more fundemental.
    "The present is theirs ; the future, for which I really work , is mine." Nikola Tesla
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Forum Radioactive Isotope mitchellmckain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Salt Lake City, UTAH, USA
    Posts
    3,112
    Virtual particles are not a source of energy. This is a basic fact.

    However, I must confess that although I understand all the individual words and references in Clarky's post I cannot comprehend the meaning of the way in which these words and references have been put together.

    I believe there is a growing trend to use technobabble to dazzle the less educated marks of fraud. The sophistication and sincerity of these perpertrators of fraud vary so greatly that I have concluded that there is a fine (even vanishing) line between an inventor, a crackpot and a swindler. Of course, as I have said before the most innovative inventors will always be crackpots until the truth of their work is recognized. This is unavoidable.
    See my physics of spaceflight simulator at http://www.relspace.astahost.com

    I now have a blog too: http://astahost.blogspot.com/
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    80
    It appears it falls down to the individuals comprehension of energy, stereotypically we think of energy as being work that 'we' can put to use, but this is not the case with the principals which are required to unify what we presently understand, because natures operation does not differentiate or externalise the meaning of energy like us.

    so to correct that statement, virtual particles are not a direct source of useful usable energy at present, mostly because we cant see them or manipulate them within the standard theories, because there are massive missing links that might allow us to comprehend manipulating the substructure.

    but the particles are clearly required as a source of energy for nature's operation which is related to the end resultant of the process, energy in a form where we can put it to useful work.
    "The present is theirs ; the future, for which I really work , is mine." Nikola Tesla
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Forum Cosmic Wizard SkinWalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Grand Prairie, TX
    Posts
    2,377
    I think being highly skeptical of the dubious claims of the "alternate energy" crowd is a safe road to travel. Their behavior has all the hallmarks of pseudoscience and little evidence that the scientific method is consistently adhered to.

    On this subject, Robert Park, the author of Voodoo Science stated in his weekly newsletter, "What's New:"
    2. TINY HYDROGEN ATOMS INVOKED TO EXPLAIN "COLD FUSION" CLAIMS!
    From the beginning, physicists marvelled at the robust health of Pons and Fleischmann. At the power levels they claimed from cold fusion cells, even the cockroaches in their lab should have been exterminated by radiation. The explanation, it was revealed in a press conference yesterday in Lancaster, PA, is that there wasn't much fusion going on to begin with. Big news, you are probably saying! So where did the heat come from? That's the surprising part; it comes from shrinking the hydrogen atoms! This is done by getting the atoms into a state BELOW the ground state. If the shrunken atoms are deuterons, of course, they may fuse from time to time, which explains why cold fusion results are erratic. This remarkable discovery was made by Randy Mills, MD Harvard Medical School, '86 and will be published by Fusion Technology in August.
    Friday, 26 April 1991 Washington, DC

    Also, there is some interesting discussion in Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hydrino_theory

    What interests me, however, isn't the actual claims so much as the methods that the claimants adhere to. They frequently appeal to the authority of scientists where they can, but when they cannot they blame science for being "an establishment" of sorts that must be overcome. Frequent mention of "paradigms" that need to change, etc. are also part of their rhetoric. But the moment one, single person with a Ph.D. comments favorably, the "establishment of science" suddenly becomes important for that specific comment.

    I find it all quite fascinating.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Forum Freshman Yevaud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    87
    Quote Originally Posted by SkinWalker
    This remarkable discovery was made by Randy Mills, MD Harvard Medical School, '86 and will be published by Fusion Technology in August.
    Hardly appropriate academic accreditation for this sort of thing.
    *Welcome, my friends, to the show that never ends*
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1
    When one is unwilling or incapable of recognizing simple truths, and when one then remains dogmatic within their comfort zone, they are no longer applying ‘science,’ but ‘dogma.’ Sir Isaac Newton, addressing the empirical fact of the Universe, merely acknowledged what was universally understood. All objects within the known ‘universe’ are already in ‘motion’ and will remain in ‘motion,’ unless, these same objects are opposed by an opposing force. They have remained in ‘motion’ for over 14 billion years.

    Perpetual Motion is, absolutely, a fundamental fact of ‘reality’ within the known Universe. http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/022503.htm

    All the Best,
    Leslie R. Pastor
    http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:MEG
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    The energy for that perpetual motion is the energy 'released' by the Big Bang. So, unless and even if, you consider the Big Bang to be a large scale vacuum fluctuation, then you still don't get something for nothing.

    TANSTAAFL
    Robert Heinlein
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Raglan Road
    Posts
    34
    Free lunch?

    mmmmmmm.......hydrogen.......
    Let me warm up first....don't want to pull a hammy.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    Hydrogen emerged from the 'condensation' of energy as space-time expanded after the Big Bang. The energy was already there. We didn't get it for nothing. That includes the energy that can be extracted through the fusion of hydrogen into helium, which is what I think you were aiming at.

    There really are no free lunches, not in this Universe.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #12  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Raglan Road
    Posts
    34
    Quote Originally Posted by Ophiolite
    Hydrogen emerged from the 'condensation' of energy as space-time expanded after the Big Bang. The energy was already there. We didn't get it for nothing. That includes the energy that can be extracted through the fusion of hydrogen into helium, which is what I think you were aiming at.

    There really are no free lunches, not in this Universe.
    I think you over-analyzed what was supposed to be very tounge-in-cheek.

    But it sounds nice, so maybe we could say that while there are no free lunches, there are some that come at a reduced cost.
    Let me warm up first....don't want to pull a hammy.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •