I'm not sure exactly where to put this thread, as it doesn't seem to me to be pseudoscience. Rather, it seems more like a conclusion drawn from various assumed truths about Time. Anyway, here it is.
For the sake of this argument, I have assumed that the definition of Time is simply:
As Time is a measure of change, to stop Time would be to make nothing change. No movement or transfer of energy in any way.Time is a measure of change.
If Time is started again, i.e. things start to change, there will have been no space of Time between the time that Time was stopped and the time that Time was started again, because Time was stopped between the two events. Therefore to any observer Time did not stop.
My conclusion from this is that Time can only ever stop if it never starts again.
What do you think? Is this wrong, obvious...or enlightening?![]()