Notices
Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Future Major Science Breakthrough- Levitation using anti-gra

  1. #1 Future Major Science Breakthrough- Levitation using anti-gra 
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    32
    Future Major Science Breakthrough- Levitation using anti-gravity matter.

    Is there any possibilities of levitational force opposing gravity in future without using jet or wind? The answer is YES.

    As the theory of gravity discovered by Newton, there is possible for somebody to discover anti-gravity matter in future. As we know that gravity existed when there is a mass, eg planet, stars. Even our body also exert some unnoticed gravity on its own because of mass. This is really amazing as how a mass can generate gravity force in nature. There must be some sort of energy used to generate strong gravity force of the earth and other stars. Could it be generated from the powerful nuclear reactor in the core of a planet? So how do we interfere the gravity forces? Lets assumes the gravity is done by gravitron particle, so how do we deflect these particles so it will not affect us?

    The eye witness of UFO flying in the sky says that the flying saucers emit colourful light. Perhaps the alien using both visible and non-visible electromagnetic spectrum to illuminate certain material on the craft and the reaction process occurred between light and the material causes levitation of the craft itself. So the alien craft can hover in our space without visible or any detected downward force. Do we have this kind of material element in our periodic table? Or other element not in periodic table which not yet discovered that existed in other planets or solar system? Some eye witness mentioned they saw the smooth shiny surface of the craft, resemble aluminum foil. If we can gather the alien craft in its crash site and using different combination of electromagnetic spectrum illuminating the craft surface, perhaps we can found the answer of levitation.There is some relationship between gravity and light rays. As light approach strong gravity forces such as Black Hole, the light ray will bend or absorbed by strong gravity. Take note that UFOs emit visible light wave not to entice us or entertain us, they have taken every precautionary step to avoid our detection. No aliens love other to discover their presence.

    As we can see hydrogen gas can defy gravity or any lighter material will stay afloat in the liquid because of different volume density, perhaps we can utilizing this application on defying gravity in the future. Perhaps we can make the air denser than our body so we will have reduced recorded weight on earth. If we all can live in water, we will be able to defy some gravity force pulling us down but it is not the case.

    The common phenomena that UFO witnesses mentioned are their electrical system went down,eg cars, clock, tv stop working when they encounter UFO.
    There is total silent, no wind turbulent, but a dead of all electrical system suddenly. There is no coincident of all electrical appliances failure at that moment, and all the electrical instruments back to normal after UFO left . From this point of we can deduce that some instrument on UFO accidentally or intentionally alter our electrical system. They may using instrument that may interfere with our electrical system. Our electrical system is using electric charge moves from the positive side of the power source to the negative. But in aliens craft may using electromagnetism that counter our electrical system, such as negative ions move to positive or so on. With counter electromagnetism, it can counter the gravitron and develop levitation.

    Magnetic levitation may be one of the solution in future, maglev, or magnetic suspension is a method by which an object is suspended with no support other than magnetic fields. The electromagnetic force is used to counteract the effects of the gravitational force. A substance which is diamagnetic repels a magnetic field. All materials have diamagnetic properties, but the effect is very weak, and usually overcome by the object's paramagnetic or ferromagnetic properties, which act in the opposite manner. Any material in which the diamagnetic component is strongest will be repelled by a magnet, though this force is not usually very large. Diamagnetic levitation can be used to levitate very light pieces of pyrolytic graphite or bismuth above a moderately strong permanent magnet. As water is predominantly diamagnetic, this technique has been used to levitate water droplets and even live animals, such as a grasshopper and a frog; however, the magnetic fields required for this are very high, typically in the range of 16 teslas, and therefore create significant problems if ferromagnetic materials are nearby.

    Superconductors may be considered perfect diamagnets (r = 0), completely expelling magnetic fields due to the Meissner effect. The levitation of the magnet is stabilized due to flux pinning within the superconductor. This principle is exploited by EDS (electrodynamic suspension) magnetic levitation trains, superconducting bearings, flywheels, etc.
    In trains where the weight of the large electromagnet is a major design issue (a very strong magnetic field is required to levitate a massive train) superconductors are sometimes proposed for use for the electromagnet, since they can produce a stronger magnetic field for the same weight.

    A magnet can be repulsively levitated when gyroscopically stabilized by spinning it in a toroidal field created by a ring of magnets. However, it will only remain stable until the rate of precession slows below a critical threshold the region of stability is quite narrow both spatially and in the required rate of precession.
    A permanent magnet can be stably suspended by various configurations of strong permanent magnets and strong diamagnets. When using superconducting magnets, the levitation of a permanent magnet can even be stabilized by the small diamagnetism of water in human fingers.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    Posts
    599
    stop


    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    32
    only stupid moomorpid don't accept the truth of future science. earth science and knowledge only represent 1% of the whole universe. so don't pretend you all guy know everything about physic.... STUPID!!!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Time Lord Paleoichneum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Washington State, USA
    Posts
    5,283
    So speaks the almighty one without a dictionary.

    Seriously, if you want any sort of meaningful dialog you should start with not verbally attacking anyone who disagrees with you. Otherwise you will be blocked as a troll.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    Posts
    599
    Quote Originally Posted by albert chong
    so don't pretend you all guy know everything about physic.... STUPID!!!
    I don't need to pretend for I am the master of physic. It's like fighting fire with fire guys
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    32
    stupid mormoopid... haha.... IQ level only 60
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Forum Masters Degree
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    625
    An admirable idea. However, as long as you take gravitons, there is a problem.

    You see, gravitons interact with anything that has energy, and are not like light. Light can be reflected off, mainly because it is not interacting with the particles of the metal. Gravitons, however, must interact with the particles, so they must be absorbed and hence must create the force of gravity.

    Taking the purely classical version of curved space-time, the only way then is to create negative energy or mass, which is possible either if they go faster than the speed of light, or through another technical method, which can be read anywhere else.

    Also, the fact that you're basing your theory on UFO accounts also serves to diminish the credibility, as UFOs have yet to be proven they exist. You might believe in them, but I need to see some proof before I do.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    32
    ok... thanks
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Forum Masters Degree
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    625
    No problem. However, as to your other ideas, I have to say that they are impossible.

    Making the air denser than our body would crush us, effectively killing us.

    Also, magnetic leviation is possible, but firstly would require a huge amount of energy just to start with if you wish to raise a big object, and you have no way of steering anywhere except on the magnet. You're confined to the region of a magnet and can't even rise up too far because the magnetic strength weakens the farther you go.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    32
    our current science and technology level still the at the beginner stage... there is more possibility in the future... stay tune for more....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11  
    Forum Masters Degree
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    625
    At the beginner stage? How can you say so? We are capable of sending satellites to planets as far away as Pluto, of creating machines that can compute and think far faster thsn humans can. We can design machines that play chess. We can destroy an entire atom. We can CREATE new elements. We caa make real live computers that are no bigger than a piece of paper, and we can send messages around the world at the speed of light.

    Our science is anything but at the beginner's stage. We have progressed far beyond Archimedes and Aristotle, beyond Newton and Galileo, beyond Einstein. We are advanced, far more than any other species on Earth. What proof do we have that our s science is at an amateur's level?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #12  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    32
    don't kidding man... even i got PhD Science i never said i am the master of the universal science.... there are still many unkwown that we need to discover in future.. i am searching for more high tech in future. hopefully can uncover space warp and levitation and other secret tech that we are experimenting now..
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #13  
    Forum Masters Degree
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    625
    I'm sorry, you have a PhD in science? Yet you started a thread asking if was a valid scientific equation mainly because Einstein simply chose those terms randomly, never mind the fact that Einstein spent ten years working on his theory, and managed to derive these equations.

    You can understand then what that means for people who know that Einstein worked on those equations, and did it properly. I myself have a hard time believing you have a PhD in science.

    What did you receive it for? Who awarded it to you?

    And exactly what unknowns are you talking about? There are only a few major problems left in physics; in biology, we''ve discovered how to make organisms; in chemistry, there are still new elements that are being created. There are not many problems left for us to solve.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #14  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    32
    Quote Originally Posted by Liongold
    And exactly what unknowns are you talking about? There are only a few major problems left in physics; in biology, we''ve discovered how to make organisms; in chemistry, there are still new elements that are being created. There are not many problems left for us to solve.
    ok... you make that claim.... lets see what our younger generation tell you in 1000 years to come... ok... bye.. see you next life... hehe...
    future science have more interesting content to study than our current science system which is quite boring...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #15  
    Forum Masters Degree
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    625
    Good gods, I can't believe you. I do not love mathematics, but I think our science is more interesting than even future science. After all, our generation has the privilege of having seen the beauty of Einstein's general relativity, and the mysterious, incomprehensible world of quantum mechanics.

    How can you not appreciate general relativity? It is beautiful, not because of the maths (I loathe mathematics, by the way), but because of the picture it generates in your mind. Levitation and warpages are secondary to the beauty of this one still picture in your mind of space slowly curving, twisting in ethereal motion and the collapsing as the object passes by.

    Levitation cannot match half the power of this single image.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #16  
    New Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    4
    liongold... what is your level of study? how dare scientist nowadays solved every technology problem? then your remark is that we will stop progressing in the future and satisfied with current state of tecnology.. that is simply nonsense. we still discover new science and tech everyday... there is no FULLSTOP. understand?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #17  
    Forum Masters Degree
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    625
    I think you misconstrue me. I do not mean we will stop progressing. I mean to say that our science should not be considered primitive in any way. I do not mean to say that science has solved every problem, merely that we are running out of problems. Does that clarify my statements?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #18  
    New Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    2
    liongold, you still immature in science. we haven't discover AIDS cure and vaccination, hepatitis B cure and many more... this simple answer prove that you still need to study more in science
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •