
Originally Posted by
theQuestIsNotOver
electrons flip and spin in shells around the nucleus.
the density of metals is indicative of the forces between atoms relevant to how shells of different nuclei can form virtual bonds with one another.
quanta is energy. mass is mass. energy is what mass can do when it no longer wants to be mass. mass is what energy can do when it no longer wants to be energy. the two are connected by by a space-time condition called the speed of light.
we all know this, right, though, don't we?
That is what you were taught. You have not a bit of understanding of what you are saying. You are reciting. You cannot explain what you are selling for others. Others that were not good scientists.
I know because I heard the accounts of Chadwick, Einstein, and his group try to explain attraction as a force. There is no such thing. They were publicly crushed in open debate. Not a chance that Chadwick and his group could ever sell aspirins over the counter safely.
You cannot explain attraction and no one else can either. You can only explain the appearance of attraction the illusion of attraction. But that is it.
The new modern scientists came to the debate with such assurance that they were right, based on nothing, that they never even thought about attraction. There whole theory was based on attraction. They never even thought about it before the debate.
Yet they were promoted to the highest positions after proving themselves the most blundering fools on earth.
I was taught something else before your stuff was real or accepted.
I saw the work that went into my stuff. And then I saw how they pushed through your stuff.
At the time it was, no contest. The original Universal Science work had 99.99 percent accuracy. With listed variables that had no possible solution.
The new work "would one day if left to grow show up the old work". The only problem was that they still used 99.99 percent of the old work to do anything. And based their finds on the solidity of the old Universal Science.
The new modern scientists are a bag of hypocrisy.
They attacked the old work at its weaknesses, that were admitted weaknesses. But so well known were the weaknesses that they were accepted variables.
Somehow with money and corruption the modern lazy scientists took over science.
Nothing that I know of has advanced really. We had everything we have now. Things are mostly smaller and more complex. Often doing senseless things, if these things, were being done in a first world nation.
We have lowered the standard of living and have introduced witch doctor practices that appear to be the right way to do things. But further the cover up of truth.
You cannot explain the bond as anything but an illusion. Some older professors in hopes that they were not flushing young scientists down the toilet would say that the forces of attraction are so complicated that, you will learn about it later.
Sincerely,
William McCormick