Notices
Results 1 to 39 of 39

Thread: A brief thought on time.....

  1. #1 A brief thought on time..... 
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    60
    What we humans tend to think about time is that it is something that flows and that it is because of time we or anything else change. This concept of time has created a whole new concept in understanding nature and lots of scientists are working on the concept of time so that it may oneday be possible to control time. But to me, it seems like the concept of time itself has created lots of trouble in understanding the real truth of the nature. What my view is; is that the concept of time does not fit anywhere in understanding nature and that the concept of time travel would have been possible if time was there. We are all unconcious and are doomed by the fantasies of the world. What i view is that there is sometihing(not time) that is changing us and that it is not possible to bring those changes back.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Administrator KALSTER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    8,231
    I have no idea what you just said...... :?


    Disclaimer: I do not declare myself to be an expert on ANY subject. If I state something as fact that is obviously wrong, please don't hesitate to correct me. I welcome such corrections in an attempt to be as truthful and accurate as possible.

    "Gullibility kills" - Carl Sagan
    "All people know the same truth. Our lives consist of how we chose to distort it." - Harry Block
    "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    60
    Quote Originally Posted by KALSTER
    I have no idea what you just said...... :?
    I am sorry if i did not make my self clear.

    The main point was that time(as what we view) is not what actually would lead us to understand what time is.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    60
    Quote Originally Posted by KALSTER
    I have no idea what you just said...... :?
    I am sorry if i did not make my self clear.

    The main point was that time(as what we view) is not what actually would lead us to understand what really time is. I mean what we understand as time travel, making time travel possible just doesn't make sense.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5 Re: A brief thought on time..... 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,176
    Quote Originally Posted by newspaper
    What we humans tend to think about time is that it is something that flows and that it is because of time we or anything else change. This concept of time has created a whole new concept in understanding nature and lots of scientists are working on the concept of time so that it may oneday be possible to control time. But to me, it seems like the concept of time itself has created lots of trouble in understanding the real truth of the nature. What my view is; is that the concept of time does not fit anywhere in understanding nature and that the concept of time travel would have been possible if time was there. We are all unconcious and are doomed by the fantasies of the world. What i view is that there is sometihing(not time) that is changing us and that it is not possible to bring those changes back.
    At any moment every individual in the universe is somewhere unique, compared to everyone else. That is what makes any moment unique.
    Every time a moment passes a unique set of circumstances is lost forever. In the end you wish you had spent everyone of those moments doing more for others, standing for truth under God.

    As George Washington was quoted "Nothing deserves your utter most patronage, more then the promotion of science and literature. Knowledge is in every country the surest basis of public happiness."

    Sincerely,


    William McCormick
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Forum Professor
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    In the circuitous haze of my mind
    Posts
    1,028
    We are all unconcious and are doomed by the fantasies of the world.
    Most people, that is.

    Yes, time is a human fabrication in terms of how we usually perceive it.

    What i view is that there is sometihing(not time) that is changing us and that it is not possible to bring those changes back.
    There is nothing changing us but the matter and energy around and inside us, which is impossible to escape.
    Of all the wonders in the universe, none is likely more fascinating and complicated than human nature.

    "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe."

    "Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence"

    -Einstein

    http://boinc.berkeley.edu/download.php

    Use your computing strength for science!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    60
    Quote Originally Posted by Cold Fusion
    There is nothing changing us but the matter and energy around and inside us, which is impossible to escape.
    I agree with you in some sense but why would the matter and energy change, i mean there must be something driving these changes.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Forum Professor Obviously's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    1,415
    Quote Originally Posted by newspaper
    I agree with you in some sense but why would the matter and energy change, i mean there must be something driving these changes.
    Physical processes?

    Time is just a concept made to measure change. That's it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9 time 
    Forum Sophomore
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    111
    the concept of time has arisen from phenomenon like rotation and revolution of earth
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10  
    Forum Freshman Xelthen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    10
    ...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11  
    Forum Junior
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Mumbai, India
    Posts
    203
    Quote Originally Posted by newspaper
    Quote Originally Posted by Cold Fusion
    There is nothing changing us but the matter and energy around and inside us, which is impossible to escape.
    I agree with you in some sense but why would the matter and energy change, i mean there must be something driving these changes.
    Entropy. It is what is driving time in the forward direction. After every change in the universe, the entropy of the universe must increase.
    Beyond Equations,

    Pritish
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #12 Re: A brief thought on time..... 
    Forum Ph.D. Steve Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
    Posts
    782
    Quote Originally Posted by newspaper
    What we humans tend to think about time is that it is something that flows and that it is because of time we or anything else change. This concept of time has created a whole new concept in understanding nature and lots of scientists are working on the concept of time so that it may oneday be possible to control time. But to me, it seems like the concept of time itself has created lots of trouble in understanding the real truth of the nature. What my view is; is that the concept of time does not fit anywhere in understanding nature and that the concept of time travel would have been possible if time was there. We are all unconcious and are doomed by the fantasies of the world. What i view is that there is sometihing(not time) that is changing us and that it is not possible to bring those changes back.
    I do find your post a little unclear. Especially the last sentence. An other issue was folks often interpret something that was not really in, and, by doing so, themselves begin to start the struggle they complain about later on.

    It's all wrapped nicely, but just don't look in, you know. There was absolutely nothing.

    Then you seem to misunderstand something. Time was there, whereas time travel was not.

    edited
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #13  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Manchester, England
    Posts
    107
    There is a clear difference between the everyday usage of the word "time" and the way in which it appears in physics. In physics, there is no use for the categories; past, present and future, but these concepts are deeply ingrained in everyday speech. I don't think there are any tenseless verbs, for example.

    I sometimes think that one of the problems which arises in discussing time is that the language we use isn't able to express what we mean. St Augustine is supposed to have said something like; "If I think of time, I know what it is, but if I am asked to explain it, I can't!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #14  
    Forum Junior
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Mumbai, India
    Posts
    203
    No, usage of the word 'time' is the same . In physics, time is measured by events occurring in the universe, while, in everyday life, is is still based on events like rising of the sun, noon, etc.
    Beyond Equations,

    Pritish
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #15 Re: A brief thought on time..... 
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    60
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Miller
    It's all wrapped nicely, but just don't look in, you know. There was absolutely nothing.
    may be you need to read more time to get it. Hidden in it is a beautiful concept that just makes no sense to most of us.

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Miller
    Then you seem to misunderstand something. Time was there, whereas time travel was not.
    I did't actually discuss if time was there. I only wanted to write that time as what we view is not what time is. and that it is far more complex than what we think it is. And looking at the current view of time: time travel just makes no sense.

    sorry if it is still confusing
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #16  
    Forum Ph.D. Steve Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
    Posts
    782
    Don't know if it was of a second language I know of or else. It's German by the way.

    I also do know well about the hidden concept you talked about. But, somehow, that's about it as long as the concept was hidden. And in many realms this concept was not so hidden as you pronounced it to be.

    I don't want to step forward and back again hence the concept was still hidden. This takes me to a good question:"Which hidden concept do we talk about?"

    Plus, if time was not what it was, what was it?

    Steve
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #17  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    60
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Miller
    Don't know if it was of a second language I know of or else. It's German by the way.

    I also do know well about the hidden concept you talked about. But, somehow, that's about it as long as the concept was hidden. And in many realms this concept was not so hidden as you pronounced it to be.

    I don't want to step forward and back again hence the concept was still hidden. This takes me to a good question:"Which hidden concept do we talk about?"

    Plus, if time was not what it was, what was it?

    Steve
    Firstly english is not my first language too

    I didn't actually mean that my post contained those hidden concept but infact what i meant was that my concept makes you think about those hidden concept that reality is hiding away from us.

    newspaper
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #18  
    Forum Ph.D. Steve Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
    Posts
    782
    I will agree as far as I also noticed the things that keep all going are not standing somewhere
    as written text or that sort of information. You know audio, video like that. Mostly it's something
    which those who are interested have to find out themselves. That's also where the true work
    lies.

    But I'm strictly opposing to agree that something 's going on steadily that was not. Like the
    hidden concept meaning a single person. That's rather blurring 'reality' and doing no good.

    Btw., I didn't say English was not being my first language.

    Steve
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #19  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    60
    Yes at this point i am with you.

    As i have given brief thought on time i would like to know how you would define or interpret what time is.

    Thanks
    www.physics-gallo.blogspot.com
    " If you give up i'm sure it'll give quite relief. No one will bother you or even pay attention to you. It feels alright but is still very painful."
    Reply With Quote  
     

  21. #20  
    Forum Ph.D. Steve Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
    Posts
    782
    Time was not even an valid mean of exploration, meaning space exploration, since space was
    and will be prevalent long before and after (earth ) time was, certainly. At some point that
    becomes a major fact.

    I had left time when I dealt with rhythm. I recognized rhythm was universal truly, not orienting
    on time, while time was bound to earth. Therefore, as an sample, time was not predestined
    to be a fourth dimension. The dimension term was not bound to earth like mass or others
    weren't. Time was! It's a cultural heritage perhaps, which can not be exported or transferred
    to other places.


    Steve

    edit:
    I got text here, which I think does prove Emc² was not conclusive.

    edited
    Reply With Quote  
     

  22. #21  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,176
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Miller
    Time to me was nothing else than for everyone else, I would say. Time was the shortcut of the
    seasons and day and night and surly has its origin in observing those phenomena, basically.

    The most important thing was that time seem not to be bound on space and there was no time
    anywhere else than on earth and at places only humans carry time to. To space missions and to
    the two space stations mankind has seen so far (hi guys, I guess everything was going well ).

    Time was not even an valid mean of exploration, meaning space exploration since space was
    there long before(earth ) time and will be, certainly. At some point that becomes a major fact.

    I had leave time when I dealt with rhythm. I recognized rhythm was universal truly, not orienting
    on time, while time was bound to earth. Therefore, as an sample, time was not predestined
    to be a fourth dimension. The dimension term was not bound to earth like mass or others
    weren't. Time was! It's a cultural heritage perhaps, which can not be exported or transferred to
    other places.

    Steve

    edit:
    I got text here, which I think does prove Emc² was not conclusive.

    I have debated E=MC^2 and I could not get anyone to agree conclusively what any of the symbols stood for. The deeper you go the more everyone lets go of what the meaning is.

    People who originally based their existence on it in the end say it is not really important.

    "E" is the symbol for "electron potential pressure" or "Electromotive force" and has been for a long time.
    "C" was Capacity in Farads.
    "M" Some say matter?
    "P" Stood for Power in watts.
    "G" stood for Mhos.

    But the point is E=MC^2 means absolutely nothing. Pertains to nothing, with current understanding.

    I was looking at Volts equal Mhos times Capacitance squared. This could be real. And a formula to explain perpetual motion, in induction equipment through an air gap.

    Because matter is not the source of energy. Ambient radiation is the source of energy. Meaning that volumes of very light gases due to the size of the spherical body created by them. Can level cities or states, or move the world. Even though the tonnage of explosives are low.

    World War Two was a show of trust that all citizens were somewhat sane despite the horrid living conditions. Because any country in the conflict could have ended the world with common supplies. World War Two was really a political movement of some kind.



    Sincerely,


    William McCormick
    Reply With Quote  
     

  23. #22  
    Forum Ph.D. Steve Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
    Posts
    782
    William McCormick

    I think Emc² has a meaning. It shall provide a clue on what energy was. Tricky was the mathematical aspect.

    One needs to handle his equation very accurate and the thinking and opinion, if, one has about.
    Otherwise it comes back all the time as 'the' issue and one was unsure again about what to think about Emc², Einstein and about energy, which was very important since the search for energy, new energy, other energy, mobile energy (to be the task for now ), better applicable energy and so forth ever will pertain.

    Sometimes I thought Einstein rather than everyone else was the perpetrator who caused the crash of the wall street stock exchange and who set off world war II. Images and audio and video of this time are somewhat proving under certain points of view.

    Perhaps Emc² would also cause one to fail to grapple with time, since he, I think, saw more in time than what was it and falsely bound space on time. I don't know about some one else who made such statements. It's the end I came to and do know it won't works for other persons until they invest the according amount of their own time.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  24. #23  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,176
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Miller
    William McCormick

    I think Emc² has a meaning. It shall provide a clue on what energy was. Tricky was the mathematical aspect.

    One needs to handle his equation very accurate and the thinking and opinion, if, one has about.
    Otherwise it comes back all the time as 'the' issue and one was unsure again about what to think about Emc², Einstein and about energy, which was very important since the search for energy, new energy, other energy, mobile energy (to be the task for now ), better applicable energy and so forth ever will pertain.

    Sometimes I thought Einstein rather than everyone else was the perpetrator who caused the crash of the wall street stock exchange and who set off world war II. Images and audio and video of this time are somewhat proving under certain points of view.

    Perhaps Emc² would also cause one to fail to grapple with time, since he, I think, saw more in time than what was it and falsely bound space on time. I don't know about some one else who made such statements. It's the end I came to and do know it won't works for other persons until they invest the according amount of their own time.
    We have perpetual motion and unlimited energy. It powers the planets and the universe. We can tap into however much we want of it. Rather safely if done with the purpose of safety.

    We had perpetual motion long before Einstein. And we still have it. Even the most basic understanding of electricity causes one to understand perpetual motion.

    It is frowned upon by law makers=failed leaders. It cuts off a dependency to their chaotic system of control. Some large business owners turned sour on humanity also do not see anything in it for themselves.

    That is why they are goofing around with solar cells for about one hundred years now. It is to avoid Tesla and others that clearly could create mega watts with a whisper of wattage.

    However E=MC^2 means nothing currently. And it shows you just how crazy schools and science is. That they still cling to it somehow. Against all America stands for.

    Sincerely,


    William McCormick
    Reply With Quote  
     

  25. #24  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,176
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Miller
    William McCormick

    I think Emc² has a meaning. It shall provide a clue on what energy was. Tricky was the mathematical aspect.

    One needs to handle his equation very accurate and the thinking and opinion, if, one has about.
    Otherwise it comes back all the time as 'the' issue and one was unsure again about what to think about Emc², Einstein and about energy, which was very important since the search for energy, new energy, other energy, mobile energy (to be the task for now ), better applicable energy and so forth ever will pertain.

    Sometimes I thought Einstein rather than everyone else was the perpetrator who caused the crash of the wall street stock exchange and who set off world war II. Images and audio and video of this time are somewhat proving under certain points of view.

    Perhaps Emc² would also cause one to fail to grapple with time, since he, I think, saw more in time than what was it and falsely bound space on time. I don't know about some one else who made such statements. It's the end I came to and do know it won't works for other persons until they invest the according amount of their own time.
    There is no grapple with time. Nothing at all fascinating about time, other then individuals waste a whole life of it, to afraid to say that they are alive and have rights as individuals.

    I have seen individuals stare at a single flower in awe for hours. Now I understand the pistil and stamens functions. And I see the beautiful geometry, colors and shadows of color, and smell the lovely fragrance.
    I would be the first to say that we will never even see the electrons that it is made of. Or the designer of the flower and universe. However it is a flower and I actually enjoy running them over with a lawn mower now and then. Ha-ha.

    But time is just a flower, it is there rather simply and harmlessly for a brief period. The only thing you can do wrong or misunderstand is that it is only there for a brief period, that you must use for God.

    E=MC^2 is garbage. If it is about energy and matter, it shows the user does not understand the universe.

    Einstein's nuclear pile was totally understood before he built it. And if he created it differently or if there was an accident. He could have wiped out the earth. He was not that intelligent for trying it on that large a scale.

    Looking back some would have to agree that he was either suicidal or perhaps the stupidest man on earth.

    I would not mind if Einstein discussed what you can do with a nuclear pile. His building it was irresponsible.

    The only thing sillier then E=MC^2 was that there is such a thing as attraction in a universe of pressure.


    Sincerely,


    William McCormick
    Reply With Quote  
     

  26. #25  
    (Q)
    (Q) is offline
    Forum Isotope (Q)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,650
    Quote Originally Posted by William McCormick
    E=MC^2 is garbage. If it is about energy and matter, it shows the user does not understand the universe.

    Looking back some would have to agree that he was either suicidal or perhaps the stupidest man on earth.

    Sincerely,


    William McCormick
    What really annoys the kooks is when experimentally verified theories contradict their pet theories and wild speculations.

    If Einstein were the stupidest man on Earth, you would rank in the top most intelligent group of people on Earth.

    How is Bizzaro-world these days, Billy?
    Religious Fundamentalist Club - Member #1.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  27. #26  
    Moderator Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,620
    Quote Originally Posted by William McCormick
    E=MC^2 is garbage. If it is about energy and matter, it shows the user does not understand the universe.
    Oh? Would you care to support these extravagant claims?

    Einstein's nuclear pile was totally understood before he built it.
    As far as I know, Einstein never "built a nuclear pile".

    Do you have any information that would support this assertion?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  28. #27  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,176
    Quote Originally Posted by Guitarist
    Quote Originally Posted by William McCormick
    E=MC^2 is garbage. If it is about energy and matter, it shows the user does not understand the universe.
    Oh? Would you care to support these extravagant claims?

    Einstein's nuclear pile was totally understood before he built it.
    As far as I know, Einstein never "built a nuclear pile".

    Do you have any information that would support this assertion?
    He was part of the team that called for unneeded experiments to thwart Germany. Germany's use of the neutral fields of ambient radiation was misunderstood by Einstein. It was not neutron particles that Germany was studying. It was ambient radiations ability to supply or absorb an abundance of electrons.

    As if you could thwart a real scientist, you cannot. Einstein was crying wolf. Germany could have mopped up the earth, if they had any good purpose at all. But they were already doomed without Einstein attacking them. Because there purpose was wrong.

    Germany had decided to fall short of the mark of excellence. Fools here in the United states noted German errors and instead of feeling sorry for Germany or helping them. Decided now was the time to jump on the pile and win. A bunch of morons.



    Sincerely,


    William McCormick
    Reply With Quote  
     

  29. #28  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,176
    Quote Originally Posted by Guitarist
    Quote Originally Posted by William McCormick
    E=MC^2 is garbage. If it is about energy and matter, it shows the user does not understand the universe.
    Oh? Would you care to support these extravagant claims?

    Einstein's nuclear pile was totally understood before he built it.
    As far as I know, Einstein never "built a nuclear pile".

    Do you have any information that would support this assertion?
    I have for 35 years after learning it was garbage, tried to find if there was anyone that had any real purpose for it. And I could not find one individual on earth that even offered the slightest value for it.

    There is nothing scientifically we cannot do without it. It is poorly defined, and most disagree on what it is.

    Sincerely,


    William McCormick
    Reply With Quote  
     

  30. #29  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,176
    Quote Originally Posted by (Q)
    Quote Originally Posted by William McCormick
    E=MC^2 is garbage. If it is about energy and matter, it shows the user does not understand the universe.

    Looking back some would have to agree that he was either suicidal or perhaps the stupidest man on earth.

    Sincerely,


    William McCormick
    What really annoys the kooks is when experimentally verified theories contradict their pet theories and wild speculations.

    If Einstein were the stupidest man on Earth, you would rank in the top most intelligent group of people on Earth.

    How is Bizzaro-world these days, Billy?

    Thank You.

    But if I cannot get the all electron universe back in place. I will suspect that I am not that intelligent and all or most are committing a genocide of the human race.

    Sincerely,


    William McCormick
    Reply With Quote  
     

  31. #30  
    Moderator Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,620
    Quote Originally Posted by William McCormick
    . There is nothing scientifically we cannot do without it.
    This is manifestly false; Quantum Field Theory, the mot accurate theory of the universe yet devised by Man, depends explicitly on that identity
    It is poorly defined, and most disagree on what it is.
    Wrong and wrong. In what sense is poorly defined? Do you have problem with the fact that E = the energy of a massive body, m = it's mass and c = light-speed?

    Who, apart from you, disagrees with "what it is", whatever this might mean?

    If you wish to make a coherent argument to support your assertions, do so. Otherwise they will remain empty and ill-informed assertions, with no obligation on anyone to even consider them

    P.S. If you are so dismissive about science in general, why join a Science Forum?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  32. #31  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    7
    Time is .....

    (I erased it)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  33. #32  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,176
    Quote Originally Posted by Guitarist
    Quote Originally Posted by William McCormick
    . There is nothing scientifically we cannot do without it.
    This is manifestly false; Quantum Field Theory, the mot accurate theory of the universe yet devised by Man, depends explicitly on that identity
    It is poorly defined, and most disagree on what it is.
    Wrong and wrong. In what sense is poorly defined? Do you have problem with the fact that E = the energy of a massive body, m = it's mass and c = light-speed?

    Who, apart from you, disagrees with "what it is", whatever this might mean?

    If you wish to make a coherent argument to support your assertions, do so. Otherwise they will remain empty and ill-informed assertions, with no obligation on anyone to even consider them

    P.S. If you are so dismissive about science in general, why join a Science Forum?
    You are reciting the rhetoric information given to you, again and again, in the name of counterintelligence. Openly stated by your government as counterintelligence. If you are an American or an Englishmen at least.

    You just did not want to know, where you were. Or hear them say that you will be a fool because paranoid maniacs are at the helm and most are afraid to topple them.

    And then you absorbed things that at the time you knew were wrong or not correct. That is your real crime against humanity Bucko. But rather then see what was behind door number 1, you shut your mouth and absorbed false information. Behind door number 1, there is anger. Comically vicious anger if you have the stomach to live or die for truth.

    I would recommend starting off with truth slowly. To get a feel for breaking points.

    I never upheld quantum mechanics either.
    It was all engineered much better years ago when building quality. Not all old stuff was quality built. However when it was, it is something to see. They knew stuff about matter that I still do not fully understand. And from actual experience I am sure that colleges do not.


    Sincerely,


    William McCormick
    Reply With Quote  
     

  34. #33  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,176
    Quote Originally Posted by Guitarist
    Quote Originally Posted by William McCormick
    . There is nothing scientifically we cannot do without it.
    This is manifestly false; Quantum Field Theory, the mot accurate theory of the universe yet devised by Man, depends explicitly on that identity
    It is poorly defined, and most disagree on what it is.
    Wrong and wrong. In what sense is poorly defined? Do you have problem with the fact that E = the energy of a massive body, m = it's mass and c = light-speed?

    Who, apart from you, disagrees with "what it is", whatever this might mean?

    If you wish to make a coherent argument to support your assertions, do so. Otherwise they will remain empty and ill-informed assertions, with no obligation on anyone to even consider them

    P.S. If you are so dismissive about science in general, why join a Science Forum?
    An object has velocity relative to other objects in different proportions.

    The speed of light is not absolute or highly important to anything that I have ever come across. And is just an arbitrary number of meters a second, and appeared to be flawed by actual experiments.

    But more importantly, what would your explanation of E=MC^2 have to do with anything in our universe?

    An object moving at very high velocity can be shown to have no actual energy by simple experiments.

    Look at a rock at the equator, it is going 1500 feet a second just sitting there. Has no real energy does it.

    An objects movements are just electrical repulsion caused by ambient radiation. There is a measurable amount of electromotive force, where barriers meet. Or different media moving at different velocities meet. However not really energy, as we poorly describe it.

    What confuses some, are the effects that they try to cover up. As objects move through substances, air, metals. The objects often emit rays and create plasma. Or create electrical fields. However the object does not have the "energy" that most believe it does.

    I guess what I am saying is that I never even remember what that formula E=MC^2 stands for, because no one has ever come up with a meaningful purpose for it. No one has ever even sparked the slightest interest in the formula for me. And it seems to be getting worse and worse.

    I hope a lot of people discuss it. You will see what I mean. All will have different interpretations for it.




    Sincerely,


    William McCormick
    Reply With Quote  
     

  35. #34  
    Forum Sophomore
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    121
    ^ Atomic bombs, nuclear power? These are applications of the equation.

    Also your proof that objects have no energy when moving fast is nonsense. That rock would seem to have much more energy if it was moving relative to you. That's why it's called the theory of relativity
    Reply With Quote  
     

  36. #35  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,176
    Quote Originally Posted by Stuart Thomson
    ^ Atomic bombs, nuclear power? These are applications of the equation.

    Also your proof that objects have no energy when moving fast is nonsense. That rock would seem to have much more energy if it was moving relative to you. That's why it's called the theory of relativity
    Matter has zero mass. It is totally an electrical effect.

    The speed of ambient radiation is so fast that the electrons that are zipping by, do not place their repulsive force upon matter. There is not enough time. Nor do they create rays that we call heat, Ultraviolet, Light, X-rays, radio.
    If we slow them down, they create all those and gravity too.

    When matter is abundant or short of electrons, from a stream or flow of electrons, usually by a change in velocity relative to something. Or something else changing velocity and directing a stream of electrons into the object. A diode is created.

    If this object that becomes a diode moves, its motion if there is no gravity or heavy atmosphere to slow it down. Will continue in a straight path, for a very long time. However this is all an electrical effect. The ambient radiation is there with ultimate power and potential waiting to be harnessed.

    The matter is without energy or power. However if it is moving, it is a diode. And is capable of riding ambient radiation. Like a ship with sails in the wind. However to stop it all you have to do is reverse the diode. You can stop the object or start the object like it is a weightless, massless object. Using ambient radiation. By creating rays similar to gravity.

    This has happened accidentally in industry. And is highly not talked about. But has been filmed and shown to Hazmat professionals that have to deal with similar situations and chemicals in industry.

    Light speed being an absolute, sounds like you were sold a couple bridges.


    Sincerely,


    William McCormick
    Reply With Quote  
     

  37. #36  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    60
    Quote Originally Posted by William McCormick
    Matter has zero mass. It is totally an electrical effect.

    The speed of ambient radiation is so fast that the electrons that are zipping by, do not place their repulsive force upon matter. There is not enough time. Nor do they create rays that we call heat, Ultraviolet, Light, X-rays, radio.
    If we slow them down, they create all those and gravity too.
    So it seems you have amazing ideas. I am having difficulty in getting you in this particular point, mainly the first line of the paragraph. one thing what i have realised after reading most of your post or reply is that you are basically not in favour of such huge energy derived from atom rather due to its vicinity. well this is prety weird concept you are trying to bring when we have such a detail about the atom it self. i am really trying hard to crack my head on what you usually post

    Thanks,
    www.physics-gallo.blogspot.com
    " If you give up i'm sure it'll give quite relief. No one will bother you or even pay attention to you. It feels alright but is still very painful."
    Reply With Quote  
     

  38. #37  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,176
    Quote Originally Posted by newspaper
    Quote Originally Posted by William McCormick
    Matter has zero mass. It is totally an electrical effect.

    The speed of ambient radiation is so fast that the electrons that are zipping by, do not place their repulsive force upon matter. There is not enough time. Nor do they create rays that we call heat, Ultraviolet, Light, X-rays, radio.
    If we slow them down, they create all those and gravity too.
    So it seems you have amazing ideas. I am having difficulty in getting you in this particular point, mainly the first line of the paragraph. one thing what i have realised after reading most of your post or reply is that you are basically not in favour of such huge energy derived from atom rather due to its vicinity. well this is prety weird concept you are trying to bring when we have such a detail about the atom it self. i am really trying hard to crack my head on what you usually post

    Thanks,

    That head cracking feeling is just one hundred years of paranoid fools selling garbage in the name of truth. It is hard to believe sometimes, even for me.

    I totally believe that ideas are to some extent regulated by popular belief. If only because of logistical difficulties, making the ideas seem to distant or far away to show or prove. They seem unobtainable.

    Yet once you target the counterintelligence group as a bunch of paranoid psychos it gets easy. This is the group that stated in the same article that the great minds that had us in a war for four years against two tiny nations. That almost kicked our butts. Had found once again the secret of the atom. And had used it on Japan.

    But they were not going to let the secret of the atom that we were already teaching to students at home, out to the public. Which would go against all that George Washington stood for. "Nothing deserves your utter most patronage more then the promotion of science and literature. Knowledge is in every country the surest bases of public happiness". George Washington.

    In that same article they listed the element used and the high velocity hammer method of detonation.

    So on one hand in the same article they claimed to want to hide the atom. The basic building block that would have to be understood by a third world nation to handle it safely, in day to day industrial work. And yet claimed to give the formula for the bomb. All in the same article. This flew over many individuals heads. Because they were just tired or war.

    Meanwhile here in New York at West Point they had the actual bomb dropped on Hiroshima and it weighed in at under a half ton. It was a simple special oil, I believe rosin oil, cased bomb, with ammonium nitrate core. I went to see it with my Navy Uncle when I was a kid.




    Here is the whole Article.

    http://www.Rockwelder.com/Explosives...imahalfton.PDF

    Note the crack about the combustion engine. It is still not needed.


    Sincerely,


    William McCormick
    Reply With Quote  
     

  39. #38  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    Quote Originally Posted by William McCormick
    That head cracking feeling is just one hundred years of paranoid fools selling garbage in the name of truth.
    The only paranoid fool around these parts William is you.
    Quote Originally Posted by William McCormick
    It is hard to believe sometimes, even for me.
    Come now. You believe so much other crap you ought to be able to swallow some truth.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  40. #39  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,176
    Quote Originally Posted by Ophiolite
    Quote Originally Posted by William McCormick
    That head cracking feeling is just one hundred years of paranoid fools selling garbage in the name of truth.
    The only paranoid fool around these parts William is you.
    Quote Originally Posted by William McCormick
    It is hard to believe sometimes, even for me.
    Come now. You believe so much other crap you ought to be able to swallow some truth.

    Ophiolite, I am so not paranoid, someone should come and study me. I have had guns put to my head, threats of beatings from authorities. And I do not even know how to become paranoid.

    I see it as society causing people to act strangely. These individuals have more then enough reasons to do so.

    What I am saying and showing, is a form of proof, anyone that does not want to see it, is a bit paranoid.



    Sincerely,


    William McCormick
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •