Thread: Could localised spacetime....

...have an area of infintie symmetry? In effect would this suggest that time, length and other relativistic effects become severly distorted? And what would someone within this area of spacetime percieve?

The idea came to me when you remember that shapes and spacetime are one and the same-not that spheres have time dilation , or do they.

The great quest of science is to use mathematics to construct a 3-d axis that creates a graph that perfectly maps space-time, one 3-d graph to the next.

To make that task, simple, surely, given the fairly regular feature of space-time, there exists repeating patterns, laws of space-time, that are fairly-well constant. To find those laws, one needs to just find a repeating code of "time", a repeating code of time that is relevant to a uniform propagation of energy in a 3-d space-time reality, and thus spherical propagation of energy (quanta) in a 3-d reality.

Toi achieve that though, time needs a "signature", a repeating footprint, thayt would need to combine quite well with our own "ability" to perceive space-time, a concurrent footprint with that of our perception "ability" of space-time.

I had a really good idea come to me recently. If you look at the 'snow' channel (as in cosmic radiation on you TV :wink, and get no interference from any other TV signals, you will notice that there is a regualrly occuring pattern that is rather circular in nature. At least it is in England. If you can, note down what it looks like (this goes to everyone else too). I think we may see some pattern then, after all motion is due to spacetime so therefore why not assume that objects do not move, but spacetime does? Then you can have a theory of spacetime that encompasses patterns of motion due to normal fluctuations of the spacetime continuum. Hope I'm not too far from the box here...

Wow.

Hope thats not sarcasm -.-

:wink:

No, whatever works.

I am not sure about television sets. I am more into microwave ovens. You know, those microwaves can induce some real weird phenomena in certain things. Check out some sites on the web relevant to MPEGS on backyard research involving microwaves and microwave ovens.

I am not one to get off track, but the yanks are now using microwave energy to spark their fuel for space-shuttle missions.

In my own work with my own theory, I am proposing that a specially designed microwave antenna associated to the circuitry of what I term a "virtual atom" can not only induce a charged field (which randomly happens anyway in most backyard microwave experiments involving metal objects placed in microwave ovens) but can also lead to a type of gravitational-mechanical effect. The experiment is a bit involved, and eventually I will get around to completing it; but so far the lead-up looks good. The idea behind my own research there is that there exists, in theory, I have found out, in theory, an "unfolded" dimension of space, a type of hyperspace, which I think is possible to actually replicate quite simply using the properly repeating charge circuirtry. The only way I can get the type of oscillation I need is by inducing a charge-oscillation through the use of micrwaves. But, in getting the required oscillation, what this hyperspace dimension construct tries to do is "adapt" to the localk space-time environment, and thus "fold". The folding of that construct leads, as the theory suggests, to a type of mechanical force;;;;;;;propulsion. In achieving this research I will be able to prove the ability of converting electrical enregy purely into mechanical propulsion.

I think the last time I did the TV fuzz stuff was when Poltergeist came out in the early 80's.

Anyway, as my research into microwaves should take me, it will prove that gravity is in fact a warp of space, but not just a warp of space, not a curvature of space, but the idea itself of one dimension of space we have yet to theorise, the "unfolded" dimension of space, trying to become complete in being folded. Mass basically, the concept of matter, distorts space-time to make it seem unfolded, not as properly "bunched" as folded space, cluttered. So, the more mass, the more the need for that mass to fold into itself, and thus present itself as a self-attractive force of matter.

I have been holding off finding that exact research result "prize", because I would rather be on a ship of interested parties before findging that gold.......more fun.....me hearty.

But, I have found that most of you guys take great offence to any new adventures of space-time, adventures not taught about at your schools or other learning institutes...............why so?

Stream, if this is the research you can use to prove your theory, I suggest you get onto it. People here are bored with your proposition after proposition.

If I didn't know you any better, and presumably in your defense on this one, I would think you know the result of your experiment is certain, and you are simply throwing enough documentation on the web, like in this chat-room, to highlight you have discussed the theory thoroughly to whoever, irregarless of anyone understanding, because technically here on this official website you have proof that you have had your idea exposed before revealing the actual proof of the theory.

???

I am also guessing that you are quite intelligent, 30 or 40 something male, and have been using basic fantasy images to capture the attention of otherwise bored male college grads in physics because no one in the physics world who has a degree and steadfast reputation in theoretical physics would give you the time of day in your proposing the new use of time as you are proposing.


???

Go to another post I started, and be relevant to the subject. I didn't start this one.