Notices

View Poll Results: who is up for the name change

Voters
1. You may not vote on this poll
  • yes

    1 100.00%
  • no

    0 0%
  • unshure

    0 0%
Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: nanobots, or not

  1. #1 nanobots, or not 
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    10
    From a physics stand point the traditional thought of a “nanobot” is flawed. The concept is sound but the name is to large. These “programmable mater converters” are truly known as quantum string vibrators. These would be actually capable of converting a dog into a cat for example. These string vibrators rely heavily upon quantum theory and more specifically string theory. The so now thought of as miracle sub partial manipulators that would be able to change oxygen into steel are up for a name change.

    To bad they are still people trying to make them a reality, and they don’t already exist.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •