Notices
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Phonon particles

  1. #1 Phonon particles 
    Forum Radioactive Isotope MagiMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,440
    I've been doing some reading recently, but I can't quite wrap my head around phonons as particles. I do accept the duality of waves and particles, even if I don't fully understand it, but I can't quite see what properties of a phonon are particle-like. Also, would the same be true for the vibrations of a string or sound waves in the air?

    Along the same lines, I've read that if a black hole were approaching Earth, you would be able to hear it, as the gravitational waves would stretch and contract your earbones. How would wave/particle duality apply to those waves?


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Forum Junior
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    264
    its photon not phonon.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Forum Ph.D. william's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Wherever I go, there I am
    Posts
    935
    Quote Originally Posted by shawngoldw
    its photon not phonon.
    Actually, there is such a thing as a phonon. MagiMaster, which are you asking about?

    Cheers
    "... the polhode rolls without slipping on the herpolhode lying in the invariable plane."
    ~Footnote in Goldstein's Mechanics, 3rd ed. p. 202
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Forum Junior
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    264
    wave-particle duality was mentioned, I figured he meant photon.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5 Re: Phonon particles 
    Moderator Moderator AlexP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    1,838
    Quote Originally Posted by MagiMaster
    I've been doing some reading recently, but I can't quite wrap my head around phonons as particles. I do accept the duality of waves and particles, even if I don't fully understand it, but I can't quite see what properties of a phonon are particle-like. Also, would the same be true for the vibrations of a string or sound waves in the air?

    Along the same lines, I've read that if a black hole were approaching Earth, you would be able to hear it, as the gravitational waves would stretch and contract your earbones. How would wave/particle duality apply to those waves?
    I think it's pretty clear that he's talking about phonons.
    "There is a kind of lazy pleasure in useless and out-of-the-way erudition." -Jorge Luis Borges
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Forum Junior
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    264
    ok, my bad
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Forum Bachelors Degree
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    NC USA
    Posts
    488
    Yeah, he's talking about phonons, which are the acoustic analogs of photons.

    Nobody deals much with phonons because, on a practical level, it is so much more convenient to deal with sound as a wave rather than as a quantized particle.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Forum Junior
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    264
    clearly I'm not the right person... but it sounds like one of you can answer his question!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Forum Radioactive Isotope MagiMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,440
    Yeah, I meant phonon. I think Wikipedia gave a definition along the lines of vibrations in a crystal. My question was, not really can you look at them as a particle, but how to do so. What particle-like properties do they (or any macroscopic(?) waves) have?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10  
    Forum Bachelors Degree
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    NC USA
    Posts
    488
    It is clear you are making the standard beginner's mistake of trying to imagine a phonon as a some sort of classical particle... a marble or tiny ball bearing that is subject to the classical laws of physics. Such an approach will only lead you to grief.

    A phonon cannot have particle-like properties in the classical sense. It is a useful concept only when certain properties of matter are analyzed using quantum methods. Then vibrational energy is quantized and the fundamental unit is called a phonon.

    This treatment is used only when we get down to the atomic level. For macroscopic waves, e.g. sound or water waves, we stick to wave mechanics, strictly classical. No phonons, please.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11  
    Forum Radioactive Isotope MagiMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,440
    Oh ok. So a phonon's particle-like property is the quantization of it's energy, making a phonon the carrier of a quantum of vibrational energy in certain situations?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #12  
    Forum Bachelors Degree
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    NC USA
    Posts
    488
    Yeah, that's about it... a quantum of energy going from one atom to another in a crystal. It can be a useful concept in certain heavy-duty mathematical treatments.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #13  
    Forum Radioactive Isotope MagiMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,440
    Thanks. That's quite a bit clearer now, although it still leaves some questions about some of the other psuedo-particles. (I guess most of them are used for the same general purpose though.)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #14  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Manchester, England
    Posts
    107
    Like photons, the "particle-like" nature of phonons extends a little beyond being quanta of energy. They also have momentum and the the interaction between photons and phonons (Brillouin scattering) is subject to the conservation of momentum in much the same way as the collision of particles is. However, attempts to visualise either a photon or a phonon as being like a very small golf ball don't lead to anything useful.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •