Notices
Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: You Thought we were out of the Dark Ages; Well Guess Again

  1. #1 You Thought we were out of the Dark Ages; Well Guess Again 
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    2
    During the dark ages you were told what to believe and those who went against such doctrine were punished severely. In today’s western society most people are taught that we are out of the dark ages. That is an outright lie that is used to convince everyone that what is being taught in the government and church controlled schools is true science. What is actually being taught are outdated beliefs that are known to be incorrect but conform to the views of those in authority. And, just as in the past, anyone who succeeds in exposing the flaws in such views is punished severely. Yes, even in America. And what’s worse is that even the newspapers, our last resort in defending our rights under the U.S. Constitution condone this new and insidious affront to our freedom of speech.

    What makes this practice so dangerous is that it has now been extended to the media that represents the future in communications; the Internet. And what makes it so despicable is that it is used not to do good, such as eliminating pornography from the Internet. In fact, this supposed right of freedom of expression, pornography, was defended by our educational system and subsequently upheld in America’s high courts. No, this latest affront to our freedoms is used for the exact same reasons as in the dark ages, to prevent the expression of new ideas involving our existence in the universe.

    The case in point involves the Millennium Relativity web site. The site went online in August of 2002 as a last resort effort to make the Millennium Theory of Relativity, a new theory in relativistic physics that replaces Einstein’s theory, available to the public. The web site quickly became one of the most popular of its kind on Internet. Its papers would normally come up on the very first page of a Google search and moreover typically as one of the first items, and often the very first item on the page. That has all changed now, beginning in March, 2007.

    Apparently as a result of the new theory’s author’s, Joseph A. Rybczyk’s, attempts to get the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) to support his research, his ranking in the Google search function has been dramatically, intentionally, and discriminately modified. That is, not only was his latest (3rd) proposal to the NSF declined, but when he requested reconsideration of the declination, his papers mysteriously no longer came up on the first page of the Google search function. This was true in spite of the fact that the same normal, typical, and exact key words as previously employed were used. Even worse, the papers now typically come up on or near the last page of a Google search. This could be 60, 100, or even more pages down in the search results. In other words, his papers were effectively eliminated from the search in what appears to be a deliberate attempt to censor his work. This is most especially true of his papers on the relativistic Doppler effect that formed the basis of his most recent NSF proposal.

    So far, complaints to the Deputy Director of the NSF, the Attorney General of the U.S. Department of Justice, and the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Google Incorporated including all 13 top Executive Officers of the company have gone unanswered. Interestingly, a call to the editor of the researcher’s local newspaper was strongly rebuked by the editor in favor of Google’s action. A subsequent complaint to the publisher of the New York Times has also gone unanswered. (A copy of the e-mail can be found on the visitor forum of the Millennium Relativity web site.)

    To find out more about what has happened, and to learn about the theory that has them so fearful, take a moment to visit the Millennium Relativity web site at http://www.mrelativity.net by clicking on the just given link.

    Also, the author requests your help in defending his right, and ultimately all of your rights, to free speech on the Internet. Please make a copy of this message and post it on as many reputable visitor forums and message boards as you can. The author will be doing the same in order to get the word out in spite of the Google anti-American and unlawful practice of censorship regarding the American First Amendment Right to Free Speech.

    Note: This message is for informative purposes only. The author will be posting this message on many visitor forums and therefore will not be able to respond to comments by the reader.

    Joseph A. Rybczyk


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Forum Bachelors Degree
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    NC USA
    Posts
    488
    It is gratifying that such trusted and influential agencies as the NSF, the Justice Department, and the New York Times, are all able to recognize scientific rubbish. *We would truly be in the Dark Ages if they accepted the rantings of a crackpot as having scientific merit.

    Tip: Reputable scientists do not write about themselves in the third person.
    *


    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Forum Junior
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    233
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveF
    It is gratifying that such trusted and influential agencies as the NSF, the Justice Department, and the New York Times, are all able to recognize scientific rubbish. *We would truly be in the Dark Ages if they accepted the rantings of a crackpot as having scientific merit.

    Tip: Reputable scientists do not write about themselves in the third person.
    *
    Nor do they claim that those agencies, along with Google, all conspired together to 'bury' anything. That's a specific sign of being paranoid and delusional. The writer should seek an appointment with a mental health physician at the earliest possible time.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    927
    in the military, i learned that porn is good. so i ask, whats wrong with porn?
    well, cept for all the spyware...
    when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth
    A.C Doyle
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5 You Thought we were out of the Dark Ages; Well Guess Again 
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    2
    When I posted my message about Google on only two science forums, I had no idea that it would provoke such a negative response. Since I have not posted it on any other forums yet, I decided in this case I will take the time to respond.

    To SteveF:

    First I would like to inform you that reputable scientists don’t hide behind fake names. Second, since you give no indication that you have read any of my research papers, I will assume that you haven’t. Yet you condemn them as being scientific rubbish. It may please you to know that back in 2002 when I contested the declination of my first proposal to the NSF, my web site ended up on a third party site called Crank dot net in an obvious attempt to defame me and discredit my work. Third, you obviously have never submitted a scientific proposal to the NSF. Referring to yourself in third person terms is a requirement. That sort of contradicts your overall background in science, doesn’t it?

    To Old Geezer:

    John F. Nash, the Nobel Prize winning mathematician from Princeton University, was all of those things you accuse me of. Guess what? I would rather share those kinds of traits with someone like him than be associated with the personality traits that characterize people like you. You hide behind a phony name and lurk on message boards to pounce on unsuspecting visitors who come there in search of understanding and support.

    To dejawolf:

    It may interest you to know that I have a belief similar to yours. It takes a certain amount of intelligence to know what it is that we do not know. You ask what’s wrong with porn. Let me tell you. First let me say that sexuality is a natural normal and desirable thing in human beings. Without it, we wouldn’t be here. And I believe in free speech as long as it does not involve anything illegal, and as long as it doesn’t infringe on my rights or the rights of others. But to expose people and their children to sexual material against their will is a violation of their rights. Nothing angers me more than to have it put on the visitor’s forum of my web site. That is another thing that is done to discredit my work and began about the same time that my web site was put on Crank dot net.

    Incidentally, I spent a four year hitch in the military and porn played no part in it. I guess I was too busy performing my duty to my country.

    To all:

    Don’t waste your time responding to any of this. I will not be commenting further.

    Joseph A. Rybczyk
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6 Re: You Thought we were out of the Dark Ages; Well Guess Aga 
    Forum Junior
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    233
    Quote Originally Posted by Rybczyk
    To all:

    Don’t waste your time responding to any of this. I will not be commenting further.

    Joseph A. Rybczyk
    Now THERE'S the best part!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Forum Bachelors Degree
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    NC USA
    Posts
    488
    Aw, let him come back.
    He's harmless.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Forum Junior
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    233
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveF
    Aw, let him come back.
    He's harmless.
    Harmless, perhaps. But it's always good when another crackpot bites the dust. We've got enough misinformation and confusion as it is. :wink:
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    So did anyone visit his site, assess his hypothesis in a cold, objective fashion, or were you all just executing the woo-woo two step? (Remember to get that big knee jerk in each of the two steps.)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10  
    Forum Ph.D. Nevyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    880
    damn, I am sorry I missed this crackpot. You just got to hate all those people that think they know better than everyone else and that we are all going to die because of govenment conspiracies
    Come see some of my art work at http://nevyn-pendragon.deviantart.com/
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    30
    LOL. If you think the press isn't controlled by interest groups, you are being a very ignorant fellow. Google, too, is swayed by interest groups.

    "The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent."

    -Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets


    "For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
    David Rockefellars Memoirs published in 2002 (page 405)


    "From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, to those of Trotsky, Bela Kun, Rosa Luxembourg, and Emma Goldman, this world wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played a definitely recognizable role in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the nineteenth century, and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads, and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire."
    -Winston Churchill, 1920


    Even the man:

    "The ruling class has the schools and press under its thumb. This enables it to sway the emotions of the masses." -Einstein

    "So did anyone visit his site, assess his hypothesis in a cold, objective fashion, or were you all just executing the woo-woo two step? (Remember to get that big knee jerk in each of the two steps.)"

    I'm guessing... no. I did a search for "Millennium Relativity" in google, and it was the first site to come up.

    It might make for an interesting read. His main Idea is outlined with the following contents:

    1. Introduction 4

    2. The Underlying Postulate 4

    3. The Speed of Light 6

    4. Constancy of Light Speed between Natural Systems 6

    5. The Transformation Process 7

    6. Developing the Transformation Formulas 9

    7. The Time Transformation Formulas 10

    8. The Distance Transformation Formulas 12

    9. The Flaw in Special Relativity 21

    10. Proving the Fundamentals 24

    11. Effects on Wavelength and Frequency 27

    a. The Transformation Effect 28

    b. The Doppler Effect 30

    c. The Combined Transformation and Doppler Effect Equations 32

    12. Doppler Effect for Transverse Motion 36

    13. Correlation of All Effects 43

    14. Conclusion 45

    References 46


    Equations

    1. Time in the moving frame 11

    2. Time in the stationary frame 12

    3. Distance in the moving frame 15

    4. Radius of stationary sphere 16

    5. Radius of moving sphere 17

    6. Distance in the stationary frame 18

    7. Equality of distance ratios 18

    8. Frequency to wavelength relationship 28

    9. Wavelength to frequency relationship 28

    10. Wavelength transformation, MF to SF 29

    11. Wavelength transformation, SF to MF 29

    12. Frequency transformation, MF to SF 30

    13. Frequency transformation, SF to MF 30

    14. Doppler effect – Observed wavelength 31

    15. Doppler effect – Transformed wavelength 31

    16. Doppler effect – Observed frequency 32

    17. Doppler effect – Transformed frequency 32

    18. Observed wavelength 33

    19. Observed frequency 33

    20. Emitted wavelength 33

    21. Emitted frequency 33

    22. Observed wavelength, Transverse motion 39

    23. Observed frequency, Transverse motion 39

    24. Observed wavelength, Transverse motion, Alternate equation 42

    25. Observed frequency, Transverse motion, Alternate equation 42

    Figures

    1. The Transformation Process 8

    2. Developing the Transformation Formulas 9

    3. The Distance Transformation Formulas 13

    4. Shows how all distances are affected by motion 19

    5. Unveils the flaw in special relativity 22

    6. Proof of the Fundamentals 25

    7. The Direct Method 25

    8. The Doppler Effect 30

    9. Combined Transformation Process and Doppler Effect 35

    10. Doppler Effect, Recession 37

    11. Math Definition of Doppler Recession 38

    12. Doppler Effect, Approach 40

    13. Math Definition of Doppler Approach 41

    14. Correlation of All Effects 43

    That's just the tip of the iceberg.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #12  
    Forum Professor
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,893
    Rybczyk, where did you learn physics? Let me guess, you're self-taught?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #13  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    10
    they are sometimes just ignored when asking for funding like me.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #14  
    Forum Junior Lucifer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Close to 290125001
    Posts
    223
    Whenever I hear of someone who's found an alternative to Relaitvity, I recall what a guy told me:

    "See, to KNOW relativity, you must KNOW the mathematics behind it. I'll tell you; we're talking about hundreds of pages of maths. It takes a couple years to master the different books dealing with these maths until you can know where you are, where you come from and where are you going just by looking at a set of equations. And this are just the basics of Relativity..."

    Physicists are really patient to not huff at someone who just read 2,000 words on Relativity and claims to have found a mistake nobody else noticed before... And there's swarms of people like this, apparently.
    “If the misery of the poor be caused not by the laws of nature, but by our institutions, great is our sin.” -Charles Darwin
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #15  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    Quote Originally Posted by Lucifer
    Physicists are really patient to not huff at someone who just read 2,000 words on Relativity and claims to have found a mistake nobody else noticed before... And there's swarms of people like this, apparently.
    They breed them in secret caverns under Grand Central Station.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #16  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    967
    What can I say, the site probably only have some minor errors. Like the word "replace" instead of "enhance".

    I for one added it to favorites, I had never seen the relationship between force and energy, relativistically.

    Honestly, you should read this: http://www.mrelativity.net/Relations...E_and_F_P1.htm
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •