Notices
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: fusion impossible?

  1. #1 fusion impossible? 
    don
    don is offline
    New Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3
    The Break-even
    This is the situation corresponding to Q = 1, i.e. the moment when the quantity of energy produced by the fusion reactions is equal to that supplied to maintain the plasma ( Pfusion= Pexternal) . This is an interesting stage from the scientific point of view, as heating of the plasma is then to a great extent done by the alpha particles and no longer nearly solely by the additional heating, which is close to the situation of the reactor.

    This is the situation where the power supplied by the fusion reactions is enough on its own to compensate losses ( Palpha= Plosses) and where the external power can thus be switched off. This corresponds to an infinite Q amplification factor ( Pexternal = 0). The plasma is thus self-maintained like a candle, which, once it has been ignited by a match (external power), carries on fuelling itself.


    What it mean that it is possible for fussion to be self sustain, but only to self sustain. Since the neutron guys ran off with 80% of energy which fusion produce, which leave the Alpha particle guys with 20% enough to either self sustaince at peak level, or produce it for general use. Now the goal is to gifure out how to allow fussion to be self sustain and provide adequete amount of energy for general use. I know this is almost a long impossible shot in the dark, but I would your though on it, any ideas?


    Iam interesest in fussion with ability to to renew it fuel during fussion process..(of course it just a theory) but I would like hear what you think about it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2 fusion 
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    27
    Sustained fusion exists so must be possible. Take a look at the sun or most stars in the night sky. The intense gravity well not only induces nuclear fusion, it also sustains it. The prob. with doing so in a minor gravity environment with generation within such low atmospheric pressure is being worked by exposure of fusing fuel to ultra high magnetic fields. Why not just reduce the amount of fuel to near zero as in limit as m goes to zero of E=mC^2. The net output E would appear to be so reduced that containment of output E is containable/useful via turning water into steam. The prob. that now needs to be adressed is that when fusion blasts apart the fuel at microscopic levels, proximity of fuel elements are seperated. Since fusion is the process of joining atoms, this plasma seperation via blast, so to speak degrades the fusion process. I've been working upon the theory of pulsing nuclear fusion, using heat source as damping effect absorbing into water forming steam. Thermal energy from pulsed fusion would simply be absorbed into water and steam would be the work media.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    don
    don is offline
    New Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3
    it is a interesting point about lower the fuels process to sustain a stable magnetic container and heat the water as you has mention,, now are you talking about extract hydrogen (deuterium) as fuel from water?.. however, Iam interesting in you theory about pulse nuclear fusion, can you post some of your insight about it? also, your theory about pulse nuclear fusion lead to another interesting theory: voodoo sience; Cold fusion. Cold fusion also know as (Chemically Assisted nuclear reaction). Cold fusion in a nut shelf is nuclear reaction and accompanying events occurring in solids with high densities of hydrogen isotope in ambient radiation. Talking about archives fusion at low energy nuclear reaction in chemical change enviroment, it is possible? however such method has fail to replicate so far since the annoucement of cold fusion in 1898. but if the theory does hold to be true, we will have allmost infinite and clean source of energy, so I think It is worth to look into.
    Iam interesest in fussion with ability to to renew it fuel during fussion process..(of course it just a theory) but I would like hear what you think about it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4 Deleted by FBI suggestion 
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    27
    Deleted by FBI suggestion
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    don
    don is offline
    New Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3
    hear, hear.. I do agree heating mass to plasma stage is does took alot of effort, strip E shell with electron sound to be more sufficient and less hastle.. now err can post some more of your insight in pulse nuclear fusion? your work will not go unotice.. your contribution will make a ripper from the heart of ocean.
    Iam interesest in fussion with ability to to renew it fuel during fussion process..(of course it just a theory) but I would like hear what you think about it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •