The de Broglie formula states that:
My question is:
"If an object slows down and eventually stops, does the wavelength of the matter wave become infinite?"

The de Broglie formula states that:
My question is:
"If an object slows down and eventually stops, does the wavelength of the matter wave become infinite?"
Last edited by Cogito Ergo Sum; April 24th, 2014 at 01:58 PM.
Yes, although with a caveat. It isn't possible for a particle to have an exact momentum, unless you have no idea where it is, due to the Uncertainty Principle that the product of the uncertainty in the momentum and the uncertainty in the position must be greater than hbar. Therefore, if a particle had a momentum of exactly zero, the uncertainty in its position would be infinite. The chance of the particle being within observational range would be too small to be worth pursuing. Any observable, "at rest" particle must have a nonzero probability of nonzero momentum.
Strange I'm not sure it is quite the same. My understanding of the Uncertainty Principle has always been that to know the position to any degree of accuracy you need to have a "wavepacket", involving what is effectively a Fourier series of superimposed frequencies that interfere constructively to produce an envelope of probability in only one localised region of space. This superposition of wavelengths, via de Broglie, implies a lack of knowledge of momentum. The "monochromatic" case, i.e. with exact momentum, would imply a wavefunction distributed evenly throughout space, i.e. total uncertainty about position. But this has nothing to do with the magnitude of the momentum, i.e. the wavelength of the monochromatic wave. Or so it seems to me.
« Gravitational waves from black hole births?  Absolute zero » 
Tags for this Thread 