Notices
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: the natural unit of time

  1. #1 the natural unit of time 
    Forum Sophomore
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    154
    It seems that Planck's unit of time is universally acknowledged as relevant.
    I read that nobody knows it genesis, but could anyone explain it, after a century?

    - Do you know its rationale? why should the square root of hG divided by C^5 be the least unit of possible time, why C^5?
    can it to be considered scientific as the unit Time is on both sides of the equation? (C=S/T)

    -I have read a few thread here about Time, well, if it is really universally accepted, can't that be the Absolute time you are desperately looking for?
    then the conventional time signal would be just a multiple of it, and provide an answer also to simultaneity.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Western US
    Posts
    2,933
    Quote Originally Posted by logic View Post
    It seems that Planck's unit of time is universally acknowledged as relevant.
    I read that nobody knows it genesis, but could anyone explain it, after a century?

    - Do you know its rationale? why should the square root of hG divided by C^5 be the least unit of possible time, why C^5?
    can it to be considered scientific as the unit Time is on both sides of the equation? (C=S/T)

    Perhaps wikipedia is a good start: Planck time - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Forum Sophomore
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    154
    Quote Originally Posted by tk421 View Post
    Perhaps wikipedia is a good start: Planck time - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Thanks, I read that and many other articles, does that answer my questions?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Forum Ph.D. merumario's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    nigeria
    Posts
    844
    The answer you are looking for is No. When you say time is absolute it means there is no dilation,no need to study simultaneity and many things Gr has.It means when you look at a supernova explosion,the time which it explodes is the time which you see it.It means that one round clock can be used everywhere in the universe. These are not true.
    "I am sorry for making this letter longer than usual.I actually lacked the time to make it shorter."###
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    Forum Sophomore
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    154
    I do not mean that, by absolute, I mean THE standard rate .
    Do you know anything about the rationale of the formula?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Forum Bachelors Degree Kerling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Copenhagen
    Posts
    440
    There is no such thing as 'The standard rate' Time has its own rate in every identifiable frame of reference.
    Planck-time is just a combination of the great constants of physics that govern the relevant regions of different physical theories. (c, Hbar, G)
    Together they make up the elemental constant for time, distance, weight etc.
    The reason it is relevant is because the fraction is identical whatever you defined as constants. Meaning it is the same in metric of SI unit. Or whatever units an alien race might use. It is an equation to find a unit for time, which is independend of how we perceive time should be. Still it is of course in seconds. But it could serve as a translational factor for our seconds to another scale of time.
    In the information age ignorance is a choice.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Forum Ph.D. merumario's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    nigeria
    Posts
    844
    Kerling that helps.
    "I am sorry for making this letter longer than usual.I actually lacked the time to make it shorter."###
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8 phen 
    Forum Junior
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    200
    on a larger scale time is nothing but comparison of one astronomical phenomenon with other.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. does time have an elementary unit?
    By somfooleishfool in forum Physics
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: June 11th, 2012, 06:48 AM
  2. Imagination Unit
    By HKurtRichter in forum Personal Theories & Alternative Ideas
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: February 8th, 2012, 02:45 PM
  3. The Imagination-Unit
    By HKurtRichter in forum Personal Theories & Alternative Ideas
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 5th, 2012, 09:32 AM
  4. Moles(unit)
    By MoltenWhale in forum Chemistry
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: September 15th, 2008, 12:46 AM
  5. unit-less values
    By AlexP in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: July 16th, 2007, 11:37 AM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •