Notices
Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: The "Theory of Relativity" attach to "High Di

  1. #1 The "Theory of Relativity" attach to "High Di 
    New Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1
    The "Theory of Relativity" attach to "High Dimension"
    岂容叵奈何!
    He Tanguang
    Recently, I borrow a book Exceed Space Time written by an American physical scientist named Michio Kaku(加来道雄) who is also a Doctor majored in philosophy. After my reading, I have to say that I learn a lot and apperceive a lot.
    In order to share the excellent article with you, I will pick out some viewpoint and give my commentary on it.
    "Einstein, -----who recollect later: after ten years thought-----. This is a wrong conclusion which I had occurred by accident when I was 16 years old that if I run after a beam of light with the velocity of light (the speed of light travel in the vacuum) well then the beam of light I saw would be a concussive electromagnetic field which is stagnated in the space, however, this case cannot be exist according to our experience as well as the Maxwell Equation."
    Even as he guessed, he found that the Maxwell Equation was not suitable to the quiescent or the frozen wave. In fact, Einstein has proved that no matter how hard we run after the beam of light, this beam of light will go forward with the same velocity of light.
    In another words, the light beam is just like the "Ghost ship" exaggerated by some old shipman. It is a visionary ship that cannot be catched up forever. No matter how fast we drive our ship, the "Ghost ship" always managed to ward and deride us.
    In the year 1905, Einstein had plenty time in the Patent Bureau where he analyzed the Maxwell Equation carefully, and educed the narrow sense relative theory that the velocities of light are same in the all reference system which make the even movement.
    We make a suppose that the foot passengers walking on the footpath make a note of the run time of car and train, the speed of car is 99 miles per hour, the speed of train is 100 miles per hour. Naturally, from our view, we can see the train run in front of us with the speed of 1 mile per hour over the car, this is because the speed can be added and subtracted just like simple numbers.
    Now, we use the light beam replace the train, and keep the velocity of light is only 100 miles per hour, so the foot passengers could also see that we run after the light beam which speed is 100 miles per hour with the speed of 99 miles per hour. According to the foot passengers we should close to the light beam. However, according to the narrow sense relativity theory, sitting in the car, we see the train run with the speed 100 miles per hour over us, this speed is far different from our expect. Obviously we see the light beam keep ahead rapidly from us, just like that we are quiescence ------until the foot passengers record that our car run with the speed of 99.99999 miles per hour ------, however, we notice that the light beam is also run with the speed of 100 miles per hour over us." (See the page 96-98 of the original)
    This theory is so obscure that we cannot understand clearly. Is it a fairy tale? Is it just a story? Is it just tell a tale like stated in 《聊斋》? Why are these entire like dream? Whether this is because it is so profound that hardly any understand? ------ No bosom friend or deliberately mystifying? ------ Or any other purpose?
    To tell the truth, even in my dream, I never think of that I will initiate a concussion to a giant who is thought even greater than gods. Certainly, I never believe his balderdash, and I always think that this Mr. Einstein is only a fool who is a good example by constantly strive and work hard to become a giant. In my opinion, Einstein who has a biggest brain in the world is worse than Gauss whose brain was only half of Einstein's.
    "The theory of relativity" is the biggest mischief given by the architect, which give a chance to that biggest brain to gain an egregious inequation what's worse is that this theory has been respected for one hundred years! What is more puzzled is that the same time or the later time was the time when the human recent civilization made great progress and full with outstanding person. But why no person can recognize this false?
    Let a rascal leading the country is hackneyed in the politic stage. But if this phenomenon appears in the scientific area where full of sense, more democratic and equal than any other where, we have to make the conclusion that the issue which the big brain cannot solve the all flesh cannot solve either. But there is still this instance that the right man who can solve the problem has never got the lucky chance to think about it. I prefer to agree with the later opinion, or the human will be shame, and how to explain the modern human civilization?
    One
    The first attack------ the Theory of relativity acts against the simplest mathematic principle: if two particles with the same reference point and move in the same direction, their speed difference must follow the algebra difference rule.
    As in Michio Kaku's (加来道雄) speech, the light traveling in the space with the speed of 300 000 kilometers per second is not light already; It is a devil or a ghost. I have to say that he is a humor great with pretty spiritualism: each your effort is a lost of labour just like Duan Yu's well-known WuShu skill "rapid shift on wave" and like Mu Rong's "beat one with the strength borrowed from himself". It is so puzzled and thought to be supernatural.
    As a doctor, Michio Kaku(加来道雄) can understand Einstein's argument completely that the time inequation: Because the speed (V) is close to the velocity of light, the denominator of the equation is limited to zero, which makes the observer's relative time infinite. And with a difference between two points on one movement axis, because what we are after is light, so this difference is not exist in fact.
    Is the time really "slow down"? The answer is no. It is a big mistake made by Einstein whose thinking system was wrong. The equation is suitable to the case that the light velocity is uniform in all the coordinated system with even movement, which neglecting the time (let t≠t').
    To prove whether time's absoluteness is simple: use six LCD meters which quality are thought to be the best, make exact record of each meter's annual error, then put high quality batteries into them to make sure they can run well more than three years. Then make records on the benchmark relative error after their running (the error only exacted to second). Three of them are put in the high speed magnetism suspend train with the protection quakeproof, moisture proof and magnetic proof. Another three are put in the still place with the same protection. When the train run more than two years with the speed over 300 kilometers per hour, we can see if the time get slow 8.77 seconds, and then we can get a conclusion whether Einstein is great or not. Newton says that the absolute, true and mathematic time is run on itself without the control of any outside things. The absolute space has nothing to do with the outside things, so it is the same and motionless forever.
    Einstein thought that he has discovered something important. He was so excited that he nearly got crazy. Ostensibly, he made a lot of inquisitions and thought hard, but all these were led to a dead angle because of the first impressions that were wrong in fact. Under this emerge of the unknown violent spring tide, he finally went into battle barebacked and hold up the flag of negating absolute space-time view.
    What Einstein had found? The first thing was that 迈克尔逊's observe on the change of ether absolute space-time coordinate and the earth revolution coordinate.
    It should be admitted that Michelson's (迈克尔逊) was such an earnest, factualistic, precise and diligent man that no other people can compare with him.
    But the experiment made by Michelson(迈克尔逊) was only proved that light travel obey the earth inertia coordinate, and cannot denial the existence of ether.
    The make point base of "theory of relativity" is "velocity of light is uniform" which has been stepped up as the second tentative by Einstein. Einstein himself maybe feels something wrong as he said, "we should step up this guess as a tentative, and we have to fetch in another tentative which looks cannot consistent with it: light travel with a fixed on velocity in the vacuous space, and this velocity has nothing to do with the move state of the missile". But to pull down Newton's absolute space-time theory is how a grate work! Maybe driven by the material gain, he only spurns the phenomena with the quillet of "surface" without considering the bad sequence.

    Tow
    Is the velocity of light keeping the same all time? The answer is no!
    Many evidences show that light wave is the same with the substantial wave in some places. The substantial wave only travel with the same speed and rule with the behavior of energy and not like the travel of wave in the essential.
    For example: the speed of wave has nothing to do with the travel speed V of the wave original against the earth, but its frequency is changed with the formula
    Its wavelength is also inverse ratio to the changed frequency.
    It is same with the travel of light. You can refer to Recent Physics Puzzle---oppugn to the theory of relativity (Page 63) written by Zheng Quan: (1) Majorana traveling lamp-house experiment; (2) Fabry and Buisson experiment; (3) Majorana traveling reflecting experiment.
    In the real life, we will never hear any voice caused by the adding of wave original to the wave speed until the supersound plane fly over our head. It is only when the plane passing over our head when the sound original over the earth compare to the velocity of sound is the shortest then we could hear the rumbling.
    When the lasting ring from the non-stop trains that pass the platform come by our presence there is a fugacious and quick modified tone. That is the result of the frequency changed at the inflexion of the function.
    Because of the media of wave is the air, so it is locked at the earth reference frame. And that light is also obeys this rule, can we say this is only a coincidence? The most probability is that ether is also exits at the earth, or we cannot explain the fact that light travel obeys the earth reference frame.
    My explanation is that: whether you admit or not, the absolute space and time is exist. Thought man can only apperceive the relative space and time at present (this relative space and time is the normal relative according to the reference point and some necessary measure. And it is not the relative space and time created by Einstein). Actually, the absoluteness concept has been implanted in all rational thinking, and this relative concept is only a step from which human get close to the absolute concept, although its error may limit to zero the absolute concept is the extremum for human cognition puzzles. It can be see but never can be grasped forever.
    First of all, I should reject the "photon" put forward by Einstein. As the quality of particle it obeys the earth reference system, and its speed is must be the summation of immobile velocity of light (300 000 km/s) and light original. So the frequency can be changed but the wavelength should not be changed. But in fact the velocity of light has not been changed but the frequency and the wavelength have been changed. Two of three have been changed; the photon has no place to live.
    There is something should be complete that: Einstein has been a giant for hundreds of years for his original creation theory of relativity. But the theory of relativity has never been accepted really. Einstein won the Nobel Price in the year 1921 for his first account formula on photoelectricity, which was like Galilei accomplished experiment and collected data and also like Newton kept it as the result of the objects action in the universe and the movement rule. But Newton's talent and genius was dazzling, Einstein is just a fool who thinks thousands of times and gets one conclusion which is much worse than Newton's. For human courage and insight, knowledge and behavior, brightness, good luck, which let one out, man cannot expose the world's puzzles, rather that the flunky's adulations so the theory of relativity was thought well is common. Once someone wants to tip it gently he must be crushed back because of the light's special essence.
    In my opinion, it is human's real sense that the theory of relativity has not been admitted. Einstein won the Nobel Price in the year 1921. It is fluke for this price; however, the puzzle of light is very hard and with the addition of Einstein's good use of time so giving him the chance to make bottom drawer for others. In a word, there is no wrong price but the people who work hard for the truth will hard to avoid the sadness when see this case. This is what they call that fair is also relativity.
    Let me take off the coat of "photons" which is the "revive in a new guise" actually something not exist. The change of electromagnetism pays attention to the change rate, which is the ratio of the energy radices of electricity and magnetism to time. Light is the electromagnetic wave given off by atom that is surged, which surge all has basically same energy but the high frequency surge takes less length on the time axes, so the energy of single atom surge wave which with the same time space is direct ratio to the frequency. This can explain the difference between high frequency light and low frequency light, which is similar to the concept of pressure in the mechanics.
    Light wave, water wave and sound wave are all the exhibition of energy and all of them can arise pressure. If it is must have a "photons" for light wave I can plait something like "water photons" or "sound photons". But I remember a famous Chinese idiom that is gild the lily, which means that the snake has no foot naturally how can you make foot for it? So I don't want to plait these "photons".
    Light is the progression form of influence according to the electromagnetic wave transmits theory worked out by Maxwell. This tell us that light wave is transnormal wave so why the light emits from the earth only takes the earth as the origin of coordinate why not takes the solar system mass center system as the origin of coordinate or takes the absoluteness space as the origin of coordinate which is the most authoritative choice?
    The discussion about proposition in the Euclid geometry tells us that "athwart proposition not always right", now let me advise those fans of Lyman and Einstein by using their own experience, which is the second attack. If the light source holds still, the observer moves towards the light source with the speed of V' then the apparent speed C' from light source to the observer obeys the equation as follows: C'= C + V'. (2)
    This is concluded out according to the wave transmits theory, no matter whether it is the substantial wave (such as sound wave) or just the transnormal wave such as Maxwell electromagnetic wave, if it is wave it's wave distance must be continuously distributed on the transmission route. The particle moves towards or off the light wave with the speed of V', the time of each un-arrived wave section to the particle should be reduced or increased.
    In addition if the light source holds still, the particle should obey the rule that frequency equals (C+V')/C and the wavelength keep fixedness.
    If the content of formula (1) shows the transmit equation of source moves but the observation point holds still then the formula (2) shows the transmit equation of light source keeps still but the observation point moves, which is the equation makes the Einstein's Devil Palace fall apart.
    However the light transmit is much surprising than the calculation concluded by multi- integral, which are source and the particle all move. It is not hard to understand the apparent speed of light transmit is C'=C+V; the wavelength A'=(C-V)* ?/C; the frequency is (C+V')/(C-V), the coefficient should be newly fix quantified. (3)
    The V is the light source's move speed; the V' is the observation point's move speed; ? is the wavelength.
    What to do with the big but un-clever brain? Just like eating a sugar cane, when he just bite the sweet part he make a conclusion that the sugar cane is sweet and with the addition that "it cannot be bitter". But now there is something wrong. Among the two proposals of Einstein's there will be two phenomena appear at the same time: one is according to the Proposal One if the observe point is move relative to the light source the initiative and passiveness of light source to observer are equivalence, but I have disclosed it that they are not equivalent; the other is that according to the Proposal Two if the velocity of light keeps unchanged but the velocity of the light from the passive light source relative to the observation point must be changed which is the actuality in deed the pure idea can holds.
    If you cannot deal with the simple arithmetic but try to use calculous even multi-calculous which must be too bad a thing. I have to say that the "great " may be the worst thing of human.
    In order to make sure whether the wavelength changed we can make an experiment on the high-speed train with the Michaelsun interferometer, but the result must be compared with the experiment with the same equipment, same light source and the same move source with the same speed. This experiment can denial the Einstein's conclusion.

    The difficulty of experiment to proof C'=C+V' is very great. If the changes of the above wavelength can not keep everyone shut out. Nobody can design an efficient, timesaving, laborsaving, moneysaving experiment to let everyone believe in it. I can design a experiment, but that originate from a old method of measuring the velocity of light. This method relate to many aspect, so I hide it until every method cannot work except it.
    About the "Ether", I keep my opinion for the negative former point. As the transmission of light keep the same with the mass wave. Maxwell's theory cannot explain why the light uses the earth coordinate system.
    The only chance to conform the existence of the "ether" is the phenomena of "aberration" which was also the most important thing affected Einstein. But the fact is not sufficient to deny the "ether" because the existence of the "ether" also can produce "aberration", the only difference is the direction. We must make sure that the incline of the telescope follow the revolution orbit is forward or backward.
    Nobody can make statement on the problem except astronomic observers. So I beseech those observers to pay attention to the telescope's inclination.
    Something people abandon unconsciously maybe something people try best to get it and the great discovery or success often comes from it.

    Three
    Another most important experiment for Einstein is the floating water light intervene experiment, which is performed by FellSon. Fellson do not think according to others and has an active thinking so he can design such an unique experiment. But this experiment lack the Macerson's carefulness and preciseness so there are many uncertain results. Such as the difference of material (refractive index variety), flowing speed variety (the intervene of mussy glide). So the general applicability need more review and at the same time how to get the formula need further demonstrate
    I put up an reasonable consequence according to the reason which can derive this phenomena and the results are more precision than Fellson's
    Now, let us compare the difference of these two results
    Fellson's experiment condition:
    Speed of water V=7 m/s Pipe length L=1.5m
    Light wavelength: 5300Ao Refractive index=1.33
    Fellson's result: 0.2031stripe displacement (if n=1.3326 result = 0.2049)
    The actual stripe displacement is 0.23
    My result : 0.2316 stripe displacement (if n=1.3326 result=0.23267)
    Fellson's error is 11.70%~10.91%, but my error is 0.7%~1.16%
    If using the other material (the material's normal temperature liquid state is not always exist, only depend on discursion), the results are consistent only when n equal 1.4. The Fellson's result will make a great change if n is increased or decreased
    For instance:
    N=1.361 (alcohol)
    Fellson's result is 0.225 stripe displacement, but my result is 0.244 stripe displacement.
    N=1.4732 (oil of turpentine)
    Fellson's result is 0. 3083 stripe displacement, but my result is 0. 2854 stripe displacement
    Please help me to validate if you have the equipment
    The formula of the principle of relativity can educe a ludicrous conclusion which velocity of light is the utmost speed in the universe.
    The rule of light transmission becomes the utmost of mechanics universe. But they are different
    Can the constant value of velocity of sound become the utmost of aerodynamics? The ultrasonic flight is the flying handicap before turbine engine is invented. But after turbine engine is invented, it is ordinary flying with several multiple velocity of sound even the ten multiple velocity of sound is not utmost. If I am not wrong, the velocity of cannon using by human reach 30 km/h. This velocity is faster than 10 multiple velocity of sound
    So the material relative velocity is according to Newtonian mechanics and is not according to Einstein's formula. The over velocity of light movement is existence which is only defined by the accelerated methods and engine and not defined by velocity of light
    In fact, "the velocity of light is the utmost of movement " is depends on the formula. There is no the skin where is feather? Let's cheer up. The velocity is liberated.
    Mr. ZhengQuan is the dissenter of the theory of relativity who written in his article that according to the Rolunze's the time may get slow down in the two coordinate system which move closed to each other with the same velocity. If one of the twin brothers depart from the earth in a space ship with the speed of V, and when he get back to the earth several years later the two brothers would both think the other is younger than himself. This is a problem that cannot be explained clearly which is the famous time with wrong problem.
    "About this problem, Einstein had ever made an explanation. He said the space ship from still to get to a special speed is a speedup process. Because of the acceleration the passenger of the ship becomes the younger one. That is to say one of the brothers who traveled around the space get younger than his brother when he got back to the earth. So the time with wrong problem is not exist in fact."
    "But Einstein's explanation has not solved the problem that the acceleration mentioned here was in which coordinate system? It may be the earth coordinate system. If there is acceleration to the earth when if the earth is also accelerate to the space ship? If it is the space ship that makes accelerated motion this may deny the relativity of the accelerated motion and admit the superiority of the earth coordinate system and deny the basic point of the relative space-time view."
    Mr. ZhengQuan just point out the first suppose of the theory of relativity. The two coordinate systems, which have relative motion, should according to the same physical theory. So Rolunze formula's (Rolunze with another famous scholar conclude the motion size according to the existence of "Ether". The size is shrunk when the "Ether" is compressed. Einstein also thought it's true after a long period thinking. Although he tries his best to make it as his own point he also has the honest character and named this formula as Rolunze formula) actual meaning has lost completely. Furthermore the core of relativity is velocity and time, the coordinate value (invariable X,Y, and variable Z) has not any meaning of accelerate. What is the reason to let this wrong point, which is respected by us?
    At this time, I also want to ask "the theory of relativity some questions"
    There is a simple arithmetic result:The space traveler spend less than 18 days to begin his trip, the acceleration is 20 m/s2, the speed will come to 30 0000 m/s2.. if the acceleration time is near to 0, this will make him younger 18 days? Or the 18 days' adventure make him enjoy his time, --why do not let him live forever
    If the process of acceleration is the reason to make the time slowing then the decelerate process will make the time become fast. The space traveler accelerates to leave and decelerate to come, the time become slow first then become fast. The integral errand should be zero. Einstein's result belongs to abnormal law of causation-it is always explain or is not explain?
    Velocity is ratio of distance with time, why do we change the intension of time (the general time size)? The velocity affect time and this word make a serious logic loop mistake
    Riman and Einstein may not have rational thinking, then let human mess. But normal is the most crucial judgement, it can not be made a mistake by these wrong men, it is time to let this laughy curtain call.
    The child of Einstein like to talk velocity, it is ok, let's find something to do. Let's make clearly about the velocity of the earth and sun, secondary planet, satellite, star and so on then calculate how long can we live. Do your grandsons have enough to do all of these things?


    Postscript
    The question about light will not end at this point; there is a long way for someone with ideal to go.
    The light issue is not over so far, the road is too long so need all of us try our best to explore it. The science needs quantificationally analysis, but many phenomena indicate that some issues, which can be solved first, are entered into a galling condition in the end. Some place looks like reasonable, but it is just not reasonable. It can not wait a man to make this clear in his definite life.
    I am only a spectator and I enter into this field with my own interests, so maybe my conclusion is very laughy.
    What is really I want to say is that the hot, hot machine, the dream of hot machine. I do not know they are true or not true. we said they are not true because they are so splendid and lighting. We said they are true because they are really more elegance than Einstein. But if we want to listen the out space voice, which is a absolute voice of another world, we should have more patience. Because we are not god so we must face our life first.

    Our life will become too wateriness if we have not ever suffered experience. More rigorous experience will let our achievement become more splendid.

    author 2006-7-9

    e-mail:cccpu0501@163.com


    Every person has it's desired opinion to choose some appropriate words when he translate something from one language to another language. If you feel any doubt to understand this english version please refer to the original text,which is the chinese version.

    "相对论"借尸"高维空",岂容叵奈何!
    作者:何潭光
    最近有意借阅了一本由美籍日裔物理学家,哲学博士加来道雄先生著述的《超越时空》,真可谓:受赐非浅、感慨 良多!
    本着"奇文共欣赏,疑义相与析"的精神,现在将原文作小量采撷,加以点评,与诸位共享。
    "我们假设人行道上的行人记录了汽车和火车的行驶时间,汽车每小时行驶99英里,火车每小时行驶100英里 。自然从我们的观点出发,我们看到火车以每小时比汽车快1英里的速度在我们前面行驶,这是因为速度能像简单 的数字一样进行加减。
    现在,我们用光束来代替火车,但光的速度仅保持在每小时100英里,行人仍然看到我们以每小时99英里的速 度紧追以每小时100英里速度传播的光束。根据行人的观点,我们应该迫近光束。然而根据狭义相对论的观点, 汽车中的我们实际看到,光束并不是像预想的那样以每小时领先我们1英里的速度行进,而是以每小时领先我们1 00英里的速度高速行进。显然我们看到光束迅速地领先于我们,好像我们处于静止状态……直到行人记 录我们的汽车以每小时99.99999英里的速度疾驶……,然而,当我们透过车窗往外观时,我们看 到光束仍然以每小时100英里的速度在我们前面高速行驶。"(原书第96~98页)
    这理论真是让人丈二金刚摸不着头脑。不知是在讲神话?摆故事?还是在谈《聊斋》?怎么讲的全是梦幻?难道真 是"曲高和者盖寡"--绝少知音?还是故弄玄虚?……,或是其它?
    说实话,我再做梦,也不曾想到有一天会向这位比神明还要崇高的伟人发起冲击。当然,他的鬼话和群鸦鼓噪我从 未相信过,并且我从来只认为这位爱先生只不过是弱智者自强不息,勤能补拙而后有成的典范。在我看来这个几乎 人类脑量之最的大家伙比起高斯斯那精巧一半的小脑袋,实在差得太远、太远、太远!
    "相对论"是造物主给人类制造的一个矿古绝今的恶作剧--让这个硕大无比的象征人类智慧的大脑壳,运用数学法则得到一个破天荒的不等式不说,让人类顶礼莫拜了一百年 !
    让人费解的是:与之同时代或更晚时期正是人类近代文明进步神速,也是英才倍出的时代,为什么就看不破,察不 出这其中的真伪呢?
    让一个无赖统领天下,在人类政治舞台上实属家常便饭。而发生在科界,一个充满理性,也是相较人类社会生活各 个层面最民主,最公平的地方 ,那就只能这样理解:难倒大脑壳的问题必然难倒众生。不过也不排除:是众生之中能够认识问题真谛的人没有合 适的机缘去思考这个问题。我愿意赞同后面的推论,不然让人类整体蒙羞,又该解释现代文明?
    排山倒海第一击--相对论违反了最简单的数学法则:同参照点:同方向两质点运动的速度值差,一定服从代数差规律。
    在加来道雄的演说下,每秒30万公里在空间传播的光,已经非光,而是魔鬼、幽灵--颇具灵性的调侃大师:你的每一份努力都是徒劳枉然,像段誉的"凌波微步",又像姑苏慕容的"借力打力",真 是匪夷所思,神乎其技!
    作为博士,加来道雄完全理解爱因斯坦的"真经要旨",时间不等式:由于物体运动速度V接近光速导致变换式分 母无穷小,使得接近光速运动的观察者的相对时间变慢到无穷大,再加上一个运动轴上的两点间差,因为追赶的是 光,所以这个差值不存在。
    时间真的会"变慢"吗?是爱老先生思维机器出大故障,运转得太慢,得出的天大错误!变换式本身是为了适应" 光速在所有作匀速运动坐标系里是不变数"的履,削断了时间的足(令t≠t') 的情况下导出。
    要证明时间是否具有绝对性很简单:用六块公认的质量最佳的液晶显示表,作好每一块表的的相互年误差记录,然 后装入高性能电池(确保三年以上的运行支持能力),再作好起运后的基准相对误差记录(走时相对互差和起动时 的基础差都只须精确到秒)。其中三只用防震、防潮、防磁(铁匣)的保险箱置于高速磁悬浮列车上,余下三只以 同样保护置于静止场所,当列车时速300公里以上的运行时间累计达两年后,是否真如"相对论"规定的变慢8 .77秒,爱因斯坦是"伟大"还是"尾大",不就清楚了吗?
    牛顿说:"绝对的真正的和数学的时间自身在流逝着。并且由于它的本性而均匀地同任何一种外界事物无关地流逝 着","绝对的空间由于它的本性以及它同外界事物无关,它永远是等同的和不动的。"
    爱因斯坦以为嗅到了什么,莫名的兴奋让他忘乎其所地癫狂,表面上他也在旁征博引地广作调查,还煞有介事地冥 思苦想--但是这一切都因先入为主的误导而陷于死角。在这种莫名的汹汹大潮的涌动下,他终于赤膊上阵,毅然高举起否定 绝对时空观的猎猎大旗。
    爱因斯坦到底看到了什么?首先是迈克尔逊关于"以太"绝对空间坐标和地球运动(公转)坐标变动 的观察。
    应该承认:作为科学家迈克尔逊如此认真探索、求实,而且严谨、勤勉,再也难得找到第二人与之相 比。
    但是,迈克尔逊这个功在千秋的实验仅仅证明了光传播服从以地球惯性系坐标为原点的性质,并不能完全否定"以 太"物质的存在。
    "相对论"的立论基础是"光速不变原理",这是爱氏把它提升到第二公设的论断。其实爱因斯坦自己似乎也觉察 到一点什么不对的地方,他说:"我们要把这个猜想提升为公设,并且还要引进另一条在表面上看来同它不相容的 公设:光在空虚空间里总是以一确定的速度传播着,这速度同发射体的运动速度状态无关。"但是推翻牛顿的绝对 时空观是何等的伟大。也许是功利之心的驱使,他宁肯把明明显显的表象用"表面"的抹布以漫不经意的手法摒弃 ,也根本不顾及天会塌下来的后果。



    光速是不是真的不变呢?答案是:否--!!!
    光波的种种迹象表明它有着和物质波(媒质无波传播方向的实质性运动,仅仅是能量的一个表现形式在以固有速率 和规律传播)惊人类似或相同之处。
    比如:声波的传播速率与波源对地同向运动速度V无关,但其频率有
    (334米/秒)/(334米/秒 - V) (1)
    的变化,其波长与变动后的频率仍为反比关系。
    而光的传播也有相同的情形,相关佐证请参看郑铨先生《近代物理学问题--相对论质疑》一书中63页:(1)Majorana运动光源实验;(2)Fabry和Buisson实验; (3)Majrana的运动反射实验。
    现实生活中,超音速飞机掠过上空之前我们是不会因波源与波速的迭加而听到任何声音,必须是飞机掠过头顶之际 (声源地距比上声速的最短时刻),隆隆之声才会姗姗来迟。
    不停靠列车驶过站台的那声长鸣,当声源经过我们面前那一刹,会出现"鸣呜"的一个短暂急速的变调声,那是频 率变化在函数拐点处凸现出来的结果。
    由于声波的媒质是空气,它锁定在地球坐标系上,而光竟然也服从类似的传播规律,这能说仅仅是一种巧合吗?更 多的可能性是"以太"本来存在,它也是局部锁定在地球上,否则没法解释光传播服从地球坐标系原 点的事实。
    我的理由是:不管你承认不承认,绝对的空间和时间是客观存在的,尽管人类现在能感知的是相对的那一种情形( 这种相对是借助参照点和某种尺度进行把握时空的正常相对,决不是爱因斯坦胡乱编派的那一个狗屁相对)。其实 绝对的概念早在一切理性思维中深深植根不移,而这个相对只不过是人类一步步接近绝对的阶梯,虽然它的误差可 以是无穷小,绝对却永远是人类把握和认识问题的极值,总是可望而不可及。
    首先要否决爱因斯坦得以成名的依附体"光子"的说法。作为粒子性质,既然服从地球坐标原点说,那就必然有表 观光速是静测光速(30万公里/秒)与源速之和的结果,则频率可变,波长不应该发生变化。但实际上,光速未变,频率变,波长变,三者已失其 二,光子无法存身!
    这里要补充解释一下:爱因斯坦虽因相对论的独创狗皮膏药而享誉百年,但"相对论"却从未受到过真真正正的正 式承认,只是由于爱氏在光电问题上的一个计算公式捷足先登(这有点像伽利略完成实验和数据采集,牛顿把它作 为宇宙间物体作用和运动规律公推的结果类似,但牛顿的才华、天赋是光芒万丈的,爱因斯坦愚人千虑而偶有一得 与之相较差之千比),获1921年诺贝尔奖而促成了"皇帝的新装"。由于人类的胆识、知识修为、智慧、机缘 缺其一者不可能揭得开光华世界的谜团,更何况屑小之辈的曲意逢迎,相对论锦上添花,肥肉上贴膘的事常常有之 ,偶尔有人轻轻顶那么一下,却因光的特殊本质莫可奈何而常常遇南墙而止。
    我觉得:没有给"相对论"以正式承认,正是人类真正理性的所在;爱氏获1921年诺贝尔奖,虽说太过侥幸, 然而鉴于光的问题本来就颇具艰辛,加之爱氏钻了知识产权的时间观念上的空子,使得"他人为之作嫁衣",便是 理之当然。一句话:奖无所错,只是那些埋头挖掘真理的人难免睹物伤情。所谓公道也具真正意义的 相对性。
    现在我来剥掉"光子"的外衣--其实是子虚乌有的"借尸还魂"。电磁变化讲究的是变化率--电或磁同能量基数,对时间的比率。光是原子受激振荡发出的电磁波,其每一个振荡均有基本相同的能量内含,但 是高频率的振荡在时间轴上占有的长度小,所以相同的时间间隔的单原子振荡波的能量内含正比于频率。这就说明 了高频率光与低频率光在光电效应上的差异--类似力学中的压强概念。
    光波、水波、声波都是能量的一个表现形式,都可引起压力。如果光波一定须要"光子"的话,我也可以编出个" 水子"、"声子"来凑凑热闹。不过我想起了画蛇添足的成语:"蛇固无足,子安能为之足"?还是不要多此一举 为好!
    如果按照麦克斯韦的电磁波传播原理,光是感生现象的累进形式,说明光波是超常波,那么在这万千变幻的宇宙中 为什么地球上发出的光单只认地球为坐标系原点,它为何不选太阳系质量中心系原点,或者是超越所有的绝对空间 坐标系原点--最具权威的选择?
    欧几里得几何中有关于命题的讨论,"逆命题不一定成立",现在我就用逆命题此项不成立的现身说法来教导教导 黎曼、爱因斯坦追星族,这是排山倒海第二击--光源不动,观察者以速度V'作关于光源的运动,则光到观察点表观速度:C'服从
    C'=C+V'结果。 (2)
    这是由波的传播原理推出,不管它是物质波(比如声波)还是纤尘不染,超越常规的纯纯净净的麦克斯韦电磁自催 生波:只要是波,它必须具备在传播路径上的波距连续分布,向源或离源的质点以速度V'运动,必须减少或增加 每一未达波节至该质点的时间。
    另外:源不动,点动还必须服从频率等于 的变化及波长不变的规律。
    如果(1)式包含的内容说明的是源动,观察点不动的光传播定式(爱因斯坦鸡毛令箭式);则(2)式是源不动 ,观察点动的光传播定式,也是爱氏魔鬼宫殿土崩瓦解式。
    但是地球上的光传播远比大脑壳用多重积分推导的算式更让人意外--那就是,源和点双动的混合型,不难理解此时的光传播表观速度是
    C'=C+V';波长 ^' = ((C-V)/C)*^;
    频率 (C+V')/(C-V) 应以 的系数重新定量。 (3)
    其中V是源速,V'是观察点速;^是静测光速波长。
    可怜的豆渣脑壳,光大有什么用?他只咬到了烂甘蔗好的那一头便连声说甜!并且加上一句"绝不可能苦",现在 问题出来了--在爱因斯坦两个公设中,同时出现的现象:观察点对于光源存在相对运动,按照公设一,源对观察者主动和被动是 等价的,我却给它捅烂了,不等价;按照公设二,光速不变,但是被动(相对地球坐标系)光源的光对有相对运动 的观测点的表观速度必须变:这是真真正正纯思想能把握了的实在!!
    连简单的算术都处理不了,你再奢谈微积分,多重积分必定是糟糕的更糟糕,"伟大"是人类的最大 不幸--尾太大!
    波长变化有无,用迈克尔逊干涉仪在高速列车上即可作成。不过应该通过同装置,同光源种类,同速率的动源实验 比较,绝对可否定爱氏一党偏执一端的鬼话。
    C'=C+V'的实验难度极大,如果上面波长的变化仍不能填塞众人悠悠之口,也没有人设计一种高效、省时、 省力、省钱的四众皆服的实验,我到可设计一套实验,那是古老的测光速法的发扬光大。由于其牵动颇大,请允许 我暂时芷拙,只有到了非此不可的时候,它自然会浮出水面。
    关于"以太"问题,我在前面对已经的否定持保留态度,是因为光的传播性质完全吻合于物质波--麦克斯韦的空洞数字不能解释光在地球上为何只选择地球坐标系的问题。
    能够确定"以太"物质存在与否的唯一机会,是被天文观察看到的"光行差"现象。这也是对爱因斯坦影响最大的 事件之一,但是这个事实被当作否决"以太"物质的铁证是不充分的--有"以太"物质存在同样可以引发"光行差"现象,只是方向截然不同,必须确定望远镜筒的倾斜是依从地球公转 轨道朝前还是向后了的。
    这个问题除了天文观察者,任何人都无发言权,所以恳请天文观察者们:仔细留意望远镜筒朝前、向后的定性结论 。
    人们不经意放弃的也许正是人类寻觅万千的至珍至宝,而伟大的发现或&#


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •