The "Theory of Relativity" attach to "High Dimension"

He Tanguang
Recently, I borrow a book Exceed Space Time written by an American physical scientist named Michio Kaku(加来道雄) who is also a Doctor majored in philosophy. After my reading, I have to say that I learn a lot and apperceive a lot.
In order to share the excellent article with you, I will pick out some viewpoint and give my commentary on it.
"Einstein, -----who recollect later: after ten years thought-----. This is a wrong conclusion which I had occurred by accident when I was 16 years old that if I run after a beam of light with the velocity of light (the speed of light travel in the vacuum) well then the beam of light I saw would be a concussive electromagnetic field which is stagnated in the space, however, this case cannot be exist according to our experience as well as the Maxwell Equation."
Even as he guessed, he found that the Maxwell Equation was not suitable to the quiescent or the frozen wave. In fact, Einstein has proved that no matter how hard we run after the beam of light, this beam of light will go forward with the same velocity of light.
In another words, the light beam is just like the "Ghost ship" exaggerated by some old shipman. It is a visionary ship that cannot be catched up forever. No matter how fast we drive our ship, the "Ghost ship" always managed to ward and deride us.
In the year 1905, Einstein had plenty time in the Patent Bureau where he analyzed the Maxwell Equation carefully, and educed the narrow sense relative theory that the velocities of light are same in the all reference system which make the even movement.
We make a suppose that the foot passengers walking on the footpath make a note of the run time of car and train, the speed of car is 99 miles per hour, the speed of train is 100 miles per hour. Naturally, from our view, we can see the train run in front of us with the speed of 1 mile per hour over the car, this is because the speed can be added and subtracted just like simple numbers.
Now, we use the light beam replace the train, and keep the velocity of light is only 100 miles per hour, so the foot passengers could also see that we run after the light beam which speed is 100 miles per hour with the speed of 99 miles per hour. According to the foot passengers we should close to the light beam. However, according to the narrow sense relativity theory, sitting in the car, we see the train run with the speed 100 miles per hour over us, this speed is far different from our expect. Obviously we see the light beam keep ahead rapidly from us, just like that we are quiescence ------until the foot passengers record that our car run with the speed of 99.99999 miles per hour ------, however, we notice that the light beam is also run with the speed of 100 miles per hour over us." (See the page 96-98 of the original)
This theory is so obscure that we cannot understand clearly. Is it a fairy tale? Is it just a story? Is it just tell a tale like stated in 《聊斋》? Why are these entire like dream? Whether this is because it is so profound that hardly any understand? ------ No bosom friend or deliberately mystifying? ------ Or any other purpose?
To tell the truth, even in my dream, I never think of that I will initiate a concussion to a giant who is thought even greater than gods. Certainly, I never believe his balderdash, and I always think that this Mr. Einstein is only a fool who is a good example by constantly strive and work hard to become a giant. In my opinion, Einstein who has a biggest brain in the world is worse than Gauss whose brain was only half of Einstein's.
"The theory of relativity" is the biggest mischief given by the architect, which give a chance to that biggest brain to gain an egregious inequation what's worse is that this theory has been respected for one hundred years! What is more puzzled is that the same time or the later time was the time when the human recent civilization made great progress and full with outstanding person. But why no person can recognize this false?
Let a rascal leading the country is hackneyed in the politic stage. But if this phenomenon appears in the scientific area where full of sense, more democratic and equal than any other where, we have to make the conclusion that the issue which the big brain cannot solve the all flesh cannot solve either. But there is still this instance that the right man who can solve the problem has never got the lucky chance to think about it. I prefer to agree with the later opinion, or the human will be shame, and how to explain the modern human civilization?
One
The first attack------ the Theory of relativity acts against the simplest mathematic principle: if two particles with the same reference point and move in the same direction, their speed difference must follow the algebra difference rule.
As in Michio Kaku's (加来道雄) speech, the light traveling in the space with the speed of 300 000 kilometers per second is not light already; It is a devil or a ghost. I have to say that he is a humor great with pretty spiritualism: each your effort is a lost of labour just like Duan Yu's well-known WuShu skill "rapid shift on wave" and like Mu Rong's "beat one with the strength borrowed from himself". It is so puzzled and thought to be supernatural.
As a doctor, Michio Kaku(加来道雄) can understand Einstein's argument completely that the time inequation: Because the speed (V) is close to the velocity of light, the denominator of the equation is limited to zero, which makes the observer's relative time infinite. And with a difference between two points on one movement axis, because what we are after is light, so this difference is not exist in fact.
Is the time really "slow down"? The answer is no. It is a big mistake made by Einstein whose thinking system was wrong. The equation is suitable to the case that the light velocity is uniform in all the coordinated system with even movement, which neglecting the time (let t≠t').
To prove whether time's absoluteness is simple: use six LCD meters which quality are thought to be the best, make exact record of each meter's annual error, then put high quality batteries into them to make sure they can run well more than three years. Then make records on the benchmark relative error after their running (the error only exacted to second). Three of them are put in the high speed magnetism suspend train with the protection quakeproof, moisture proof and magnetic proof. Another three are put in the still place with the same protection. When the train run more than two years with the speed over 300 kilometers per hour, we can see if the time get slow 8.77 seconds, and then we can get a conclusion whether Einstein is great or not. Newton says that the absolute, true and mathematic time is run on itself without the control of any outside things. The absolute space has nothing to do with the outside things, so it is the same and motionless forever.
Einstein thought that he has discovered something important. He was so excited that he nearly got crazy. Ostensibly, he made a lot of inquisitions and thought hard, but all these were led to a dead angle because of the first impressions that were wrong in fact. Under this emerge of the unknown violent spring tide, he finally went into battle barebacked and hold up the flag of negating absolute space-time view.
What Einstein had found? The first thing was that 迈克尔逊's observe on the change of ether absolute space-time coordinate and the earth revolution coordinate.
It should be admitted that Michelson's (迈克尔逊) was such an earnest, factualistic, precise and diligent man that no other people can compare with him.
But the experiment made by Michelson(迈克尔逊) was only proved that light travel obey the earth inertia coordinate, and cannot denial the existence of ether.
The make point base of "theory of relativity" is "velocity of light is uniform" which has been stepped up as the second tentative by Einstein. Einstein himself maybe feels something wrong as he said, "we should step up this guess as a tentative, and we have to fetch in another tentative which looks cannot consistent with it: light travel with a fixed on velocity in the vacuous space, and this velocity has nothing to do with the move state of the missile". But to pull down Newton's absolute space-time theory is how a grate work! Maybe driven by the material gain, he only spurns the phenomena with the quillet of "surface" without considering the bad sequence.

Tow
Is the velocity of light keeping the same all time? The answer is no!
Many evidences show that light wave is the same with the substantial wave in some places. The substantial wave only travel with the same speed and rule with the behavior of energy and not like the travel of wave in the essential.
For example: the speed of wave has nothing to do with the travel speed V of the wave original against the earth, but its frequency is changed with the formula
Its wavelength is also inverse ratio to the changed frequency.
It is same with the travel of light. You can refer to Recent Physics Puzzle---oppugn to the theory of relativity (Page 63) written by Zheng Quan: (1) Majorana traveling lamp-house experiment; (2) Fabry and Buisson experiment; (3) Majorana traveling reflecting experiment.
In the real life, we will never hear any voice caused by the adding of wave original to the wave speed until the supersound plane fly over our head. It is only when the plane passing over our head when the sound original over the earth compare to the velocity of sound is the shortest then we could hear the rumbling.
When the lasting ring from the non-stop trains that pass the platform come by our presence there is a fugacious and quick modified tone. That is the result of the frequency changed at the inflexion of the function.
Because of the media of wave is the air, so it is locked at the earth reference frame. And that light is also obeys this rule, can we say this is only a coincidence? The most probability is that ether is also exits at the earth, or we cannot explain the fact that light travel obeys the earth reference frame.
My explanation is that: whether you admit or not, the absolute space and time is exist. Thought man can only apperceive the relative space and time at present (this relative space and time is the normal relative according to the reference point and some necessary measure. And it is not the relative space and time created by Einstein). Actually, the absoluteness concept has been implanted in all rational thinking, and this relative concept is only a step from which human get close to the absolute concept, although its error may limit to zero the absolute concept is the extremum for human cognition puzzles. It can be see but never can be grasped forever.
First of all, I should reject the "photon" put forward by Einstein. As the quality of particle it obeys the earth reference system, and its speed is must be the summation of immobile velocity of light (300 000 km/s) and light original. So the frequency can be changed but the wavelength should not be changed. But in fact the velocity of light has not been changed but the frequency and the wavelength have been changed. Two of three have been changed; the photon has no place to live.
There is something should be complete that: Einstein has been a giant for hundreds of years for his original creation theory of relativity. But the theory of relativity has never been accepted really. Einstein won the Nobel Price in the year 1921 for his first account formula on photoelectricity, which was like Galilei accomplished experiment and collected data and also like Newton kept it as the result of the objects action in the universe and the movement rule. But Newton's talent and genius was dazzling, Einstein is just a fool who thinks thousands of times and gets one conclusion which is much worse than Newton's. For human courage and insight, knowledge and behavior, brightness, good luck, which let one out, man cannot expose the world's puzzles, rather that the flunky's adulations so the theory of relativity was thought well is common. Once someone wants to tip it gently he must be crushed back because of the light's special essence.
In my opinion, it is human's real sense that the theory of relativity has not been admitted. Einstein won the Nobel Price in the year 1921. It is fluke for this price; however, the puzzle of light is very hard and with the addition of Einstein's good use of time so giving him the chance to make bottom drawer for others. In a word, there is no wrong price but the people who work hard for the truth will hard to avoid the sadness when see this case. This is what they call that fair is also relativity.
Let me take off the coat of "photons" which is the "revive in a new guise" actually something not exist. The change of electromagnetism pays attention to the change rate, which is the ratio of the energy radices of electricity and magnetism to time. Light is the electromagnetic wave given off by atom that is surged, which surge all has basically same energy but the high frequency surge takes less length on the time axes, so the energy of single atom surge wave which with the same time space is direct ratio to the frequency. This can explain the difference between high frequency light and low frequency light, which is similar to the concept of pressure in the mechanics.
Light wave, water wave and sound wave are all the exhibition of energy and all of them can arise pressure. If it is must have a "photons" for light wave I can plait something like "water photons" or "sound photons". But I remember a famous Chinese idiom that is gild the lily, which means that the snake has no foot naturally how can you make foot for it? So I don't want to plait these "photons".
Light is the progression form of influence according to the electromagnetic wave transmits theory worked out by Maxwell. This tell us that light wave is transnormal wave so why the light emits from the earth only takes the earth as the origin of coordinate why not takes the solar system mass center system as the origin of coordinate or takes the absoluteness space as the origin of coordinate which is the most authoritative choice?
The discussion about proposition in the Euclid geometry tells us that "athwart proposition not always right", now let me advise those fans of Lyman and Einstein by using their own experience, which is the second attack. If the light source holds still, the observer moves towards the light source with the speed of V' then the apparent speed C' from light source to the observer obeys the equation as follows: C'= C + V'. (2)
This is concluded out according to the wave transmits theory, no matter whether it is the substantial wave (such as sound wave) or just the transnormal wave such as Maxwell electromagnetic wave, if it is wave it's wave distance must be continuously distributed on the transmission route. The particle moves towards or off the light wave with the speed of V', the time of each un-arrived wave section to the particle should be reduced or increased.
In addition if the light source holds still, the particle should obey the rule that frequency equals (C+V')/C and the wavelength keep fixedness.
If the content of formula (1) shows the transmit equation of source moves but the observation point holds still then the formula (2) shows the transmit equation of light source keeps still but the observation point moves, which is the equation makes the Einstein's Devil Palace fall apart.
However the light transmit is much surprising than the calculation concluded by multi- integral, which are source and the particle all move. It is not hard to understand the apparent speed of light transmit is C'=C+V; the wavelength A'=(C-V)* ?/C; the frequency is (C+V')/(C-V), the coefficient should be newly fix quantified. (3)
The V is the light source's move speed; the V' is the observation point's move speed; ? is the wavelength.
What to do with the big but un-clever brain? Just like eating a sugar cane, when he just bite the sweet part he make a conclusion that the sugar cane is sweet and with the addition that "it cannot be bitter". But now there is something wrong. Among the two proposals of Einstein's there will be two phenomena appear at the same time: one is according to the Proposal One if the observe point is move relative to the light source the initiative and passiveness of light source to observer are equivalence, but I have disclosed it that they are not equivalent; the other is that according to the Proposal Two if the velocity of light keeps unchanged but the velocity of the light from the passive light source relative to the observation point must be changed which is the actuality in deed the pure idea can holds.
If you cannot deal with the simple arithmetic but try to use calculous even multi-calculous which must be too bad a thing. I have to say that the "great " may be the worst thing of human.
In order to make sure whether the wavelength changed we can make an experiment on the high-speed train with the Michaelsun interferometer, but the result must be compared with the experiment with the same equipment, same light source and the same move source with the same speed. This experiment can denial the Einstein's conclusion.

The difficulty of experiment to proof C'=C+V' is very great. If the changes of the above wavelength can not keep everyone shut out. Nobody can design an efficient, timesaving, laborsaving, moneysaving experiment to let everyone believe in it. I can design a experiment, but that originate from a old method of measuring the velocity of light. This method relate to many aspect, so I hide it until every method cannot work except it.
About the "Ether", I keep my opinion for the negative former point. As the transmission of light keep the same with the mass wave. Maxwell's theory cannot explain why the light uses the earth coordinate system.
The only chance to conform the existence of the "ether" is the phenomena of "aberration" which was also the most important thing affected Einstein. But the fact is not sufficient to deny the "ether" because the existence of the "ether" also can produce "aberration", the only difference is the direction. We must make sure that the incline of the telescope follow the revolution orbit is forward or backward.
Nobody can make statement on the problem except astronomic observers. So I beseech those observers to pay attention to the telescope's inclination.
Something people abandon unconsciously maybe something people try best to get it and the great discovery or success often comes from it.

Three
Another most important experiment for Einstein is the floating water light intervene experiment, which is performed by FellSon. Fellson do not think according to others and has an active thinking so he can design such an unique experiment. But this experiment lack the Macerson's carefulness and preciseness so there are many uncertain results. Such as the difference of material (refractive index variety), flowing speed variety (the intervene of mussy glide). So the general applicability need more review and at the same time how to get the formula need further demonstrate
I put up an reasonable consequence according to the reason which can derive this phenomena and the results are more precision than Fellson's
Now, let us compare the difference of these two results
Fellson's experiment condition:
Speed of water V=7 m/s Pipe length L=1.5m
Light wavelength: 5300Ao Refractive index=1.33
Fellson's result: 0.2031stripe displacement (if n=1.3326 result = 0.2049)
The actual stripe displacement is 0.23
My result : 0.2316 stripe displacement (if n=1.3326 result=0.23267)
Fellson's error is 11.70%~10.91%, but my error is 0.7%~1.16%
If using the other material (the material's normal temperature liquid state is not always exist, only depend on discursion), the results are consistent only when n equal 1.4. The Fellson's result will make a great change if n is increased or decreased
For instance:
N=1.361 (alcohol)
Fellson's result is 0.225 stripe displacement, but my result is 0.244 stripe displacement.
N=1.4732 (oil of turpentine)
Fellson's result is 0. 3083 stripe displacement, but my result is 0. 2854 stripe displacement
The formula of the principle of relativity can educe a ludicrous conclusion which velocity of light is the utmost speed in the universe.
The rule of light transmission becomes the utmost of mechanics universe. But they are different
Can the constant value of velocity of sound become the utmost of aerodynamics? The ultrasonic flight is the flying handicap before turbine engine is invented. But after turbine engine is invented, it is ordinary flying with several multiple velocity of sound even the ten multiple velocity of sound is not utmost. If I am not wrong, the velocity of cannon using by human reach 30 km/h. This velocity is faster than 10 multiple velocity of sound
So the material relative velocity is according to Newtonian mechanics and is not according to Einstein's formula. The over velocity of light movement is existence which is only defined by the accelerated methods and engine and not defined by velocity of light
In fact, "the velocity of light is the utmost of movement " is depends on the formula. There is no the skin where is feather? Let's cheer up. The velocity is liberated.
Mr. ZhengQuan is the dissenter of the theory of relativity who written in his article that according to the Rolunze's the time may get slow down in the two coordinate system which move closed to each other with the same velocity. If one of the twin brothers depart from the earth in a space ship with the speed of V, and when he get back to the earth several years later the two brothers would both think the other is younger than himself. This is a problem that cannot be explained clearly which is the famous time with wrong problem.
"About this problem, Einstein had ever made an explanation. He said the space ship from still to get to a special speed is a speedup process. Because of the acceleration the passenger of the ship becomes the younger one. That is to say one of the brothers who traveled around the space get younger than his brother when he got back to the earth. So the time with wrong problem is not exist in fact."
"But Einstein's explanation has not solved the problem that the acceleration mentioned here was in which coordinate system? It may be the earth coordinate system. If there is acceleration to the earth when if the earth is also accelerate to the space ship? If it is the space ship that makes accelerated motion this may deny the relativity of the accelerated motion and admit the superiority of the earth coordinate system and deny the basic point of the relative space-time view."
Mr. ZhengQuan just point out the first suppose of the theory of relativity. The two coordinate systems, which have relative motion, should according to the same physical theory. So Rolunze formula's (Rolunze with another famous scholar conclude the motion size according to the existence of "Ether". The size is shrunk when the "Ether" is compressed. Einstein also thought it's true after a long period thinking. Although he tries his best to make it as his own point he also has the honest character and named this formula as Rolunze formula) actual meaning has lost completely. Furthermore the core of relativity is velocity and time, the coordinate value (invariable X,Y, and variable Z) has not any meaning of accelerate. What is the reason to let this wrong point, which is respected by us?
At this time, I also want to ask "the theory of relativity some questions"
There is a simple arithmetic result：The space traveler spend less than 18 days to begin his trip, the acceleration is 20 m/s2, the speed will come to 30 0000 m/s2.. if the acceleration time is near to 0, this will make him younger 18 days? Or the 18 days' adventure make him enjoy his time, --why do not let him live forever
If the process of acceleration is the reason to make the time slowing then the decelerate process will make the time become fast. The space traveler accelerates to leave and decelerate to come, the time become slow first then become fast. The integral errand should be zero. Einstein's result belongs to abnormal law of causation-it is always explain or is not explain?
Velocity is ratio of distance with time, why do we change the intension of time (the general time size)? The velocity affect time and this word make a serious logic loop mistake
Riman and Einstein may not have rational thinking, then let human mess. But normal is the most crucial judgement, it can not be made a mistake by these wrong men, it is time to let this laughy curtain call.
The child of Einstein like to talk velocity, it is ok, let's find something to do. Let's make clearly about the velocity of the earth and sun, secondary planet, satellite, star and so on then calculate how long can we live. Do your grandsons have enough to do all of these things?

Postscript
The question about light will not end at this point; there is a long way for someone with ideal to go.
The light issue is not over so far, the road is too long so need all of us try our best to explore it. The science needs quantificationally analysis, but many phenomena indicate that some issues, which can be solved first, are entered into a galling condition in the end. Some place looks like reasonable, but it is just not reasonable. It can not wait a man to make this clear in his definite life.
I am only a spectator and I enter into this field with my own interests, so maybe my conclusion is very laughy.
What is really I want to say is that the hot, hot machine, the dream of hot machine. I do not know they are true or not true. we said they are not true because they are so splendid and lighting. We said they are true because they are really more elegance than Einstein. But if we want to listen the out space voice, which is a absolute voice of another world, we should have more patience. Because we are not god so we must face our life first.

Our life will become too wateriness if we have not ever suffered experience. More rigorous experience will let our achievement become more splendid.

author 2006-7-9

e-mail：cccpu0501@163.com

Every person has it's desired opinion to choose some appropriate words when he translate something from one language to another language. If you feel any doubt to understand this english version please refer to the original text,which is the chinese version.

"相对论"借尸"高维空"，岂容叵奈何！

"我们假设人行道上的行人记录了汽车和火车的行驶时间，汽车每小时行驶99英里，火车每小时行驶100英里 。自然从我们的观点出发，我们看到火车以每小时比汽车快1英里的速度在我们前面行驶，这是因为速度能像简单 的数字一样进行加减。

"相对论"是造物主给人类制造的一个矿古绝今的恶作剧--让这个硕大无比的象征人类智慧的大脑壳，运用数学法则得到一个破天荒的不等式不说，让人类顶礼莫拜了一百年 ！

"相对论"的立论基础是"光速不变原理"，这是爱氏把它提升到第二公设的论断。其实爱因斯坦自己似乎也觉察 到一点什么不对的地方，他说："我们要把这个猜想提升为公设，并且还要引进另一条在表面上看来同它不相容的 公设：光在空虚空间里总是以一确定的速度传播着，这速度同发射体的运动速度状态无关。"但是推翻牛顿的绝对 时空观是何等的伟大。也许是功利之心的驱使，他宁肯把明明显显的表象用"表面"的抹布以漫不经意的手法摒弃 ，也根本不顾及天会塌下来的后果。

(334米/秒)/(334米/秒 - V) （1）

C'=C+V'结果。 （2）

C'=C+V'；波长 ^' = ((C-V)/C)*^；

C'=C+V'的实验难度极大，如果上面波长的变化仍不能填塞众人悠悠之口，也没有人设计一种高效、省时、 省力、省钱的四众皆服的实验，我到可设计一套实验，那是古老的测光速法的发扬光大。由于其牵动颇大，请允许 我暂时芷拙，只有到了非此不可的时候，它自然会浮出水面。