# Thread: Does velocity simulate or create gravity in outer space?

1. If you were traveling far enough from earth not to feel its gravity, would enough velocity still pull you back in your seat the same way accelerating in a car does? Or would there be no sensation at all?

2.

3. Originally Posted by NotBob
If you were traveling far enough from earth not to feel its gravity, would enough velocity still pull you back in your seat the same way accelerating in a car does? Or would there be no sensation at all?
Hmmm is this going to lead to a bashing of the equivalence priciple, by any chance? or do you genuinely not know the physicists aswer to this question?

4. No. Enough velocity will NOT be noticed, no matter how great it is. This is because of Galilean Relativity. Enough acceleration will put you back in your seat in the same way as accelerating in a car or laying on the earth, as the equivalence principle states.

5. Originally Posted by NotBob
If you were traveling far enough from earth not to feel its gravity,
When you say "feel its gravity", do you mean be unaffected by it? If so, you would have to travel some 15 billion light years ago to satisfy this requirement.

6. Originally Posted by Vroomfondel
No. Enough velocity will NOT be noticed, no matter how great it is. This is because of Galilean Relativity. Enough acceleration will put you back in your seat
I agree. Velocity is irrelevant. Acceleration is the key.

7. i concure

8. Originally Posted by Hermes
Originally Posted by NotBob
If you were traveling far enough from earth not to feel its gravity,
When you say "feel its gravity", do you mean be unaffected by it? If so, you would have to travel some 15 billion light years ago to satisfy this requirement.
What if "15 bilion light years" means being next to a binary pulsar? Im pretty sure gravity cant be ignored there

9. Originally Posted by Vroomfondel
Originally Posted by Hermes
Originally Posted by NotBob
If you were traveling far enough from earth not to feel its gravity,
When you say "feel its gravity", do you mean be unaffected by it? If so, you would have to travel some 15 billion light years ago to satisfy this requirement.
What if "15 bilion light years" means being next to a binary pulsar? Im pretty sure gravity cant be ignored there
If you look carefully, the question is not whether gravity can be ignored, but whether gravity exerted by the earth, this earth, can be ignored. Proximity to a binary pulsar will have no effect on what gravity may or may not be exerted by the earth. I think that you just misread the point.

10. Originally Posted by Vroomfondel
No. Enough velocity will NOT be noticed, no matter how great it is. This is because of Galilean Relativity. Enough acceleration will put you back in your seat in the same way as accelerating in a car or laying on the earth, as the equivalence principle states.
Thanks for the replies everyone, but this answers my question. It has always bothered me how Star Trek/Star Wars use gravity simulation as if it were a simlpe innovation; giant ships take off from a planet's surface smoothly and effortlessly without any noticeable exhaust, w/o transition between the planet's gravitational force and the artificial one once in space. I would think any magnetic(?) simulation of gravity would have adverse effects on human physiology, and we would need some gravity at some point to make things like our digestive track work properly. So realistically, space ships of our future might look more like rockets or skyscrapers than the Enterprise or a Star Destroyer, right?

11. Originally Posted by NotBob
So realistically, space ships of our future might look more like rockets or skyscrapers than the Enterprise or a Star Destroyer, right?
I don't know why. Would you lay your city out as a couple of extremely long blocks or as many more shorter blocks? I would prefer the latter.

12. However we weren't talking about cities, but ships/space travel.

13. Originally Posted by NotBob
However we weren't talking about cities, but ships/space travel.
I disagree. I don't see any reason to care about the shape solely in the interests of travel itself. Therefore, I am framing the argument in terms of the living arranagements of the numerous people who would engage in such travel. This is quite analogous to a city, isn't it?

14. Originally Posted by Hermes
Originally Posted by Vroomfondel
Originally Posted by Hermes
Originally Posted by NotBob
If you were traveling far enough from earth not to feel its gravity,
When you say "feel its gravity", do you mean be unaffected by it? If so, you would have to travel some 15 billion light years ago to satisfy this requirement.
What if "15 bilion light years" means being next to a binary pulsar? Im pretty sure gravity cant be ignored there
If you look carefully, the question is not whether gravity can be ignored, but whether gravity exerted by the earth, this earth, can be ignored. Proximity to a binary pulsar will have no effect on what gravity may or may not be exerted by the earth. I think that you just misread the point.
I knew what you meant, i was just wondering how you would reply

15. Originally Posted by Vroomfondel
Originally Posted by Hermes
Originally Posted by Vroomfondel
Originally Posted by Hermes
Originally Posted by NotBob
If you were traveling far enough from earth not to feel its gravity,
When you say "feel its gravity", do you mean be unaffected by it? If so, you would have to travel some 15 billion light years ago to satisfy this requirement.
What if "15 bilion light years" means being next to a binary pulsar? Im pretty sure gravity cant be ignored there
If you look carefully, the question is not whether gravity can be ignored, but whether gravity exerted by the earth, this earth, can be ignored. Proximity to a binary pulsar will have no effect on what gravity may or may not be exerted by the earth. I think that you just misread the point.
I knew what you meant, i was just wondering how you would reply
I too was wondering, what it would look like to have extremely nested posts.

16. Originally Posted by Hermes
Originally Posted by NotBob
However we weren't talking about cities, but ships/space travel.
I disagree. I don't see any reason to care about the shape solely in the interests of travel itself. Therefore, I am framing the argument in terms of the living arranagements of the numerous people who would engage in such travel. This is quite analogous to a city, isn't it?
Either way I'd care about the shape if I were designing it, as longer rather than taller would be less aerodynamic, if that's the right word for space travel, wouldn't it? And whatever gravity force would be opposite from the propulsion, if only as you accelerate.

17. Originally Posted by Hermes
Originally Posted by Vroomfondel
Originally Posted by Hermes
Originally Posted by Vroomfondel
Originally Posted by Hermes
Originally Posted by NotBob
If you were traveling far enough from earth not to feel its gravity,
When you say "feel its gravity", do you mean be unaffected by it? If so, you would have to travel some 15 billion light years ago to satisfy this requirement.
What if "15 bilion light years" means being next to a binary pulsar? Im pretty sure gravity cant be ignored there
If you look carefully, the question is not whether gravity can be ignored, but whether gravity exerted by the earth, this earth, can be ignored. Proximity to a binary pulsar will have no effect on what gravity may or may not be exerted by the earth. I think that you just misread the point.
I knew what you meant, i was just wondering how you would reply
I too was wondering, what it would look like to have extremely nested posts.
Yes, it makes for an interesting looking post.

18. Originally Posted by NotBob
Either way I'd care about the shape if I were designing it, as longer rather than taller would be less aerodynamic, if that's the right word for space travel, wouldn't it? And whatever gravity force would be opposite from the propulsion, if only as you accelerate.
don't really know, of course, but I think that once in space all of these would be irrelevant in terms of effect.

19. Originally Posted by NotBob
Originally Posted by Hermes
Originally Posted by Vroomfondel
Originally Posted by Hermes
Originally Posted by Vroomfondel
Originally Posted by Hermes
Originally Posted by NotBob
If you were traveling far enough from earth not to feel its gravity,
When you say "feel its gravity", do you mean be unaffected by it? If so, you would have to travel some 15 billion light years ago to satisfy this requirement.
What if "15 bilion light years" means being next to a binary pulsar? Im pretty sure gravity cant be ignored there
If you look carefully, the question is not whether gravity can be ignored, but whether gravity exerted by the earth, this earth, can be ignored. Proximity to a binary pulsar will have no effect on what gravity may or may not be exerted by the earth. I think that you just misread the point.
I knew what you meant, i was just wondering how you would reply
I too was wondering, what it would look like to have extremely nested posts.
Yes, it makes for an interesting looking post.
Notice how this is now symmetrical, in terms of the posters.

 Bookmarks
##### Bookmarks
 Posting Permissions
 You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts   BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On [VIDEO] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are Off Pingbacks are Off Refbacks are On Terms of Use Agreement