# Thread: Orbital momentum of light

1. Take a laser and spin it in a circle and once the light reaches a certain distance from it's source, the outermost point of light will be rotating around the source at faster than the speed of light. This does not mean that the light is actually moving faster than the speed of light as it still takes the light time to create a radius for a big enough circle. But if it was already that far and the light was being constantly emitted, then couldn't you send instantaneous messages by manipulating the source's direction (lets say from side to side) and applying a value for the degree of manipulation?

I may not quite understand light correctly.

2.

3. Mmm...I think I understand what you are saying, but the light if put in a circle like that would 'fall apart' since the area near the middle of the circle would make more revolutions per minute than the outer portion, causing it to degenerate. So no, this wouldn't allow for instantaneous messages. The speed of light if it could be, would be EXTREMELY difficult to pass. No standard form of thought would get you to such a result...you would need theory upon theory upon radical theory all piled on top of each other to get such a result. In other words, you would need to create an entirely new field of science.

Anyway, you should be careful with handing out ideas. If you were in fact right, you would have just screwed yourself out of quite a bit of money for that idea; but you at the very least probably subconsciously doubted yourself, which is why you asked here and did not hesitate more. In that case, its good to ask such questions since being proven wrong can prove constructive as you learn more things about the subject.

4. The photons that are emitted by the laser when spinning it actually still need some time (distance/speed of light) to have an effect on the reflecting object. So, if you had a very strong and highly focussed laser that could produce a point on a planet very far from us, any change of direction still needs the light travel time to propagate through. The movement is not instantaneously reflected on the distant surface.

It is like water that comes out of a water hose. If you shake and wiggle the hose, you see how this movement leads to a bent path of the water.

5. Originally Posted by Dwayne Dibley
Take a laser and spin it in a circle and once the light reaches a certain distance from it's source, the outermost point of light will be rotating around the source at faster than the speed of light. This does not mean that the light is actually moving faster than the speed of light as it still takes the light time to create a radius for a big enough circle. But if it was already that far and the light was being constantly emitted, then couldn't you send instantaneous messages by manipulating the source's direction (lets say from side to side) and applying a value for the degree of manipulation?

I may not quite understand light correctly.
No, you cannot send an instantaneous signal in that manner. Think about it. Anything that you do to modulate that signal only propagates at c.

6. Originally Posted by Cold Fusion
Mmm...I think I understand what you are saying, but the light if put in a circle like that would 'fall apart' since the area near the middle of the circle would make more revolutions per minute than the outer portion, causing it to degenerate. So no, this wouldn't allow for instantaneous messages. The speed of light if it could be, would be EXTREMELY difficult to pass. No standard form of thought would get you to such a result...you would need theory upon theory upon radical theory all piled on top of each other to get such a result. In other words, you would need to create an entirely new field of science.

Anyway, you should be careful with handing out ideas. If you were in fact right, you would have just screwed yourself out of quite a bit of money for that idea; but you at the very least probably subconsciously doubted yourself, which is why you asked here and did not hesitate more. In that case, its good to ask such questions since being proven wrong can prove constructive as you learn more things about the subject.
This total rubbish. Is there any tiny element of physics that you actually understand ?

7. so from what I gather, the light is limited by the angular momentum of it's source as opposed to being bound to the source like a spoke. would that then mean if you could see the light from the laser from a top-down angle that it would create a spiral wave pattern?

8. If you could ever see the light that is passing, yes.

9. Originally Posted by Dwayne Dibley
so from what I gather, the light is limited by the angular momentum of it's source as opposed to being bound to the source like a spoke. would that then mean if you could see the light from the laser from a top-down angle that it would create a spiral wave pattern?
Yeah. It would be kind of like the way water looks when it gets thrown around by a spinning sprinkler.

 Bookmarks
##### Bookmarks
 Posting Permissions
 You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts   BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On [VIDEO] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are Off Pingbacks are Off Refbacks are On Terms of Use Agreement