Notices
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: relativity and the twins paradox

  1. #1 relativity and the twins paradox 
    Forum Sophomore
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    130
    Hi there!

    I've been reading Stephen Hawking's book, a brief history of time.

    I'm a little confused about the twin's paradox:

    If one of two twins goes to live on top of a mountain, and the second twin goes to live at sea level, the first twin will age faster than the second. As far as I can understand this, the first twin will age faster because light reaches him first (the difference is so minuscle because the height of a mountain is so tiny relative to the speed of light). Is that correct?

    I also read another version of the paradox, which states that if a twin (called A) gets into a spaceship and travels into space at close to the speed of light, while his twin (called B) stays on earth, that on the twin A's return to earth we will see that the twin B has aged considerably.

    I'm confused, because I thought the longer it takes light to reach you, the faster time?

    Or maybe I'm not getting the whole concept wrong? The speed of light is constant no matter how fast you are moving.

    Hope someone can explain this a bit better!

    Thanks, looking forward to a response!


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Forum Sophomore
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    110
    Your answer can be found here - http://thescienceforum.com/Special-R...mer-19044t.php


    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Forum Sophomore
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    130
    Wow thanks Chronman, that looks like a really neat article!
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •