1. from my limited research into films set in space I understand that there is such a thing as artificial gravity and also that a gyroscope has gravitational effects.
So my question is whether a planet or a star that is spinning on its axis has a stronger gravitational atraction (on a neighbouring star) than it would if if was stationary.
Also if an object is moving (or accellerating) with respect to another will its gravitational pull likewise be different?

2.

3. Originally Posted by geordief
from my limited research into films set in space I understand that there is such a thing as artificial gravity
The only type of "artificial gravity" based in actual fact is designed around the centrifuge. You stand on the inside of a spinning cylinder. This does not create any real gravity. The "force" you feel is just your natural tendency to travel in a straight line.

and also that a gyroscope has gravitational effects.
No it hasn't

So my question is whether a planet or a star that is spinning on its axis has a stronger gravitational atraction (on a neighbouring star) than it would if if was stationary.
Also if an object is moving (or accellerating) with respect to another will its gravitational pull likewise be different?
No. (barring relativistic effects, which are negligible at normal speeds of rotation)

4. So my question is whether a planet or a star that is spinning on its axis has a stronger gravitational atraction (on a neighbouring star) than it would if if was stationary.
Also if an object is moving (or accellerating) with respect to another will its gravitational pull likewise be different?[/quote]

No. (barring relativistic effects, which are negligible at normal speeds of rotation)[/quote]
thanks
Well when do the relatavistic effects kick in (at what percentage of the speed of light of the rotation)?
And to what degree do they boost the gravitational force?
Is it infinitely?

5. Relativistic effects are always present. As you approach the speed of light they become more noticeable. For low speeds they can be ignored, but as you approach c they have a greater impact.

Your system determines at what speed you start to notice the effects, and it will be different for nearly everything.

6. Seems like a simple question with a simple answer-NO
force of g depends on mass not rotation.

7. Originally Posted by fizzlooney
Seems like a simple question with a simple answer-NO
force of g depends on mass not rotation.
Janus is being careful and precise. He is alluding to a subtle effect of rotation in general relativity called the Lens-Thirring effect or "frame dragging".

It is real but it is very small in normal situations, ie except for very high spin rates.

8. It is real but it is very small in normal situations, ie except for very high spin rates.
So small in fact that it hasen't even been detected yet, as you'd know.

 Bookmarks
##### Bookmarks
 Posting Permissions
 You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts   BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On [VIDEO] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are Off Pingbacks are Off Refbacks are On Terms of Use Agreement