Notices
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: negative acceleration ( confusion!!!!!!!!!!!)

  1. #1 negative acceleration ( confusion!!!!!!!!!!!) 
    Forum Freshman almirza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    OMAN
    Posts
    80
    A pachutist at the instant of first contact with th ground has two forces acting on him contact push and the gravititional force but the cantact push force is bigger . I found the reason for that but i did not understand it. It says the parachutist has a negative acceleration which requires a net upward force!!!!!!!!!!
    can u explain it for me???????


    ALMIRZA
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2 Re: negative acceleration ( confusion!!!!!!!!!!!) 
    JS
    JS is offline
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Copenhagen
    Posts
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by almirza
    A pachutist at the instant of first contact with th ground has two forces acting on him contact push and the gravititional force but the cantact push force is bigger . I found the reason for that but i did not understand it. It says the parachutist has a negative acceleration which requires a net upward force!!!!!!!!!!
    can u explain it for me???????
    He has to stop. Prior to the impact, he has a velocity v (i.e. a momentum p towards the earth). After the impact, he has a velocity of 0 relative to the earth, and hence a momentum of 0 relative to the earth. Since F = p-dot and since p-dot is away from the earth, the contact force during the impact must on average exceed the force of gravity.

    Always remember that velocity and acceleration are vector quantities. While the magnitude will always be positive a vector also has a direction, and in one-dimensional problems it is common to conflate the vector and scalar notation and denote direction with the sign (i.e. -v means that the object is moving at a speed of v in the minus direction).

    Although in the usual approximation of a wholly inelastic, instantaneous collision between incompressible objects, the contact force becomes infinite (which is not a problem, because it only does work in an infinitisimal interval of time), so I don't really see point in the exercise.


    And God said: Div(E) = \rho / \epsilon_0, Curl(E) = - \partial(B,t), Div(B) = 0, Curl(B) = \mu_0 (j + \epsilon_0 \partial(E,t)). And there was light.

    [...]

    And thus God sent forth Man from the Garden of Eden after a heated discussion of dresscodes and eating habits.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Forum Freshman John L's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cary, NC
    Posts
    23
    I sure hope that he was "deployed". :wink:
    We must all hang together or assuredly we will all hang seperately. -Benjamin Franklin

    http://ai-jane.org/bb/index.php
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •