
Originally Posted by
Arcane_Mathamatition
okay, this is funny, you are speaking relativistically. My motion, relative to your motion, causes my perception of events to, possibly, be different than your perception of events. This, by no means, defines time as nonexistent, only dependent upon motion. But, also, consider a clock that uses a photon, perpetually bouncing between 2 mirror plates, at rest state. You can define time by the rate at which the photon in the box bounces, one cycle being one unit. Governed by the speed of light, being that the photon will always, ALWAYS, be traveling at the speed of light. You send the box moving, and what happens? the horizontal motion, the speed, will alter the vertical, time, as governed by the hypotenuse of a triangle created by the two legs, speed and time, being c, the speed of light. I'm sorry, but that is a horrible way to prove the non-existence of time, you are merely treating time as a constant altering a variable of motion[/i]