“I just want to explain what I mean when I say that we should try to hold on to physical reality. We are … all aware of the situation regarding what will turn out to be the basic foundational concepts in physics: the point-mass or the particle is surely not among them; the field, in the Faraday-Maxwell sense, might be, but not with certainty. But that which we conceive as existing (“real”) should somehow be localized in time and space.“ THE ABOVE IS A BRIEF PARAGRAPH OF EINSTEIN TRYING TO SHOW IS VIEW OF REALITY. FROM THE ABOVE WE CAN VERY MUCH ASCERTAIN THAT EINSTEIN BELIEVED IN REALITY AS ONLY WHAT CAN BE LOCATED IN SPACE AND TIME,AND IT SHOULD BE REGARDLESS OF AN OBSERVER. If this is true,what then what happens to a more realistic view and interpretation for schrodingers cat? THE CAT WAS IN A SUPERPOSITION,AND UNLESS THE CAT IS CONSIDERD REAL WITH TWO POSSIBLE POSITION AT SAMETIME(WHICH WAS CONSIDERD LIKE THAT) WHAT THEN HAPPENS TO THE OTHER POSITION AFTER MEASURMENT?IT DID APPEAR REAL BEFORE,SO WHY COLLAPSE TO SOMETHING LESS REAL OR NOT EVEN REAL.