Thread: Dissolution of Science and Philosophy

The universal solvent that dissolves every science & philosophy is invariantology!

The questions raised by invariantology to dissolve the different sciences and philosophies are:
1. What are the differences among our ideas on different things?

2. What are the differences among our questions on different things?

3. What are differences among different processes?

4. What are inferred from experimental findings?

5. What are the differences among the criterions to distinguish different things?

6. What are the differences among the designs of different experiments?

Invariantology is nonsensical if these are nonsensical questions!
Invariantology is nonscientific if these are nonscientific questions!
Invariantology is not philosophical if these are not philosophical questions!
Invariantology is useless if these are useless questions!

More at: http://wwf.edula.com

Originally Posted by balasaraswathi

The universal solvent that dissolves every science & philosophy is invariantology!

The questions raised by invariantology to dissolve the different sciences and philosophies are:
1. What are the differences among our ideas on different things?

2. What are the differences among our questions on different things?

3. What are differences among different processes?

4. What are inferred from experimental findings?

5. What are the differences among the criterions to distinguish different things?

6. What are the differences among the designs of different experiments?

Invariantology is nonsensical if these are nonsensical questions!
Invariantology is nonscientific if these are nonscientific questions!
Invariantology is not philosophical if these are not philosophical questions!
Invariantology is useless if these are useless questions!

More at: http://wwf.edula.com

Shouldn't that be "More [B'locks] at:" ?


You might also like to make a study of the larger class, "Identical Differential Invariantology Objectively Theorised."

It too is abbreviated to an 'ology' much practiced and widely worshipped.
It nicely unifies Invariantology and many other modern 'sciences'

Welcome to the forum, balasaraswathi. Superficially, at least, your post and the web site it is extracted from and linked to, is the sort of vague, inconclusive, verbose rambling that gives philosophy such a bad name.

Could you express your central thesis a little more rubustly and clearly? That would certainly help me and, I suspect, other readers too.