Notices
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: On 'The Idea of Justice', by Dr Amartya Sen.

  1. #1 On 'The Idea of Justice', by Dr Amartya Sen. 
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    9
    I am reading the preface of the book by Dr Amartya Sen, which is,'The Idea of Justice', with much interest, and anticipation for the future.
    A few thoughts arose, when I was reading the preface, and these thoughts arose, out of a need to address an imbalance in my perception about the basic idea of the subject. I feel, that one person cannot administer justice to another, and the other, if he were to expect justice from the first, would he accept that his idea of justice does not meet exactly, the idea of justice of the person expected to administer justice? In the case, can justice be done in measures? Possibly, that is how justice has been seen to be administered by the concerned dispenser of justice. The dispenser of justice, and the receiver of justice, know, that they cannot give nor receive justice in the desired measure. When both the giver of justice, and the receiver of justice, cannot do justice to their sense of justice, then has justice really been served? When does the dispenser dispense justice? Possibly, in his personal capacity. Or, in the case of the court, in the court's capacity. Now, if the law is blind, to the needs of the parties seeking justice, having no personal motive in dispensing justice, in what capacity is the court dispensing justice? If an individual, decides to exercise his discretion of perceived justice, on a willing party, then, also, has justice really been served?
    I will add more ideas, later


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Forum Radioactive Isotope skeptic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    4,840
    What is the definition of 'justice' in the book?
    I am concerned about the number of people who cannot draw a distinction between 'justice' and retribution. In fact, I tend to feel that the word 'justice' should be dumped, since it is too loaded with emotional baggage.

    I would like to see an alternative term that means 'action taken to reduce future offending'. This need have nothing to do with revenge, retribution, or any similar emotional garbage. Just methods used to cut crime.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    9
    I have not come across the definition yet. Dr Sen has not defined the term, till the page that I have read, or I have not been particular in my reading. The idea of 'crime', should indict society, and the individual. The society has an equal role to play, with the individual, in preventing crime. This is because, individuals make society, and society is formed of individuals. In a situation where the state does not exist, there, the society need not be paramount.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. Lord: Justice
    By near.lucemferre in forum Scientific Study of Religion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: January 8th, 2011, 06:52 PM
  2. Revenge and Justice
    By arKane in forum Criminology and Forensic Science
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: December 19th, 2010, 05:24 PM
  3. Justice & Utilitarianism?
    By ArezList in forum Politics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: July 4th, 2010, 08:19 PM
  4. Social Justice and the Gun
    By kojax in forum Politics
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: May 24th, 2010, 04:37 PM
  5. Social Justice Science
    By MikeSci in forum Links
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: November 16th, 2008, 10:38 AM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •