Many of us are familiar with the Anthropic Principle of cosmology and the philosphical causual argument for the proof of an existence of God, that is in the following lines:
1. Everything that has a beginning to its existence also has a cause for its existence.
2. The universe has a beginning to its existence.
3. The universe falls under the subset of the set of everything, therefore the universe has a cause for its existence.
4. The cause for the existence of the universe can be defined as God, or something not in effect of the system.
5. Therefore, god exists.
Now, given that god must not be in effect of the system, that is because parts of the system cannot be responsible for their own causation (and infinite and causal-loops cannot exist), god must also be unique to the system. The Anthropic Principle states that our conception of reality must also be compatible to our observations of it (i.e., mental and materialistic constructs are mutually, principally, identical). This implies that god made our mind compatible with the world he live in. My question is, does this imply that god is omnipotent or omniscience (as many religions suggest), or rather, explainable in scientific terms in nothing more than probabilistic scenarios that resulted in life?