Notices
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Empathy: What does ever dog owner know?

  1. #1 Empathy: What does ever dog owner know? 
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    924
    Empathy: What does ever dog owner know?

    Letting your dog out side when necessary demonstrates our ability to empathesize with other creatures.

    There are various definitions of empathy given by various individuals but almost all of them point to the same meaning. Empathy is defined as the ability to understand the feelings, thoughts, and beliefs of another person. Empathy is often characterized as the ability to “walk in the shoes of another”, i.e. to acquire an emotional resonance with another.

    In his classic work about modern art, “Abstraction and Empathy”, Wilhelm Worringer provides us with a theory of empathy derived from Theodor Lipps that can be usefully applied to objects of art as well as all objects including persons.

    “The presupposition of the act of empathy is the general apperceptive activity. Every sensuous object, in so far as it exists for me, is always the product of two components, that which is sensuously given and of my apperceptive activity.”

    Apperception—the process of understanding something perceived in terms of previous experience.

    What does in so far as it exists for me mean. I would say that something exists for me when I comprehend that something. Comprehension is a hierarchical concept and can be usefully considered as in the shape of a pyramid. At the base of the comprehension pyramid is awareness that is followed by consciousness. We are aware of many things but we are conscious of much less. Consciousness is awareness plus our focused attention.

    Continuing with the pyramid analogy, knowing follows consciousness and understanding is at the pinnacle of the pyramid. We know less than we are conscious of and we understand less than we know. Understanding is about meaning whereas knowing is about knowledge. To move from knowing something to a point when that something is meaningful to me, i.e. understood by me, is a big step for man and a giant step for mankind.

    My very best friend is meaningful to me and my very worst enemy must, for security reasons, also be meaningful to me. The American failures in Vietnam and Iraq are greatly the result of the fact that our government and our citizens never understood these ‘foreigners’. We failed at the very important relationship—we did not empathesize with the people and thus failed to understand our enemy. It is quite possible that if we had understood them we would never have gone to war with them.

    If we had empathy with Germany in the 1930s would we have stopped Hitler before he forced us into war?

    If we had empathy with Germany before August 1914 would we have prevented WWI?

    Do you agree that we understand our best friend and that we must also understand our worst enemy?


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Forum Sophomore
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    The Edge
    Posts
    189
    The American government knew exactly what it thought it was doing.


    When you 'wash' a dog, you strip away it's personal indentity. A dog's identity comes from it's smell. No smell - no identity.


    First you enslave it, keep it on a short leash, wash if of it's Identity, and then expect it not to bark in protest?


    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    924
    I suspect that the concept of empathy is foundational for comprehending the concept of morality. If we ever do develop a science of morality I suspect that empathy will be a good place to begin.

    I think that it is important to be able to distinguish among the words empathy, sympathy, and compassion.

    Webster says empathy—the imaginative projection of a subjective state into an object so that the object appears to be infused with it—the action of understanding, being aware of, being sensitive to, and vicariously experiencing the feelings, thoughts, and experiencing of another of either the past or present without having the feelings, thoughts, and experience fully communicated in an objectively explicit manner

    Webster says sympathy—an affinity, association, or relationship between persons or things wherein whatever affects one similarly the other.

    Webster says compassion--sympathetic consciousness of other's distress together with a desire to alleviate it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Forum Senior Kukhri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    392
    Quote Originally Posted by Vexer
    The American government knew exactly what it thought it was doing.


    When you 'wash' a dog, you strip away it's personal indentity. A dog's identity comes from it's smell. No smell - no identity.


    First you enslave it, keep it on a short leash, wash if of it's Identity, and then expect it not to bark in protest?
    Hahahahahaha! Don't forget that we eat them too. I'm headed to the market this weekend to find some dog meat "Gaegogi".
    Co-producer of Red Oasis
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •