Notices
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Democracy’s Faustian Bargain: Never Facing Reality until…

  1. #1 Democracy’s Faustian Bargain: Never Facing Reality until… 
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    924
    Democracy’s Faustian Bargain: Never Facing Reality until…

    The fundamental weakness of democracy is that it rests upon the deep fallacy of human propensities: we pamper our self with delusion as long as possible. We never make drastic changes until the abyss is tomorrow.

    Quickie from wiki: “Something that is faustian refers to a wider interpretation of the events of Faust by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. In part one of Goethe's Faust, the central character's pact with the devil allows him to have energy, life and youth unless he becomes so entranced by the passing moment that he wishes that things will never change. When Faust stumbles unthinkingly into that wish, his world and his life are forfeit to Mephistopheles.”

    St. Augustine’s plea: “Grant me chastity and continence, but not yet.”

    We use technology to paint our self onto the precipice and then rely on technology to save us from falling into the abyss.

    “The religious believer assigns dignity to whatever his religion holds sacred—a set of moral laws, a way of life, or particular objects of worship. He grows angry when the dignity of what he holds sacred is violated.” Quote from “The End of History and the Last Man” by Francis Fukuyama

    To what does the non believer assign dignity? If the non believer does not assign dignity to rationality, upon what foundation does s/he stand? If the non believer does depend upon rationality for dignity how is it possible that so few know anything about rationality?

    Our schools and colleges are beginning to introduce our young people to the domain of knowledge called Critical Thinking. CT is taught because our educators have begun to recognize that teaching a young person what to think is not sufficient for the citizens of a democracy in an age of high technology. CT is an attempt to teach young people how to think. Like the adage about giving a man a fish versus teaching him how to fish, a youngster who knows how to think is prepared for a lifetime rather than for a day.

    What about today’s adult? Today’s adult was educated in a time when schools and colleges never gave universal instruction in the art and science of thinking—rationality.

    If today’s adult wishes to learn CT s/he must learn it on ‘their nickel’. I think a good read to begin with is this one:


    http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Educ/EducHare.htm


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Forum Isotope Bunbury's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    2,590
    Fukuyama’s religion was the free market and its spread via any means including violence (Iraq being one of his legacies). “The End of History” (which I have not read) was apparently supposed to be the final triumph of unregulated markets, making further study of economics unnecessary.

    I understand he is now an apostate and along with several other one-time true believers in neoconservatism, has endorsed pragmatism, through Obama. An apology would be nice but seems somehow inadequate.


    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •